S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                   4897
 
                        2019-2020 Regular Sessions
 
                           I N  A S S E M B L Y
 
                             February 5, 2019
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by M. of A. SCHIMMINGER, KOLB -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of
   A. BARCLAY, CROUCH, GALEF, HAWLEY, PALMESANO -- read once and referred
   to the Committee on Judiciary
 
 AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to  enact-
   ing  the  "medical  liability  reform act"; and to repeal subparagraph
   (ii) of paragraph 1 of subdivision (d) of section 3101 of such law and
   rules relating to disclosure of expert witnesses  in  medical,  dental
   and podiatric medical malpractice actions
 
   THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may  be  cited  as
 the "medical liability reform act".
   § 2. Section 3012-a of the civil practice law and rules, as amended by
 chapter 507 of the laws of 1987, is amended to read as follows:
   §  3012-a. Certificate of merit in medical, dental and podiatric malp-
 ractice actions. (a) In any action  for  medical,  dental  or  podiatric
 malpractice,  the  complaint  shall  be  accompanied  by  a certificate,
 executed by the attorney for the plaintiff, declaring that:
   (1) the attorney has reviewed the facts of the case and has  consulted
 with at least one physician in medical malpractice actions, at least one
 dentist  in  dental  malpractice  actions  or at least one podiatrist in
 podiatric malpractice actions who is licensed to practice in this  state
 [or  any  other state] and who the attorney reasonably believes is know-
 ledgeable in the relevant issues involved in the particular action,  AND
 WHO  HAS SIGNED AN AFFIDAVIT CONCLUDING THAT THERE IS A REASONABLE BASIS
 FOR THE COMMENCEMENT OF AN ACTION, WITH SUCH AFFIDAVIT TO ACCOMPANY  THE
 CERTIFICATE  REQUIRED  BY  THIS  SECTION,  and  that  the  attorney  has
 concluded on the basis of such review [and], consultation AND  AFFIDAVIT
 that there is a reasonable basis for the commencement of such action; or
   (2)  the  attorney was unable to obtain the consultation AND AFFIDAVIT
 required by paragraph one of this subdivision because  a  limitation  of
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.
              

                                                            LBD09132-01-9

 A. 4897                             2
 
 time,  established  by article two of this chapter, would bar the action
 and that the certificate required by paragraph one of  this  subdivision
 could  not reasonably be obtained before such time expired. If a certif-
 icate is executed pursuant to this subdivision, the certificate required
 by  this  section shall be filed within ninety days after service of the
 complaint; or
   (3) the attorney was unable to obtain the consultation  AND  AFFIDAVIT
 required  by  paragraph one of this subdivision because the attorney had
 made three separate good faith attempts with three separate  physicians,
 dentists  or podiatrists, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph
 one of this subdivision to obtain such consultation and  none  of  those
 contacted would agree to such a consultation.
   (b) Where a certificate is required pursuant to this section, a single
 certificate  shall  be  filed  for  each  action,  even if more than one
 defendant has been named in the complaint or is subsequently named.
   (c) Where the attorney intends to rely solely on the doctrine of  "res
 ipsa  loquitur", this section shall be inapplicable.  In such cases, the
 complaint shall be accompanied by a certificate, executed by the  attor-
 ney, declaring that the attorney is solely relying on such doctrine and,
 for that reason, is not filing a certificate required by this section.
   (d)  If  a request by the plaintiff for the records of the plaintiff's
 medical or dental treatment by the defendants has  been  made  and  such
 records  have  not been produced, the plaintiff shall not be required to
 serve the certificate required by this section until ninety  days  after
 such records have been produced.
   (e)  [For  purposes  of this section, and subject to the provisions of
 section thirty-one hundred one of this chapter, an attorney who  submits
 a  certificate as required by paragraph one or two of subdivision (a) of
 this section and the physician, dentist  or  podiatrist  with  whom  the
 attorney consulted shall not be required to disclose the identity of the
 physician,  dentist  or  podiatrist  consulted  and the contents of such
 consultation; provided, however, that when the] WHEN AN attorney makes a
 claim under paragraph three of subdivision (a) of this section  that  he
 OR SHE was unable to obtain the required consultation AND AFFIDAVIT with
 the physician, dentist or podiatrist, the court may, upon the request of
 a  defendant  made  prior  to  compliance  by  the  plaintiff  with  the
 provisions of [section thirty-one hundred] ARTICLE  THIRTY-ONE  of  this
 chapter,  require  the  attorney  to  divulge  to the court the names of
 physicians, dentists or podiatrists refusing such consultation.
   (f) The provisions of this section shall not be applicable to a plain-
 tiff who is not represented by an attorney.
   (g) The plaintiff may, in lieu of serving the certificate AND  AFFIDA-
 VIT  required  by this section, provide the defendant or defendants with
 the information required by paragraph one of subdivision (d) of  section
 thirty-one  hundred  one  of  this  chapter  within  the  period of time
 prescribed by this section.
   (H) WHERE A CERTIFICATE AND AFFIDAVIT IS  REQUIRED  PURSUANT  TO  THIS
 SECTION, THE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE SUCH CERTIFICATE AND AFFIDAVIT SHALL
 REQUIRE  THAT  THE  ACTION  BE  DEEMED  A DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT FOR
 NEGLECT TO FILE THE ACTION FOR THE PURPOSES OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED  FIVE
 OF THIS CHAPTER.
   §  3.  Section  1600  of the civil practice law and rules, as added by
 chapter 682 of the laws of 1986, is amended to read as follows:
   § 1600. Definitions. As used in this article [the  term  "non-economic
 loss" includes but is not limited to pain and suffering, mental anguish,
 loss of consortium or other damages for non-economic loss]:

 A. 4897                             3
 
   1. "NONECONOMIC DAMAGES" MEANS NONPECUNIARY DAMAGES ARISING FROM PAIN,
 SUFFERING,  INCONVENIENCE,  PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT OR DISFIGUREMENT, MENTAL
 ANGUISH, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, LOSS OF SOCIETY AND COMPANIONSHIP, LOSS  OF
 CONSORTIUM, INJURY TO REPUTATION, HUMILIATION AND ALL OTHER NONPECUNIARY
 DAMAGES.
   2.  "ACTUAL  ECONOMIC  DAMAGES" MEANS OBJECTIVELY VERIFIABLE PECUNIARY
 DAMAGES ARISING FROM MEDICAL EXPENSES AND MEDICAL CARE, LOSS OF EARNINGS
 AND EARNING CAPACITY, BURIAL COSTS, LOSS OF USE  OF  PROPERTY,  LOSS  OF
 GUIDANCE, COSTS OF REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF PROPERTY, COSTS OF OBTAINING
 SUBSTITUTE  DOMESTIC  SERVICES,  LOSS OF EMPLOYMENT, LOSS OF BUSINESS OR
 EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES, REHABILITATION SERVICES,  CUSTODIAL  CARE  AND
 ALL OTHER PECUNIARY DAMAGES.
   §  4.  Section  1601  of the civil practice law and rules, as added by
 chapter 682 of the laws of 1986 and subdivision 1 as amended by  chapter
 635 of the laws of 1996, is amended to read as follows:
   §  1601.  Limited  liability  of persons jointly liable.  1.  Notwith-
 standing any other provision of law, when a verdict or  decision  in  an
 action or claim for personal injury is determined in favor of a claimant
 in  an  action  involving two or more tortfeasors jointly liable or in a
 claim against the state [and the liability of a defendant is found to be
 fifty percent or less of the total liability  assigned  to  all  persons
 liable], the liability of [such] A defendant to the claimant for [non-e-
 conomic  loss]  THE  CLAIMANT'S  ACTUAL ECONOMIC DAMAGES AND NONECONOMIC
 DAMAGES shall not exceed that defendant's equitable share determined  in
 accordance  with  the  relative  culpability  of  each person causing or
 contributing to the total liability for [non-economic loss]  THE  CLAIM-
 ANT'S ACTUAL ECONOMIC DAMAGES AND NONECONOMIC DAMAGES; provided, however
 that  the culpable conduct of any person not a party to the action shall
 not be considered in determining  any  equitable  share  herein  if  the
 claimant  proves  that with due diligence he or she was unable to obtain
 jurisdiction over such person in said action (or in a claim against  the
 state, in a court of this state); and further provided that the culpable
 conduct of any person shall not be considered in determining any equita-
 ble share herein to the extent that action against such person is barred
 because  the  claimant  has not sustained a "grave injury" as defined in
 section eleven of the workers' compensation law.
   2. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect or impair  any
 right  of  a  tortfeasor under section 15-108 of the general obligations
 law.
   § 5. The civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a new arti-
 cle 50-C to read as follows:
                               ARTICLE 50-C
                         LIMITATION ON NONECONOMIC
                                  DAMAGES
 SECTION 5051. DEFINITIONS.
         5052. DAMAGE AWARDS.
   § 5051. DEFINITIONS. AS USED IN THIS ARTICLE:
   1. "NONECONOMIC DAMAGES" MEANS NONPECUNIARY DAMAGES ARISING FROM PAIN,
 SUFFERING, INCONVENIENCE, PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT OR  DISFIGUREMENT,  MENTAL
 ANGUISH,  EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, LOSS OF SOCIETY AND COMPANIONSHIP, LOSS OF
 CONSORTIUM, INJURY TO REPUTATION, HUMILIATION AND ALL OTHER NONPECUNIARY
 DAMAGES.
   2. "ACTUAL ECONOMIC DAMAGES" MEANS  OBJECTIVELY  VERIFIABLE  PECUNIARY
 DAMAGES ARISING FROM MEDICAL EXPENSES AND MEDICAL CARE, LOSS OF EARNINGS
 AND  EARNING  CAPACITY,  BURIAL  COSTS, LOSS OF USE OF PROPERTY, LOSS OF
 GUIDANCE, COSTS OF REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF PROPERTY, COSTS OF OBTAINING

 A. 4897                             4
 
 SUBSTITUTE DOMESTIC SERVICES, LOSS OF EMPLOYMENT, LOSS  OF  BUSINESS  OR
 EMPLOYMENT  OPPORTUNITIES,  REHABILITATION  SERVICES, CUSTODIAL CARE AND
 ALL OTHER PECUNIARY DAMAGES.
   3.  "PERSONAL  INJURY  ACTION"  MEANS  ANY ACTION, INCLUDING BUT IN NO
 MANNER LIMITED TO MEDICAL, DENTAL  AND  PODIATRIC  MALPRACTICE  ACTIONS,
 WHETHER  IN  TORT,  CONTRACT  OR OTHERWISE, IN WHICH THE PLAINTIFF SEEKS
 DAMAGES FOR INJURY TO THE PERSON OR WRONGFUL DEATH.
   4. "COMPENSATION" MEANS MONETARY AWARDS.
   § 5052. DAMAGE AWARDS. 1. IN ANY PERSONAL INJURY ACTION, THE  PREVAIL-
 ING  PLAINTIFF  OR  PERSON  WHO CLAIMS INJURY BY OR THROUGH SUCH INJURED
 PLAINTIFF MAY BE AWARDED:
   (A) COMPENSATION FOR ACTUAL ECONOMIC DAMAGES SUFFERED BY  THE  INJURED
 PLAINTIFF  OR  OTHER PERSON WHO CLAIMS INJURY BY OR THROUGH SUCH INJURED
 PLAINTIFF; AND
   (B) COMPENSATION FOR  NONECONOMIC  DAMAGES  SUFFERED  BY  THE  INJURED
 PLAINTIFF  OR OTHER PERSON WHO CLAIMS INJURY THROUGH SUCH INJURED PLAIN-
 TIFF, OR AS A CONSEQUENCE OF INJURY TO SUCH INJURED  PLAINTIFF,  NOT  TO
 EXCEED TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS.
   2. THE DAMAGE AWARD RECOVERABLE FOR A PERSONAL INJURY ACTION SHALL NOT
 EXCEED THE AMOUNT PERMITTED TO BE AWARDED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION ONE OF
 THIS SECTION REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF DEFENDANTS TO SUCH ACTION. IF A
 JURY  AWARDS  AN AMOUNT FOR NONECONOMIC DAMAGES THAT EXCEEDS THE LIMITA-
 TION UNDER SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION, THE COURT SHALL  REDUCE  THE
 AMOUNT TO CONFORM TO THE LIMITATION.
   3.  NO  OTHER  PERSONAL INJURY ACTION MAY BE BROUGHT BY THE PREVAILING
 PLAINTIFF OR OTHER PERSON WHO CLAIMS INJURY THROUGH SUCH INJURED  PLAIN-
 TIFF,  OR  AS  A  CONSEQUENCE  OF  INJURY  TO SUCH INJURED PLAINTIFF, TO
 RECOVER AMOUNTS FOR THE INJURY OR OCCURRENCE THAT  GIVES  RISE  TO  SUCH
 PERSONAL INJURY ACTION.
   4.  WHERE A DEFENDANT HAS SUCCESSFULLY PLEADED AND PROVED CONTRIBUTORY
 NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF THE PREVAILING PLAINTIFF PURSUANT  TO  ARTICLE
 FOURTEEN-A OF THIS CHAPTER, THE DAMAGE AWARD TO THE PREVAILING PLAINTIFF
 SHALL BE DIMINISHED FROM THE AMOUNTS AWARDED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION ONE
 OF  THIS  SECTION BY THE PROPORTION WHICH THE CULPABLE CONDUCT ATTRIBUT-
 ABLE TO THE PREVAILING PLAINTIFF BEARS TO  THE  CULPABLE  CONDUCT  WHICH
 CAUSED THE DAMAGES.
   5.  NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO PREVENT THE APPLICA-
 TION OF SECTION FORTY-FIVE HUNDRED  FORTY-FIVE  OF  THIS  CHAPTER  TO  A
 DAMAGE  AWARD  FOR A PERSONAL INJURY ACTION MADE PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION
 ONE OF THIS SECTION.
   6. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, THE JURY SHALL  NOT  BE
 INSTRUCTED OF THE LIMITATION ON NONECONOMIC DAMAGES AS SET FORTH IN THIS
 ARTICLE.
   §  6.  Subparagraph  (i)  of paragraph 1 of subdivision (d) of section
 3101 of the civil practice law and rules, as amended by chapter  184  of
 the laws of 1988, is amended to read as follows:
   (i) Upon request, each party shall identify each person whom the party
 expects  to  call  as  an  expert witness at trial and shall disclose in
 reasonable detail the subject matter on which each expert is expected to
 testify, the substance of the facts and opinions on which each expert is
 expected to testify, the qualifications of each  expert  witness  and  a
 summary of the grounds for each expert's opinion. However, where a party
 for  good  cause  shown retains an expert an insufficient period of time
 before the commencement of trial to give appropriate notice thereof, the
 party shall not thereupon be precluded  from  introducing  the  expert's
 testimony  at  the  trial  solely  on grounds of noncompliance with this

 A. 4897                             5
 
 paragraph. In that instance, upon motion of any party, made before or at
 trial, or on its own initiative, the court may make whatever  order  may
 be  just.  [In an action for medical, dental or podiatric malpractice, a
 party, in responding to a request, may omit the names of medical, dental
 or  podiatric experts but shall be required to disclose all other infor-
 mation concerning such experts otherwise required by this paragraph.]
   § 7. Subparagraph (ii) of paragraph 1 of subdivision  (d)  of  section
 3101  of the civil practice law and rules is REPEALED and a new subpara-
 graph (ii) is added to read as follows:
   (II) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS ARTICLE OR OF ARTICLE
 THIRTY-TWO OF THIS CHAPTER, IN AN ACTION FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL  OR  PODIA-
 TRIC  MALPRACTICE,  AT  THE  TIMES  AND  IN THE SEQUENCE DIRECTED BY THE
 COURT, SUCH TIMES TO BE PRIOR TO THE SERVICE AND FILING  OF  A  NOTE  OF
 ISSUE  UNLESS  THE  COURT  DIRECTS  OTHERWISE AND PRESERVES THE RIGHT OF
 EVERY PARTY TO DEPOSE A PERSON WHOSE DISCLOSURE OCCURS SUBSEQUENT TO THE
 FILING OF A NOTE OF ISSUE,  EACH  PARTY  SHALL  DISCLOSE  TO  THE  OTHER
 PARTIES  THE  IDENTITY OF ANY PERSON WHO MAY BE USED AT TRIAL TO PROVIDE
 EXPERT TESTIMONY IN THE CASE AND EACH SUCH DISCLOSURE SHALL BE  ACCOMPA-
 NIED  BY A WRITTEN REPORT PREPARED AND SIGNED BY SUCH PERSON. THE REPORT
 SHALL CONTAIN A COMPLETE STATEMENT OF ALL OPINIONS TO BE  EXPRESSED  AND
 THE BASIS AND REASONS THEREFOR; THE DATA OR OTHER INFORMATION CONSIDERED
 BY  SUCH  PERSON  IN  FORMING THE OPINIONS; ANY EXHIBITS TO BE USED AS A
 SUMMARY OF OR SUPPORT  FOR  THE  OPINIONS;  THE  QUALIFICATIONS  OF  THE
 PERSON,  INCLUDING  A  LIST  OF  ALL PUBLICATIONS AUTHORED BY THE PERSON
 DURING THE PRECEDING TEN YEARS; THE COMPENSATION  TO  BE  PAID  FOR  THE
 PERSON'S  CONSIDERATION  OF DATA OR OTHER INFORMATION AND FOR HIS OR HER
 TESTIMONY; AND A LISTING OF ANY OTHER CASES  IN  WHICH  THE  PERSON  HAS
 TESTIFIED AS AN EXPERT AT TRIAL OR BY ORAL DEPOSITION WITHIN THE PRECED-
 ING  FOUR  YEARS. EACH PARTY SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PRODUCE EACH PERSON SO
 IDENTIFIED BY SUCH PARTY AS AN EXPERT WITNESS, FOR EXAMINATION UPON ORAL
 DEPOSITION UPON RECEIPT OF A NOTICE TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION  IN  ACCORD-
 ANCE WITH RULE THIRTY-ONE HUNDRED SEVEN OF THIS ARTICLE. UNLESS MANIFEST
 INJUSTICE  WOULD RESULT, THE COURT SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE PARTY NOTICING
 AN ORAL DEPOSITION OF SUCH AN EXPERT WITNESS PAY SUCH WITNESS A  REASON-
 ABLE FEE FOR TIME SPENT IN ATTENDING SUCH ORAL DEPOSITION.  IF ANY PARTY
 FAILS  TO  IDENTIFY A PERSON AS AN EXPERT WITNESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 PROVISIONS OF THIS CLAUSE, OR IF ANY PARTY  FAILS  TO  MAKE  ANY  PERSON
 IDENTIFIED  BY THE PARTY AS AN EXPERT WITNESS AVAILABLE FOR ORAL DEPOSI-
 TION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CLAUSE, THAT PARTY  SHALL
 BE  PRECLUDED  FROM OFFERING SUCH EXPERT'S TESTIMONY AT THE TRIAL OF THE
 ACTION.
   § 8. This act shall take effect immediately; provided,  however,  that
 sections  two, three, six and seven of this act shall take effect on the
 ninetieth day after this act shall have become a law and shall apply  to
 actions  commenced  and  claims  filed on or after the effective date of
 such sections. The provisions of sections four  and  five  of  this  act
 shall  apply  to  causes  of  action and claims accruing on or after the
 effective date of this act.