Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
Jun 20, 2018 |
committed to rules |
Feb 28, 2018 |
advanced to third reading |
Feb 27, 2018 |
2nd report cal. |
Feb 13, 2018 |
1st report cal.503 |
Jan 03, 2018 |
referred to children and families |
May 16, 2017 |
referred to children and families |
Senate Bill S6402
2017-2018 Legislative Session
Sponsored By
(R, C, IP) Senate District
Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Rules Committee
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Delivered to Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
Votes
co-Sponsors
(D) Senate District
2017-S6402 (ACTIVE) - Details
2017-S6402 (ACTIVE) - Summary
Establishes the intent of the legislature to generally defer to parental choices regarding the care, custody and control of their children; mandates that the death of a parent shall be a factor when considering a grandparent's standing to receive visitation or custody; directs that costs be payable by an unsuccessful petitioner where a contest was brought in bad faith.
2017-S6402 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo
BILL NUMBER: S6402 TITLE OF BILL : An act to amend the domestic relations law, in relation to the rights of grandparents with respect to visitation rights or custody of minor children PURPOSE OF THE BILL : The purpose of this bill is to require that grandparents be granted legal standing by a judge before being considered for visitation rights or custody of a minor child. SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS : Section 1 amends part 1 of section 72 of the domestic relations law to establish the requirements of the petitioner and the court in a proceeding seeking to overturn a parental decision regarding custody or visitation of their child. Subsection (a) specifies that any child in question must reside in this state. Subsection (b) stipulates that a strong presumption exists in favor of parental decisions and any petitioner wishing to overturn such a decision must allege with specificity that the child would experience significant harm to his or her health, safety, or welfare if visitation were denied. Additionally, the court shall be required to check the criminal
2017-S6402 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 6402 2017-2018 Regular Sessions I N S E N A T E May 16, 2017 ___________ Introduced by Sen. MARCHIONE -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Children and Families AN ACT to amend the domestic relations law, in relation to the rights of grandparents with respect to visitation rights or custody of minor children THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 72 of the domestic relations law, as amended by chapter 657 of the laws of 2003, is amended to read as follows: § 72. Special proceeding or habeas corpus to obtain visitation rights or custody in respect to certain infant grandchildren. 1. (A) Where [either or both of the parents of a minor child, residing within this state, is or are deceased, or where] circumstances show that conditions exist which equity would see fit to intervene, a grandparent or the grandparents of [such child] A MINOR CHILD, RESIDING WITHIN THIS STATE may apply to the supreme court by commencing a special proceeding or for a writ of habeas corpus to have such child brought before such court, or may apply to the family court pursuant to subdivision (b) of section six hundred fifty-one of the family court act[; and on]. (B) WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER SUCH GRANDPARENT OR GRANDPARENTS SHALL HAVE STANDING TO COMMENCE SUCH PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION, A STRONG PRESUMPTION EXISTS IN FAVOR OF PARENTAL DECI- SIONS CONCERNING VISITATION. FURTHER, THE COURT SHALL NOT APPOINT A GUARDIAN AD LITEM UNTIL SUCH TIME AS STANDING OF SUCH GRANDPARENT OR GRANDPARENTS HAS BEEN DETERMINED. A PETITIONER SEEKING TO OVERTURN A PARENTAL DECISION MUST ALLEGE, WITH DETAIL AND SPECIFICITY, THAT THE CHILD WOULD EXPERIENCE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO HIS OR HER HEALTH, SAFETY, OR WELFARE IF VISITATION WERE DENIED. PRIOR TO FILING THE PETITION, THE PETITIONER MUST HAVE MADE A GOOD FAITH ATTEMPT AT RECONCILIATION WITH THE RESPONDENT AND THE PETITION MUST ALLEGE SO WITH SPECIFICITY, AND MUST BE VERIFIED OR ACCOMPANIED BY A VERIFIED AFFIDAVIT. THE PETITIONER EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted.
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.