S. 3110--A 2
3. (A) Any designated offender [subsequent to conviction and sentenc-
ing for a crime specified in subdivision seven of section nine hundred
ninety-five of this article,] shall be required to provide a sample
appropriate for DNA testing to determine identification characteristics
specific to such person and to be included in a state DNA identification
index pursuant to this article.
(B)(I) IN THE CASE OF A DESIGNATED OFFENDER WHO IS SENTENCED TO A TERM
OF IMPRISONMENT, SUCH SAMPLE SHALL BE COLLECTED BY THE PUBLIC SERVANT TO
WHOSE CUSTODY THE DESIGNATED OFFENDER HAS BEEN COMMITTED.
(II) IN THE CASE OF A DESIGNATED OFFENDER WHO IS SENTENCED TO A TERM
OF PROBATION, SUCH SAMPLE SHALL BE COLLECTED BY THE LOCAL PROBATION
DEPARTMENT SUPERVISING THE DESIGNATED OFFENDER.
(III) IN THE CASE OF A DESIGNATED OFFENDER WHO IS NEITHER SENTENCED TO
A TERM OF IMPRISONMENT NOR PROBATION, SUCH SAMPLE SHALL BE COLLECTED BY
THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT OF THE COUNTY IN WHICH SENTENCING TAKES PLACE,
UNLESS AN ALTERNATE COLLECTION PROCEDURE HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED.
(IV) PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT NOTHING IN THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL PROHIBIT
THE COLLECTION OF A DNA SAMPLE FROM A DESIGNATED OFFENDER BY ANY COURT
OFFICIAL, STATE OR LOCAL CORRECTION OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE, PROBATION
OFFICER, PAROLE OFFICER, OR OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR PUBLIC
SERVANT WHO HAS BEEN NOTIFIED BY THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
SERVICES THAT THE DESIGNATED OFFENDER HAS NOT PROVIDED A DNA SAMPLE.
(C) NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF ANY LAW TO THE CONTRARY, A CITY
WITH A POPULATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE OR ANY COUNTY ACTING THROUGH
ITS LEGISLATIVE BODY, IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED AND EMPOWERED TO ADOPT, AMEND
OR REPEAL A LOCAL LAW TO IMPOSE A DNA COLLECTION FEE NOT TO EXCEED FIFTY
DOLLARS ON DESIGNATED OFFENDERS FROM WHOM ITS PROBATION DEPARTMENT IS
REQUIRED BY SUBPARAGRAPH (III) OF PARAGRAPH (B) OF THIS SUBDIVISION TO
COLLECT A DNA SAMPLE; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE FAILURE OF A DESIG-
NATED OFFENDER TO PAY SUCH DNA COLLECTION FEE, IF REQUIRED, SHALL NOT
PREVENT THE COLLECTION OF THE OFFENDER'S DNA SAMPLE.
(D) A PUBLIC SERVANT TO WHOSE CUSTODY A DESIGNATED OFFENDER WHO HAS
NOT YET PROVIDED A DNA SAMPLE HAS BEEN COMMITTED MAY USE REASONABLE
PHYSICAL FORCE TO COLLECT SUCH SAMPLE IF THE OFFENDER, AFTER WRITTEN OR
ORAL REQUEST, REFUSES TO PROVIDE SUCH SAMPLE.
(E) THE DETENTION, ARREST, INDICTMENT OR CONVICTION OF A PERSON BASED
UPON DNA RECORDS CONTAINED IN THE STATE DNA IDENTIFICATION INDEX SHALL
NOT BE INVALIDATED IF IT IS LATER DETERMINED THAT THE DIVISION OF CRIMI-
NAL JUSTICE SERVICES INADVERTENTLY, BUT IN GOOD FAITH, COLLECTED OR
PLACED THE PERSON'S DNA SAMPLE IN THE INDEX.
(F) THE COMMISSIONER OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES SHALL PROMULGATE
RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE PERIODIC REVIEW OF THE DNA IDENTIFI-
CATION INDEX TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE INDEX CONTAINS DNA PROFILES
THAT SHOULD NOT BE IN THE INDEX, INCLUDING THE STEPS NECESSARY TO
EXPUNGE ANY PROFILES WHICH THE DIVISION DETERMINES SHOULD NOT BE IN THE
INDEX.
S 3. The opening paragraph of section 995-f of the executive law is
designated subdivision 1 and a new subdivision 2 is added to read as
follows:
2. ANY DESIGNATED OFFENDER SUBJECT TO PROBATION OR PAROLE SUPERVISION
WHO IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A SAMPLE APPROPRIATE FOR DNA TESTING PURSUANT
TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE, AND WHO FAILS TO PROVIDE SUCH SAMPLE
UPON NOTIFICATION BY A COURT, STATE OR LOCAL CORRECTION OFFICIAL OR
EMPLOYEE, PROBATION OFFICER, PAROLE OFFICER, OR OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT
OFFICIAL OR PUBLIC SERVANT OF HIS OR HER OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE SUCH A
SAMPLE, SHALL BE DEEMED TO VIOLATE THE CONDITIONS OF PROBATION OR
S. 3110--A 3
PAROLE, AND SUCH VIOLATION SHALL BE A BASIS FOR THE REVOCATION OF
PROBATION OR PAROLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE FOUR HUNDRED TEN OF THE
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW OR SECTION TWO HUNDRED FIFTY-NINE-I OF THIS CHAP-
TER. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE, "PAROLE SUPERVISION" SHALL BE DEEMED
TO INCLUDE POST-RELEASE SUPERVISION.
S 4. Subdivision 4 of section 995-c of the executive law, as added by
chapter 737 of the laws of 1994, is amended to read as follows:
4. The commissioner of [the division of] criminal justice services, in
consultation with the commission, the commissioner of health, the divi-
sions of parole and of probation and correctional alternatives, and the
department of correctional services, shall promulgate rules and regu-
lations governing the procedures for notifying designated offenders of
the requirements of this section. FURTHERMORE, THE COMMISSIONER OF
CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES SHALL ALSO PROMULGATE RULES AND REGULATIONS
GOVERNING THE PROCEDURES FOR OBTAINING A SAMPLE APPROPRIATE FOR DNA
TESTING FROM A PERSON WHO IS REQUIRED TO REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE SIX-C OF THE CORRECTION LAW.
S 5. Section 995-b of the executive law is amended by adding a new
subdivision 3-a to read as follows:
3-A. THE COMMISSION, IN CONSULTATION WITH THE DNA SUBCOMMITTEE, SHALL
DEVELOP, WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SUBDIVISION,
VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES REFLECTING BEST PRACTICES REGARDING THE COLLECTION
AND PRESERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AND
FORENSIC LABORATORIES. SUCH VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT
BE LIMITED TO, THE MINIMUM PERIOD OF TIME THAT BIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE
OBTAINED FROM CRIME SCENES SHOULD BE RETAINED. AS USED IN THIS SUBDIVI-
SION, THE TERM "BIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE" SHALL MEAN SEMEN, BLOOD, SALIVA,
HAIR, SKIN, TISSUE OR OTHER IDENTIFIED BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL, AND SHALL
INCLUDE A SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAMINATION KIT.
S 6. The executive law is amended by adding a new section 837-s to
read as follows:
S 837-S. OFFICE OF WRONGFUL CONVICTION REVIEW. THERE SHALL BE ESTAB-
LISHED WITHIN THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES AN OFFICE OF
WRONGFUL CONVICTION REVIEW, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO IN THIS SECTION AS
THE "OFFICE". THE OFFICE SHALL CONDUCT REVIEWS OF CRIMINAL AND JUVENILE
CASES IN THIS STATE INVOLVING WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS AND CONSIDER WHETHER
THERE MAY BE POSSIBLE REFORMS THAT COULD PROTECT AGAINST SIMILAR WRONG-
FUL CONVICTIONS OCCURRING IN THE FUTURE. SUCH REVIEWS SHALL INCLUDE
PARTICIPATION BY PROSECUTORS, DEFENSE ATTORNEYS, FORMER JUDGES AND OTHER
EXPERTS IN RELEVANT FIELDS. WHENEVER A PERSON WHO HAS BEEN CONVICTED OF
A CRIME OR ADJUDICATED A YOUTHFUL OFFENDER IS SUBSEQUENTLY DETERMINED TO
BE INNOCENT OF SUCH OFFENSE AND EXONERATED, THE OFFICE SHALL REVIEW THE
CIRCUMSTANCES OF SUCH CASE TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE OR CAUSES OF SUCH
WRONGFUL CONVICTION. THE OFFICE SHALL CONDUCT SUCH REVIEWS OF PAST CASES
INCLUDING, AT A MINIMUM, ALL CASES IN WHICH EXONERATION RESULTED FROM
DNA EVIDENCE, AND ON AN ONGOING BASIS, ALL CASES IN WHICH A DEFENDANT IS
EXONERATED. THE OFFICE SHALL MAKE AVAILABLE AN ANNUAL REPORT DETAILING,
AT A MINIMUM, THE NUMBER OF CASES ACCEPTED FOR INVESTIGATION, THE NUMBER
OF COMPLETED INVESTIGATIONS AND THE STATUS OF PENDING INVESTIGATIONS.
THE REPORT SHALL INCLUDE THE OFFICE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AS TO THE
CAUSE OR CAUSES OF WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN INVESTIGATIONS THAT IT HAS
COMPLETED. THE REPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE GOVERNOR, ATTORNEY GENER-
AL, CHIEF JUDGE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS, TEMPORARY PRESIDENT OF THE
SENATE, SPEAKER OF THE ASSEMBLY AND TO GOVERNMENTAL UNITS OR AGENCIES
THAT IT FINDS MAY HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN THE INVESTIGATION OR ADJUDI-
CATION OF WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF
S. 3110--A 4
LAW, THE OFFICE MAY REQUEST AND SHALL RECEIVE FROM ANY COURT, DEPART-
MENT, DIVISION, BOARD, BUREAU, COMMISSION OR OTHER AGENCY OF THE STATE
OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OR ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY SUCH ASSIST-
ANCE, INFORMATION, RECORDS AND DATA AS WILL ENABLE IT EFFECTIVELY TO
CARRY OUT ITS POWERS AND DUTIES.
S 7. Paragraph (d) of subdivision 1 of section 160.50 of the criminal
procedure law, as amended by chapter 169 of the laws of 1994, is amended
to read as follows:
(d) such records shall be made available to the person accused or to
such person's designated agent, and shall be made available to (i) a
prosecutor in any proceeding in which the accused has moved for an order
pursuant to section 170.56 or 210.46 of this [chapter] PART, or (ii) a
law enforcement agency upon ex parte motion in any superior court, if
such agency demonstrates to the satisfaction of the court that justice
requires that such records be made available to it, or (iii) any state
or local officer or agency with responsibility for the issuance of
licenses to possess guns, when the accused has made application for such
a license, or (iv) the [New York state] division of parole when the
accused is on parole supervision as a result of conditional release or a
parole release granted by the [New York] state board of parole, and the
arrest which is the subject of the inquiry is one which occurred while
the accused was under such supervision, or (v) any prospective employer
of a police officer or peace officer [as those terms are defined in
subdivisions thirty-three and thirty-four of section 1.20 of this chap-
ter], in relation to an application for employment as a police officer
or peace officer; provided, however, that every person who is an appli-
cant for the position of police officer or peace officer shall be
furnished with a copy of all records obtained under this paragraph and
afforded an opportunity to make an explanation thereto, or (vi) the
probation department responsible for supervision of the accused when the
arrest which is the subject of the inquiry is one which occurred while
the accused was under such supervision, OR (VII) THE DIVISION OF CRIMI-
NAL JUSTICE SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH INQUIRIES BY THE OFFICE OF
WRONGFUL CONVICTION REVIEW ESTABLISHED BY SECTION EIGHT HUNDRED THIRTY-
SEVEN-S OF THE EXECUTIVE LAW; and
S 8. Subdivision 4 of section 190.25 of the criminal procedure law is
amended by adding a new paragraph (c) to read as follows:
(C) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, ALL GRAND JURY TESTI-
MONY, EVIDENCE, DECISIONS, RESULTS AND OTHER MATTERS ATTENDING A GRAND
JURY PROCEEDING SHALL BE DISCLOSED TO THE OFFICE OF WRONGFUL CONVICTION
REVIEW ESTABLISHED BY SECTION EIGHT HUNDRED THIRTY-SEVEN-S OF THE EXECU-
TIVE LAW, UPON ITS REQUEST, IN CONNECTION WITH AN INQUIRY BY SUCH OFFICE
INTO A WRONGFUL CONVICTION RELATED TO SUCH GRAND JURY PROCEEDING.
S 9. Paragraph (a) of subdivision 4 of section 30.10 of the criminal
procedure law is amended to read as follows:
(a) Any period following the commission of the offense during which
(i) the defendant was continuously outside this state or (ii) the where-
abouts of the defendant were continuously unknown and continuously unas-
certainable by the exercise of reasonable diligence OR (III) THE IDENTI-
TY OF THE DEFENDANT WAS CONTINUOUSLY UNKNOWN AND A DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID
(DNA) RECORD OF THE DEFENDANT'S GENETIC CODE, OBTAINED BY FORENSIC DNA
TESTING OF EVIDENCE LOCATED AT A TIME OR PLACE RELEVANT TO THE COMMIS-
SION OF THE OFFENSE, COULD NOT BE MATCHED TO AN INDIVIDUAL IDENTIFIED BY
DNA RECORDS CONTAINED IN THE STATE DNA IDENTIFICATION INDEX BY THE EXER-
CISE OF REASONABLE DILIGENCE. However, in no event shall the period of
S. 3110--A 5
limitation be extended by more than five years beyond the period other-
wise applicable under subdivision two OF THIS SECTION.
S 10. Section 240.40 of the criminal procedure law is amended by
adding a new subdivision 1-a to read as follows:
1-A. UPON MOTION OF A DEFENDANT AGAINST WHOM AN INDICTMENT OR SUPERIOR
COURT INFORMATION IS PENDING, THE COURT IN WHICH SUCH ACCUSATORY INSTRU-
MENT IS PENDING MAY ORDER A COMPARISON OF A DNA PROFILE DERIVED FROM
EVIDENCE RECOVERED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT TO THE DEFENDANT'S DNA OR TO A DNA
DATABANK UPON A SHOWING BY THE DEFENDANT THAT SUCH COMPARISON IS MATERI-
AL TO THE PREPARATION OF A DEFENSE, AND THAT THE REQUEST IS REASONABLE,
PROVIDED THAT THE COURT SHALL NOT DO SO IF IT IS SATISFIED THAT THE
PEOPLE HAVE SHOWN GOOD CAUSE WHY SUCH AN ORDER SHOULD NOT BE ISSUED. IF
THE MOTION OF THE DEFENDANT IS FOR COMPARISON OF A GIVEN PROFILE DERIVED
FROM DNA EVIDENCE TO A DNA DATABANK, THE COURT MAY DIRECT A STATE OR
LOCAL PUBLIC FORENSIC LABORATORY TO ARRANGE FOR SUCH PROFILE TO BE
ENTERED INTO AND SEARCHED AGAINST LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL DNA DATABANKS
TO THE EXTENT AND IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS AND
REGULATIONS GOVERNING SUCH DATABANKS, INCLUDING REQUIREMENTS AS TO HOW
PROFILES FOR FORENSIC DNA ANALYSIS MUST BE GENERATED AND REQUIREMENTS
FOR SEARCHING AND STORAGE IN THE DATABANK IN QUESTION. IF SUCH A DATA-
BANK SEARCH REVEALS THAT THE DNA DERIVED FROM EVIDENCE RECOVERED BY LAW
ENFORCEMENT MATCHES A PROFILE IN THE DATABANK, THE DEFENDANT SHALL BE
NOTIFIED OF THE FACT THAT THERE WAS A MATCH WITH SOME SUCH PROFILE, AND
THE COURT SHALL GRANT REASONABLE ADJOURNMENTS SO AS TO ALLOW THE PEOPLE
TO PURSUE APPROPRIATE INVESTIGATIVE STEPS. NOTHING IN THIS ARTICLE
SHALL BE DEEMED TO ALLOW A DEFENDANT TO OBTAIN AN ORDER REQUIRING
COLLECTION OF A DNA SAMPLE FROM ANY OTHER PERSON.
S 11. The opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 440.10 of the
criminal procedure law is amended to read as follows:
[At any time after the entry of a judgment, the] THE court in which
[it] A JUDGEMENT OF CONVICTION was entered may, upon A TIMELY motion of
the defendant, vacate such judgment upon the ground that:
S 12. Paragraph (d) of subdivision 2 of section 440.10 of the criminal
procedure law is amended and two new paragraphs (e) and (f) are added to
read as follows:
(d) The ground or issue raised relates solely to the validity of the
sentence and not to the validity of the conviction[.]; OR
(E) THE DEFENDANT PREVIOUSLY BROUGHT A MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT,
WHICH WAS DENIED BY THE COURT, AND THE DEFENDANT IS CURRENTLY SEEKING TO
VACATE THE JUDGMENT ON A GROUND OTHER THAN NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE
UNDER PARAGRAPH (G) OF SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION; OR
(F) THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE TIME LIMITS SET
FORTH IN SUBDIVISION EIGHT OF THIS SECTION.
S 13. The opening paragraph of paragraph (c) of subdivision 3 of
section 440.10 of the criminal procedure law is amended to read as
follows:
Upon a previous motion made pursuant to this section, the defendant
was in a position adequately to raise the [ground or issue underlying
the present motion] CLAIM OF NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE UNDER PARAGRAPH
(G) OF SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION but did not do so.
S 14. Section 440.10 of the criminal procedure law is amended by
adding a new subdivision 8 to read as follows:
8. ANY MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT BY A DEFENDANT MUST BE FILED WITHIN
ONE YEAR OF THE DATE ON WHICH A JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION BECOMES FINAL BY
THE CONCLUSION OF DIRECT REVIEW OR THE EXPIRATION OF THE TIME FOR SEEK-
ING SUCH REVIEW; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT A MOTION BY A DEFENDANT CLAIM-
S. 3110--A 6
ING NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE UNDER PARAGRAPH (G) OF SUBDIVISION ONE OF
THIS SECTION MAY BE MADE AT ANY TIME FOLLOWING THE DISCOVERY OF THE NEW
EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE DEFENDANT'S CLAIM OF INNOCENCE. NOTHING IN THIS
SUBDIVISION SHALL RELIEVE THE DEFENDANT OF THE OBLIGATION, SET FORTH IN
PARAGRAPH (G) OF SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION, TO SHOW THAT HE OR SHE
HAS MADE THE MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT WITH DUE DILIGENCE AFTER THE
DISCOVERY OF THE ALLEGED NEW EVIDENCE.
S 15. Paragraph (a) of subdivision 1-a of section 440.30 of the crimi-
nal procedure law, as amended by chapter 138 of the laws of 2004, is
amended and a new paragraph (c) is added to read as follows:
(a) Where the defendant's motion requests the performance of a foren-
sic DNA test on specified evidence, and upon the court's determination
that any evidence containing deoxyribonucleic acid ("DNA") was secured
in connection with the [trial] PROCEEDINGS resulting in the judgment,
the court shall grant the application for forensic DNA testing of such
evidence upon its determination that if a DNA test had been conducted on
such evidence, and if the results had been admitted in the trial result-
ing in the judgment, there exists a reasonable probability that the
verdict would have been more favorable to the defendant. IN THE CASE OF
A DEFENDANT CONVICTED UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY, THE COURT SHALL GRANT THE
APPLICATION ONLY UPON ITS DETERMINATION THAT IF THE RESULTS HAD BEEN
AVAILABLE TO THE DEFENDANT, THERE EXISTS A REASONABLE PROBABILITY THAT
THE DEFENDANT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CONVICTED BY PLEA OF GUILTY OR OTHER-
WISE, AND IN MAKING THAT DETERMINATION, THE COURT MAY CONSIDER, AMONG
OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION, THE PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE
DEFENDANT'S PLEA OF GUILTY.
(C) IN ADDITION TO REQUESTING THE PERFORMANCE OF A FORENSIC DNA TEST
OF SPECIFIED EVIDENCE, AS SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVI-
SION, THE DEFENDANT MAY ALSO MOVE FOR A COMPARISON OF A DNA PROFILE
DERIVED FROM EVIDENCE RECOVERED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT TO A DNA DATABANK.
IN DECIDING WHETHER TO GRANT A MOTION FOR SUCH COMPARISON, THE COURT MAY
CONSIDER WHETHER THE DEFENDANT HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO MOVE FOR SUCH A
COMPARISON PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION ONE-A OF SECTION 240.40 OF THIS PART,
BUT UNJUSTIFIABLY FAILED TO DO SO. IF THE COURT GRANTS THE MOTION FOR
SUCH A COMPARISON, IT MAY DIRECT A STATE OR LOCAL PUBLIC FORENSIC LABO-
RATORY TO ARRANGE FOR SUCH PROFILE TO BE ENTERED INTO AND SEARCHED
AGAINST LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL DNA DATABANKS TO THE EXTENT AND IN A
MANNER CONSISTENT WITH FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING
SUCH DATABANKS, INCLUDING REQUIREMENTS AS TO HOW PROFILES FOR FORENSIC
DNA ANALYSIS MUST BE GENERATED AND REQUIREMENTS FOR SEARCHING AND STOR-
AGE IN THE DATABANK IN QUESTION. IF SUCH A DATABANK SEARCH REVEALS THAT
THE DNA DERIVED FROM EVIDENCE RECOVERED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT MATCHES A
PROFILE IN THE DATABANK, THE DEFENDANT SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF THE FACT
THAT THERE WAS A MATCH WITH SOME SUCH PROFILE, AND THE COURT SHALL GRANT
REASONABLE ADJOURNMENTS SO AS TO ALLOW THE PEOPLE TO PURSUE APPROPRIATE
INVESTIGATIVE STEPS. NOTHING IN THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE DEEMED TO ALLOW A
DEFENDANT TO OBTAIN AN ORDER REQUIRING COLLECTION OF A DNA SAMPLE FROM
ANY OTHER PERSON.
S 16. Section 440.30 of the criminal procedure law is amended by
adding a new subdivision 8 to read as follows:
8. AT ANY TIME AFTER THE ENTRY OF A JUDGMENT, IF THE PEOPLE BECOME
AWARE OF EVIDENCE THAT SUBSTANTIALLY TENDS TO EXONERATE A CONVICTED
DEFENDANT AND WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY KNOWN TO THE DEFENSE, THE PEOPLE SHALL
NOTIFY THE COURT OF THE EXISTENCE OF SUCH EVIDENCE. UPON RECEIPT OF SUCH
NOTIFICATION, THE COURT SHALL NOTIFY THE DEFENDANT TO THE SAME EFFECT
AND, IF APPROPRIATE, APPOINT DEFENSE COUNSEL SO THAT THE DEFENDANT MAY
S. 3110--A 7
SEEK ANY APPROPRIATE REMEDY UNDER THIS ARTICLE. THE PEOPLE MAY MAKE
NOTIFICATION TO A COURT PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION WITHOUT TAKING THE
POSITION THAT THE DEFENDANT WAS IN FACT INNOCENT AND, IF THE DEFENDANT
MOVES FOR RELIEF UNDER THIS ARTICLE, THE PEOPLE MAY TAKE ANY POSITION,
INCLUDING CONSENT OR OPPOSITION, AS TO SUCH MOTION. THE COURT MAY
CONSIDER, BUT NEED NOT GRANT, THE DEFENDANT'S RELEASE ON BAIL PENDING
THE DETERMINATION OF A MOTION MADE FOLLOWING SUCH A NOTIFICATION.
S 17. The section heading of section 440.40 of the criminal procedure
law is amended and a new subdivision 7 is added to read as follows:
Motion to set aside sentence OR TO VACATE JUDGMENT; by people.
7. AT ANY TIME AFTER THE ENTRY OF A JUDGMENT, THE PEOPLE MAY, IN LIEU
OF THE NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION EIGHT OF SECTION
440.30 OF THIS ARTICLE, MOVE TO VACATE A DEFENDANT'S JUDGMENT OF
CONVICTION UPON THE GROUND THAT THE DEFENDANT IS ACTUALLY INNOCENT OF
THE CHARGES UNDERLYING THE JUDGMENT. IN SUCH A MOTION, THE PEOPLE SHALL
SET FORTH EVIDENTIARY FACTS AND INFERENCES SUPPORTING THE CONTENTION
THAT THE DEFENDANT IS INNOCENT. UPON RECEIPT OF SUCH A MOTION, THE COURT
SHALL ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT BE PRODUCED BEFORE THE COURT WITHOUT
DELAY. AT SUCH A COURT APPEARANCE, THE COURT MAY SUMMARILY GRANT THE
MOTION BASED ON THE ALLEGATIONS IN THE PEOPLE'S MOTION AND IN ANY
RESPONSIVE PAPERS FILED ON THE DEFENDANT'S BEHALF, AND BASED ON ANY ORAL
ARGUMENTS MADE ON THE MOTION. IF THE COURT DOES NOT SUMMARILY GRANT THE
MOTION: (A) IT MUST APPOINT COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT IF THE DEFENDANT
IS NOT ALREADY REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, (B) IT MUST CONSIDER, BUT NEED
NOT GRANT, A DEFENDANT'S RELEASE ON BAIL PENDING THE DETERMINATION OF
THE MOTION, AND (C) IT MUST GRANT A PROMPT HEARING, AT WHICH THE PARTIES
MAY CALL WITNESSES AND OFFER DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE, BEFORE RENDERING ITS
DECISION TO GRANT OR DENY THE MOTION. IF THE COURT DENIES THE MOTION, IT
SHALL SET FORTH FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SUPPORTING ITS
DECISION.
S 18. Section 65.10 of the penal law is amended by adding a new subdi-
vision 4-b to read as follows:
4-B. MANDATORY CONDITION FOR DNA DESIGNATED OFFENDERS. WHEN IMPOSING A
SENTENCE OF PROBATION OR CONDITIONAL DISCHARGE UPON A PERSON CONVICTED
OF AN OFFENSE SPECIFIED IN SUBDIVISION SEVEN OF SECTION NINE HUNDRED
NINETY-FIVE OF THE EXECUTIVE LAW, THE COURT SHALL REQUIRE, AS A MANDATO-
RY CONDITION OF SUCH SENTENCE, THAT SUCH PERSON PROVIDE A DNA SAMPLE AS
REQUIRED BY SECTION NINE HUNDRED NINETY-FIVE-C OF THE EXECUTIVE LAW.
S 19. Paragraph (b) of subdivision 3 and paragraph (b) of subdivision
5 of section 8-b of the court of claims act, as added by chapter 1009 of
the laws of 1984, are amended to read as follows:
(b) (i) he has been pardoned upon the ground of innocence of the crime
or crimes for which he was sentenced and which are the grounds for the
complaint; or (ii) his judgment of conviction was reversed or vacated,
and the accusatory instrument dismissed or, if a new trial was ordered,
either he was found not guilty at the new trial or he was not retried
and the accusatory instrument dismissed; provided that the judgement of
conviction was reversed or vacated, and the accusatory instrument was
dismissed, on any of the following grounds: (A) paragraph [(a),] (b),
(c), [(e)] or (g) of subdivision one of section 440.10 of the criminal
procedure law; or (B) subdivision one (where based upon grounds set
forth in item (A) [hereof] OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH), two, three (where the
count dismissed was the sole basis for the imprisonment complained of)
or five of section 470.20 of the criminal procedure law; or (C) compara-
ble provisions of the former code of criminal procedure or subsequent
law; or (D) SUBDIVISION SEVEN OF SECTION 440.40 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCE-
S. 3110--A 8
DURE LAW; OR (E) the statute, or application thereof, on which the accu-
satory instrument was based violated the constitution of the United
States or the state of New York; OR (F) THE CLAIMANT'S CONVICTION WAS
VACATED UNDER ANOTHER SECTION OF LAW NOT ENUMERATED IN THIS PARAGRAPH,
BUT WHOSE APPLICATION TO CLAIMANT'S CONVICTION INVOLVED FACTS AND
CIRCUMSTANCES THAT DIRECTLY SUPPORT CLAIMANT'S ASSERTION OF INNOCENCE;
AND PROVIDED THAT, IN CASES WHERE THE CONVICTION MAY HAVE BEEN VACATED
ON MORE THAN ONE GROUND, INCLUDING ONE OF THE GROUNDS ENUMERATED IN THIS
PARAGRAPH, THE COURT OF CLAIMS SHALL NOT BE BOUND BY A DECISION OF THE
CRIMINAL COURT VACATING THE CONVICTION BASED ONLY ON A GROUND NOT
ENUMERATED IN THIS PARAGRAPH; and
(b) (i) he has been pardoned upon the ground of innocence of the crime
or crimes for which he was sentenced and which are the grounds for the
complaint; or (ii) his judgment of conviction was reversed or vacated,
and the accusatory instrument dismissed or, if a new trial was ordered,
either he was found not guilty at the new trial or he was not retried
and the accusatory instrument dismissed; provided that the judgement of
conviction was reversed or vacated, and the accusatory instrument was
dismissed, on any of the following grounds: (A) paragraph [(a),] (b),
(c), [(e)] or (g) of subdivision one of section 440.10 of the criminal
procedure law; or (B) subdivision one (where based upon grounds set
forth in item (A) [hereof] OF THIS PARAGRAPH), two, three (where the
count dismissed was the sole basis for the imprisonment complained of)
or five of section 470.20 of the criminal procedure law; or (C) compara-
ble provisions of the former code of criminal procedure or subsequent
law; or (D) SUBDIVISION SEVEN OF SECTION 440.40 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCE-
DURE LAW; OR (E) the statute, or application thereof, on which the accu-
satory instrument was based violated the constitution of the United
States or the state of New York; OR (F) THE CLAIMANT'S CONVICTION WAS
VACATED UNDER ANOTHER SECTION OF LAW NOT ENUMERATED IN THIS PARAGRAPH,
BUT WHOSE APPLICATION TO CLAIMANT'S CONVICTION INVOLVED FACTS AND
CIRCUMSTANCES THAT DIRECTLY SUPPORT CLAIMANT'S ASSERTION OF INNOCENCE;
AND PROVIDED THAT, IN CASES WHERE THE CONVICTION MAY HAVE BEEN VACATED
ON MORE THAN ONE GROUND, INCLUDING ONE OF THE GROUNDS ENUMERATED IN THIS
PARAGRAPH, THE COURT OF CLAIMS SHALL NOT BE BOUND BY A DECISION OF THE
CRIMINAL COURT VACATING THE CONVICTION BASED ONLY ON A GROUND NOT
ENUMERATED IN THIS PARAGRAPH; and
S 20. This act shall take effect November 1, 2010; provided, however,
that the amendments to paragraph (a) of subdivision 3 of section 995-c
of the executive law, made by section two of this act, shall apply to
any person who is convicted of a crime, adjudicated a youthful offender,
incarcerated or subject to probation or parole supervision, or subject
to a requirement to register as a sex offender, on or after such effec-
tive date; provided, further, that the amendments to paragraph (a) of
subdivision 4 of section 30.10 of the criminal procedure law, made by
section nine of this act, shall apply to offenses where the applicable
period of limitation, including any extension of such period of limita-
tion pursuant to law in effect before such effective date, has not
expired on such effective date; and provided, further, that, sections
six, seven and eight of this act shall take effect April 1, 2011, and
shall expire and be deemed repealed September 1, 2014.