S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
9965
I N A S S E M B L Y
June 4, 2014
___________
Introduced by COMMITTEE ON RULES -- (at request of M. of A. Lentol) --
(at request of the Department of Law) -- read once and referred to the
Committee on Judiciary
AN ACT to amend the court of claims act, in relation to claims for
unjust conviction and imprisonment
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Unjust
Imprisonment Act of 2014".
S 2. Subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of section 8-b of the court of
claims act, subdivision 2 as amended by chapter 210 of the laws of 2007,
and subdivisions 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 as added by chapter 1009 of the laws
of 1984, are amended, and a new subdivision 5-a is added to read as
follows:
2. Any person convicted and subsequently imprisoned for one or more
felonies or misdemeanors against the state which he OR SHE did not
commit may, under the conditions hereinafter provided, present a claim
for damages against the state. In scheduling court appearances and
filing deadlines, the court shall give docket priority at each stage of
the proceeding to such claims for damages under this subdivision where
the claimant asserts proof of innocence through DNA evidence. Any
adjournments granted in the course of such a proceeding should be for as
short a time as is practicable.
3. In order to present the claim for unjust conviction and imprison-
ment, claimant must establish by documentary evidence that:
(a) he OR SHE has been convicted of one or more felonies or misdemea-
nors against the state and subsequently sentenced to a term of imprison-
ment, and has served all or any part of the sentence; and
(b) (i) he OR SHE has been pardoned upon the ground of innocence of
the crime or crimes for which he OR SHE was sentenced and which are the
grounds for the complaint; or (ii) his OR HER judgment of conviction was
reversed or vacated, and the accusatory instrument dismissed or, if a
new trial was ordered, either he OR SHE was found not guilty at the new
trial or he OR SHE was not retried and the accusatory instrument
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD14015-05-4
A. 9965 2
dismissed; provided that the [judgement] JUDGMENT of conviction was
reversed or vacated, and the accusatory instrument was dismissed, on any
of the following grounds: (A) paragraph (a), (b), (c), (D), (e) [or],
(F), (g), (G-1), OR (H) of subdivision one of section 440.10 of the
criminal procedure law; or (B) subdivision one (where based upon grounds
set forth in [item (A) hereof] CLAUSE (A) OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH), two,
three (where the count dismissed was the sole basis for the imprisonment
complained of) or five of section 470.20 of the criminal procedure law;
or (C) comparable provisions of the former code of criminal procedure or
subsequent law; or (D) the statute, or application thereof, on which the
accusatory instrument was based violated the constitution of the United
States or the state of New York; and
(c) his OR HER claim is not time-barred by the provisions of subdivi-
sion seven of this section.
4. The claim shall state facts in sufficient detail to permit the
court to find that claimant is likely to succeed at trial in proving
that (a) he OR SHE did not commit any of the CRIMINAL acts charged in
the accusatory instrument AND SUBMITTED TO THE FACT FINDER, OR CONTAINED
IN THE ACCUSATORY INSTRUMENT BEFORE THE COURT THAT ACCEPTED THE CLAIM-
ANT'S PLEA OF GUILTY, AS THE CASE MAY BE, or his OR HER acts or ALLEGED
omissions [charged in the accusatory instrument] SO SUBMITTED OR
CONTAINED, AS THE CASE MAY BE, did not constitute a felony or misdemea-
nor against the state, and (b) he OR SHE did not by his OR HER own
[conduct] MISCONDUCT cause or bring about his OR HER conviction. FOR
PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION, A CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR PLEA OF GUILTY
MADE OR ENTERED BY THE CLAIMANT MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED EVIDENCE OF
MISCONDUCT UNLESS SUCH CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR PLEA OF GUILTY WAS MADE
OR ENTERED KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY, WITHOUT DURESS AND WITH THE INTENT TO
PREVENT THE INVESTIGATION OR PROSECUTION: (I) OF THE CLAIMANT FOR A
CRIME UNRELATED TO THE CRIME OR CRIMES THAT WERE THE SUBJECT OF SUCH
CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR PLEA OF GUILTY; OR (II) OF ANOTHER PERSON WHO
CLAIMANT, AT THE TIME OF SUCH CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR PLEA, BELIEVED TO
BE THE PERPETRATOR OF THE CRIME OR CRIMES THAT WERE THE SUBJECT OF SUCH
CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR PLEA. The claim shall be verified by the claim-
ant; PROVIDED THAT NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER LAW,
DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO VERIFY A CLAIM PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION,
WHERE SUCH DISMISSAL OCCURS ON OR AFTER THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO
THOUSAND FOURTEEN, SHALL BE WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND THE CLAIMANT SHALL BE
GIVEN LEAVE TO AMEND HIS OR HER CLAIM WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF SUCH DISMISS-
AL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If the court finds after reading the claim that
claimant is not likely to succeed at trial, it shall dismiss the claim,
either on its own motion or on the motion of the state.
5. In order to obtain a judgment in his OR HER favor, claimant must
prove by clear and convincing evidence that:
(a) he OR SHE has been convicted of one or more felonies or misdemea-
nors against the state and subsequently sentenced to a term of imprison-
ment, and has served all or any part of the sentence; and
(b) (i) he OR SHE has been pardoned upon the ground of innocence of
the crime or crimes for which he OR SHE was sentenced and which are the
grounds for the complaint; or (ii) his OR HER judgment of conviction was
reversed or vacated, and the accusatory instrument dismissed or, if a
new trial was ordered, either [he] THE CLAIMANT was found not guilty at
the new trial or he OR SHE was not retried and the accusatory instrument
dismissed; provided that the [judgement] JUDGMENT of conviction was
reversed or vacated, and the accusatory instrument was dismissed, on any
of the following grounds: (A) paragraph (a), (b), (c), (D), (e) [or],
A. 9965 3
(F), (g), (G-1) OR (H) of subdivision one of section 440.10 of the crim-
inal procedure law; or (B) subdivision one (where based upon grounds set
forth in [item (A) hereof] CLAUSE (A) OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH), two, three
(where the count dismissed was the sole basis for the imprisonment
complained of) or five of section 470.20 of the criminal procedure law;
or (C) comparable provisions of the former code of criminal procedure or
subsequent law; or (D) the statute, or application thereof, on which the
accusatory instrument was based violated the constitution of the United
States or the state of New York; and
(c) he OR SHE did not commit any of the CRIMINAL acts charged in the
accusatory instrument AND SUBMITTED TO THE FACT FINDER, OR CONTAINED IN
THE ACCUSATORY INSTRUMENT BEFORE THE COURT THAT ACCEPTED THE CLAIMANT'S
PLEA OF GUILTY, AS THE CASE MAY BE, or his OR HER acts or ALLEGED omis-
sions [charged in the accusatory instrument] SO SUBMITTED OR CONTAINED,
AS THE CASE MAY BE, did not constitute a felony or misdemeanor against
the state; and
(d) [he] THE CLAIMANT did not by his OR HER own [conduct] MISCONDUCT
cause or bring about his OR HER conviction. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS PARA-
GRAPH, A CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR PLEA OF GUILTY MADE OR ENTERED BY THE
CLAIMANT MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED EVIDENCE OF MISCONDUCT UNLESS SUCH
CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR PLEA OF GUILTY WAS MADE OR ENTERED KNOWINGLY,
VOLUNTARILY, WITHOUT DURESS AND WITH THE INTENT TO PREVENT THE INVESTI-
GATION OR PROSECUTION: (I) OF THE CLAIMANT FOR A CRIME UNRELATED TO THE
CRIME OR CRIMES THAT WERE THE SUBJECT OF SUCH CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR
PLEA OF GUILTY; OR (II) OF ANOTHER PERSON WHO CLAIMANT, AT THE TIME OF
SUCH CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR PLEA, BELIEVED TO BE THE PERPETRATOR OF
THE CRIME OR CRIMES THAT WERE THE SUBJECT OF SUCH CONFESSION, ADMISSION
OR PLEA.
5-A. A DETERMINATION OF A CRIMINAL COURT MADE PRIOR TO THE CONVICTION
AND IMPRISONMENT OF THE CLAIMANT THAT A WRITTEN OR ORAL CONFESSION,
ADMISSION, OR OTHER STATEMENT OR EXPRESSION ALLEGEDLY MADE BY THE CLAIM-
ANT WAS NOT INVOLUNTARILY MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 60.45 OF THE CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE LAW OR OTHERWISE, SHALL NOT BE ADMISSIBLE IN ANY PROCEEDING
UNDER THIS SECTION AS EVIDENCE THAT THE CLAIMANT CAUSED OR BROUGHT ABOUT
HIS OR HER OWN CONVICTION.
6. If the court finds that the claimant is entitled to a judgment, it
shall award damages in such sum of money as the court determines will
fairly and reasonably compensate him OR HER.
7. Any person claiming compensation under this section based on a
pardon that was granted before the effective date of this section or the
dismissal of an accusatory instrument that occurred before the effective
date of this section shall file his OR HER claim within two years after
the effective date of this section. Any person claiming compensation
under this section based on a pardon that was granted on or after the
effective date of this section or the dismissal of an accusatory instru-
ment that occurred on or after the effective date of this section shall
file his OR HER claim within [two] THREE years after the pardon or
dismissal; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT IF RETRIAL IS PERMITTED FOLLOWING
SUCH PARDON OR DISMISSAL, THE PERIOD WITHIN WHICH SUCH CLAIM MUST BE
FILED SHALL BE TOLLED DURING THE PERIOD IN WHICH SUCH A RETRIAL IS
PERMISSIBLE AND PROVIDED, FURTHER, THAT UPON MOTION OR NOTICE BY THE
STATE TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS ALLEGING THAT A RETRIAL IS CONTEMPLATED,
THE COURT OF CLAIMS MAY HOLD FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ON ANY SUCH CLAIM THAT
HAS BEEN FILED IN ABEYANCE UNTIL THE CONCLUSION OF THE RETRIAL OR UNTIL
A RETRIAL IS NO LONGER CONTEMPLATED, WHICH EVER FIRST OCCURS.
S 3. This act shall take effect immediately.