Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
Mar 09, 2010 |
referred to codes |
Assembly Bill A10169
2009-2010 Legislative Session
Sponsored By
HYER-SPENCER
Archive: Last Bill Status - In Assembly Committee
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Delivered to Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
co-Sponsors
David Koon
Margaret Markey
Mike Spano
Nelson Castro
multi-Sponsors
Daniel Burling
Clifford Crouch
Dennis H. Gabryszak
Sandy Galef
2009-A10169 (ACTIVE) - Details
- See Senate Version of this Bill:
- S7004
- Current Committee:
- Assembly Codes
- Law Section:
- Penal Law
- Laws Affected:
- Amd ยงยง260.05 & 260.06, Pen L
- Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:
-
2011-2012:
A5295, S2945
2013-2014: A7968, S3847
2015-2016: A3162, S2819
2017-2018: A7052, S6301
2019-2020: S1759
2021-2022: S4631
2023-2024: S4089
2009-A10169 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo
BILL NUMBER:A10169 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the penal law, in relation to non-support of a child PURPOSE: Requires a delinquent parent to demonstrate as an affirmative defense that the inability to pay excuses his or her failure to provide child support for their minor child. SUMMARY OF PROVISION: Section one amends sections 260.05 & 260.06 of the penal law by deleting the defendant's ability to pay from the definition of the offense found in such sections and adds to both sections a new provision that allows a defendant to show inability to pay as an affirmative defense. JUSTIFICATION: Persons who are legally obligated to provide child support should not be permitted' to escape criminal prosecution where they have deliberately taken action to avoid paying child support by engaging in wasteful personal spending and-concealment of funds. Currently, parents guilty of the crime of non-support of a child may escape criminal liability simply because the prosecutor is tasked with proving the unknowable, that is, the parent's ability to pay. .The ability to pay is an inherently subjective question which requires that the prosecutor submit evidence not only of the parent's income and spending but proof which distinguishes between legitimate expenses and wasteful spending. This amendment will rightly place the burden of
2009-A10169 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 10169 I N A S S E M B L Y March 9, 2010 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. HYER-SPENCER -- read once and referred to the Committee on Codes AN ACT to amend the penal law, in relation to non-support of a child THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 260.05 of the penal law, as amended by chapter 397 of the laws of 1997, the opening paragraph and subdivision 1 as amended and subdivision 2 as added by chapter 70 of the laws of 2008, is amended to read as follows: S 260.05 Non-support of a child in the second degree. A person is guilty of non-support of a child when: 1. being a parent, guardian or other person legally charged with the care or custody of a child less than sixteen years old, he or she fails or refuses without lawful excuse to provide support for such child [when he or she is able to do so, or becomes unable to do so, when, though employable, he or she voluntarily terminates his or her employment, voluntarily reduces his or her earning capacity, or fails to diligently seek employment]; or 2. being a parent, guardian or other person obligated to make child support payments by an order of child support entered by a court of competent jurisdiction for a child less than eighteen years old, he or she knowingly fails or refuses without lawful excuse to provide support for such child [when he or she is able to do so, or becomes unable to do so, when, though employable, he or she voluntarily terminates his or her employment, voluntarily reduces his or her earning capacity, or fails to diligently seek employment]. IN ANY PROSECUTION UNDER THIS SECTION, IT IS AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE THAT THE DEFENDANT IS UNABLE TO PROVIDE SUPPORT FOR THE CHILD. PROVIDED THAT NOTHING IN THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL CONSTITUTE A DEFENSE TO A PROSE- CUTION FOR OR PRECLUDE CONVICTION OF THE OFFENSE DEFINED IN THIS SECTION WHERE THE DEFENDANT BECOMES UNABLE TO PROVIDE SUPPORT WHEN, THOUGH EMPLOYABLE, HE OR SHE VOLUNTARILY TERMINATES HIS OR HER EMPLOYMENT, VOLUNTARILY REDUCES HIS OR HER EARNING CAPACITY, OR FAILS TO DILIGENTLY SEEK EMPLOYMENT. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted.
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.