S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
10068
I N A S S E M B L Y
June 11, 2014
___________
Introduced by COMMITTEE ON RULES -- (at request of M. of A. Abinanti) --
read once and referred to the Committee on Mental Health
AN ACT to amend the mental hygiene law, in relation to due process
procedures for all adults with mental disabilities
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "protection
of adults with mental disabilities act".
S 2. Legislative findings and intent. Certain federal and state laws
and regulations currently provide various due process protections for
certain categories of persons with mental disabilities. For example,
the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act provides a child
or parents of a child with a disability important due process
protections, including the right to an impartial hearing to challenge a
determination regarding the appropriate setting for a child with a disa-
bility. New York state also provides substantial due process protections
for the parents of a child with a disability who needs residential care
while this child is in school.
However, when a mentally disabled individual reaches the age of twen-
ty-one, their due process protections become significantly diminished
or, in some cases, end completely. Specifically, those developmentally
disabled adults in transitional care who reach the age of twenty-one on
or before June 30, 1996 have minimal due process protections pursuant to
section 13.38 of the mental hygiene law, and those who reached age twen-
ty-one on or after July 1, 1996 receive no due process protections. Some
of New York's most vulnerable adult populations, including those who
remain continuously disabled and continuously in need of residential or
other forms of care, thus lose important due process protections simply
because of their age.
The legislature recognizes that inappropriate or ineffective place-
ments and/or services for persons with mental disabilities can have
devastating effects for those persons impacted, including abuse, self-
harm, improper medication or even death. Additionally, the legislature
recognizes the harm a person with mental disabilities can suffer from
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD15555-01-4
A. 10068 2
the disruption to his/her current treatment needs, home life and famil-
iar surroundings that an inappropriate change in placement, or an
improper change in services, entails. Moreover, it is increasingly the
policy of the state of New York to afford persons with disabilities the
opportunity to participate in their treatment and residential placement
decisions, and to obtain their or their guardian's consent prior to any
changes of placement.
The legislature hereby finds that New York state must ensure that all
mentally disabled adults are afforded necessary and basic due process
protections, and fair and meaningful due process proceedings, relating
to proposed changes in placement, or proposed changes in services
rendered, to those mentally disabled adults under the care of New York
state agencies to ensure that appropriate, effective treatment and
placements are provided for this highly vulnerable adult population.
In order to ensure that New York state is providing the most appropri-
ate setting and services for all persons with mental disabilities, the
legislature hereby finds that it is incumbent upon New York state to
institute uniform minimum due process protections for all persons with
mental disabilities age twenty-one and older. These protections provide,
in part, for fair and meaningful due process proceedings relating to a
proposed change of placement or a proposed change in services by the
offices of the department of mental hygiene, and are intended to supple-
ment and strengthen the patchwork of various protections for adults with
mental disabilities in place under existing laws.
S 3. The mental hygiene law is amended by adding a new section 13.36
to read as follows:
S 13.36 PROTECTION OF ADULTS WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES.
1. DEFINITIONS. AS USED IN THIS SECTION, UNLESS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY
STATED OR UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES:
(A) "ADULTS WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES" MEANS ALL PERSONS WITH A MENTAL
DISABILITY, AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN SECTION 1.03 OF THIS CHAPTER, AND
WHO ARE TWENTY-ONE YEARS OLD OR OLDER, OR THE GUARDIAN OR GUARDIANS OR
REPRESENTATIVE OR REPRESENTATIVES OF ANY SUCH PERSON, IF ANY EXIST.
(B) "SERVICES" MEANS ANY AND ALL CARE AND TREATMENT RENDERED TO ADULTS
WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES (I) WHO ARE UNDER THE CARE, AUTHORITY, JURIS-
DICTION, SUPERVISION OR CONTROL OF THE VARIOUS OFFICES OF THE DEPART-
MENT, AND/OR (II) WHICH ARE FUNDED IN ANY PART BY ANY OFFICE OF THE
DEPARTMENT. AS USED IN THIS SECTION, "SERVICES" INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT
LIMITED TO, "SERVICES FOR THE MENTALLY DISABLED" AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED
IN SECTION 1.03 OF THIS CHAPTER, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER TREATMENT OF ANY
FORM OR TYPE.
(C) "TRIGGERING EVENT" MEANS ANY PROPOSED ACTION, OR DENIAL, BY THE
DEPARTMENT OR ANY OF ITS OFFICES, AS DESCRIBED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF
PARAGRAPH (A) OR SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF PARAGRAPH (B) OF SUBDIVISION TWO OF
THIS SECTION.
2. ROLE OF DEPARTMENT; TRIGGERING EVENTS. THE DEPARTMENT, THROUGH ITS
VARIOUS OFFICES AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH ANY OTHER NECESSARY STATE AGENCY
OR OFFICE, WHERE APPLICABLE, SHALL DEVELOP, IMPLEMENT, AND ENSURE A
SYSTEM OF MEANINGFUL DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS FOR ADULTS WITH MENTAL
DISABILITIES, AND SHALL DEVELOP AND PROMULGATE REGULATIONS, POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES NECESSARY TO RESOLVE OBJECTIONS BY OR ON BEHALF OF ADULTS
WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES IN CONFORMANCE WITH THIS SECTION. SUCH DUE
PROCESS PROTECTIONS SHALL BE AFFORDED TO ADULTS WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES
WHEN:
(A) ANY OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT INITIATES A PROPOSAL WHICH MAY RESULT
IN:
A. 10068 3
(I) A CHANGE IN PLACEMENT FOR AN ADULT WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES,
INCLUDING ANY PROPOSED DISCHARGE OR RELOCATION FROM A FACILITY WHERE
SERVICES ARE BEING PROVIDED; OR
(II) A REDUCTION, SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF SPECIFIC SERVICES OR
FUNDING WHICH IS BEING PROVIDED TO AN ADULT WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES
PURSUANT TO AN INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT PLAN, INCLUDING AN INDIVIDUAL-
IZED SERVICES PLAN; AND,
(III) A TIMELY OBJECTION TO SUCH PROPOSAL OR PROPOSALS AND A REQUEST
FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL IS MADE BY OR ON BEHALF OF AN ADULT WITH
MENTAL DISABILITIES; OR,
(B) ANY OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT:
(I) DENIES AN ADULT WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES SPECIFIC SERVICES OR A
SPECIFIC PLACEMENT WHICH IS RECOMMENDED FOR THAT INDIVIDUAL PURSUANT TO
AN INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT PLAN, INCLUDING AN INDIVIDUALIZED SERVICES
PLAN; AND,
(II) A TIMELY OBJECTION TO SUCH DENIAL OR DENIALS AND A REQUEST FOR AN
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL IS MADE BY OR ON BEHALF OF AN ADULT WITH MENTAL
DISABILITIES.
3. MINIMUM DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS. DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS FOR ADULTS
WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES IMPLEMENTED BY THE DEPARTMENT AND ITS OFFICES
SHALL INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, THE RIGHTS OF ADULTS WITH MENTAL DISABILI-
TIES:
(A) TO BE PROVIDED WITH ADVANCE WRITTEN NOTICE BY THE RELEVANT OFFICE
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ANY TRIGGERING EVENT, WHETHER IT BE A PROPOSED
ACTION OR A DENIAL BY SUCH OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT, WHICH NOTICE SHALL
SET FORTH ALL REASONS AND DOCUMENTATION, IF ANY, IN SUPPORT OF THE
DETERMINATION BY THE RELEVANT OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT, AND WHICH SHALL
SPECIFICALLY ADVISE AN ADULT WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES AS TO HIS OR HER
RIGHT TO FORMALLY OBJECT IN WRITING AND TO REQUEST AN ADMINISTRATIVE
HEARING WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF RECEIPT OF NOTICE OF THE TRIGGERING
EVENT, AND AS TO THEIR OTHER RIGHTS AS PROVIDED WITHIN THIS SECTION;
(B) TO BE REPRESENTED IN ANY PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE RELEVANT OFFICE OF
THE DEPARTMENT BY ANY PERSON INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, A PARENT,
GUARDIAN, CORRESPONDENT, ADVOCATE, LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE, THEMSELVES, OR
ANY OTHER PERSON OR REPRESENTATIVE;
(C) TO REQUEST, AND TO BE PROVIDED WITH, AN OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT, IN
A MEANINGFUL FASHION AND AT A REASONABLE TIME NOT LESS THAN FOURTEEN
(14) DAYS FROM THE DATE A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
IS MADE, ANY OBJECTION TO A TRIGGERING EVENT BY THE RELEVANT OFFICE OF
THE DEPARTMENT TO AN IMPARTIAL DECISION MAKER IN THE CONTEXT OF AN
EVIDENTIARY HEARING;
(D) TO DISCOVER AND OBTAIN, AND HAVE A MEANINGFUL OPPORTUNITY TO
REVIEW IN ADVANCE OF THE EVIDENTIARY HEARING, ANY DOCUMENTS TO BE USED
BY THE RELEVANT OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT IN SUPPORT OF ITS DETERMINATION
AT SUCH HEARING;
(E) TO PRESENT AND ELICIT EVIDENCE AND WITNESSES, AND CONFRONT AND
CROSS-EXAMINE EVIDENCE AND WITNESSES AT SUCH EVIDENTIARY HEARING;
(F) TO OBTAIN A REASONABLY PROMPT WRITTEN DETERMINATION BY THE IMPAR-
TIAL HEARING OFFICER, WHICH SHALL BE BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY
INTRODUCED AND RENDERED AT THE HEARING, AND IN WHICH IT IS DETERMINED
WHETHER THE TRIGGERING EVENT TAKEN OR PROPOSED BY THE RELEVANT OFFICE OF
THE DEPARTMENT, IF ULTIMATELY ALLOWED, WOULD BE (I) IN THE OVERALL BEST,
INDIVIDUAL INTERESTS OF THE ADULT WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES, (II) RESULT
IN APPROPRIATE, EFFECTIVE SERVICES AND/OR PLACEMENT FOR SUCH INDIVIDUAL,
AND (III) SO AS TO BEST ENABLE THEIR PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT;
A. 10068 4
(G) TO APPEAL, IF NECESSARY, THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION RENDERED BY THE
IMPARTIAL HEARING OFFICER TO THE COMMISSIONER OF THE RELEVANT OFFICE OF
THE DEPARTMENT, WHO MAY REMAND THE MATTER TO THE HEARING OFFICER FOR
FURTHER REVIEW OR FINDINGS, IF NECESSARY, AND WHO SHALL, AFTER REVIEW OF
THE MATTER, ISSUE A FURTHER WRITTEN DETERMINATION WHICH SHALL BE BINDING
ON THE RELEVANT OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT AS ITS FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE
DETERMINATION;
(H) TO APPEAL, IF NECESSARY, THE FINAL WRITTEN DETERMINATION RENDERED
BY THE COMMISSIONER ON BEHALF OF THE RELEVANT OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT
BY WAY OF A PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO ARTICLE SEVENTY-EIGHT OF THE CIVIL
PRACTICE LAW AND RULES; AND
(I) TO CONTINUED SERVICES, PROGRAMMING, FUNDING AND PLACEMENT BY THE
RELEVANT OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT, OF THE SAME LEVEL AND TYPE AS THAT
PROVIDED BY SUCH OFFICE PRIOR TO THE TRIGGERING EVENT, DURING THE PERIOD
THAT AN OBJECTION BY AN ADULT WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES IS UNDERGOING
ADMINISTRATIVE AND/OR APPELLATE REVIEW, UNLESS AS OTHERWISE AGREED TO BY
SUCH OFFICE AND SUCH ADULT WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES OR HIS OR HER GUARD-
IAN OR REPRESENTATIVE.
4. NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL PREVENT THE DEPARTMENT AND ITS
OFFICES FROM DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISMS
WHICH ARE NOT INCONSISTENT WITH THE DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS FOR ADULTS
WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES SET FORTH BY THIS SECTION, INCLUDING EXPEDITED,
OR INFORMAL (NON-BINDING), DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISMS THAT MAY BE
AGREED TO BY THE RELEVANT OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT AND SUCH ADULT WITH
MENTAL DISABILITIES OR HIS OR HER GUARDIAN OR REPRESENTATIVE.
5. THE MINIMUM DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS FOR ADULTS WITH MENTAL DISABIL-
ITIES SET FORTH WITHIN THIS SECTION SHALL SERVE TO SUPPLEMENT AND REIN-
FORCE ANY AND ALL OTHER LAWS OR AUTHORITIES WHICH PROVIDE FOR CERTAIN
RIGHTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ADULT POPULATION, INCLUDING THE
STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT OR APPLICABLE FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS,
IF ANY, PERTAINING TO DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS FOR SUCH INDIVIDUALS. IN
THE ABSENCE OF REGULATIONS, THE PROVISIONS OF THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE
PROCEDURE ACT SHALL CONTROL THE HEARING PROCESS WHERE NOT INCONSISTENT
WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION. THE DEPARTMENT, THROUGH ITS
OFFICES, SHALL TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THE CONTINUED
COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE FEDERAL AUTHORITIES TO THE EXTENT THAT
ANY PROVISION OF THIS SECTION MAY BE DEEMED TO CONFLICT WITH SUCH
AUTHORITIES.
S 4. This act shall take effect immediately.