Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
Jan 06, 2016 |
referred to judiciary |
Jan 13, 2015 |
referred to judiciary |
Assembly Bill A1813
2015-2016 Legislative Session
Sponsored By
FARRELL
Archive: Last Bill Status - In Assembly Committee
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Delivered to Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
2015-A1813 (ACTIVE) - Details
2015-A1813 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 1813 2015-2016 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y January 13, 2015 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. FARRELL -- read once and referred to the Commit- tee on Judiciary AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to the undertaking required during the pendency of a stay of enforcement of a judgment against a participating or non-participating manufacturer under the master settlement agreement THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a new section 5519-a to read as follows: S 5519-A. STAY OF ENFORCEMENT FOR MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PARTIC- IPATING AND NON-PARTICIPATING MANUFACTURERS OR THEIR SUCCESSORS. (A) IN CIVIL LITIGATION CONCERNING A THEORY OF LIABILITY RELATING TO THE HEALTH EFFECTS, DESIGN, OR MARKETING OF, OR REPRESENTATIONS CONCERNING, TOBACCO PRODUCTS AS DEFINED BY THE MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, AND THAT INVOLVES A PARTICIPATING OR NON-PARTICIPATING MANUFACTURER, AS THOSE TERMS ARE DEFINED IN THE MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, OR ANY OF THEIR SUCCESSORS, OR PARENT ENTITIES FOUND TO BE LIABLE BY VIRTUE OF THEIR STATUS AS PARENT TO HAVE CONTROLLED THE CONDUCT OF SUCH MANUFACTURERS OR THEIR SUCCESSORS, THE UNDERTAKING REQUIRED DURING THE PENDENCY OF ALL APPEALS OR DISCRETIONARY REVIEWS BY ANY APPELLATE COURTS IN ORDER TO STAY THE EXECUTION OF ANY JUDGMENT OR ORDER GRANTING LEGAL, EQUITABLE OR OTHER RELIEF DURING THE ENTIRE COURSE OF APPELLATE REVIEW, INCLUDING REVIEW BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, SHALL BE SET PURSUANT TO THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF LAW; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE COURT OF ORIGINAL INSTANCE SHALL SET THE TOTAL UNDERTAKING REQUIRED IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS, REGARDLESS OF THE VALUE OF THE JUDGMENT APPEALED. NOTHING HEREIN SHALL AFFECT THE DISCRETION OF AN APPELLATE COURT PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (C) OF SECTION FIFTY-FIVE HUNDRED NINETEEN OF THIS ARTICLE. WHERE THE COURT SETS THE UNDERTAKING EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD00013-01-5
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.