NY State Senate Bill 2017-S4767

Senate Bill S4767

2017-2018 Legislative Session

Relates to adjournments in contemplation of dismissal and suspended judgments in child protective proceedings in the family court

download bill text pdf

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Rules Committee

Introduced
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
Delivered to Governor
Signed By Governor

Please enter your contact information

First Name

Last Name

Email Address

A valid email address is required.

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Actions

View Actions

	Assembly Actions - Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Jun 20, 2018	committed to rules
Feb 06, 2018	advanced to third reading
Feb 05, 2018	2nd report cal.
Jan 30, 2018	1st report cal.345
Jan 03, 2018	referred to children and families
Jun 21, 2017	committed to rules
May 08, 2017	advanced to third reading
May 03, 2017	2nd report cal.
May 02, 2017	1st report cal.713
Feb 27, 2017	referred to children and families

Votes

- Jan 30, 2018 - Children And Families Committee Vote
  S4767
  
  3
  
  Aye
  
  0
  
  Nay
  
  3
  
  Aye with Reservations
  
  0
  
  Absent
  
  1
  
  Excused
  
  0
  
  Abstained
  - - Children And Families Committee Vote: Jan 30, 2018
      
      aye (3)
      
      Avella
      
      Persaud
      
      Savino
      
      aye wr (3)
      
      Bonacic
      
      Helming
      
      Serino
      
      excused (1)
      
      Montgomery
  May 2, 2017 - Children And Families Committee Vote
  S4767
  
  5
  
  Aye
  
  0
  
  Nay
  
  2
  
  Aye with Reservations
  
  0
  
  Absent
  
  0
  
  Excused
  
  0
  
  Abstained
  - - Children And Families Committee Vote: May 2, 2017
      
      aye (5)
      
      Avella
      
      Helming
      
      Montgomery
      
      Persaud
      
      Savino
      
      aye wr (2)
      
      Bonacic
      
      Serino

co-Sponsors

2017-S4767 (ACTIVE) - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A6837
Current Committee:: Senate Rules
Law Section:: Family Court Act
Laws Affected:: Amd §§1039, 1053 & 1071, Fam Ct Act
Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:: 2015-2016: S7220, A10341
2019-2020: S6214

2017-S4767 (ACTIVE) - Summary

Relates to adjournments in contemplation of dismissal and suspended judgments in child protective proceedings in the family court.

2017-S4767 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

                                 BILL NUMBER:  S4767

 TITLE OF BILL :

An act to amend the family court act, in relation to adjournments in
contemplation of dismissal and suspended judgments in child protective
proceedings in the family court

This is one in a series of measures being introduced at the request of
the Chief Administrative Judge upon the recommendation of his Family
Court Advisory and Rules Committee.

Long-standing uncertainty regarding the consequences of adjournments
in contemplation of dismissal (ACODs) and suspended judgments in child
protective proceedings has hindered the ability of Family Courts to
utilize these important mechanisms for resolving child protective
cases without the need for resort to a more drastic alternative, such
as out-of-home foster care placement. This measure would clarify and
fill gaps in the statutory framework with respect to both of these
issues.

This measure would clarify that an ACOD may be ordered either before
entry of a fact-finding order or before entry of a final disposition.
It would maintain current law permitting an ACOD to be ordered upon
consent of the parties and child's attorney prior to entry of a
fact-finding order. Preserving a 1990 amendment to section 1039(e) of

the Family Court Act that followed from the Court of Appeals decision
in Matter of Marie B., 62 N.Y.2d 352 (1984), if Family Court finds a
violation of the conditions of the adjournment and restores the matter
to its calendar, the parent would be entitled to a fact-finding
hearing on the original child abuse or neglect petition prior to the
case advancing to the dispositional stage. Eliminating the confusing
and overly limiting phrase "upon a fact-finding hearing," this measure
makes clear that an ACOD may instead be ordered "(a)fter the entry of
a fact-finding order but prior to the entry of a dispositional order"
also upon motion by any party or the child's attorney. In such a case,
consent of the petitioner child protective agency and child's attorney
would not be required but both would have a right to be heard
regarding their positions. In the event the matter is restored to the
Family Court calendar as a result of a violation of the conditions of
the adjournment, the matter would proceed to disposition no later than
thirty days after the application to restore the matter to the
calendar, unless an extension for "good cause" is granted by the
court. In all cases, Family Court must state reasons on the record for
ordering an ACOD.

This measure also clarifies that an ACOD may be extended for up to one
year, either upon consent of the parties and child's attorney (if
prior to fact-finding) or for good cause upon the respondent's consent
(if after fact-finding and prior to disposition). If a violation of
the conditions of the ACOD is alleged, the adjournment period is
tolled pending a determination regarding the alleged violation.
Additionally, sixty days prior to expiration of the ACOD, the child
protective agency must report to the Family Court, parties and child's
attorney regarding compliance with the conditions. If there has been
no violation of the adjournment and it has not been extended, the
petition would be deemed dismissed and, in the case of a
post-fact-finding ACOD, the fact-finding itself would be deemed
vacated. If the court finds a violation, it may extend the ACOD,
possibly with new or different conditions, or may restore the matter
to the calendar for fact-finding (for pre-fact-finding ACODs) or for
disposition (for post-fact-finding ACODs).

During the period of an ACOD, Family Court would not be authorized to
place the child pursuant to Family Court Act sections 1017(2)(a)(iii),
1052(a)(iii), 1055 or order custody to a parent or non-respondent
parent pursuant to sections 1017(2)(a)(i), 1052(a)(vi), (vii) and
1055-b. The ACOD may not be conditioned upon the child's voluntary
placement pursuant to section 358-a of the Social Services Law. Except
as required under sections 1024 or 1027 of the Family Court Act, the
child could not be removed from home during the adjournment period.
These amendments are necessary in light of the fact that children
remanded or placed in foster care, notwithstanding the ACOD of the
underlying proceeding, are not eligible for Federal foster care
reimbursement under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act. It goes
without saying that if the case warrants dismissal following a period
of adjournment, the court would not be able to find that retention in
the home would be contrary to the child's best interests, as is
required by the State and Federal Adoption and Safe Families Acts for
Federal foster care eligibility.  See Family Court Act § 1027(b);
Social Services Law § 358-43); Public Law 105-89.

Like the provisions regarding ACODs, the dispositional alternative of
suspended judgment in child protective cases has long generated
confusion because the Family Court Act is largely silent regarding
procedures for its issuance, as well as its ultimate consequences.
Similar to statutory amendments made in 2005 and 2006 to section 633
of the Family Court Act,{1} the suspended judgment provisions
applicable to permanent neglect cases, this measure would amend
section 1053 of the Family Court Act to require that the order
suspending judgment contain the duration, terms and conditions of the
order. The order also would require a warning in conspicuous print
that failure to comply may lead to its revocation and to issuance of
any other order of disposition that might have been made under Family
Court Act section 1052 at the time the judgment was suspended. A copy
of the order must be furnished to the respondent.

This measure would add clarity regarding procedures applicable when a
parent has successfully complied with the conditions of a suspended
judgment. The order suspending judgment must include a date for a
review by the court and parties of the parent's compliance no later
than 30 days prior to the expiration of the suspended judgment period.
In addition to the existing requirements for progress reports 90 days
after issuance of the order and as ordered by the court, the measure
would require a report no later than 60 days prior to the suspended
judgment's expiration.

Consistent with the Appellate Division's observation in Matter of Baby
Girl W., 245 A.D.2d 830 (3rd Dept., 1997), this measure provides that,
at the end of a successful period of a suspended judgment, the
underlying order of fact-finding would not automatically be vacated;
nor would the report on the Statewide Central Register of Child Abuse
and Maltreatment automatically be sealed or expunged. Rather, as in
Matter of Makynli IV., 17 Misc.3d 1127(A) (Fam. Ct., Monroe Co., 2007)
(Unreported), the parent could apply to Family Court pursuant to
section 1061 of the Family Court Act for an order vacating the order
of fact-finding and dismissing the proceeding in accordance with
subdivision (c) of section 1051 of the Act on the ground that the
court's aid is no longer required and that the dismissal would be in
the children's best interests. See also Matter of Crystal S., 74
A.D.3d 823 (2nd Dept., 2010); Matter of Araynah B., 34 Misc.3d 566
(Fam. Ct., Kings Co., 2011). Such a dismissal would then provide the
parent with grounds to seek administrative relief in terms of sealing
or expungement of the State Central Register report. As the Monroe
County Family Court noted in its earlier opinion in the case, (A)
suspended judgment neither condones Respondent's neglectful action,
nor does it necessarily eradicate the finding. (Citation omitted).

Matter of MN, 16 Misc.3d 499, 506 (Fam. Ct., Monroe Co., 2007).
Significantly, it is the requirement of this procedural step, i.e.,
the motion under section 1061 of the Family Court Act, that
distinguishes the outcome of a successful suspended judgment from that
of an ACOD. A suspended judgment may thus be an appropriate
disposition in cases in which the court determines that a full
dismissal of the proceedings, including vacatur of the fact-finding,
should not be automatic.

Concomitantly, this measure amends the procedures to be followed in
the event that the parent does not comply with the conditions of a
suspended judgment. While chapter 519 of the Laws of 2008 amended
section 1052(a) of the Family Court Act to clarify that a disposition
of suspended judgment may not be combined with that of placement of a
child, there may be cases where a temporary removal of a child may be
necessary pending the outcome of a motion or order to show cause
alleging a violation of a suspended judgment. Thus, just as Family
Court may remove a child from home if necessary for the child's
protection pending disposition of a child protective proceeding,
pursuant to section 1027(a)(iii) of the Family Court Act, so, too,
this measure would permit the convening of a hearing and, if needed,
temporary removal of child from his or her home pending the resolution
of a violation proceeding.

This measure provides needed clarity to both the provisions regarding
ACODs and the disposition of suspended judgment, thus enhancing the
usefulness of these options for the resolution of child abuse and
neglect proceedings in Family Court. Both of these options are
critically important to promote and preserve the well-being of
children and their families by providing opportunities for families to
access services in order to repair the problems that precipitated
court action without the disruption and, all too often, the trauma of
out-of-home placement.

This measure, which would have no fiscal impact on the State, would
take effect 90 days after becoming law.

 2016 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY :

Senate 7220-A (Sen. Avella) (committed to Rules)
Assembly 10341 (M. of A. Weinstein) (PASSED)

 2011-12 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY :

Senate 6678 (Sen. Saland) (Rules)

 2010 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY :

Senate 8235-A (Sen. Montgomery) (Rules)
Assembly 11506 (M. of A. Weinstein) (PASSED) {1} See L. 2005, c. 3; L.
2006, c. 437.

2017-S4767 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

                            
 
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                   4767
 
                        2017-2018 Regular Sessions
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                             February 27, 2017
                                ___________
 
 Introduced by Sen. AVELLA -- (at request of the Office of Court Adminis-
   tration)  --  read  twice  and ordered printed, and when printed to be
   committed to the Committee on Children and Families
 
 AN ACT to amend the family court act, in  relation  to  adjournments  in
   contemplation of dismissal and suspended judgments in child protective
   proceedings in the family court
 
   THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section 1. Section 1039 of the family court act, as amended by chapter
 707 of the laws of 1975, subdivisions (a), (b),  (c),  (d)  and  (e)  as
 amended by chapter 41 of the laws of 2010 and subdivision (f) as amended
 by chapter 601 of the laws of 1985, is amended to read as follows:
   §  1039.  Adjournment in contemplation of dismissal.  (a) (I) Prior to
 [or upon] THE ENTRY OF a fact-finding [hearing] ORDER,  the  court  may,
 upon a motion by [the petitioner with the consent of the respondent and]
 ANY  PARTY  OR  the child's attorney WITH THE CONSENT OF ALL PARTIES AND
 THE CHILD'S ATTORNEY, or upon its own motion with the  consent  of  [the
 petitioner,  the respondent] ALL PARTIES and the child's attorney, order
 that the proceeding be ["]adjourned  in  contemplation  of  dismissal[".
 Under  no circumstances shall the court order any party to consent to an
 order under this section].
   (II) AFTER ENTRY OF A FACT-FINDING ORDER BUT PRIOR TO THE ENTRY  OF  A
 DISPOSITIONAL  ORDER,  THE COURT MAY, WITH CONSENT OF THE RESPONDENT AND
 UPON MOTION OF ANY PARTY OR THE CHILD'S ATTORNEY OR UPON ITS OWN  MOTION
 WITHOUT  REQUIRING  THE  CONSENT  OF  THE PETITIONER OR ATTORNEY FOR THE
 CHILD, ORDER THAT  THE  PROCEEDING  BE  ADJOURNED  IN  CONTEMPLATION  OF
 DISMISSAL.  THE PETITIONER, RESPONDENT AND ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD HAVE A
 RIGHT TO BE HEARD WITH RESPECT TO THE MOTION.
   (III) The court may make [such] AN order UNDER THIS SECTION only after
 it has apprised the respondent of the provisions of this section and  it
 is  satisfied  that  the  respondent  understands  the  effect  of  such
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.

                                                            LBD07083-01-7

 S. 4767                             2
 
 provisions.  UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE COURT ORDER ANY  PARTY  TO
 CONSENT  TO  AN  ORDER  UNDER  THIS  SECTION.  THE COURT SHALL STATE ITS
 REASONS ON THE RECORD FOR ORDERING AN ADJOURNMENT  IN  CONTEMPLATION  OF
 DISMISSAL UNDER THIS SECTION.
   (b)  An adjournment in contemplation of dismissal is an adjournment of
 the proceeding for a period not to exceed one year with a view to  ulti-
 mate  dismissal  of the petition in furtherance of justice.  IN THE CASE
 OF AN ADJOURNMENT IN CONTEMPLATION OF DISMISSAL AFTER  THE  ENTRY  OF  A
 FACT-FINDING  ORDER, SUCH DISMISSAL INCLUDES VACATUR OF THE FACT-FINDING
 ORDER.
   (I) Upon the consent of the petitioner, the respondent and the child's
 attorney, the court may issue an order extending [such] THE period OF AN
 ADJOURNMENT IN CONTEMPLATION OF DISMISSAL ISSUED PURSUANT  TO  PARAGRAPH
 (I)  OF  SUBDIVISION  (A)  OF THIS SECTION PRIOR TO THE ENTRY OF A FACT-
 FINDING ORDER for such time and upon such conditions as may be agreeable
 to the parties.
   (II) FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN AND WITH THE CONSENT OF THE RESPONDENT,  THE
 COURT  MAY,  ON ITS OWN MOTION OR ON MOTION OF ANY PARTY OR THE ATTORNEY
 FOR THE CHILD AND AFTER PROVIDING NOTICE AND AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE  HEARD
 TO  ALL PARTIES AND THE ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, ISSUE AN ORDER EXTENDING
 AN ADJOURNMENT IN CONTEMPLATION OF DISMISSAL ISSUED  PURSUANT  TO  PARA-
 GRAPH  (II)  OF  SUBDIVISION  (A) OF THIS SECTION AFTER ENTRY OF A FACT-
 FINDING ORDER FOR SUCH TIME AND UPON SUCH CONDITIONS AS MAY  BE  IN  THE
 BEST  INTERESTS  OF  THE  CHILD  OR CHILDREN WHO ARE THE SUBJECTS OF THE
 PROCEEDING.
   (III) THE COURT SHALL STATE ITS REASONS ON THE RECORD FOR EXTENDING AN
 ADJOURNMENT  IN  CONTEMPLATION  OF  DISMISSAL  UNDER  THIS  SUBDIVISION,
 INCLUDING ITS REASONS FOR CHANGES IN THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, IF ANY.
   (c)  [Such] THE order [may] SHALL include terms and conditions [agree-
 able to the parties and to the  court,  provided  that  such  terms  and
 conditions]  IN  FURTHERANCE OF THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD OR CHIL-
 DREN WHO ARE THE SUBJECTS OF THE PROCEEDING AND shall include,  BUT  NOT
 BE  LIMITED TO, a requirement that the child and the respondent be under
 the supervision of a child  protective  agency  during  the  adjournment
 period.  EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBDIVISION (G) OF THIS SECTION, AN ORDER
 PURSUANT  TO SUBPARAGRAPHS (I) AND (III) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION
 TWO OF SECTION ONE THOUSAND SEVENTEEN, PARAGRAPHS (III), (VI), AND (VII)
 OF SUBDIVISION (A) OF SECTION ONE THOUSAND FIFTY-TWO, SECTION ONE  THOU-
 SAND  FIFTY-FIVE  OR  SECTION  ONE THOUSAND FIFTY-FIVE-B OF THIS ARTICLE
 SHALL NOT BE MADE IN ANY CASE ADJOURNED UNDER THIS SECTION; NOR SHALL AN
 ORDER UNDER THIS SECTION CONTAIN A  CONDITION  REQUIRING  THE  CHILD  OR
 CHILDREN  TO  BE  PLACED  VOLUNTARILY PURSUANT TO SECTIONS THREE HUNDRED
 FIFTY-EIGHT AND THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY-FOUR-A OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES  LAW.
 In  any  order  issued pursuant to this section, [such agency] THE PETI-
 TIONER shall be directed to make a progress report  to  the  court,  the
 parties and the child's attorney on the implementation of such order, no
 later  than  ninety  days  after the issuance of such order[, unless the
 court determines that the facts and circumstances of  the  case  do  not
 require  such  reports to be made] AND SHALL SUBMIT A REPORT PURSUANT TO
 SECTION ONE THOUSAND FIFTY-EIGHT OF THIS ARTICLE  NO  LATER  THAN  SIXTY
 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE ORDER. The [child protective agency]
 PETITIONER  shall make further reports to the court, the parties and the
 child's attorney in such manner and at  such  times  as  the  court  may
 direct.
   (d)  Upon  application  of  the  respondent,  the petitioner[,] OR the
 child's attorney or upon the court's own motion, made at any time during

 S. 4767                             3
 
 the duration of the order, if the child  protective  agency  has  failed
 substantially  to provide the respondent with adequate supervision or to
 observe the terms and conditions of the order, the court may direct  the
 child protective agency to observe such terms and conditions and provide
 adequate  supervision  or  may  make  any  order  authorized pursuant to
 section two hundred fifty-five OR ONE THOUSAND FIFTEEN-A of this act.
   (e) [Upon application of] IF, PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE PERIOD OF
 AN ADJOURNMENT IN CONTEMPLATION OF DISMISSAL, A MOTION OR ORDER TO  SHOW
 CAUSE  IS  FILED  BY  the petitioner or the child's attorney or upon the
 court's own motion, made at any time during the duration of  the  order,
 [the]  THAT  ALLEGES  A  VIOLATION  OF  THE  TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE
 ADJOURNMENT, THE PERIOD OF THE ADJOURNMENT IN CONTEMPLATION OF DISMISSAL
 IS TOLLED AS OF THE DATE OF SUCH FILING UNTIL  THE  ENTRY  OF  AN  ORDER
 DISPOSING  OF  THE  MOTION OR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.  THE court may REVOKE
 THE ADJOURNMENT IN CONTEMPLATION OF DISMISSAL AND restore the matter  to
 the  calendar  OR  THE COURT MAY EXTEND THE PERIOD OF THE ADJOURNMENT IN
 CONTEMPLATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (B) OF THIS  SECTION,
 if  the  court  finds  after a hearing ON THE ALLEGED VIOLATION that the
 respondent has failed substantially to observe the terms and  conditions
 of the order or to cooperate with the supervising child protective agen-
 cy.  [In  such  event]  WHERE  THE  COURT HAS REVOKED THE ADJOURNMENT IN
 CONTEMPLATION OF DISMISSAL AND RESTORED THE MATTER TO THE CALENDAR:
   (I) IN THE CASE OF AN ADJOURNMENT IN CONTEMPLATION OF DISMISSAL ISSUED
 PRIOR TO THE ENTRY OF A FACT-FINDING ORDER, unless the  parties  consent
 to  an  order  pursuant  to section one thousand fifty-one of this [act]
 ARTICLE or unless the petition is dismissed  upon  the  consent  of  the
 petitioner,  the court shall thereupon proceed to a fact-finding hearing
 under this article no later than sixty days after [such] THE application
 TO RESTORE THE MATTER TO THE CALENDAR, unless such period is extended by
 the court for good cause shown; OR
   (II) IN THE CASE OF  AN  ADJOURNMENT  IN  CONTEMPLATION  OF  DISMISSAL
 ISSUED AFTER THE ENTRY OF A FACT-FINDING ORDER, THE COURT SHALL THEREUP-
 ON  PROCEED  TO A DISPOSITIONAL HEARING UNDER THIS ARTICLE NO LATER THAN
 THIRTY DAYS AFTER THE APPLICATION TO RESTORE THE MATTER TO THE CALENDAR,
 UNLESS SUCH PERIOD IS EXTENDED BY THE COURT FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN.
   (III) THE COURT SHALL STATE ITS REASONS ON THE RECORD FOR REVOKING  AN
 ADJOURNMENT  IN  CONTEMPLATION  OF DISMISSAL AND RESTORING THE MATTER TO
 THE CALENDAR UNDER THIS SUBDIVISION.
   (f) If the proceeding is not [so] restored to the calendar AS A RESULT
 OF A FINDING OF AN ALLEGED VIOLATION PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (E) OF THIS
 SECTION AND IF THE ADJOURNMENT IN  CONTEMPLATION  OF  DISMISSAL  IS  NOT
 EXTENDED  PURSUANT  TO SUBDIVISION (B) OF THIS SECTION, the petition is,
 at the expiration of the adjournment IN CONTEMPLATION OF DISMISSAL peri-
 od, deemed to have been dismissed by the court in furtherance of justice
 [unless an application is pending pursuant to subdivision  (e)  of  this
 section].  If  [such application is granted] THE COURT FINDS A VIOLATION
 PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (E) OF THIS SECTION, the petition shall  not  be
 dismissed  and  shall  proceed in accordance with the provisions of such
 subdivision (e).
   (g) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section,  IF  A  MOTION  OR
 ORDER  TO  SHOW CAUSE IS FILED ALLEGING A VIOLATION PURSUANT TO SUBDIVI-
 SION (E) OF THIS SECTION AND THE COURT FINDS THAT REMOVAL OF  THE  CHILD
 FROM THE HOME IS NECESSARY PURSUANT TO SECTION ONE THOUSAND TWENTY-SEVEN
 OF  THIS ARTICLE DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE VIOLATION MOTION OR ORDER TO
 SHOW CAUSE, the court[,] may, at any time  prior  to  dismissal  of  the
 petition  pursuant  to  subdivision  (f) OF THIS SECTION, issue an order

 S. 4767                             4
 
 authorized pursuant to section one thousand twenty-seven OF  THIS  ARTI-
 CLE.  NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL PRECLUDE THE CHILD PROTECTIVE AGENCY
 FROM TAKING EMERGENCY ACTION PURSUANT TO SECTION  ONE  THOUSAND  TWENTY-
 FOUR  OF  THIS  ARTICLE WHERE COMPELLED BY THE TERMS OF THAT SECTION. IF
 THE VIOLATION IS FOUND AND THE MATTER IS RESTORED TO THE  CALENDAR,  THE
 COURT MAY MAKE FURTHER ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIVISION (E) OF THIS
 SECTION.
   §  2. Section 1053 of the family court act, as added by chapter 962 of
 the laws of 1970 and subdivision (c) as amended by  chapter  41  of  the
 laws of 2010, is amended to read as follows:
   § 1053. Suspended judgment.  (a) Rules of court shall define permissi-
 ble terms and conditions of a suspended judgment. These terms and condi-
 tions  shall  relate  to  the  acts  or omissions of the parent or other
 person legally responsible for the care of the child.
   (b) The maximum duration of any term or condition of a suspended judg-
 ment is one year, unless the court finds at the conclusion of that peri-
 od, upon a hearing, that exceptional circumstances require an  extension
 thereof for A PERIOD OF UP TO an additional year.  THE COURT SHALL STATE
 ITS  REASONS  ON THE RECORD FOR EXTENDING A PERIOD OF SUSPENDED JUDGMENT
 UNDER THIS SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING ITS REASONS FOR CHANGES IN  THE  TERMS
 AND CONDITIONS, IF ANY.
   (c)  Except  as  provided  for herein, in any order issued pursuant to
 this section, the court may require the child protective agency to  make
 progress  reports to the court, the parties, and the child's attorney on
 the implementation of such order. Where  the  order  of  disposition  is
 issued  upon  the  consent of the parties and the child's attorney, such
 agency shall report to the court, the parties and the  child's  attorney
 no  later  than  ninety days after the issuance of the order, unless the
 court determines that the facts and circumstances of  the  case  do  not
 require such report to be made.
   (D) THE ORDER OF SUSPENDED JUDGMENT MUST SET FORTH THE DURATION, TERMS
 AND  CONDITIONS  OF  THE  SUSPENDED  JUDGMENT,  AND  MUST CONTAIN A DATE
 CERTAIN FOR A COURT REVIEW NOT LATER THAN THIRTY DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPI-
 RATION OF THE PERIOD OF SUSPENDED JUDGMENT. THE ORDER OF SUSPENDED JUDG-
 MENT ALSO MUST STATE IN CONSPICUOUS PRINT THAT A  FAILURE  TO  OBEY  THE
 ORDER  MAY  LEAD TO ITS REVOCATION AND TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ORDER THAT
 MIGHT HAVE BEEN MADE AT THE TIME JUDGMENT WAS SUSPENDED. A COPY  OF  THE
 ORDER OF SUSPENDED JUDGMENT MUST BE FURNISHED TO THE RESPONDENT.
   (E)  NOT  LATER THAN SIXTY DAYS BEFORE THE EXPIRATION OF THE PERIOD OF
 SUSPENDED JUDGMENT, THE PETITIONER SHALL  FILE  A  REPORT,  PURSUANT  TO
 SECTION  ONE THOUSAND FIFTY-EIGHT OF THIS ARTICLE, WITH THE FAMILY COURT
 AND ALL PARTIES, INCLUDING THE RESPONDENT AND HIS OR HER  ATTORNEY,  THE
 ATTORNEY  FOR  THE CHILD AND INTERVENORS, IF ANY, REGARDING THE RESPOND-
 ENT'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE SUSPENDED  JUDGMENT.  THE  REPORT
 SHALL  BE  REVIEWED  BY THE COURT ON THE SCHEDULED COURT DATE.  UNLESS A
 MOTION OR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HAS BEEN FILED PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION  OF
 THE  PERIOD  OF  SUSPENDED  JUDGMENT  ALLEGING A VIOLATION OR SEEKING AN
 EXTENSION OF THE PERIOD OF THE SUSPENDED  JUDGMENT,  THE  TERMS  OF  THE
 DISPOSITION  OF  SUSPENDED  JUDGMENT  SHALL BE DEEMED SATISFIED. IN SUCH
 EVENT, THE COURT'S JURISDICTION OVER THE PROCEEDING SHALL BE TERMINATED.
 HOWEVER, THE ORDER OF FACT-FINDING AND THE PRESUMPTIVE  EFFECT  OF  SUCH
 FINDING  UPON  RETENTION OF THE REPORT OF SUSPECTED ABUSE AND NEGLECT ON
 THE STATE CENTRAL REGISTER IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH (B) OF  SUBDIVI-
 SION EIGHT OF SECTION FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW
 SHALL  REMAIN IN EFFECT UNLESS THE COURT GRANTS A MOTION BY THE RESPOND-

 S. 4767                             5
 
 ENT TO VACATE THE ORDER OF FACT-FINDING PURSUANT TO SECTION ONE THOUSAND
 SIXTY-ONE OF THIS ARTICLE.
   §  3.  Section 1071 of the family court act, as amended by chapter 437
 of the laws of 2006, is amended to read as follows:
   § 1071. Failure to comply with terms and conditions of suspended judg-
 ment. If, prior to the expiration of the period of the  suspended  judg-
 ment,  a  motion  or  order  to  show cause is filed that alleges that a
 parent or other person legally responsible for a child's  care  violated
 the  terms  and  conditions of a suspended judgment issued under section
 one thousand fifty-three of this article, the period  of  the  suspended
 judgment  shall be tolled AS OF THE DATE OF SUCH FILING pending disposi-
 tion of the motion or order to show cause.  IF A MOTION OR ORDER TO SHOW
 CAUSE ALLEGING A VIOLATION HAS BEEN  FILED  AND  THE  COURT  FINDS  THAT
 REMOVAL  OF THE CHILD FROM THE HOME PENDING DISPOSITION OF THE MOTION OR
 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IS NECESSARY PURSUANT TO SECTION ONE THOUSAND  TWEN-
 TY-SEVEN  OF THIS ARTICLE, THE COURT MAY ISSUE AN ORDER PURSUANT TO SUCH
 SECTION ONE THOUSAND  TWENTY-SEVEN.    NOTHING  IN  THIS  SECTION  SHALL
 PRECLUDE THE CHILD PROTECTIVE AGENCY FROM TAKING EMERGENCY ACTION PURSU-
 ANT  TO SECTION ONE THOUSAND TWENTY-FOUR OF THIS ARTICLE WHERE COMPELLED
 BY THE TERMS OF THAT  SECTION.  If,  after  A  hearing  ON  THE  ALLEGED
 VIOLATION,  the court is satisfied by competent proof that the parent or
 other person violated the order of suspended  judgment,  the  court  may
 revoke  the  suspension  of judgment and enter any order that might have
 been made at the time judgment was suspended OR MAY EXTEND THE PERIOD OF
 SUSPENDED JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (B) OF SECTION  ONE  THOUSAND
 FIFTY-THREE  OF  THIS  ARTICLE.  THE  COURT  SHALL STATE ITS REASONS FOR
 REVOKING OR EXTENDING A PERIOD OF SUSPENDED JUDGMENT UNDER THIS SECTION.
   § 4. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day  after  it  shall
 have become a law.

Comments

Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.

Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Senate Bill S4767

Share this bill

Sponsored By

Tony Avella