Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
Jan 14, 2014 |
referred to investigations and government operations delivered to senate passed assembly |
Jan 08, 2014 |
ordered to third reading cal.52 returned to assembly died in senate |
Jun 19, 2013 |
referred to rules delivered to senate passed assembly ordered to third reading rules cal.492 rules report cal.492 reported |
Jun 17, 2013 |
reported referred to rules |
Jun 10, 2013 |
reported referred to codes |
Jun 07, 2013 |
print number 864a |
Jun 07, 2013 |
amend (t) and recommit to governmental operations |
Jan 09, 2013 |
referred to governmental operations |
Assembly Bill A864A
2013-2014 Legislative Session
Sponsored By
WEPRIN
Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Investigations And Government Operations Committee
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Delivered to Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
Bill Amendments
co-Sponsors
William Scarborough
Kevin Cahill
Amy Paulin
Michelle Schimel
multi-Sponsors
Peter Abbate
Inez Barron
James F. Brennan
William Colton
2013-A864 - Details
- See Senate Version of this Bill:
- S5828
- Current Committee:
- Senate Investigations And Government Operations
- Law Section:
- Executive Law
- Laws Affected:
- Amd §296, Exec L
- Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:
-
2011-2012:
A6170
2015-2016: A2049, S3263
2017-2018: A4977, S4507
2019-2020: A4204, S1970
2013-A864 - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 864 2013-2014 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y (PREFILED) January 9, 2013 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. WEPRIN -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. ABBATE, BARRON, BRENNAN, COLTON, GIBSON, HIKIND, LAVINE, MILLER, ORTIZ, RIVERA, ROBERTS, ROBINSON, SALADINO, SCARBOROUGH, STEVENSON, WEISEN- BERG -- read once and referred to the Committee on Governmental Oper- ations AN ACT to amend the civil rights law, the executive law and the labor law, in relation to prohibiting discrimination against religious attire THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 40-c of the civil rights law is amended by adding a new subdivision 3 to read as follows: 3. A. NO EMPLOYEE WHO IS EMPLOYED AT A STATE OR MUNICIPAL AGENCY IN A POSITION THAT CUSTOMARILY WEARS A UNIFORM SHALL BE REQUIRED TO WEAR ANY PORTION OF THE UNIFORM THAT CONFLICTS WITH SUCH EMPLOYEE'S RELIGIOUSLY MOTIVATED OR MANDATED GARB OR APPURTENANCES THERETO. B. NO EMPLOYEE WHO IS EMPLOYED BY A STATE OR MUNICIPAL AGENCY SHALL BE REQUIRED TO REMOVE ANY FACIAL HAIR THAT IS WORN BY SUCH EMPLOYEE IN ADHERENCE TO THE EMPLOYEE'S RELIGIOUS TENETS. C. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY INSTANCE IN WHICH THE FAILURE TO WEAR THE APPROVED UNIFORM OR REMOVE THE EXCESS FACIAL HAIR COULD RESULT IN DANGER TO THE EMPLOYEE OR TO THE PUBLIC. S 2. Subdivision 1 of section 296 of the executive law is amended by adding a new paragraph (h) to read as follows: (H) FOR ANY EMPLOYER, LABOR ORGANIZATION OR EMPLOYMENT AGENCY TO DISCHARGE, EXPEL OR OTHERWISE DISCRIMINATE AGAINST ANY EMPLOYEE FOR FAILURE TO WEAR A REQUIRED UNIFORM WHEN SUCH EMPLOYEE IS ATTIRED IN RELIGIOUSLY MOTIVATED OR MANDATED GARB OR APPURTENANCES THERETO, INCLUD- ING FACIAL HAIR; PROVIDED THAT SUCH ATTIRE DOES NOT POSE A DANGER OR HAZARD TO SUCH EMPLOYEE OR THE PUBLIC. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted.
co-Sponsors
William Scarborough
Kevin Cahill
Amy Paulin
Michelle Schimel
multi-Sponsors
Peter Abbate
James F. Brennan
William Colton
Vivian Cook
2013-A864A (ACTIVE) - Details
- See Senate Version of this Bill:
- S5828
- Current Committee:
- Senate Investigations And Government Operations
- Law Section:
- Executive Law
- Laws Affected:
- Amd §296, Exec L
- Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:
-
2011-2012:
A6170
2015-2016: A2049, S3263
2017-2018: A4977, S4507
2019-2020: A4204, S1970
2013-A864A (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 864--A 2013-2014 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y (PREFILED) January 9, 2013 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. WEPRIN, SCARBOROUGH, CAHILL, PAULIN, SCHIMEL -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. ABBATE, BARRON, BRENNAN, COLTON, COOK, GABRYSZAK, GIBSON, HIKIND, HOOPER, LAVINE, MILLER, MOSLEY, ORTIZ, PERRY, RIVERA, ROBERTS, ROBINSON, SALADINO, SOLAGES, STEVENSON, WEIS- ENBERG -- read once and referred to the Committee on Governmental Operations -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to prohibiting discrimi- nation against religious attire THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Paragraph (a) of subdivision 10 of section 296 of the exec- utive law, as amended by chapter 539 of the laws of 2002, is amended to read as follows: (a) It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for any employer, or an employee or agent thereof, to impose upon a person as a condition of obtaining or retaining employment, including opportunities for promotion, advancement or transfers, any terms or conditions that would require such person to violate or forego a sincerely held practice of his or her religion, including but not limited to the observance of any particular day or days or any portion thereof as a sabbath or other holy day in accordance with the requirements of his or her religion OR THE WEARING OF ANY ATTIRE, CLOTHING, OR FACIAL HAIR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF HIS OR HER RELIGION, unless, after engaging in a bona fide effort, the employer demonstrates that it is unable to reasonably accommodate the employee's or prospective employee's sincerely held religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer's business. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, an employee shall not be entitled to premium wages or premium benefits for work performed during hours to which such premium EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted.
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.