Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
Jan 21, 2020 |
referred to consumer protection |
Senate Bill S7340
2019-2020 Legislative Session
Sponsored By
(D, WF) 47th Senate District
Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Consumer Protection Committee
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Delivered to Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
2019-S7340 (ACTIVE) - Details
2019-S7340 (ACTIVE) - Summary
Requires that a billing statement delivered to the customer by an energy services company include a side-by-side comparison showing both the price charged by the energy service company for commodity and delivery service during the prior billing period, and the price the customer would have paid had they taken commodity and delivery service from their local utility corporation or municipality; and requires an energy service company to provide each of its customers with an annual statement comparing the price charged by the energy service company for commodity and delivery services and other energy-related value-added products over the prior twelve-month period with the price such customer would have paid had they taken commodity and delivery service from their local utility corporation or municipality.
2019-S7340 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo
BILL NUMBER: S7340 SPONSOR: HOYLMAN TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the general business law, in relation to requiring comparison of prices charged by energy services companies SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 of this bill adds two new subdivisions 9 and 10 to Section 349-d of the General Business Law (Energy services company consumers bill of rights.) The new subdivision 9 would require a side-by-side comparison on the first page of ESCO customers' billing statements of the price the ESCO charged during the prior billing period, compared to the price the customer would have paid if they had received service from their local utility corporation or municipality. It would also require ESCOs to provide an itemized list of prices charged by the ESCO for any energy- related value-added products during such billing period.
2019-S7340 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 7340 I N S E N A T E January 21, 2020 ___________ Introduced by Sen. HOYLMAN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Consumer Protection AN ACT to amend the general business law, in relation to requiring comparison of prices charged by energy services companies THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Subdivisions 9, 10, 11 and 12 of section 349-d of the general business law, subdivision 9 as amended by section 34 of part A of chapter 62 of the laws of 2011 and subdivisions 10, 11 and 12 as added by chapter 416 of the laws of 2010, are amended to read as follows: 9. THE FIRST PAGE OF EACH BILLING STATEMENT FROM AN ESCO DELIVERED TO THE CUSTOMER, EITHER BY THE ESCO DIRECTLY OR BY A UTILITY CORPORATION, BY A MUNICIPALITY OR BY ANY OTHER METHOD, SHALL INCLUDE A SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON SHOWING BOTH THE PRICE CHARGED BY THE ESCO FOR COMMODITY AND DELIVERY SERVICE DURING THE PRIOR BILLING PERIOD, AND THE PRICE THE CUSTOMER WOULD HAVE PAID HAD THEY TAKEN COMMODITY AND DELIVERY SERVICE FROM THEIR LOCAL UTILITY CORPORATION OR MUNICIPALITY, AS APPLICABLE. SUCH STATEMENT SHALL ALSO INCLUDE, SEPARATELY AND APART FROM THE PRICE CHARGED BY THE ESCO FOR COMMODITY AND DELIVERY SERVICE, AN ITEMIZED LIST OF PRICES CHARGED BY THE ESCO FOR ANY ENERGY-RELATED VALUE-ADDED PRODUCTS PROVIDED BY THE ESCO DURING THE PRIOR BILLING PERIOD. 10. EVERY TWELVE MONTHS, AN ESCO SHALL PROVIDE EACH OF ITS CUSTOMERS WITH A STATEMENT COMPARING THE PRICE CHARGED BY THE ESCO FOR COMMODITY AND DELIVERY SERVICES AND OTHER ENERGY-RELATED VALUE-ADDED PRODUCTS OVER THE PRIOR TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD WITH THE PRICE SUCH CUSTOMER WOULD HAVE PAID HAD THEY TAKEN COMMODITY AND DELIVERY SERVICE FROM THEIR LOCAL UTILITY CORPORATION OR MUNICIPALITY, AS APPLICABLE, FOR SUCH PERIOD. SUCH STATEMENT SHALL CONVEY SUCH INFORMATION IN A MANNER THAT UNAMBIG- UOUSLY CONVEYS WHETHER THE CUSTOMER IS SAVING MONEY OR PAYING A PREMIUM FOR SERVICE FROM THE ESCO OVER SUCH PERIOD. 11. The attorney general, upon his or her own motion or upon referral from the public service commission, the Long Island power authority or the department of state, may bring a civil action against any energy EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.