S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
2620
2017-2018 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
January 13, 2017
___________
Introduced by Sen. LANZA -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes
AN ACT to amend the penal law, in relation to the seizure and forfeiture
of vehicles, vessels and aircraft used in counterfeit goods
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Title J of part 3 of the penal law is amended by adding a
new article 166 to read as follows:
ARTICLE 166
SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE OF VEHICLES, VESSELS AND
AIRCRAFT USED IN COUNTERFEIT GOODS
SECTION 166.00 SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE OF VEHICLES, VESSELS AND AIRCRAFT
USED IN COUNTERFEIT GOODS.
§ 166.00 SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE OF VEHICLES, VESSELS AND AIRCRAFT USED
IN COUNTERFEIT GOODS.
1. ANY VEHICLE, VESSEL OR AIRCRAFT WHICH HAS BEEN OR IS BEING USED IN
VIOLATION OF SECTION 165.71, 165.72, OR 165.73 OF THIS TITLE SHALL BE
SEIZED BY ANY PEACE OFFICER, WHO IS ACTING PURSUANT TO HIS OR HER
SPECIAL DUTIES, OR POLICE OFFICER, AND FORFEITED AS PROVIDED IN THIS
SECTION. HOWEVER, SUCH FORFEITURE AND SEIZURE PROVISIONS SHALL NOT
APPLY TO ANY VEHICLE, VESSEL OR AIRCRAFT USED BY ANY PERSON AS A COMMON
CARRIER IN THE TRANSACTION OF BUSINESS AS SUCH COMMON CARRIER.
2. THE SEIZED PROPERTY SHALL BE DELIVERED BY THE POLICE OFFICER OR
PEACE OFFICER HAVING MADE THE SEIZURE TO THE CUSTODY OF THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY WHEREIN THE SEIZURE WAS MADE, TOGETHER WITH A
REPORT OF ALL THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE SEIZURE.
3. IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY WHEREIN
THE SEIZURE IS MADE, TO INQUIRE INTO THE FACTS OF THE SEIZURE SO
REPORTED TO HIM OR HER AND IF IT APPEARS PROBABLE THAT A FORFEITURE HAS
BEEN INCURRED BY REASON OF A VIOLATION OF SECTION 165.71, 165.72, OR
165.73 OF THIS TITLE, FOR THE DETERMINATION OF WHICH THE INSTITUTION OF
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD02586-01-7
S. 2620 2
PROCEEDINGS IN THE SUPREME COURT IS NECESSARY, TO CAUSE THE PROPER
PROCEEDINGS TO BE COMMENCED AND PROSECUTED, AT ANY TIME AFTER THIRTY
DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE SEIZURE, TO DECLARE SUCH FORFEITURE, UNLESS,
UPON INQUIRY AND EXAMINATION, SUCH DISTRICT ATTORNEY OR CORPORATION
COUNSEL DECIDES THAT SUCH PROCEEDINGS CAN NOT PROBABLY BE SUSTAINED OR
THAT THE ENDS OF PUBLIC JUSTICE DO NOT REQUIRE THAT THEY SHOULD BE
INSTITUTED OR PROSECUTED, IN WHICH CASE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OR CORPO-
RATION COUNSEL SHALL CAUSE SUCH SEIZED PROPERTY TO BE RETURNED TO THE
OWNER THEREOF.
4. NOTICE OF THE INSTITUTION OF THE FORFEITURE PROCEEDING SHALL BE
SERVED EITHER (A) PERSONALLY ON THE OWNERS OF THE SEIZED PROPERTY, OR
(B) BY REGISTERED MAIL TO THE OWNERS' LAST KNOWN ADDRESS AND BY PUBLICA-
TION OF THE NOTICE ONCE A WEEK FOR TWO SUCCESSIVE WEEKS IN A NEWSPAPER
PUBLISHED OR CIRCULATED IN THE COUNTY WHEREIN THE SEIZURE WAS MADE.
5. FORFEITURE SHALL NOT BE ADJUDGED WHERE THE OWNERS ESTABLISH BY
PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT (A) THE USE OF SUCH SEIZED PROPERTY,
IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 165.71, 165.72, OR 165.73 OF THIS TITLE, WAS NOT
INTENTIONAL ON THE PART OF ANY OWNER, OR (B) SUCH SEIZED PROPERTY WAS
USED IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 165.71, 165.72, OR 165.73 OF THIS TITLE, BY
ANY PERSON OTHER THAN AN OWNER THEREOF, WHILE SUCH SEIZED PROPERTY WAS
UNLAWFULLY IN THE POSSESSION OF A PERSON WHO ACQUIRED POSSESSION THEREOF
IN VIOLATION OF THE CRIMINAL LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES, OR OF ANY STATE.
6. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT HAVING CUSTODY OF
THE SEIZED PROPERTY, AFTER SUCH JUDICIAL DETERMINATION OF FORFEITURE,
SHALL, AT THEIR DISCRETION, EITHER RETAIN SUCH SEIZED PROPERTY FOR THE
OFFICIAL USE OF THEIR OFFICE OR DEPARTMENT, OR, BY A PUBLIC NOTICE OF AT
LEAST FIVE DAYS, SELL SUCH FORFEITED PROPERTY AT PUBLIC SALE. THE NET
PROCEEDS OF ANY SUCH SALE, AFTER DEDUCTION OF THE LAWFUL EXPENSES
INCURRED, SHALL BE PAID INTO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE COUNTY WHEREIN THE
SEIZURE WAS MADE.
7. WHENEVER ANY PERSON INTERESTED IN ANY PROPERTY WHICH IS SEIZED AND
DECLARED FORFEITED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION FILES WITH A
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT A PETITION FOR THE RECOVERY OF SUCH
FORFEITED PROPERTY, THE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT MAY RESTORE SUCH
FORFEITED PROPERTY UPON SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS HE OR SHE DEEMS
REASONABLE AND JUST, IF THE PETITIONER ESTABLISHES EITHER OF THE AFFIR-
MATIVE DEFENSES SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION FIVE OF THIS SECTION AND THAT
THE PETITIONER WAS WITHOUT PERSONAL OR ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FORFEI-
TURE PROCEEDING. IF THE PETITION IS FILED AFTER THE SALE OF THE
FORFEITED PROPERTY, ANY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE PETITIONER SHALL BE
LIMITED TO THE NET PROCEEDS OF SUCH SALE AFTER DEDUCTION OF THE LAWFUL
EXPENSES AND COSTS INCURRED BY THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, POLICE DEPARTMENT
OR CORPORATION COUNSEL.
8. NO SUIT OR ACTION UNDER THIS SECTION FOR WRONGFUL SEIZURE SHALL BE
INSTITUTED UNLESS SUCH SUIT OR ACTION IS COMMENCED WITHIN TWO YEARS
AFTER THE TIME WHEN THE PROPERTY WAS SEIZED.
§ 2. This act shall take effect on the first of November next succeed-
ing the date on which it shall have become a law.