S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
911--A
2015-2016 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
January 7, 2015
___________
Introduced by Sens. LIBOUS, ADDABBO, AMEDORE, AVELLA, BOYLE, BRESLIN,
DeFRANCISCO, DILAN, ESPAILLAT, FUNKE, GALLIVAN, GIANARIS, HAMILTON,
HASSELL-THOMPSON, HOYLMAN, KENNEDY, KRUEGER, LANZA, LARKIN, LATIMER,
MONTGOMERY, PANEPINTO, PARKER, PERALTA, PERKINS, RANZENHOFER, RITCHIE,
ROBACH, SANDERS, SERRANO, SQUADRON, STAVISKY, VALESKY, YOUNG -- read
twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the
Committee on Codes -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered
reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee
AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to accrual
of causes of action for medical, dental and podiatric malpractice
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The opening paragraph of subdivision (g) of section 203 of
the civil practice law and rules is designated paragraph 1 and a new
paragraph 2 is added to read as follows:
2. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW TO THE CONTRARY, FOR THE
PURPOSES OF SECTIONS FIFTY-E AND FIFTY-I OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW,
SECTION TEN OF THE COURT OF CLAIMS ACT, AND THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER
LAW PERTAINING TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF AN ACTION OR SPECIAL PROCEEDING,
OR TO THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF CLAIM AS A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO
COMMENCEMENT OF AN ACTION OR SPECIAL PROCEEDING WITHIN A SPECIFIED TIME
PERIOD, THE PERIOD IN WHICH TO COMMENCE AN ACTION OR PROCEEDING OR TO
FILE SUCH NOTICE OF CLAIM FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR PODIATRIC MALPRACTICE
SHALL NOT BEGIN TO RUN UNTIL THE LATER OF EITHER: (A) WHEN ONE KNOWS OR
REASONABLY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN OF THE ALLEGED NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION
AND KNOWS OR REASONABLY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT SUCH NEGLIGENT ACT OR
OMISSION HAS CAUSED AN INJURY; OR (B) THE DATE OF THE LAST TREATMENT
WHERE THERE IS CONTINUOUS TREATMENT FOR THE SAME ILLNESS, INJURY OR
CONDITION WHICH GAVE RISE TO THE ACCRUAL OF AN ACTION. HOWEVER, SUCH
ACTION SHALL COMMENCE NO LATER THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE ACT, OMISSION OR
FAILURE COMPLAINED OF OR LAST TREATMENT WHERE THERE IS CONTINUOUS TREAT-
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD00100-02-5
S. 911--A 2
MENT FOR THE SAME ILLNESS, INJURY OR CONDITION WHICH GAVE RISE TO THE
ACT, OMISSION OR FAILURE; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT WHERE THE ACTION IS
BASED UPON THE DISCOVERY OF A FOREIGN OBJECT IN THE BODY OF A PATIENT,
THE ACTION MAY BE COMMENCED WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE DATE OF SUCH DISCOV-
ERY OR OF THE DATE OF DISCOVERY OF FACTS WHICH WOULD REASONABLY LEAD TO
SUCH DISCOVERY, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER.
S 2. Section 214-a of the civil practice law and rules, as amended by
chapter 485 of the laws of 1986, is amended to read as follows:
S 214-a. Action for medical, dental or podiatric malpractice to be
commenced within two years and six months; exceptions. An action for
medical, dental or podiatric malpractice must be commenced within two
years and six months of the ACCRUAL OF ANY SUCH ACTION. THE ACCRUAL OF
AN ACTION OCCURS AT THE LATER OF EITHER (A) WHEN ONE KNOWS OR REASONABLY
SHOULD HAVE KNOWN OF THE ALLEGED NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION AND KNOWS OR
REASONABLY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT SUCH NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION HAS
CAUSED AN INJURY; OR (B) WITHIN TWO YEARS AND SIX MONTHS OF THE LAST
TREATMENT WHERE THERE IS CONTINUOUS TREATMENT FOR THE SAME ILLNESS,
INJURY OR CONDITION WHICH GAVE RISE TO THE ACCRUAL OF AN ACTION. HOWEV-
ER, SUCH ACTION SHALL COMMENCE NO LATER THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE act,
omission or failure complained of or last treatment where there is
continuous treatment for the same illness, injury or condition which
gave rise to the said act, omission or failure; provided, however, that
where the action is based upon the discovery of a foreign object in the
body of the patient, the action may be commenced within one year of the
date of such discovery or of the date of discovery of facts which would
reasonably lead to such discovery, whichever is earlier. For the purpose
of this section the term "continuous treatment" shall not include exam-
inations undertaken at the request of the patient for the sole purpose
of ascertaining the state of the patient's condition. For the purpose of
this section the term "foreign object" shall not include a chemical
compound, fixation device or prosthetic aid or device.
S 3. This act shall take effect immediately.