S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
8002
I N S E N A T E
June 3, 2016
___________
Introduced by Sen. DeFRANCISCO -- read twice and ordered printed, and
when printed to be committed to the Committee on Judiciary
AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to enact-
ing the "local government jobs and revenue protection act of 2016"
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "local
government jobs and revenue protection act of 2016."
S 2. Legislative intent. New York state, New York city and county
governments throughout the state are the recipients of hundred of
millions of dollars each year under the master settlement agreement. The
total of all master settlement payments to these governments over the
years has so far exceeded fourteen billion dollars. These funds are
vitally important and any disruption in these payments would put the
recipients at financial risk. The legislature hereby finds that it is in
the public interest to enact the "local government jobs and revenue
protection act of 2016" in order to continue the flow of these funds to
the state and local governments which depend on this revenue during the
appeal of a judgement against master settlement agreement signatories,
affiliates, successors and non-participating manufacturers.
S 3. The civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a new
section 5519-a to read as follows:
S 5519-A. STAY OF ENFORCEMENT FOR TOBACCO PRODUCT MASTER SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT PARTICIPATING OR NON-PARTICIPATING MANUFACTURERS OR THEIR
SUCCESSORS OR AFFILIATES. (A) IN CIVIL LITIGATION UNDER ANY LEGAL THEORY
INVOLVING A PARTICIPATING MANUFACTURER OR A NON-PARTICIPATING MANUFAC-
TURER, AS THOSE TERMS ARE DEFINED IN THE MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, OR
ANY OF THEIR SUCCESSORS OR AFFILIATES, THE UNDERTAKING REQUIRED DURING
THE PENDENCY OF ALL APPEALS OR DISCRETIONARY REVIEWS BY ANY APPELLATE
COURTS IN ORDER TO STAY THE EXECUTION OF ANY JUDGMENT OR ORDER GRANTING
LEGAL, EQUITABLE OR OTHER RELIEF DURING THE ENTIRE COURSE OF APPELLATE
REVIEW, INCLUDING REVIEW BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, SHALL BE
SET PURSUANT TO THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF LAW OR COURT RULES;
PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT THE TOTAL UNDERTAKING REQUIRED OF ALL APPELLANTS
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD15747-01-6
S. 8002 2
COLLECTIVELY SHALL NOT EXCEED TWO HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS, REGARD-
LESS OF THE VALUE OF THE JUDGMENT APPEALED.
(B) NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION (A) OF THIS SECTION,
UPON PROOF BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE, BY AN APPELLEE, THAT AN
APPELLANT IS DISSIPATING ASSETS OUTSIDE THE COURSE OF ORDINARY BUSINESS
TO AVOID PAYMENT OF A JUDGMENT, A COURT MAY REQUIRE THE APPELLANT TO
POST A BOND IN AN AMOUNT UP TO THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE JUDGEMENT.
S 4. This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall
have becomes a law, and shall apply to any cause of action pending on or
filed on or after such effective date.