Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
Jan 05, 2022 |
referred to codes |
Jan 19, 2021 |
referred to codes |
Assembly Bill A2608
2021-2022 Legislative Session
Sponsored By
LAVINE
Archive: Last Bill Status - In Assembly Committee
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Delivered to Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
co-Sponsors
Thomas Abinanti
Judy Griffin
William Colton
multi-Sponsors
Sandy Galef
2021-A2608 (ACTIVE) - Details
2021-A2608 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 2608 2021-2022 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y January 19, 2021 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. LAVINE, ABINANTI, GRIFFIN, COLTON -- Multi-Spon- sored by -- M. of A. GALEF -- read once and referred to the Committee on Codes AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to the compar- ison of fingerprints THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 440.30 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new subdivision 1-b to read as follows: 1-B. IN RESPONSE TO A MOTION UNDER THIS SECTION, THE COURT MAY ORDER THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES TO COMPARE A FINGERPRINT OBTAINED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTIGATION OR PROSECUTION OF THE DEFENDANT AGAINST THE STATEWIDE AUTOMATED FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM, OR ITS SUCCESSOR SYSTEM, AND THE NATIONAL INTEGRATED AUTOMATED FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM, OR ITS SUCCESSOR SYSTEM, UPON THE COURT'S DETERMINATION THAT (1) SUCH FINGERPRINT COMPLIES WITH FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION OR STATE REQUIREMENTS, WHICHEVER ARE APPLICABLE AND AS SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE APPLIED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES SEEKING SUCH A COMPARISON AND (2) IF SUCH COMPARISON HAD BEEN CONDUCTED, AND IF THE RESULTS HAD BEEN ADMITTED IN THE TRIAL RESULTING IN THE JUDGMENT, A REASONABLE PROBABILITY EXISTS THAT THE VERDICT WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDANT, OR IN A CASE INVOLVING A PLEA OF GUILTY, IF THE RESULTS HAD BEEN AVAILABLE TO THE DEFENDANT PRIOR TO THE PLEA, A REASONABLE PROBABILITY EXISTS THAT THE CONVICTION WOULD NOT HAVE RESULTED. § 2. This act shall take effect immediately. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD06616-02-1
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.