BILL NUMBER:S3901

TITLE OF BILL:  An act to amend the general municipal law, in relation
to vested rights relating to land development in the counties of
Dutchess, Orange, Putnam, Rockland and Westchester; and providing for
the repeal of such provisions upon expiration thereof

PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL:

Relates to vested rights of property owners relating to the
development of their land in the counties of Dutchess, Orange, Putnam,
Rockland and Westchester; requires notice by applicant to property
owners within 250 feet of land development application; provides for
the repeal of such provisions six years after they take effect

SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS:

Section one amends the general municipal law by adding a new section
150.

Subdivision 1 creates a six-year pilot program in Dutchess, Orange,
Putnam, Rockland and Westchester counties, and provides that there
shall be a rebuttable presumption that municipal zoning, planning,
environmental and all other applicable enactments by a village, town
or city regulating the development of land which are applicable to a
particular parcel of land as of nine months after the filing date of
              

an application deemed completed by the municipality for a project or,
at the discretion of the applicant, as of nine months after the filing
date of a draft environmental impact statement, shall remain
applicable to the proposed project for a period of six years after
such filing date, as long as it is being pursued with reasonable
efforts by the applicant. Written notice of such application will be
sent by the applicant to all property owners within 250 feet of the
applicant's property lines.

Subdivision 2 provides that in order to rebut the presumption, a
municipal body must show with a detailed written finding that these
has been a change in federal or state law, which alters the relevant
requirements; or that there is newly discovered information or changes
in circumstances which will establish that the proposed project is
likely to harm or endanger public health, public welfare, safety or
biological habitat that is not being prevented by existing laws,
codes, ordinances or other governmental entities. Thus, while the
property owner will be protected to the extent that his project will
be judged according to the laws, codes, and regulations in existence
nine months from the filing of the application, the municipality will
not be prevented from applying a new or amended law in those
situations where the application of the new or amended law is
warranted due to a change in circumstances or newly discovered
information, which establishes a likely harm to public health, safety,
general welfare, or biological habitat. Additionally, where the
municipality is already considering a change in the local codes or
laws before the filing of the proposed application, such changes are
allowable.


Subdivision 3 provides that the time constraints under Article 78 of
the civil practice law and rules are to be applicable if there is a
challenge and, therefore, must be challenged within four months.

Subdivision 4 provides that the bill does not prevent the municipality
from enforcing all existing laws as to the subject property and
changes in the codes, laws and regulations before and after the nine
month window that apply to other properties in the municipality.

Subdivision 5 provides that the bill shall not apply to applications
requiring zoning changes. In those situations, where the application
does not fit under existing zoning laws and requires a zoning change,
the applicant is permitted to make such application and the local
municipality may decide whether or not to grant it.

Subdivision 6 provides that if the applicant makes substantial changes
in the application (other than in response to comments made during the
SEQRA process), it will be considered a new application and the
constraints of this section will be inapplicable.  New section 151
provides that this article shall apply only to the counties of
Dutchess, Orange, Putnam, Rockland and Westchester, and to no other
counties in the state.

Section two provides the effective date.

JUSTIFICATION:

Currently, the law in New York allows a municipality to continually
modify existing codes, laws, rules and regulations at any stage in the
SEQRA, or site plan approval, subdivision or building permit process.
Landowners often make a substantial investment prior to the start of
construction, both before and during the review process.  Changes in
the law mid-review can derail projects and discourage future projects,
especially in affordable housing projects.

Property owners often purchase property based on an understanding of
the zoning regulations that exist at that time, and when a property
owner wants to add a pool, deck or addition to a home, for example, he
or she may engage engineers and/or architects who put forth a proposal
in accordance with current zoning laws or building regulations.

It is unreasonable that the municipality may change an ordinance or
regulation at any time without sound reason after a property owner has
filed the application. Such action may prevent a property owner, who
relied upon the ordinances and regulations that were in place at the
time of filing, from using the property as he or she expected.

Property developers often make substantial investments prior to the
start of filing the application by preparing surveys, plans, reports,
sale models, and studies such as those regarding engineering,
wetlands, traffic, noise and air quality, and conducting ecological or
archeological surveys.

Due to a reasonable expectation that a project will be completed,
substantial expenses are incurred prior to a formal application is
filed. At the same time, municipalities should be given a reasonable


amount of time to respond to the filing of a completed application and
should be allowed to consider and enact new legislation.

Municipalities, currently, may change the law and impose new and
restrictive conditions, such as increased buffer areas, steep slopes,
lower floor area ratio requirements or upzoning, causing property
owners to alter their plans or change the intended use of their
property. This bill enforces, as a matter of equity, a property
owner's right to develop property in accordance with laws, codes,
ordinances, rules and regulations in effect nine months after the date
the property owner makes the application, but does not prevent a
municipality from promulgating changes as to any other property in the
municipality.

However, when a municipality has regulatory changes in progress at the
time the property owner makes an application, the municipality may
continue to promulgate the changes.

Importantly, a municipality may, under certain circumstances, change
applicable laws, codes, ordinances, or rules and regulations relating
to land use during the approval process when there is a change in
federal or state laws, rules, or regulations or when newly discovered
information or changes in circumstances establish that the project is
likely to harm or endanger public health, safety or biological
habitat, and the project is not being prevented by existing laws,
codes, regulations or other governmental entities.

PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

S.2565 of 2013 and 2014, referred to Local Government
S.4554-B of 2011 and 2012, reported out of Local Government in 2011,
and referred to Local Government in 2012.
S.1988-B of 2009 and 2010, reported out of Local Government in 2009,
and referred to Local Government in 2010.
S.3852-B of 2007 and 2008, reported out of Local Government both
years.
S.7322 of 2006, reported out of Local Government.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None to the State or local governments.

EFFECTIVE DATE:

This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after it
shall have become law, and shall expire and be deemed repealed six
years after it shall take effect but shall continue to apply to
parcels for which an application has been filed pursuant to section
150 of the general municipal law prior to such repeal.