S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
6639--A
Cal. No. 607
I N S E N A T E
February 21, 2014
___________
Introduced by Sens. DeFRANCISCO, MAZIARZ, VALESKY -- read twice and
ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on
Corporations, Authorities and Commissions -- reported favorably from
said committee, ordered to first and second report, ordered to a third
reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining its place in the
order of third reading
AN ACT to amend the public authorities law, in relation to authorizing
public authorities and public benefit corporations to negotiate with
professional firms providing architectural or engineering services in
order from the most qualified to the least qualified with regard to
the provision of services to the authority or corporation
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subparagraph (iv) of paragraph (b) of subdivision 3 of
section 2879 of the public authorities law, as amended by chapter 383 of
the laws of 1994, is amended to read as follows:
(iv) as used in this subparagraph, the term "professional firm" shall
be defined as any individual or sole proprietorship, partnership, corpo-
ration, association, or other legal entity permitted by law to practice
the professions of architecture, engineering or surveying.
IT IS THE POLICY OF NEW YORK STATE TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACTS FOR ARCHI-
TECTURAL AND/OR ENGINEERING SERVICES AND/OR SURVEYING SERVICES ON THE
BASIS OF DEMONSTRATED COMPETENCE AND QUALIFICATION FOR THE TYPE OF
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REQUIRED AND AT FAIR AND REASONABLE FEES.
IN THE PROCUREMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING
SERVICES, THE CORPORATION IS AUTHORIZED TO ENCOURAGE PROFESSIONAL FIRMS
ENGAGED IN THE LAWFUL PRACTICE OF THE PROFESSION TO SUBMIT AN ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS AND PERFORMANCE DATA. THE CORPORATION FOR
EACH PROPOSED PROJECT IS AUTHORIZED TO EVALUATE CURRENT STATEMENTS OF
QUALIFICATIONS AND PERFORMANCE DATA ON FILE WITH THE CORPORATION. IF
DESIRED, THE CORPORATION MAY CONDUCT DISCUSSIONS WITH THREE OR MORE
PROFESSIONAL FIRMS REGARDING ANTICIPATED DESIGN CONCEPTS AND PROPOSED
METHODS OF APPROACH TO THE ASSIGNMENT. THE CORPORATION IS AUTHORIZED TO
SELECT, IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE, BASED UPON CRITERIA ESTABLISHED BY THE
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD00703-04-4
S. 6639--A 2
CORPORATION, NO LESS THAN THREE PROFESSIONAL FIRMS DEEMED TO BE THE MOST
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TO PROVIDE THE SERVICES REQUIRED.
EVERY CORPORATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT WITH THE HIGH-
EST QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL FIRM FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND/OR ENGINEERING
SERVICES AND/OR SURVEYING SERVICES AT COMPENSATION WHICH THE CORPORATION
DETERMINES IN WRITING TO BE FAIR AND REASONABLE TO SUCH CORPORATION. IN
MAKING THIS DECISION, THE CORPORATION IS AUTHORIZED TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT
THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE SERVICES TO BE RENDERED, INCLUDING THE COSTS,
THE SCOPE, COMPLEXITY AND PROFESSIONAL NATURE THEREOF.
The corporation shall not refuse to negotiate with a professional firm
solely because the ratio of the "allowable indirect costs" to direct
labor costs of the professional firm or the hourly labor rate in any
labor category of the professional firm exceeds a limitation generally
set by the corporation in the determination of the reasonableness of the
estimated cost of services to be rendered by the professional firm, but
rather the corporation should also consider the reasonableness of cost
based on the total estimated cost of the service of the professional
firm which should include, among other things, all the direct labor
costs of the professional firm for such services plus all "allowable
indirect costs," other direct costs, and negotiated profit of the
professional firm. "Allowable indirect costs" of a professional firm are
defined as those costs generally associated with overhead which cannot
be specifically identified with a single project or contract and are
considered reasonable and allowable under specific state contract or
allowability limits. SHOULD THE CORPORATION CHOOSE TO ENGAGE IN A QUAL-
IFICATION BASED PROCUREMENT AND BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE A SATISFACTORY
CONTRACT WITH THE PROFESSIONAL FIRM CONSIDERED TO BE THE MOST QUALIFIED,
AT A FEE THE CORPORATION DETERMINES TO BE FAIR AND REASONABLE TO THE
CORPORATION, NEGOTIATIONS WITH THAT PROFESSIONAL FIRM SHALL BE FORMALLY
TERMINATED. THE CORPORATION SHALL THEN UNDERTAKE NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE
SECOND MOST QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL FIRM. FAILING ACCORD WITH THE SECOND
MOST QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL FIRM, THE CORPORATION SHALL FORMALLY TERMI-
NATE NEGOTIATIONS. THE CORPORATION SHALL THEN UNDERTAKE NEGOTIATIONS
WITH THE THIRD MOST QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL FIRM. SHOULD THE CORPORATION
BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE A SATISFACTORY CONTRACT WITH ANY OF THE SELECTED
PROFESSIONAL FIRMS, IT SHALL SELECT ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL FIRMS IN
ORDER OF THEIR COMPETENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS AND IT SHALL CONTINUE NEGO-
TIATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION UNTIL AN AGREEMENT IS REACHED.
THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH SHALL ONLY APPLY TO ENGINEERING
AND/OR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AND/OR SURVEYING SERVICES IN EXCESS OF
TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE METROPOLITAN
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY OR THE
TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AUTHORITY OR TO ANY OF THEIR SUBSIDIARIES.
S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.