Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
Jan 24, 2014 |
print number 3250a |
Jan 24, 2014 |
amend and recommit to elections |
Jan 08, 2014 |
referred to elections |
Jan 31, 2013 |
referred to elections |
Senate Bill S3250A
2013-2014 Legislative Session
Sponsored By
(D, WF) 28th Senate District
Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Elections Committee
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Delivered to Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
Bill Amendments
co-Sponsors
(D, WF) 47th Senate District
2013-S3250 - Details
- See Assembly Version of this Bill:
- A2109
- Current Committee:
- Senate Elections
- Law Section:
- Election Law
- Laws Affected:
- Add Art 18 §§18-100 - 18-110, El L
- Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:
-
2009-2010:
A3281
2011-2012: A6398
2015-2016: S2741, A5744
2017-2018: S5616, A8613
2019-2020: S2717, A8073
2021-2022: S491, A5085
2023-2024: A8830
2013-S3250 - Sponsor Memo
BILL NUMBER:S3250 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the election law, in relation to estab- lishing an instant runoff voting method for certain local elections and providing for the repeal of such provisions upon expiration thereof PURPOSE: To permit the use of the instant run off voting method on a trial basis in elections in the years 2012, 2013 and 2014. This pilot program would permit the State Legislature to evaluate the broader application of the instant runoff voting method. SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: A new Article 18 of the election law is estab- lished. EXISTING LAN: None. JUSTIFICATION: The current system of elections often results in the election of a candidate that does not have the majority of support when there are three or more candidates. Further, where there are three or more candidates in an election, voters often will not vote for their preferred candidate to avoid "wasting" their vote on a "spoiler" candi- date. Rather, they will vote against a candidate they dislike, by voting for a leading candidate that they perceive as the lesser of two evils. The result of the current system in multi-candidate elections can be the selection of candidates that lack majority party support. In the City of New York, where runoff elections are required for certain offices, where
2013-S3250 - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3250 2013-2014 Regular Sessions I N S E N A T E January 31, 2013 ___________ Introduced by Sen. KRUEGER -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Elections AN ACT to amend the election law, in relation to establishing an instant runoff voting method for certain local elections and providing for the repeal of such provisions upon expiration thereof THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Legislative findings. The current system of voting often results in the election of a candidate that does not have the majority support of the electorate when there are three or more candidates running for an elective office. Further, where there are three or more candidates for an elective office, voters often will not vote for their preferred candidate to avoid "wasting" their vote on a "spoiler" candi- date. Rather, they will vote against a candidate they dislike, by voting for a leading candidate that they perceive as the lesser of two evils. The result of the current system in multi-candidate races can be the election of candidates that lack majority support. The instant runoff voting method provides for the majority election for elective offices. Instant runoff voting gives voters the option to rank candidates according to the order of their choice. If no candidate obtains a majority of first-choice votes, then the candidate receiving the fewest first-choice votes is eliminated. Each vote cast for the eliminated candidate shall be transferred to the candidate who was the voter's next choice on the ballot. The process is continued until a candidate receives a majority of votes. There are several potential benefits to the instant runoff voting method. First, voters are free to mark their ballot for the candidate they truly prefer without fear that their choice will help elect their least preferred candidate. Second, it insures that the elected candidate has true majority support. In addition, the instant runoff voting method will (1) promote higher voter turnout, and (2) encourage positive EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD03242-01-3
co-Sponsors
(D, WF) 47th Senate District
2013-S3250A (ACTIVE) - Details
- See Assembly Version of this Bill:
- A2109
- Current Committee:
- Senate Elections
- Law Section:
- Election Law
- Laws Affected:
- Add Art 18 §§18-100 - 18-110, El L
- Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:
-
2009-2010:
A3281
2011-2012: A6398
2015-2016: S2741, A5744
2017-2018: S5616, A8613
2019-2020: S2717, A8073
2021-2022: S491, A5085
2023-2024: A8830
2013-S3250A (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo
BILL NUMBER:S3250A TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the election law, in relation to estab- lishing an instant runoff voting method for certain local elections and providing for the repeal of such provisions upon expiration thereof PURPOSE: To permit the use of the instant run off voting method on a trial basis in elections in the years 2014, 2015 and 2016. This pilot program would permit the State Legislature to evaluate the broader application of the instant runoff voting method. SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: A new Article 11 of the election law is estab- lished. EXISTING LAN: None. JUSTIFICATION: The current system of elections often results in the election of a candidate that does not have the majority of support when there are three or more candidates. Further, where there are three or more candidates in an election, voters often will not vote for their preferred candidate to avoid "wasting" their vote on a "spoiler" candi- date. Rather, they will vote against a candidate they dislike, by voting for a leading candidate that they perceive as the lesser of two evils. The result of the current system in multi-candidate elections can be the selection of candidates that lack majority party support. In the City of New York, where runoff elections are required for certain offices, where
2013-S3250A (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3250--A 2013-2014 Regular Sessions I N S E N A T E January 31, 2013 ___________ Introduced by Sens. KRUEGER, HOYLMAN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Elections -- recommitted to the Committee on Elections in accordance with Senate Rule 6, sec. 8 -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the election law, in relation to establishing an instant runoff voting method for certain local elections and providing for the repeal of such provisions upon expiration thereof THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Legislative findings. The current system of voting often results in the election of a candidate that does not have the majority support of the electorate when there are three or more candidates running for an elective office. Further, where there are three or more candidates for an elective office, voters often will not vote for their preferred candidate to avoid "wasting" their vote on a "spoiler" candi- date. Rather, they will vote against a candidate they dislike, by voting for a leading candidate that they perceive as the lesser of two evils. The result of the current system in multi-candidate races can be the election of candidates that lack majority support. The instant runoff voting method provides for the majority election for elective offices. Instant runoff voting gives voters the option to rank candidates according to the order of their choice. If no candidate obtains a majority of first-choice votes, then the candidate receiving the fewest first-choice votes is eliminated. Each vote cast for the eliminated candidate shall be transferred to the candidate who was the voter's next choice on the ballot. The process is continued until a candidate receives a majority of votes. There are several potential benefits to the instant runoff voting method. First, voters are free to mark their ballot for the candidate they truly prefer without fear that their choice will help elect their EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD03242-02-4
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.