NY State Senate Bill 2015-S6949C

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Assembly Committee

Introduced
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
Delivered to Governor
Signed By Governor

Please enter your contact information

First Name

Last Name

Email Address

A valid email address is required.

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Actions

View Actions

	Assembly Actions - Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Jun 17, 2016	referred to ways and means delivered to assembly passed senate
Jun 14, 2016	amended on third reading 6949c
Jun 14, 2016	amended on third reading 6949b
Jun 08, 2016	ordered to third reading cal.1571 committee discharged and committed to rules
May 19, 2016	print number 6949a
May 19, 2016	amend and recommit to investigations and government operations
Mar 09, 2016	referred to investigations and government operations

Votes

- Jun 17, 2016 - Floor Vote
  S6949C
  
  62
  
  Aye
  
  0
  
  Nay
  
  0
  
  Absent
  
  1
  
  Excused
  
  0
  
  Abstained
  - - Floor Vote: Jun 17, 2016
      
      aye (62)
      
      Addabbo Jr.
      
      Akshar
      
      Amedore
      
      Avella
      
      Bonacic
      
      Boyle
      
      Breslin
      
      Carlucci
      
      Comrie
      
      Croci
      
      DeFrancisco
      
      Dilan
      
      Espaillat
      
      Farley
      
      Felder
      
      Flanagan
      
      Funke
      
      Gallivan
      
      Gianaris
      
      Golden
      
      Griffo
      
      Hamilton
      
      Hannon
      
      Hassell-Thompson
      
      Hoylman-Sigal
      
      Kaminsky
      
      Kennedy
      
      Klein
      
      Krueger
      
      LaValle
      
      Lanza
      
      Larkin
      
      Latimer
      
      Little
      
      Marcellino
      
      Marchione
      
      Martins
      
      Montgomery
      
      Murphy
      
      Nozzolio
      
      O'Mara
      
      Ortt
      
      Panepinto
      
      Parker
      
      Peralta
      
      Perkins
      
      Persaud
      
      Ranzenhofer
      
      Ritchie
      
      Rivera
      
      Robach
      
      Sanders Jr.
      
      Savino
      
      Serino
      
      Serrano
      
      Seward
      
      Squadron
      
      Stavisky
      
      Stewart-Cousins
      
      Valesky
      
      Venditto
      
      Young
      
      excused (1)
      
      Diaz
  Jun 8, 2016 - Rules Committee Vote
  S6949C
  
  22
  
  Aye
  
  0
  
  Nay
  
  2
  
  Aye with Reservations
  
  0
  
  Absent
  
  1
  
  Excused
  
  0
  
  Abstained
  - - Rules Committee Vote: Jun 8, 2016
      
      aye (22)
      
      Bonacic
      
      Breslin
      
      Carlucci
      
      DeFrancisco
      
      Dilan
      
      Farley
      
      Flanagan
      
      Hannon
      
      Hassell-Thompson
      
      LaValle
      
      Lanza
      
      Larkin
      
      Little
      
      Marcellino
      
      Montgomery
      
      Nozzolio
      
      Parker
      
      Perkins
      
      Robach
      
      Seward
      
      Stewart-Cousins
      
      Valesky
      
      aye wr (2)
      
      Gianaris
      
      Krueger
      
      excused (1)
      
      Espaillat

Bill Amendments

Original

C (Active)

2015-S6949 - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A9506
Current Committee:: Assembly Ways And Means
Law Section:: Public Officers Law
Laws Affected:: Amd §89, Pub Off L
Versions Introduced in 2017-2018 Legislative Session:: S2392, A2750

2015-S6949 - Summary

Establishes that in a FOIL proceeding, the court shall assess against an agency reasonable attorneys' fees and other litigation costs incurred when a person substantially prevails unless the court finds otherwise.

2015-S6949 - Sponsor Memo

                                 BILL NUMBER:  S6949

 TITLE OF BILL :  An act to amend the public officers law, in relation
to freedom of information requests and attorneys' fees

 PURPOSE

To require the court to issue reasonable attorneys' fees when an
agency denies access to freedom of information requests in clear
disregard of the law and with no reasonable basis.

 SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS :

Section 1 provides that the court shall award attorneys' fees when a
party substantially prevails and when the court finds an agency denied
access in clear disregard of the exceptions to rights of access in
section eighty-seven of the freedom of information laws, and had no
reasonable basis for denying access.

Section 2 provides the effective date.

 JUSTIFICATION :

When a public agency denies disclosure of information sought through a
Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request, one recourse for the denied
party is to initiate a judicial proceeding to challenge the denial. A

judicial proceeding to challenge an agency's denial of disclosure is a
costly endeavor in both time and money. The full proceeding can take
several months from the time of filing to the exhaustion of all
appeals. In addition, the cost of hiring an attorney can be
significant depending on the length and scope of the proceedings.
Often, citizens simply cannot afford to take a government agency to
trial to exercise their right to access public information.

This bill requires the court to award attorneys' fees when a party
substantially prevails and when the court finds an agency denied
access in clear disregard of FOIL, and it had no reasonable basis for
denying access.

 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY :

Similar to A.1438B, same as S.533B of 2015, vetoed. A.2121 of 2013 and
2014, referred to governmental operations. Same as 5.108 of 2013 and
2014, referred to investigations and government operations. A.9407 of
2012, referred to governmental operations. Same as S.6270 of 2012,
referred to investigations and government operations.

 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS :

None.

 EFFECTIVE DATE :
This act shall take effect immediately.

2015-S6949 - Bill Text download pdf

                            
                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                  6949

                            I N  S E N A T E

                              March 9, 2016
                               ___________

Introduced  by Sen. GALLIVAN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
  printed to be committed to the Committee on Investigations and Govern-
  ment Operations

AN ACT to amend the public officers  law,  in  relation  to  freedom  of
  information requests and attorneys' fees

  THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section 1. Paragraph (c) of subdivision 4 of section 89 of the  public
officers  law, as amended by chapter 492 of the laws of 2006, is amended
to read as follows:
  (c) (1) The court in such a proceeding may assess, against such agency
involved, reasonable [attorney's] ATTORNEYS' fees and  other  litigation
costs  reasonably  incurred  by  such  person  in  any  case  under  the
provisions of this  section  in  which  such  person  has  substantially
prevailed, [when:
  i. the agency had no reasonable basis for denying access; or
  ii.]  AND  WHEN  the  agency  failed to respond to a request or appeal
within the statutory time.
  (2) THE COURT IN SUCH PROCEEDING SHALL  ASSESS,  AGAINST  SUCH  AGENCY
INVOLVED,  REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND OTHER LITIGATION COSTS REASON-
ABLY INCURRED BY SUCH PERSON, IN ANY CASE UNDER THE PROVISIONS  OF  THIS
SECTION  IN  WHICH SUCH PERSON HAS SUBSTANTIALLY PREVAILED AND THE COURT
FINDS THAT THE AGENCY DENIED ACCESS IN CLEAR DISREGARD OF THE EXCEPTIONS
TO RIGHTS OF ACCESS IN SECTION EIGHTY-SEVEN OF THIS ARTICLE AND  HAD  NO
REASONABLE BASIS FOR DENYING ACCESS.
  S2. This act shall take effect immediately.



 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD13918-02-6

2015-S6949A - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A9506
Current Committee:: Assembly Ways And Means
Law Section:: Public Officers Law
Laws Affected:: Amd §89, Pub Off L
Versions Introduced in 2017-2018 Legislative Session:: S2392, A2750

2015-S6949A - Summary

2015-S6949A - Sponsor Memo

                                 BILL NUMBER:  S6949A

 TITLE OF BILL :

An act to amend the public officers law, in relation to freedom of
information requests and attorneys' fees

 PURPOSE :

To require the court to issue reasonable attorneys' fees when an
agency denies access to freedom of information requests and the party
has substantially prevailed, unless the court finds that the position
of such agency was substantially justified or that special
circumstances make such assessment unjust.

 SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS :

Section 1 provides that the court shall award attorneys' fees when a
party substantially prevails, unless the court finds that the position
of such agency was substantially justified or that special
circumstances make such assessment unjust.

Section 2 provides the effective date.

 JUSTIFICATION :

When a public agency denies disclosure of information sought through a
Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request, one recourse for the denied
party is to initiate a judicial proceeding to challenge the denial. A
judicial proceeding to challenge an agency's denial of disclosure is a
costly endeavor in both time and money. The full proceeding can take
several months from the time of filing to the exhaustion of all
appeals. In addition, the cost of hiring an attorney can be
significant depending on the length and scope of the proceedings.
Often, citizens simply cannot afford to take a government agency to
trial to exercise their right to access public information.

This bill requires the court to award attorneys' fees when a party
substantially prevails, unless the court finds that the position of
such agency was substantially justified. Furthermore,the bill will
conform FOIL lawsuits to other lawsuits against the state, which
mandate the award of attorney's fees unless the agency can prove it
was "substantially justified" in its position. The standard comes from
the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules § 8601(a), which has been
cited in many years of case law interpreting what it means for an
agency to have been "substantially justified" in its actions.

 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY :

Similar to A.1438B, same as S.533B of 2015, vetoed.
A.2121 of 2013 and 2014, referred to governmental operations.  Same as
S.108 of 2013 and 2014, referred to investigations and govern- ment
operations.
A.9407 of 2012, referred to governmental operations.  Same as S.6270
of 2012, referred to investigations and government operations.

 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS :

None

 EFFECTIVE DATE :
Effective immediately

2015-S6949A - Bill Text download pdf

                            
                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                 6949--A

                            I N  S E N A T E

                              March 9, 2016
                               ___________

Introduced  by Sen. GALLIVAN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
  printed to be committed to the Committee on Investigations and Govern-
  ment  Operations  --  committee  discharged,  bill  amended,   ordered
  reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee

AN  ACT  to  amend  the  public  officers law, in relation to freedom of
  information requests and attorneys' fees

  THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section  1. Paragraph (c) of subdivision 4 of section 89 of the public
officers law, as amended by chapter 492 of the laws of 2006, is  amended
to read as follows:
  (c)  [The  court  in such a proceeding may assess, against such agency
involved, reasonable attorney's fees and other litigation costs  reason-
ably  incurred  by  such person in any case under the provisions of this
section in which such person has substantially prevailed, when:
  i. the agency had no reasonable basis for denying access; or
  ii.  the agency failed to respond to a request or  appeal  within  the
statutory time.]
  THE  COURT  IN  SUCH  PROCEEDING  SHALL  ASSESS,  AGAINST  SUCH AGENCY
INVOLVED, REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND OTHER LITIGATION COSTS  REASON-
ABLY  INCURRED  BY SUCH PERSON, IN ANY CASE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THIS
SECTION IN WHICH SUCH PERSON  HAS  SUBSTANTIALLY  PREVAILED  UNLESS  THE
COURT FINDS THAT THE POSITION OF SUCH AGENCY WAS SUBSTANTIALLY JUSTIFIED
OR THAT SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES MAKE SUCH ASSESSMENT UNJUST.
  S2. This act shall take effect immediately.




 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD13918-08-6

2015-S6949B - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A9506
Current Committee:: Assembly Ways And Means
Law Section:: Public Officers Law
Laws Affected:: Amd §89, Pub Off L
Versions Introduced in 2017-2018 Legislative Session:: S2392, A2750

2015-S6949B - Summary

2015-S6949B - Sponsor Memo

                                 BILL NUMBER:  S6949B

 TITLE OF BILL :  An act to amend the public officers law, in relation
to freedom of information requests and attorneys' fees

 PURPOSE :

To require the court to issue reasonable attorneys' fees when an
agency denies access to freedom of information requests and the party
has substantially prevailed, unless the court finds that the position
of such agency was substantially justified or that special
circumstances make such assessment unjust; or if the agency failed to
respond to a request or appeal within the statutory time, unless the
court finds that the agency provided substantive evidence of inability
to comply.

 SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS :

Section 1 provides that the court shall award attorneys' fees when a
party substantially prevails and when the court finds an agency denied
access in clear disregard of the exceptions to rights of access in
section eighty-seven of the freedom of information laws, and had no
reasonable basis for denying access.

Section 2 provides the effective date.

 JUSTIFICATION :

When a public agency denies disclosure of information sought through a
Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request, one recourse for the denied
party is to initiate a judicial proceeding to challenge the denial. A
judicial proceeding to challenge an agency's denial of disclosure is a
costly endeavor in both time and money. The full proceeding can take
several months from the time of filing to the exhaustion of all
appeals. In addition, the cost of hiring an attorney can be
significant depending on the length and scope of the proceedings.
Often, citizens simply cannot afford to take a government agency to
trial to exercise their right to access public information.

This bill requires the court to award attorneys' fees when a party
substantially prevails, unless the court finds that the position of
such agency was substantially justified. In the alternative,
attorneys' fees will be awarded if the agency failed to respond to a
request or appeal within the statutory time, unless the court finds
that the agency provided substantive evidence of inability to comply.

This legislation will conform FOIL lawsuits to other lawsuits against
the state, which mandate the award of attorney's fees unless the
agency can prove it was "substantially justified" in its position.
The standard comes from the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules §
8601(a), which has been cited in many years of case law interpreting
what it means for an agency to have been "substantially justified" in
its actions.

 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY :

Similar to A.1438B, same as S.533B of 2015, vetoed. A.2121 of 2013 and
2014, referred to governmental operations. Same as S.108 of 2013 and
2014, referred to investigations and government operations. A.9407 of
2012, referred to governmental operations. Same as 5.6270 of 2012,
referred to investigations and government operations.

 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS :

None.

 EFFECTIVE DATE :
This act shall take effect immediately.

2015-S6949B - Bill Text download pdf

                            
                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                 6949--B
    Cal. No. 1571

                            I N  S E N A T E

                              March 9, 2016
                               ___________

Introduced  by Sen. GALLIVAN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
  printed to be committed to the Committee on Investigations and Govern-
  ment  Operations  --  committee  discharged,  bill  amended,   ordered
  reprinted  as  amended  and recommitted to said committee -- committee
  discharged and said bill  committed  to  the  Committee  on  Rules  --
  ordered  to  a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining
  its place in the order of third reading

AN ACT to amend the public officers  law,  in  relation  to  freedom  of
  information requests and attorneys' fees

  THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section 1. Paragraph (c) of subdivision 4 of section 89 of the  public
officers  law, as amended by chapter 492 of the laws of 2006, is amended
to read as follows:
  (c) [The court in such a proceeding may assess,  against  such  agency
involved,  reasonable attorney's fees and other litigation costs reason-
ably incurred by such person in any case under the  provisions  of  this
section in which such person has substantially prevailed, when:
  i. the agency had no reasonable basis for denying access; or
  ii.    the  agency failed to respond to a request or appeal within the
statutory time.]
  THE COURT  IN  SUCH  PROCEEDING  SHALL  ASSESS,  AGAINST  SUCH  AGENCY
INVOLVED,  REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND OTHER LITIGATION COSTS REASON-
ABLY INCURRED BY SUCH PERSON, IN ANY CASE UNDER THE PROVISIONS  OF  THIS
SECTION  IN  WHICH  SUCH  PERSON  HAS SUBSTANTIALLY PREVAILED UNLESS THE
COURT FINDS THAT THE POSITION OF SUCH AGENCY WAS SUBSTANTIALLY JUSTIFIED
OR THAT SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES MAKE SUCH ADJUSTMENT; OR THE AGENCY FAILED
TO RESPOND TO A REQUEST OR APPEAL WITHIN THE STATUTORY TIME, UNLESS  THE
COURT  FINDS  THAT THE AGENCY PROVIDED SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE OF INABILITY
TO COMPLY.
  S 2.  This act shall take effect immediately.


 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD13918-12-6

2015-S6949C (ACTIVE) - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A9506
Current Committee:: Assembly Ways And Means
Law Section:: Public Officers Law
Laws Affected:: Amd §89, Pub Off L
Versions Introduced in 2017-2018 Legislative Session:: S2392, A2750

2015-S6949C (ACTIVE) - Summary

2015-S6949C (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

                                 BILL NUMBER:  S6949C

 TITLE OF BILL :

An act to amend the public officers law, in relation to freedom of
information requests and attorneys' fees

 PURPOSE :

To require the court to issue reasonable attorneys' fees when an
agency denies access to freedom of information requests and the party
has substantially prevailed, unless the court finds that the position
of such agency was substantially justified or that special
circumstances make such assessment unjust; or if the agency failed to
respond to a request or appeal within the statutory time, unless the
court finds that the agency provided substantive evidence of inability
to comply.

 SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS :

Section 1 provides that the court shall award attorneys' fees when a
party substantially prevails, unless the court finds that the position
of such agency was substantially justified or that special
circumstances make such assessment unjust; or if the agency failed to
respond to a request or appeal within the statutory time, unless the
court finds that the agency provided substantive evidence of inability

to comply.

Section 2 provides the effective date.

 JUSTIFICATION :

When a public agency denies disclosure of information sought through a
Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request, one recourse for the denied
party is to initiate a judicial proceeding to challenge the denial. A
judicial proceeding to challenge an agency's denial of disclosure is a
costly endeavor in both time and money. The full proceeding can take
several months from the time of filing to the exhaustion of all
appeals. In addition, the cost of hiring an attorney can be
significant depending on the length and scope of the proceedings.
Often, citizens simply cannot afford to take a government agency to
trial to exercise their right to access public information.

This bill requires the court to award attorneys' fees when a party
substantially prevails, unless the court finds that the position of
such agency was substantially justified. In the alternative,
attorneys' fees will be awarded if the agency failed to respond to a
request or appeal within the statutory time, unless the court finds
that the agency provided substantive evidence of inability to comply.

This legislation will conform FOIL lawsuits to other lawsuits against
the state, which mandate the award of attorney's fees unless the
agency can prove it was "substantially justified" in its position.
The standard comes from the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules §
8601(a), which has been cited in many years of case law interpreting
what it means for an agency to have been "substantially justified" in
its actions.

 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY :

Similar to A.1438B, same as S.533B of 2015, vetoed. A.2121 of 2013 and
2014, referred to governmental operations. Same as S.108 of 2013 and
2014, referred to investigations and government operations. A.9407 of
2012, referred to governmental operations. Same as S.6270 of 2012,
referred to investigations and government operations.

 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS :

None

 EFFECTIVE DATE :
Effective immediately

2015-S6949C (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

                            
                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                 6949--C
    Cal. No. 1571

                            I N  S E N A T E

                              March 9, 2016
                               ___________

Introduced  by Sen. GALLIVAN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
  printed to be committed to the Committee on Investigations and Govern-
  ment  Operations  --  committee  discharged,  bill  amended,   ordered
  reprinted  as  amended  and recommitted to said committee -- committee
  discharged and said bill  committed  to  the  Committee  on  Rules  --
  ordered  to  a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining
  its place in the order of third reading -- again amended  and  ordered
  reprinted, retaining its place in the order of third reading

AN  ACT  to  amend  the  public  officers law, in relation to freedom of
  information requests and attorneys' fees

  THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section  1. Paragraph (c) of subdivision 4 of section 89 of the public
officers law, as amended by chapter 492 of the laws of 2006, is  amended
to read as follows:
  (c)  [The  court  in such a proceeding may assess, against such agency
involved, reasonable attorney's fees and other litigation costs  reason-
ably  incurred  by  such person in any case under the provisions of this
section in which such person has substantially prevailed, when:
  i. the agency had no reasonable basis for denying access; or
  ii.  the agency failed to respond to a request or  appeal  within  the
statutory time.]
  THE  COURT  IN  SUCH  PROCEEDING  SHALL  ASSESS,  AGAINST  SUCH AGENCY
INVOLVED, REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND OTHER LITIGATION COSTS  REASON-
ABLY  INCURRED  BY SUCH PERSON, IN ANY CASE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THIS
SECTION IN WHICH SUCH PERSON  HAS  SUBSTANTIALLY  PREVAILED  UNLESS  THE
COURT FINDS THAT THE POSITION OF SUCH AGENCY WAS SUBSTANTIALLY JUSTIFIED
OR THAT SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES MAKE SUCH ASSESSMENT UNJUST; OR THE AGENCY
FAILED  TO  RESPOND  TO  A  REQUEST OR APPEAL WITHIN THE STATUTORY TIME,
UNLESS THE COURT FINDS THAT THE AGENCY PROVIDED SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE  OF
INABILITY TO COMPLY.
  S 2.  This act shall take effect immediately.

 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD13918-14-6

Comments

Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.

Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Senate Bill S6949C

Sponsored By

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Assembly Committee

Jun 17, 2016 - Floor Vote

Floor Vote: Jun 17, 2016

Jun 8, 2016 - Rules Committee Vote

Rules Committee Vote: Jun 8, 2016

Bill Amendments

2015-S6949 - Details

2015-S6949 - Summary

2015-S6949 - Sponsor Memo

2015-S6949 - Bill Text download pdf

2015-S6949A - Details

2015-S6949A - Summary

2015-S6949A - Sponsor Memo

2015-S6949A - Bill Text download pdf

2015-S6949B - Details

2015-S6949B - Summary

2015-S6949B - Sponsor Memo

2015-S6949B - Bill Text download pdf

2015-S6949C (ACTIVE) - Details

2015-S6949C (ACTIVE) - Summary

2015-S6949C (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

2015-S6949C (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments

Senate Bill S6949C

Share this bill

Sponsored By

Patrick M. Gallivan

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Assembly Committee

Bill Amendments

2015-S6949 - Details

2015-S6949 - Summary

2015-S6949 - Sponsor Memo

2015-S6949 - Bill Text download pdf

2015-S6949A - Details

2015-S6949A - Summary

2015-S6949A - Sponsor Memo

2015-S6949A - Bill Text download pdf

2015-S6949B - Details

2015-S6949B - Summary

2015-S6949B - Sponsor Memo

2015-S6949B - Bill Text download pdf

2015-S6949C (ACTIVE) - Details

2015-S6949C (ACTIVE) - Summary

2015-S6949C (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

2015-S6949C (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments