A. 6678--B 2
§ 3. The article heading of article 17 of the election law is amended
to read as follows:
[VIOLATIONS OF] PROTECTING THE ELECTIVE FRANCHISE
§ 4. Article 17 of the election law is amended by adding a new title 2
to read as follows:
TITLE 2
JOHN R. LEWIS VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF NEW YORK
SECTION 17-200. LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE AND STATEMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY.
17-202. INTERPRETATION OF LAWS RELATED TO ELECTIVE FRANCHISE.
17-204. DEFINITIONS.
17-206. RIGHTS OF ACTION.
17-208. ASSISTANCE FOR LANGUAGE-MINORITY GROUPS.
17-210. PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION.
17-212. PRECLEARANCE.
17-214. RIGHT OF ACTION AGAINST VOTER INTIMIDATION, DECEPTION OR
OBSTRUCTION.
17-216. AUTHORITY TO ISSUE SUBPOENAS.
17-218. EXPEDITED JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AND PRELIMINARY RELIEF.
17-220. ATTORNEYS' FEES.
17-222. APPLICABILITY.
17-224. SEVERABILITY.
§ 17-200. LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE AND STATEMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY. IN
RECOGNITION OF THE PROTECTIONS FOR THE RIGHT TO VOTE PROVIDED BY THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WHICH SUBSTANTIALLY EXCEED THE
PROTECTIONS FOR THE RIGHT TO VOTE PROVIDED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE
UNITED STATES, AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEES OF
EQUAL PROTECTION, FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, AND FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION
UNDER THE LAW AND AGAINST THE DENIAL OR ABRIDGEMENT OF THE VOTING RIGHTS
OF MEMBERS OF A RACE, COLOR, OR LANGUAGE-MINORITY GROUP, IT IS THE
PUBLIC POLICY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK TO:
1. ENCOURAGE PARTICIPATION IN THE ELECTIVE FRANCHISE BY ALL ELIGIBLE
VOTERS TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT; AND
2. ENSURE THAT ELIGIBLE VOTERS WHO ARE MEMBERS OF RACIAL, COLOR, AND
LANGUAGE-MINORITY GROUPS SHALL HAVE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE
IN THE POLITICAL PROCESSES OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, AND ESPECIALLY TO
EXERCISE THE ELECTIVE FRANCHISE.
§ 17-202. INTERPRETATION OF LAWS RELATED TO ELECTIVE FRANCHISE. IN
FURTHER RECOGNITION OF THE PROTECTIONS FOR THE RIGHT TO VOTE PROVIDED BY
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, STATUTES, RULES AND REGU-
LATIONS, AND LOCAL LAWS OR ORDINANCES RELATED TO THE ELECTIVE FRANCHISE
SHALL BE CONSTRUED LIBERALLY IN FAVOR OF (A) PROTECTING THE RIGHT TO
CAST AN EFFECTIVE BALLOT; (B) ENSURING THAT ELIGIBLE VOTERS ARE NOT
IMPAIRED IN REGISTERING TO VOTE OR VOTING INCLUDING HAVING THEIR VOTES
COUNTED, AND (C) ENSURING EQUITABLE ACCESS WITH REGARD TO RACE, COLOR,
AND LANGUAGE-MINORITY GROUPS TO OPPORTUNITIES TO REGISTER TO VOTE AND TO
VOTE. THE AUTHORITY TO PRESCRIBE OR MAINTAIN VOTING OR ELECTIONS POLI-
CIES AND PRACTICES CANNOT BE SO EXERCISED AS TO UNNECESSARILY DENY OR
ABRIDGE THE RIGHT TO VOTE. POLICIES AND PRACTICES THAT BURDEN THE RIGHT
TO VOTE MUST BE NARROWLY TAILORED TO PROMOTE A COMPELLING POLICY JUSTI-
FICATION THAT MUST BE SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.
§ 17-204. DEFINITIONS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS TITLE:
1. "AT-LARGE" METHOD OF ELECTION MEANS A METHOD OF ELECTING MEMBERS TO
THE GOVERNING BODY OF A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: (A) IN WHICH ALL OF THE
VOTERS OF THE ENTIRE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION ELECT EACH OF THE MEMBERS TO
A. 6678--B 3
THE GOVERNING BODY; (B) IN WHICH THE CANDIDATES ARE REQUIRED TO RESIDE
WITHIN GIVEN AREAS OF THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION AND ALL OF THE VOTERS OF
THE ENTIRE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION ELECT EACH OF THE MEMBERS TO THE
GOVERNING BODY; OR (C) THAT COMBINES AT-LARGE ELECTIONS WITH DISTRICT-
BASED ELECTIONS, UNLESS THE ONLY MEMBER OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF A POLI-
TICAL SUBDIVISION ELECTED AT-LARGE HOLDS EXCLUSIVELY EXECUTIVE RESPONSI-
BILITIES. AT-LARGE METHOD OF ELECTION DOES NOT INCLUDE RANKED-CHOICE
VOTING, CUMULATIVE VOTING, AND LIMITED VOTING.
2. "DISTRICT-BASED" METHOD OF ELECTION MEANS A METHOD OF ELECTING
MEMBERS TO THE GOVERNING BODY OF A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION USING A
DISTRICTING OR REDISTRICTING PLAN IN WHICH EACH MEMBER OF THE GOVERNING
BODY RESIDES WITHIN A DISTRICT OR WARD THAT IS A DIVISIBLE PART OF THE
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION AND IS ELECTED ONLY BY VOTERS RESIDING WITHIN THAT
DISTRICT OR WARD, EXCEPT FOR A MEMBER OF THE GOVERNING BODY THAT HOLDS
EXCLUSIVELY EXECUTIVE RESPONSIBILITIES.
3. "ALTERNATIVE" METHOD OF ELECTION MEANS A METHOD OF ELECTING MEMBERS
TO THE GOVERNING BODY OF A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION USING A METHOD OTHER
THAN AT-LARGE OR DISTRICT-BASED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, RANKED-
CHOICE VOTING, CUMULATIVE VOTING, AND LIMITED VOTING.
4. "POLITICAL SUBDIVISION" MEANS A GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF REPRESENTATION
CREATED FOR THE PROVISION OF GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN, VILLAGE, SCHOOL DISTRICT, OR ANY OTHER
DISTRICT ORGANIZED PURSUANT TO STATE OR LOCAL LAW.
5. "PROTECTED CLASS" MEANS A CLASS OF ELIGIBLE VOTERS WHO ARE MEMBERS
OF A RACE, COLOR, OR LANGUAGE-MINORITY GROUP, AS REFERENCED AND DEFINED
IN THE FEDERAL VOTING RIGHTS ACT.
6. "RACIALLY POLARIZED VOTING" MEANS VOTING IN WHICH THERE IS A
DIFFERENCE IN THE CANDIDATE OR ELECTORAL CHOICE PREFERRED BY MEMBERS IN
A PROTECTED CLASS, AND THE CANDIDATE OR ELECTORAL CHOICE PREFERRED BY
THE REST OF THE ELECTORATE. THE METHODOLOGIES FOR ESTIMATING GROUP
VOTING BEHAVIOR AS APPROVED IN APPLICABLE FEDERAL CASES TO ENFORCE THE
FEDERAL VOTING RIGHTS ACT TO ESTABLISH RACIALLY POLARIZED VOTING MAY BE
USED FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION TO PROVE THAT ELECTIONS ARE CHAR-
ACTERIZED BY RACIALLY POLARIZED VOTING, BUT THOSE METHODOLOGIES SHALL
NOT BE THE EXCLUSIVE MEANS OF PROVING RACIALLY POLARIZED VOTING.
7. "FEDERAL VOTING RIGHTS ACT" MEANS THE FEDERAL VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF
1965, 52 U.S.C. § 10301 ET SEQ.
8. THE "CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU" MEANS THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU OF THE
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
9. "GOVERNMENT ENFORCEMENT ACTION" MEANS A DENIAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE OR
JUDICIAL PRECLEARANCE BY THE STATE OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, PENDING LITI-
GATION FILED BY A FEDERAL OR STATE ENTITY, A FINAL JUDGMENT OR ADJUDI-
CATION, A CONSENT DECREE, OR SIMILAR FORMAL ACTION.
10. "PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION" MEANS THE COMMISSION FORMED BY THIS
TITLE TO MAKE DETERMINATIONS AS TO PRECLEARANCE, INFORMED BY THE RECOM-
MENDATIONS OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU.
11. "DECEPTIVE OR FRAUDULENT DEVICE, CONTRIVANCE, OR COMMUNICATION"
MEANS ONE THAT CONTAINS FALSE INFORMATION PERTAINING TO: (A) THE TIME,
PLACE, AND MANNER OF ANY ELECTION; (B) THE QUALIFICATIONS OR
RESTRICTIONS ON VOTER ELIGIBILITY FOR SUCH ELECTION; OR (C) A STATEMENT
OF ENDORSEMENT BY ANY SPECIFICALLY NAMED PERSON, POLITICAL PARTY, OR
ORGANIZATION.
§ 17-206. RIGHTS OF ACTION. 1. RIGHT OF ACTION AGAINST VOTER
SUPPRESSION. (A) NO VOTING QUALIFICATION, PREREQUISITE TO VOTING, LAW,
ORDINANCE, STANDARD, PRACTICE, PROCEDURE, REGULATION, OR POLICY SHALL BE
ENACTED OR IMPLEMENTED BY ANY BOARD OF ELECTIONS OR POLITICAL SUBDIVI-
A. 6678--B 4
SION IN A MANNER THAT RESULTS IN A DENIAL OR ABRIDGEMENT OF THE RIGHT OF
ANY MEMBER OF A PROTECTED CLASS TO VOTE.
(B) A VIOLATION IS ESTABLISHED IF, BASED ON THE TOTALITY OF THE
CIRCUMSTANCES, THE ABILITY OF MEMBERS OF THE PROTECTED CLASS TO ELECT
CANDIDATES OF THEIR CHOICE OR INFLUENCE THE OUTCOME OF ELECTIONS IS
IMPAIRED.
(C) FOR POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS WHERE EITHER THE PRIMARY OR GENERAL
ELECTION IS HELD ON A DATE THAT IS NOT CONCURRENT WITH THE PRIMARY OR
GENERAL ELECTION DATES FOR STATE, COUNTY, OR CITY OFFICE AS ESTABLISHED
IN SECTION EIGHT OF ARTICLE THREE OR SECTION EIGHT OF ARTICLE THIRTEEN
OF THE CONSTITUTION, AND IN STATE LAW, THERE SHALL BE A PRESUMPTION THAT
THE DATE OF ELECTION RESULTS IN THE DENIAL OR ABRIDGEMENT OF THE RIGHT
TO VOTE WHERE FOR THREE CONSECUTIVE GENERAL ELECTIONS IN WHICH THERE IS
AT LEAST ONE CONTESTED RACE FOR AN OFFICE, THE NUMBER OF ACTUAL VOTERS
IN EACH CONTESTED ELECTION IS LESS THAN TWENTY-FIVE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL
NUMBER OF VOTES CAST IN THE MOST RECENT GENERAL ELECTION FOR THE PRESI-
DENCY OF THE UNITED STATES BY VOTERS IN THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, OR IN
WHICH, FOR ANY PROTECTED CLASS CONSISTING OF AT LEAST TWENTY-FIVE THOU-
SAND CITIZENS OF VOTING AGE OR WHOSE MEMBERS COMPRISE AT LEAST TEN
PERCENT OF THE CITIZEN VOTING AGE POPULATION, THE PERCENT OF MEMBERS OF
THAT PROTECTED CLASS THAT ARE ACTUAL VOTERS IS AT LEAST TWENTY-FIVE
PERCENT LOWER THAN THE PERCENT OF CITIZENS OF VOTING AGE THAT ARE NOT
MEMBERS OF THAT PROTECTED CLASS THAT ARE ACTUAL VOTERS.
2. RIGHT OF ACTION AGAINST VOTE DILUTION. (A) A METHOD OF ELECTION,
INCLUDING AT-LARGE, DISTRICT-BASED, OR ALTERNATIVE, SHALL NOT HAVE THE
EFFECT OF IMPAIRING THE ABILITY OF MEMBERS OF A PROTECTED CLASS TO ELECT
CANDIDATES OF THEIR CHOICE OR INFLUENCE THE OUTCOME OF ELECTIONS, AS A
RESULT OF THE DILUTION OR THE ABRIDGMENT OF THE RIGHTS OF MEMBERS OF THE
PROTECTED CLASS.
(B) A VIOLATION OF THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE:
(I) ESTABLISHED IF A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION USES AN AT-LARGE METHOD OF
ELECTION AND IT IS SHOWN THAT EITHER: (A) VOTING PATTERNS OF MEMBERS OF
THE PROTECTED CLASS WITHIN THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION ARE RACIALLY POLAR-
IZED; OR (B) UNDER THE TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES, THE ABILITY OF
MEMBERS OF THE PROTECTED CLASS TO ELECT CANDIDATES OF THEIR CHOICE OR
INFLUENCE THE OUTCOME OF ELECTIONS IS IMPAIRED; OR
(II) ESTABLISHED IF A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION USES A DISTRICT-BASED OR
ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF ELECTION AND IT IS SHOWN THAT CANDIDATES OR ELEC-
TORAL CHOICES PREFERRED BY MEMBERS OF THE PROTECTED CLASS WOULD USUALLY
BE DEFEATED, AND EITHER: (A) VOTING PATTERNS OF MEMBERS OF THE PROTECTED
CLASS WITHIN THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION ARE RACIALLY POLARIZED; OR (B)
UNDER THE TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES, THE ABILITY OF MEMBERS OF THE
PROTECTED CLASS TO ELECT CANDIDATES OF THEIR CHOICE OR INFLUENCE THE
OUTCOME OF ELECTIONS IS IMPAIRED; OR
(C) IN ASSESSING WHETHER VOTING PATTERNS OF MEMBERS OF THE PROTECTED
CLASS WITHIN THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION ARE RACIALLY POLARIZED OR WHETHER
CANDIDATES OR ELECTORAL CHOICES PREFERRED BY MEMBERS OF THE PROTECTED
CLASS WOULD USUALLY BE DEFEATED: (I) ELECTIONS CONDUCTED PRIOR TO THE
FILING OF AN ACTION PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION ARE MORE PROBATIVE THAN
ELECTIONS CONDUCTED AFTER THE FILING OF THE ACTION; (II) EVIDENCE
CONCERNING ELECTIONS FOR MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION ARE MORE PROBATIVE THAN EVIDENCE CONCERNING OTHER ELECTIONS;
(III) STATISTICAL EVIDENCE IS MORE PROBATIVE THAN NON-STATISTICAL
EVIDENCE; (IV) WHERE THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT MORE THAN ONE PROTECTED
CLASS OF ELIGIBLE VOTERS ARE POLITICALLY COHESIVE IN THE POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION, MEMBERS OF EACH OF THOSE PROTECTED CLASSES MAY BE COMBINED;
A. 6678--B 5
(V) EVIDENCE CONCERNING THE INTENT ON THE PART OF THE VOTERS, ELECTED
OFFICIALS, OR THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A
PROTECTED CLASS IS NOT REQUIRED; (VI) EVIDENCE THAT VOTING PATTERNS AND
ELECTION OUTCOMES COULD BE EXPLAINED BY FACTORS OTHER THAN RACIALLY
POLARIZED VOTING, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PARTISANSHIP, SHALL NOT
BE CONSIDERED; (VII) EVIDENCE THAT SUB-GROUPS WITHIN A PROTECTED CLASS
HAVE DIFFERENT VOTING PATTERNS SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED; (VIII) EVIDENCE
CONCERNING WHETHER MEMBERS OF A PROTECTED CLASS ARE GEOGRAPHICALLY
COMPACT OR CONCENTRATED SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED, BUT MAY BE A FACTOR IN
DETERMINING AN APPROPRIATE REMEDY; AND (IX) EVIDENCE CONCERNING PROJECT-
ED CHANGES IN POPULATION OR DEMOGRAPHICS SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED, BUT
MAY BE A FACTOR, IN DETERMINING AN APPROPRIATE REMEDY.
3. EVALUATION OF TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES. IN ASSESSING WHETHER,
UNDER THE TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES, THE ABILITY OF MEMBERS OF THE
PROTECTED CLASS TO ELECT CANDIDATES OF THEIR CHOICE OR INFLUENCE THE
OUTCOME OF ELECTIONS IS IMPAIRED WITHOUT A COMPELLING POLICY JUSTIFICA-
TION, FACTORS THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED
TO: (A) THE HISTORY OF DISCRIMINATION IN THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION,
GEOGRAPHIC REGION, OR THE STATE; (B) THE EXTENT TO WHICH MEMBERS OF THE
PROTECTED CLASS HAVE BEEN ELECTED TO OFFICE IN THE POLITICAL SUBDIVI-
SION; (C) THE USE OF ANY VOTING QUALIFICATION, PREREQUISITE TO VOTING,
LAW, ORDINANCE, STANDARD, PRACTICE, PROCEDURE, REGULATION, OR POLICY
THAT MAY ENHANCE THE DILUTIVE EFFECTS OF THE ELECTION SCHEME; (D) DENIAL
OF ACCESS OF EITHER ELIGIBLE VOTERS OR CANDIDATES WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE
PROTECTED CLASS TO THOSE PROCESSES DETERMINING WHICH GROUPS OF CANDI-
DATES WILL RECEIVE ACCESS TO THE BALLOT, FINANCIAL SUPPORT, OR OTHER
SUPPORT IN A GIVEN ELECTION; (E) THE EXTENT TO WHICH MEMBERS OF THE
PROTECTED CLASS CONTRIBUTE TO POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS AT LOWER RATES; (F)
THE EXTENT TO WHICH MEMBERS OF A PROTECTED CLASS IN THE STATE OR POLI-
TICAL SUBDIVISION VOTE AT LOWER RATES THAN OTHER MEMBERS OF THE ELECTOR-
ATE; (G) THE EXTENT TO WHICH MEMBERS OF THE PROTECTED CLASS ARE DISAD-
VANTAGED IN AREAS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO EDUCATION, EMPLOYMENT,
HEALTH, CRIMINAL JUSTICE, HOUSING, LAND USE, OR ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION; (H) THE EXTENT TO WHICH MEMBERS OF THE PROTECTED CLASS ARE
DISADVANTAGED IN OTHER AREAS WHICH MAY HINDER THEIR ABILITY TO PARTIC-
IPATE EFFECTIVELY IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS; (I) THE USE OF OVERT OR
SUBTLE RACIAL APPEALS IN POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS; (J) A SIGNIFICANT LACK OF
RESPONSIVENESS ON THE PART OF ELECTED OFFICIALS TO THE PARTICULARIZED
NEEDS OF MEMBERS OF THE PROTECTED CLASS; AND (K) WHETHER THE POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION HAS A COMPELLING POLICY JUSTIFICATION FOR ADOPTING OR MAIN-
TAINING THE METHOD OF ELECTION OR THE VOTING QUALIFICATION, PREREQUISITE
TO VOTING, LAW, ORDINANCE, STANDARD, PRACTICE, PROCEDURE, REGULATION, OR
POLICY. NO FACTOR IS DISPOSITIVE OR NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH THE EXIST-
ENCE OF RACIALLY POLARIZED VOTING. EVIDENCE OF THESE FACTORS CONCERNING
THE STATE, PRIVATE ACTORS, OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS IN THE
GEOGRAPHIC REGION MAY BE CONSIDERED BUT IS LESS PROBATIVE THAN EVIDENCE
CONCERNING THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION ITSELF.
4. STANDING. ANY AGGRIEVED PERSON, ORGANIZATION WHOSE MEMBERSHIP
INCLUDES OR IS LIKELY TO INCLUDE AGGRIEVED PERSONS, ORGANIZATION WHOSE
MISSION WOULD BE FRUSTRATED BY A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION, ORGANIZATION
THAT WOULD EXPEND RESOURCES IN ORDER TO FULFILL ITS MISSION AS A RESULT
OF A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION, OR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY FILE AN
ACTION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COUNTY IN
WHICH THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED.
5. REMEDIES. (A) UPON A FINDING OF A VIOLATION OF ANY PROVISION OF
THIS SECTION, THE COURT SHALL IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE REMEDIES THAT ARE
A. 6678--B 6
TAILORED TO REMEDY THE VIOLATION. REMEDIES MAY INCLUDE, BUT SHALL NOT BE
LIMITED TO:
(I) A DISTRICT-BASED METHOD OF ELECTION;
(II) AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF ELECTION;
(III) NEW OR REVISED DISTRICTING OR REDISTRICTING PLANS;
(IV) ELIMINATION OF STAGGERED ELECTIONS SO THAT ALL MEMBERS OF THE
GOVERNING BODY ARE ELECTED ON THE SAME DATE;
(V) INCREASING THE SIZE OF THE GOVERNING BODY;
(VI) MOVING THE DATES OF ELECTIONS TO BE CONCURRENT WITH THE PRIMARY
OR GENERAL ELECTION DATES FOR STATE, COUNTY, OR CITY OFFICE AS ESTAB-
LISHED IN SECTION EIGHT OF ARTICLE THREE OR SECTION EIGHT OF ARTICLE
THIRTEEN OF THE CONSTITUTION;
(VII) TRANSFERRING AUTHORITY FOR CONDUCTING THE POLITICAL SUBDIVI-
SION'S ELECTIONS TO THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS FOR THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED;
(VIII) ADDITIONAL VOTING HOURS OR DAYS;
(IX) ADDITIONAL POLLING LOCATIONS;
(X) ADDITIONAL MEANS OF VOTING SUCH AS VOTING BY MAIL;
(XI) ORDERING OF SPECIAL ELECTIONS;
(XII) REQUIRING EXPANDED OPPORTUNITIES FOR VOTER REGISTRATION;
(XIII) REQUIRING ADDITIONAL VOTER EDUCATION;
(XIV) MODIFYING THE ELECTION CALENDAR; OR
(XV) THE RESTORATION OR ADDITION OF PERSONS TO REGISTRATION LISTS.
(B) THE COURT SHALL ONLY ADOPT A REMEDY THAT WILL NOT DIMINISH THE
ABILITY OF MINORITY GROUPS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS AND
TO ELECT THEIR PREFERRED CANDIDATES TO OFFICE. THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER
PROPOSED REMEDIES BY ANY PARTIES AND INTERESTED NON-PARTIES, AND SHALL
NOT PROVIDE DEFERENCE OR PRIORITY TO A PROPOSED REMEDY BECAUSE IT IS
PROPOSED BY THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION. THIS TITLE GIVES THE COURT
AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT REMEDIES NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF
LAW, INCLUDING ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW.
6. PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTING NEW OR REVISED DISTRICTING OR REDIS-
TRICTING PLANS. THE GOVERNING BODY OF A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION WITH THE
AUTHORITY UNDER THIS TITLE AND ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL LAWS TO
ENACT AND IMPLEMENT A NEW METHOD OF ELECTION THAT WILL REPLACE THE POLI-
TICAL SUBDIVISION'S AT-LARGE METHOD OF ELECTION WITH A DISTRICT-BASED OR
ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF ELECTION, OR ENACT AND IMPLEMENT A NEW DISTRICTING
OR REDISTRICTING PLAN, SHALL UNDERTAKE EACH OF THE STEPS ENUMERATED IN
THIS SUBDIVISION, IF PROPOSED SUBSEQUENT TO RECEIPT OF A NYVRA NOTIFICA-
TION LETTER, AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION SEVEN OF THIS SECTION, OR THE
FILING OF A CLAIM PURSUANT TO THIS TITLE OR THE FEDERAL VOTING RIGHTS
ACT.
(A) BEFORE DRAWING A DRAFT DISTRICTING OR REDISTRICTING PLAN OR PLANS
OF THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICTS, THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION
SHALL HOLD AT LEAST TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS OVER A PERIOD OF NO MORE THAN
THIRTY DAYS, AT WHICH THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO PROVIDE INPUT REGARDING
THE COMPOSITION OF THE DISTRICTS. BEFORE THESE HEARINGS, THE POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION MAY CONDUCT OUTREACH TO THE PUBLIC, INCLUDING TO NON-ENGL-
ISH-SPEAKING COMMUNITIES, TO EXPLAIN THE DISTRICTING OR REDISTRICTING
PROCESS AND TO ENCOURAGE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION.
(B) AFTER ALL DRAFT DISTRICTING OR REDISTRICTING PLANS ARE DRAWN, THE
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION SHALL PUBLISH AND MAKE AVAILABLE FOR RELEASE AT
LEAST ONE DRAFT DISTRICTING OR REDISTRICTING PLAN AND, IF MEMBERS OF THE
GOVERNING BODY OF THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION WILL BE ELECTED IN THEIR
DISTRICTS AT DIFFERENT TIMES TO PROVIDE FOR STAGGERED TERMS OF OFFICE,
THE POTENTIAL SEQUENCE OF THE ELECTIONS. THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION SHALL
A. 6678--B 7
ALSO HOLD AT LEAST TWO ADDITIONAL HEARINGS OVER A PERIOD OF NO MORE THAN
FORTY-FIVE DAYS, AT WHICH THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO PROVIDE INPUT REGARD-
ING THE CONTENT OF THE DRAFT DISTRICTING OR REDISTRICTING PLAN OR PLANS
AND THE PROPOSED SEQUENCE OF ELECTIONS, IF APPLICABLE. THE DRAFT
DISTRICTING OR REDISTRICTING PLAN OR PLANS SHALL BE PUBLISHED AT LEAST
SEVEN DAYS BEFORE CONSIDERATION AT A HEARING. IF THE DRAFT DISTRICTING
OR REDISTRICTING PLAN OR PLANS ARE REVISED AT OR FOLLOWING A HEARING,
THE REVISED VERSIONS SHALL BE PUBLISHED AND MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC
FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS BEFORE BEING ADOPTED.
(C) IN DETERMINING THE FINAL SEQUENCE OF THE DISTRICT ELECTIONS
CONDUCTED IN A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION IN WHICH MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNING
BODY WILL BE ELECTED AT DIFFERENT TIMES TO PROVIDE FOR STAGGERED TERMS
OF OFFICE, THE GOVERNING BODY SHALL GIVE SPECIAL CONSIDERATION TO THE
PURPOSES OF THIS TITLE, AND IT SHALL TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE PREFERENCES
EXPRESSED BY MEMBERS OF THE DISTRICTS.
7. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT AND SAFE HARBOR FOR JUDICIAL ACTIONS.
BEFORE COMMENCING A JUDICIAL ACTION AGAINST A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION
UNDER THIS SECTION, A PROSPECTIVE PLAINTIFF SHALL SEND BY CERTIFIED MAIL
A WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CLERK OF THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, OR, IF THE
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION DOES NOT HAVE A CLERK, THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, AGAINST WHICH THE ACTION WOULD BE BROUGHT,
ASSERTING THAT THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION MAY BE IN VIOLATION OF THIS
TITLE. THIS WRITTEN NOTICE SHALL BE REFERRED TO AS A "NYVRA NOTIFICATION
LETTER" IN THIS TITLE. FOR ACTIONS AGAINST A SCHOOL DISTRICT OR ANY
OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THAT HOLDS ELECTIONS GOVERNED BY THE EDUCA-
TION LAW, THE PROSPECTIVE PLAINTIFF SHALL ALSO SEND BY CERTIFIED MAIL A
COPY OF THE NYVRA NOTIFICATION LETTER TO THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION.
(A) A PROSPECTIVE PLAINTIFF SHALL NOT COMMENCE A JUDICIAL ACTION
AGAINST A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION UNDER THIS SECTION WITHIN FIFTY DAYS OF
SENDING TO THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION A NYVRA NOTIFICATION LETTER.
(B) BEFORE RECEIVING A NYVRA NOTIFICATION LETTER, OR WITHIN FIFTY DAYS
OF MAILING OF A NYVRA NOTIFICATION LETTER, THE GOVERNING BODY OF A POLI-
TICAL SUBDIVISION MAY PASS A RESOLUTION AFFIRMING: (I) THE POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION'S INTENTION TO ENACT AND IMPLEMENT A REMEDY FOR A POTENTIAL
VIOLATION OF THIS TITLE; (II) SPECIFIC STEPS IT WILL UNDERTAKE TO FACIL-
ITATE APPROVAL AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SUCH A REMEDY; AND (III) A SCHEDULE
FOR ENACTING AND IMPLEMENTING SUCH A REMEDY. SUCH A RESOLUTION SHALL BE
REFERRED TO AS A "NYVRA RESOLUTION" IN THIS TITLE. IF A POLITICAL SUBDI-
VISION PASSES A NYVRA RESOLUTION, A PROSPECTIVE PLAINTIFF SHALL NOT
COMMENCE AN ACTION TO ENFORCE THIS SECTION AGAINST THE POLITICAL SUBDI-
VISION WITHIN NINETY DAYS OF THE RESOLUTION'S PASSAGE. FOR ACTIONS
AGAINST A SCHOOL DISTRICT, THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION MAY ORDER THE
ENACTMENT OF AN NYVRA RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO THE COMMISSIONER'S AUTHORI-
TY UNDER SECTION THREE HUNDRED FIVE OF THE EDUCATION LAW.
(C) IF THE GOVERNING BODY OF A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION LACKS THE AUTHOR-
ITY UNDER THIS TITLE OR APPLICABLE STATE LAW OR LOCAL LAWS TO ENACT OR
IMPLEMENT A REMEDY IDENTIFIED IN A NYVRA RESOLUTION WITHIN NINETY DAYS
AFTER THE PASSAGE OF THE NYVRA RESOLUTION, OR IF THE POLITICAL SUBDIVI-
SION IS A COVERED ENTITY AS DEFINED UNDER SECTION 17-212 OF THIS TITLE,
THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION MAY UNDERTAKE THE STEPS
ENUMERATED IN THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS UPON PASSAGE OF A NYVRA RESOL-
UTION:
(I) THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION MAY APPROVE A
PROPOSED REMEDY THAT COMPLIES WITH THIS TITLE AND SUBMIT SUCH A PROPOSED
REMEDY TO THE PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION. SUCH A SUBMISSION SHALL BE
REFERRED TO AS A "NYVRA PROPOSAL" IN THIS TITLE.
A. 6678--B 8
(II) PRIOR TO PASSING A NYVRA PROPOSAL, THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION
SHALL HOLD AT LEAST ONE PUBLIC HEARING, AT WHICH THE PUBLIC IS INVITED
TO PROVIDE INPUT REGARDING THE NYVRA PROPOSAL. BEFORE THIS HEARING, THE
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION MAY CONDUCT OUTREACH TO THE PUBLIC, INCLUDING TO
NON-ENGLISH-SPEAKING COMMUNITIES, TO ENCOURAGE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION.
(III) WITHIN FORTY-FIVE DAYS OF RECEIPT OF A NYVRA PROPOSAL, THE CIVIL
RIGHTS BUREAU SHALL SUBMIT A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE PRECLEAR-
ANCE COMMISSION AS TO WHETHER THE PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION SHOULD GRANT
OR DENY APPROVAL OF THE NYVRA PROPOSAL.
(IV) WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF RECEIPT OF A NYVRA PROPOSAL, THE PRECLEAR-
ANCE COMMISSION SHALL EITHER GRANT OR DENY APPROVAL OF THE NYVRA
PROPOSAL.
(V) THE PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION SHALL ONLY GRANT APPROVAL TO THE NYVRA
PROPOSAL IF IT CONCLUDES THAT: (A) THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION MAY BE IN
VIOLATION OF THIS TITLE; (B) THE NYVRA PROPOSAL WOULD REMEDY ANY POTEN-
TIAL VIOLATION OF THIS TITLE; (C) THE NYVRA PROPOSAL IS UNLIKELY TO
VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION OR ANY FEDERAL LAW; (D) THE NYVRA PROPOSAL WILL
NOT DIMINISH THE ABILITY OF MINORITY GROUPS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE POLI-
TICAL PROCESS AND TO ELECT THEIR PREFERRED CANDIDATES TO OFFICE; AND (E)
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NYVRA PROPOSAL IS FEASIBLE. THE PRECLEARANCE
COMMISSION MAY GRANT APPROVAL TO THE NYVRA PROPOSAL NOTWITHSTANDING ANY
OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, INCLUDING ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW.
(VI) IF THE PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION GRANTS APPROVAL, THE NYVRA
PROPOSAL SHALL BE ENACTED AND IMPLEMENTED IMMEDIATELY, NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, INCLUDING ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW. IF
THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION IS A COVERED ENTITY AS DEFINED UNDER SECTION
17-212 OF THIS TITLE, THERE SHALL BE NO NEED FOR THE POLITICAL SUBDIVI-
SION TO ALSO OBTAIN PRECLEARANCE FOR THE NYVRA PROPOSAL PURSUANT TO SUCH
SECTION.
(VII) IF THE PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION DENIES APPROVAL, THE NYVRA
PROPOSAL SHALL NOT BE ENACTED OR IMPLEMENTED. THE PRECLEARANCE COMMIS-
SION SHALL INTERPOSE OBJECTIONS EXPLAINING ITS BASIS AND MAY, IN ITS
DISCRETION, INDICATE ANOTHER NYVRA PROPOSAL FOR WHICH IT WOULD GRANT
APPROVAL.
(VIII) IF THE PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION DOES NOT RESPOND, THE NYVRA
PROPOSAL SHALL NOT BE ENACTED OR IMPLEMENTED.
(D) A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THAT HAS PASSED A NYVRA RESOLUTION MAY
ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH A PROSPECTIVE PLAINTIFF WHO SENDS A NYVRA
NOTIFICATION LETTER PROVIDING THAT SUCH A PROSPECTIVE PLAINTIFF SHALL
NOT COMMENCE AN ACTION TO ENFORCE THIS SECTION AGAINST THE POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION FOR AN ADDITIONAL NINETY DAYS. THIS WRITTEN AGREEMENT MAY BE
REFERRED TO AS A "NYVRA EXTENSION AGREEMENT". THE NYVRA EXTENSION AGREE-
MENT SHALL INCLUDE A REQUIREMENT THAT EITHER THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION
SHALL ENACT AND IMPLEMENT A REMEDY THAT COMPLIES WITH THIS TITLE OR THE
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION SHALL PASS A NYVRA PROPOSAL AND SUBMIT IT TO THE
CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU.
(E) IF, PURSUANT TO A PROCESS COMMENCED BY A NYVRA NOTIFICATION
LETTER, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION ENACTS OR IMPLEMENTS A REMEDY OR THE
CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU GRANTS APPROVAL TO A NYVRA PROPOSAL, A PROSPECTIVE
PLAINTIFF WHO SENT THE NYVRA NOTIFICATION LETTER MAY, WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
OF THE ENACTMENT OR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REMEDY OR APPROVAL OF THE
NYVRA PROPOSAL, DEMAND REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE COST OF THE WORK PRODUCT
GENERATED TO SUPPORT THE NYVRA NOTIFICATION LETTER. A PROSPECTIVE PLAIN-
TIFF SHALL MAKE THE DEMAND IN WRITING AND SHALL SUBSTANTIATE THE DEMAND
WITH FINANCIAL DOCUMENTATION, SUCH AS A DETAILED INVOICE FOR DEMOGRAPHY
SERVICES OR FOR THE ANALYSIS OF VOTING PATTERNS IN THE POLITICAL SUBDI-
A. 6678--B 9
VISION. A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION MAY REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION IF
THE PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION IS INSUFFICIENT TO CORROBORATE THE CLAIMED
COSTS. A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION SHALL REIMBURSE A PROSPECTIVE PLAINTIFF
FOR REASONABLE COSTS CLAIMED, OR IN AN AMOUNT TO WHICH THE PARTIES MUTU-
ALLY AGREE. THE CUMULATIVE AMOUNT OF REIMBURSEMENTS TO ALL PROSPECTIVE
PLAINTIFFS, EXCEPT FOR ACTIONS BROUGHT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, SHALL
NOT EXCEED FORTY-THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS, AS ADJUSTED ANNUALLY TO THE
CONSUMER PRICE INDEX FOR ALL URBAN CONSUMERS, UNITED STATES CITY AVER-
AGE, AS PUBLISHED BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. TO THE
EXTENT A PROSPECTIVE PLAINTIFF WHO SENT THE NYVRA NOTIFICATION LETTER
AND A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION ARE UNABLE TO COME TO A MUTUAL AGREEMENT,
EITHER PARTY MAY FILE A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACTION TO OBTAIN A CLARIFI-
CATION OF RIGHTS.
(F) NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBDIVISION, IF THE FIRST
DAY FOR DESIGNATING PETITIONS FOR A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION'S NEXT REGULAR
ELECTION TO SELECT MEMBERS OF ITS GOVERNING BOARD HAS BEGUN OR IS SCHED-
ULED TO BEGIN WITHIN THIRTY DAYS, OR IF A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION IS SCHE-
DULED TO CONDUCT ANY ELECTION WITHIN ONE HUNDRED TWENTY DAYS, A PLAIN-
TIFF ALLEGING ANY VIOLATION OF THIS TITLE MAY COMMENCE A JUDICIAL ACTION
AGAINST A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION UNDER THIS SECTION, PROVIDED THAT THE
RELIEF SOUGHT BY SUCH A PLAINTIFF INCLUDES PRELIMINARY RELIEF FOR THAT
ELECTION. PRIOR TO OR CONCURRENT WITH COMMENCING SUCH A JUDICIAL ACTION,
ANY SUCH PLAINTIFF SHALL ALSO SUBMIT A NYVRA NOTIFICATION LETTER TO THE
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION. IF A JUDICIAL ACTION COMMENCED UNDER THIS
PROVISION IS WITHDRAWN OR DISMISSED FOR MOOTNESS BECAUSE THE POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION HAS ENACTED OR IMPLEMENTED A REMEDY OR THE CIVIL RIGHTS
BUREAU HAS GRANTED APPROVAL OF A NYVRA PROPOSAL PURSUANT TO A PROCESS
COMMENCED BY A NYVRA NOTIFICATION LETTER, ANY SUCH PLAINTIFF MAY ONLY
DEMAND REIMBURSEMENT PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION.
8. COALITION CLAIMS PERMITTED. MEMBERS OF DIFFERENT PROTECTED CLASSES
MAY FILE AN ACTION JOINTLY PURSUANT TO THIS CHAPTER IF THEY DEMONSTRATE
THAT THE COMBINED VOTING PREFERENCES OF THE MULTIPLE PROTECTED CLASSES
ARE POLARIZED AGAINST THE REST OF THE ELECTORATE.
§ 17-208. ASSISTANCE FOR LANGUAGE-MINORITY GROUPS. 1. POLITICAL SUBDI-
VISIONS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE. A BOARD OF ELECTIONS OR
A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THAT ADMINISTERS ELECTIONS SHALL PROVIDE
LANGUAGE-RELATED ASSISTANCE IN VOTING AND ELECTIONS TO A LANGUAGE-MINOR-
ITY GROUP IN A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION IF THE DIRECTOR DETERMINES, BASED
ON DATA FROM THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY, OR DATA OF COMPARABLE QUALI-
TY COLLECTED BY A PUBLIC OFFICE, THAT:
(A) MORE THAN TWO PERCENT OF THE CITIZENS OF VOTING AGE OF A POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION ARE MEMBERS OF A SINGLE LANGUAGE-MINORITY GROUP AND SPEAK
ENGLISH "LESS THAN VERY WELL" ACCORDING TO THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY
SURVEY;
(B) MORE THAN FOUR THOUSAND OF THE CITIZENS OF VOTING AGE OF SUCH
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION ARE MEMBERS OF A SINGLE LANGUAGE-MINORITY GROUP
AND SPEAK ENGLISH "LESS THAN VERY WELL" ACCORDING TO THE AMERICAN COMMU-
NITY SURVEY; OR
(C) IN THE CASE OF A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THAT CONTAINS ALL OR ANY
PART OF A NATIVE AMERICAN RESERVATION, MORE THAN TWO PERCENT OF THE
NATIVE AMERICAN CITIZENS OF VOTING AGE WITHIN THE NATIVE AMERICAN RESER-
VATION ARE MEMBERS OF A SINGLE LANGUAGE-MINORITY GROUP AND SPEAK ENGLISH
"LESS THAN VERY WELL" ACCORDING TO THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY. FOR
THE PURPOSES OF THIS PARAGRAPH, "NATIVE AMERICAN" IS DEFINED TO INCLUDE
ANY PERSONS RECOGNIZED BY THE UNITED STATES CENSUS BUREAU OR NEW YORK AS
"AMERICAN INDIAN" OR "ALASKA NATIVE".
A. 6678--B 10
2. LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE TO BE PROVIDED. WHEN THE DIRECTOR DETERMINES
THAT A BOARD OF ELECTIONS OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION SHALL PROVIDE
LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE TO A PARTICULAR MINORITY GROUP, SUCH BOARD OF
ELECTIONS OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION SHALL PROVIDE VOTING MATERIALS IN THE
COVERED LANGUAGE OF AN EQUAL QUALITY OF THE CORRESPONDING ENGLISH
LANGUAGE MATERIALS, INCLUDING REGISTRATION OR VOTING NOTICES, FORMS,
INSTRUCTIONS, ASSISTANCE, OR OTHER MATERIALS OR INFORMATION RELATING TO
THE ELECTORAL PROCESS, INCLUDING BALLOTS. WHENEVER ANY SUCH BOARD OF
ELECTIONS OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION PROVIDES ANY REGISTRATION OR VOTING
NOTICES, FORMS, INSTRUCTIONS, ASSISTANCE, OR OTHER MATERIALS OR INFORMA-
TION RELATING TO THE ELECTORAL PROCESS, INCLUDING BALLOTS, IN A COVERED
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, IT SHALL PROVIDE THEM IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE
APPLICABLE MINORITY GROUP AS WELL AS IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, PROVIDED
THAT WHERE THE LANGUAGE OF THE APPLICABLE MINORITY GROUP IS ORAL OR
UNWRITTEN OR IN THE CASE OF SOME AMERICAN INDIANS, IF THE PREDOMINANT
LANGUAGE IS HISTORICALLY UNWRITTEN, THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS OR POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION IS ONLY REQUIRED TO FURNISH ORAL INSTRUCTIONS, ASSISTANCE,
OR OTHER INFORMATION RELATING TO REGISTRATION AND VOTING.
3. ACTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT FOR ENGLISH-ONLY VOTING MATERIALS.
A BOARD OF ELECTIONS OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THAT SHALL PROVIDE
LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE TO A PARTICULAR MINORITY GROUP, WHICH SEEKS TO
PROVIDE ENGLISH-ONLY MATERIALS NOTWITHSTANDING THE DETERMINATION OF THE
DIRECTOR, MAY FILE AN ACTION AGAINST THE STATE FOR A DECLARATORY JUDG-
MENT PERMITTING SUCH PROVISION. THE COURT SHALL GRANT THE REQUESTED
RELIEF IF IT FINDS THAT THE DETERMINATION OF THE DIRECTOR WAS UNREASON-
ABLE OR AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION.
4. STANDING. ANY AGGRIEVED PERSONS, ORGANIZATION WHOSE MEMBERSHIP
INCLUDES OR IS LIKELY TO INCLUDE AGGRIEVED PERSONS, ORGANIZATION WHOSE
MISSION WOULD BE FRUSTRATED BY A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION, ORGANIZATION
THAT WOULD EXPEND RESOURCES IN ORDER TO FULFILL ITS MISSION AS A RESULT
OF A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION, OR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY FILE AN
ACTION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COUNTY IN
WHICH THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION OCCURRED.
§ 17-210. PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION. 1. PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION. THERE
IS HEREBY ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF LAW, A PRECLEARANCE
COMMISSION, AN ENTITY RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING DETERMINATIONS AS TO
PRECLEARANCE AND OTHER MATTERS AS ENUMERATED UNDER THIS TITLE, WHICH
DETERMINATIONS SHALL BE BASED UPON THE PROVISIONS OF THIS TITLE AND THE
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU. THIS COMMISSION SHALL BE
REFERRED TO AS THE "PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION" OR "COMMISSION" IN THIS
TITLE.
2. PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION STRUCTURE AND MEMBERSHIP. (A) THE COMMIS-
SION SHALL CONSIST OF FIVE MEMBERS WHO SHALL BE SELECTED AS SET FORTH IN
THIS SECTION AND SHALL HAVE AND EXERCISE THE POWERS AND DUTIES SET FORTH
IN THIS TITLE.
(B) THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION SHALL SERVE STAGGERED TERMS TO
ENSURE CONTINUITY. FOR THE FIRST CLASS OF THE COMMISSION, THE FIRST
MEMBER SELECTED AND APPOINTED AS DESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION SHALL SERVE A
TERM OF FIVE YEARS, THE SECOND MEMBER THUS SELECTED AND APPOINTED SHALL
SERVE A TERM OF FOUR YEARS, THE THIRD MEMBER THUS SELECTED AND APPOINTED
SHALL SERVE A TERM OF THREE YEARS, THE FOURTH MEMBER THUS SELECTED AND
APPOINTED SHALL SERVE A TERM OF TWO YEARS, AND THE FIFTH MEMBER THUS
SELECTED AND APPOINTED SHALL SERVE A TERM OF ONE YEAR. ALL SUBSEQUENT
MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION SHALL BE SELECTED AND APPOINTED AS DESCRIBED
IN THIS SECTION AND SHALL SERVE A TERM OF FIVE YEARS, UNLESS SELECTED
AND APPOINTED TO COMPLETE A VACANT TERM.
A. 6678--B 11
(C) THE COMMISSION BY A MAJORITY VOTE SHALL ELECT A CHAIRPERSON FROM
AMONG ITS MEMBERS TO PRESIDE OVER ITS MEETINGS, OTHER PROCEEDINGS, AND
VOTES, FOR A TERM OF ONE YEAR.
(D) A MAJORITY OF THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, CONFERRING IN PERSON,
TELEPHONICALLY, BY VIDEOCONFERENCE, OR BY OTHER MEANS AS AGREED BY THE
COMMISSION, SHALL CONSTITUTE A QUORUM, AND THE COMMISSION SHALL HAVE THE
POWER TO ACT BY MAJORITY VOTE OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF MEMBERS OF THE
COMMISSION WITHOUT VACANCY.
(E) TO BE ELIGIBLE TO SERVE AS A MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION OR BE NOMI-
NATED TO SERVE AS A MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION, AN INDIVIDUAL MUST:
(I) BE A RESIDENT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK;
(II) BE A MEMBER OF THE NEW YORK STATE BAR;
(III) HAVE AT LEAST FIVE YEARS OF LEGAL EXPERIENCE;
(IV) HAVE DEMONSTRATED EXPERIENCE REPRESENTING OR WORKING ON BEHALF OF
MEMBERS OF PROTECTED CLASSES, AS DEFINED IN THIS TITLE; AND
(V) HAVE DEMONSTRATED AN ABILITY TO APPRECIATE THE EXPERIENCES OF
MEMBERS OF PROTECTED CLASSES, AS DEFINED IN THIS TITLE, IN VOTING IN
ELECTIONS IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK, OR HAVE DEMONSTRATED AN APPRECIATION
FOR OR COMMITMENT TO THE DIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
(F) NO INDIVIDUAL SHALL BE ELIGIBLE TO SERVE AS A MEMBER OF THE
COMMISSION WHO:
(I) IS CURRENTLY SERVING IN ANY ELECTED GOVERNMENTAL OFFICE OR HAS
WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS SERVED IN ANY ELECTED GOVERNMENTAL OFFICE;
(II) IS CURRENTLY SERVING ON ANY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; OR
(III) IS CURRENTLY HOLDING ANY OFFICIAL POSITION FOR A POLITICAL
PARTY.
(G) MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION SHALL BE COMPENSATED AT AN HOURLY RATE
BASED ON THE RATE EQUIVALENT TO AN ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SIMILAR
EXPERIENCE FOR TIME ACTUALLY SPENT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THE MEMBER'S
DUTIES UNDER THIS SECTION, AND, IN ADDITION THERETO, SHALL BE REIMBURSED
FOR ALL REASONABLE EXPENSES ACTUALLY AND NECESSARILY INCURRED BY THE
MEMBER IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THE MEMBER'S DUTIES UNDER THIS SECTION.
COMMISSIONERS SHALL PROVIDE INVOICES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LAW, ACCOUNT-
ING FOR TIME SPENT TO THE TENTH OF AN HOUR AND DETAILING THEIR ACTIVITY
TO THE DEGREE OF SPECIFICITY REQUIRED FOR THE RECOVERY OF ATTORNEYS'
FEES AND EXPENSES IN FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS CASES.
(H) MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY BE REMOVED FOR CAUSE BY MAJORITY
VOTE OF THE COMMISSION FOR SUBSTANTIAL NEGLECT OF DUTY, MISCONDUCT IN
OFFICE, OR INABILITY TO DISCHARGE THE POWERS OR DUTIES OF OFFICE, AFTER
WRITTEN NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY FOR A REPLY.
(I) ANY VACANCY OCCURRING ON THE COMMISSION SHALL BE FILLED WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS OF ITS OCCURRENCE, IN THE SAME MANNER AS A MEMBER IS
INITIALLY SELECTED, TO COMPLETE THE VACANT TERM.
(J) A COMMISSIONER WHO HAS COMPLETED ONE OR MORE TERMS ON THE COMMIS-
SION, INCLUDING ANY PARTIAL TERM WHICH THE COMMISSIONER WAS SELECTED TO
COMPLETE UPON A VACANCY, SHALL BE ELIGIBLE TO APPLY FOR AND BE SELECTED
FOR FURTHER SERVICE ON THE COMMISSION, UNLESS REMOVED FOR CAUSE.
3. NOMINATING COMMITTEE. (A) THERE IS HEREBY ESTABLISHED A NOMINATING
COMMITTEE OF ORGANIZATIONAL NOMINATORS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING AND
NOMINATING CANDIDATES WHO ARE QUALIFIED UNDER THIS SECTION TO SERVE AS
COMMISSIONERS ON THE PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION. THIS COMMITTEE OF ORGAN-
IZATIONAL NOMINATORS SHALL BE REFERRED TO AS THE "NOMINATING COMMITTEE"
OR "COMMITTEE" IN THIS TITLE AND SHALL HAVE AND EXERCISE THE POWERS AND
DUTIES SET FORTH HEREIN.
(B) THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE SHALL CONSIST OF AT LEAST FIVE, AND NO
MORE THAN FIFTEEN, ORGANIZATIONS CERTIFIED BY THE CHIEF OF THE CIVIL
A. 6678--B 12
RIGHTS BUREAU AS MEETING ALL OF THE QUALIFICATIONS IN THIS SUBDIVISION.
AN ORGANIZATIONAL NOMINATOR, TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR CERTIFICATION TO THE
NOMINATING COMMITTEE, SHALL:
(I) BE A REGISTERED 501(C)(3) NONPROFIT ENTITY INCORPORATED IN NEW
YORK STATE THAT HAS BEEN IN CONTINUOUS OPERATION FOR AT LEAST THE LAST
TWENTY YEARS;
(II) HAVE DEMONSTRATED A COMMITMENT TO THE PURPOSES OF THIS TITLE AND
SPECIFICALLY TO SECURING THE VOTING RIGHTS OF PROTECTED CLASS MEMBERS AS
DEFINED IN THIS TITLE, WHICH COMMITMENT MAY BE DEMONSTRATED BY (A)
REFERENCE TO SUCH PROTECTED CLASS MEMBERS IN THE ORGANIZATION'S MISSION
STATEMENT; OR (B) PARTICIPATION IN TEN OR MORE LAWSUITS IN FEDERAL COURT
OR THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ON BEHALF OF ONE OR MORE MEMBERS
OF A PROTECTED CLASS ON ISSUES RELATED TO THIS TITLE; AND
(III) BE REGISTERED WITH THE CHARITIES BUREAU OF THE NEW YORK STATE
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; AND
(C) THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE BY MAJORITY VOTE SHALL ELECT A CHAIR FROM
AMONG ITS MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS FOR A TERM OF ONE YEAR.
(D) A MAJORITY OF THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE SHALL CONSTITUTE A QUORUM,
AND THE COMMITTEE SHALL HAVE THE POWER TO ACT BY MAJORITY VOTE OF THE
TOTAL NUMBER OF MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE WITHOUT VACANCY.
(E) THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU SHALL ESTABLISH A PROCESS AND PROCEDURES
BY WHICH TO SOLICIT AND REVIEW, ON A ROLLING OR INTERMITTENT BASIS,
APPLICATIONS FOR INCLUSION IN THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE. WITHIN A REASON-
ABLE TIME FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION, THE CHIEF OF THE
CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU SHALL CERTIFY UP TO FIFTEEN ORGANIZATIONS THAT MEET
THE QUALIFICATIONS OF PARAGRAPH (B) OF THIS SUBDIVISION AS MEMBERS OF
THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE. WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE CERTIFICATION BY THE
CHIEF OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU OF AT LEAST FIVE ORGANIZATIONS FOR
INCLUSION IN THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE, THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE SHALL
ADOPT PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES BY WHICH IT WILL MEET ON A REGULAR OR
AS-NEEDED BASIS TO SOLICIT AND REVIEW THE APPLICATIONS OF CANDIDATES FOR
SERVICE ON THE PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION. THESE PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES
SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:
(I) THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE SHALL SOLICIT APPLICATIONS STATEWIDE FROM
CANDIDATES FOR SERVICE ON THE COMMISSION;
(II) FROM THE APPLICATIONS RECEIVED FOR MEMBERSHIP ON THE COMMISSION,
THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE SHALL SELECT A POOL OF THIRTY QUALIFIED CANDI-
DATES FOR INCLUSION IN A NOMINEE POOL, PROVIDED THAT, IF THE NOMINATING
COMMITTEE FINDS, AFTER DUE DILIGENCE, THAT THERE ARE FEWER THAN THIRTY
QUALIFIED APPLICANTS TO BE COMMISSIONERS, THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE MAY
REDUCE THE NOMINEE POOL'S SIZE BY A THREE-FIFTHS VOTE TO A LOWER NUMBER
SO THAT THE COMMISSION'S MEMBERSHIP MAY BE FILLED;
(III) ONLY CANDIDATES WHO MEET THE QUALIFICATIONS SET FORTH IN THIS
SECTION FOR SERVICE ON THE PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN
THE NOMINEE POOL;
(IV) THREE-FIFTHS OF THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE'S MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS
MUST AGREE AND VOTE IN SUPPORT OF ANY CANDIDATE'S INCLUSION IN THE NOMI-
NEE POOL; AND
(V) THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE SHALL MAINTAIN THE QUALIFIED CANDIDATE
POOL SO THAT SUBSEQUENT VACANCIES MAY BE FILLED IN THE MANNER SPECIFIED
IN SUBDIVISION FOUR OF THIS SECTION.
(F) THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE'S MEMBERS SHALL NEITHER BE PUBLIC OFFI-
CERS NOR BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW.
NOTWITHSTANDING WHICH, THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE AND ITS MEMBERS SHALL BE
ENTITLED TO REPRESENTATION, INDEMNIFICATION, AND TO BE HELD HARMLESS TO
THE SAME EXTENT AS ANY OTHER PERSON EMPLOYED IN SERVICE OF THE STATE AND
A. 6678--B 13
ENTITLED TO SUCH COVERAGE UNDER SECTIONS SEVENTEEN AND NINETEEN OF THE
PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW.
(G) A MEMBER OF THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE MAY BE REMOVED FOR CAUSE BY
MAJORITY VOTE OF THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE FOR SUBSTANTIAL NEGLECT OF
DUTY, MISCONDUCT, OR INABILITY TO DISCHARGE THE POWERS OR DUTIES OF THE
COMMITTEE, AFTER WRITTEN NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY FOR A REPLY.
(H) NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE SEVEN OF THE PUBLIC
OFFICERS LAW, NO MEETING OR PROCEEDING OF THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE SHALL
BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.
4. SELECTION OF COMMISSIONERS BY LOT FROM NOMINEE POOL BY CHIEF
JUDGE. WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE DATE BY WHICH THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE
HAS IDENTIFIED AND NOMINATED A POOL OF CANDIDATES WHO ARE QUALIFIED TO
SERVE AS MEMBERS OF THE PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION UNDER THIS SECTION, THE
CHIEF JUDGE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS SHALL SELECT BY LOT FROM THE INDI-
VIDUALS NOMINATED TO THE NOMINEE POOL BY THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE A
NUMBER OF CANDIDATES EQUAL TO THE NUMBER OF VACANCIES ON THE COMMISSION,
WHO SHALL BE APPOINTED AS COMMISSIONERS. AT THE EXPIRATION OF EACH
COMMISSIONER'S TERM OR UPON ANY VACANCY, THE CHIEF JUDGE SHALL SELECT BY
LOT FROM THE POOL OF QUALIFIED CANDIDATES AVAILABLE AT THAT TIME.
§ 17-212. PRECLEARANCE. 1. PRECLEARANCE. TO ENSURE THAT THE RIGHT TO
VOTE IS NOT DENIED OR ABRIDGED ON ACCOUNT OF RACE, COLOR, OR LANGUAGE-
MINORITY GROUP, AS A RESULT OF THE ENACTMENT OR IMPLEMENTATION OF A
COVERED POLICY, AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION, AFTER THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION, THE ENACTMENT OR IMPLEMENTATION OF A
COVERED POLICY BY A COVERED ENTITY, AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION THREE OF
THIS SECTION, SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PRECLEARANCE BY THE CIVIL RIGHTS
BUREAU OR BY A DESIGNATED COURT AS SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION.
2. COVERED POLICIES. A "COVERED POLICY" SHALL INCLUDE ANY NEW OR MODI-
FIED VOTING QUALIFICATION, PREREQUISITE TO VOTING, LAW, ORDINANCE, STAN-
DARD, PRACTICE, PROCEDURE, REGULATION, OR POLICY CONCERNING ANY OF THE
FOLLOWING TOPICS:
(A) DISTRICTING OR REDISTRICTING;
(B) METHOD OF ELECTION;
(C) FORM OF GOVERNMENT;
(D) ANNEXATION OF A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION;
(E) INCORPORATION OF A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION;
(F) CONSOLIDATION OR DIVISION OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS;
(G) REMOVAL OF VOTERS FROM ENROLLMENT LISTS OR OTHER LIST MAINTENANCE
ACTIVITIES;
(H) NUMBER, LOCATION, OR HOURS OF ANY ELECTION DAY OR EARLY VOTING
POLL SITE;
(I) DATES OF ELECTIONS AND THE ELECTION CALENDAR, EXCEPT WITH RESPECT
TO SPECIAL ELECTIONS;
(J) REGISTRATION OF VOTERS;
(K) ASSIGNMENT OF ELECTION DISTRICTS TO ELECTION DAY OR EARLY VOTING
POLL SITES;
(L) ASSISTANCE OFFERED TO MEMBERS OF A LANGUAGE-MINORITY GROUP; AND
(M) THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU MAY DESIGNATE ADDITIONAL TOPICS FOR INCLU-
SION IN THIS LIST PURSUANT TO A RULE PROMULGATED UNDER THE STATE ADMIN-
ISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT, IF IT DETERMINES THAT A NEW OR MODIFIED VOTING
QUALIFICATION, PREREQUISITE TO VOTING, LAW, ORDINANCE, STANDARD, PRAC-
TICE, PROCEDURE, REGULATION, OR POLICY CONCERNING SUCH TOPICS MAY HAVE
THE EFFECT OF DENYING OR ABRIDGING THE RIGHT TO VOTE ON ACCOUNT OF RACE,
COLOR, OR LANGUAGE-MINORITY GROUP.
3. COVERED ENTITY. A "COVERED ENTITY" SHALL INCLUDE: (A) ANY POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION WHICH, WITHIN THE PREVIOUS TWENTY-FIVE YEARS, HAS BECOME
A. 6678--B 14
SUBJECT TO A COURT ORDER OR GOVERNMENT ENFORCEMENT ACTION BASED UPON A
FINDING OF ANY VIOLATION OF THIS TITLE, THE FEDERAL VOTING RIGHTS ACT,
THE FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, OR A VOTING-
RELATED VIOLATION OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION; (B) ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION WHICH, WITHIN THE PREVIOUS
FIVE YEARS, HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH ITS OBLIGATIONS TO PROVIDE DATA OR
INFORMATION TO THE STATEWIDE DATABASE; (C) ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION
WHICH, WITHIN THE PREVIOUS TWENTY-FIVE YEARS, HAS BECOME SUBJECT TO AT
LEAST THREE COURT ORDERS OR GOVERNMENT ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS BASED UPON A
FINDING OF ANY VIOLATION OF ANY STATE OR FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS LAW OR THE
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION CONCERNING
DISCRIMINATION AGAINST MEMBERS OF A PROTECTED CLASS; (D) ANY COUNTY IN
WHICH, BASED ON DATA PROVIDED BY THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
SERVICES, THE COMBINED MISDEMEANOR AND FELONY ARREST RATE OF MEMBERS OF
ANY PROTECTED CLASS CONSISTING OF AT LEAST TEN THOUSAND CITIZENS OF
VOTING AGE OR WHOSE MEMBERS COMPRISE AT LEAST TEN PERCENT OF THE CITIZEN
VOTING AGE POPULATION OF THE COUNTY, EXCEEDS THE PROPORTION THAT THE
PROTECTED CLASS CONSTITUTES OF THE CITIZEN VOTING AGE POPULATION OF THE
COUNTY AS A WHOLE BY AT LEAST TWENTY PERCENT AT ANY POINT WITHIN THE
PREVIOUS TEN YEARS; OR (E) ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION IN WHICH, BASED ON
DATA MADE AVAILABLE BY THE UNITED STATES CENSUS, THE DISSIMILARITY INDEX
OF ANY PROTECTED CLASS CONSISTING OF AT LEAST TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND CITI-
ZENS OF VOTING AGE OR WHOSE MEMBERS COMPRISE AT LEAST TEN PERCENT OF THE
CITIZEN VOTING AGE POPULATION OF THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, IS IN EXCESS
OF FIFTY WITH RESPECT TO NON-HISPANIC WHITE CITIZENS OF VOTING AGE WITH-
IN THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION AT ANY POINT WITHIN THE PREVIOUS TEN YEARS.
IF ANY COVERED ENTITY IS A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION IN WHICH A BOARD OF
ELECTIONS HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED, THAT BOARD OF ELECTIONS SHALL ALSO BE
DEEMED A COVERED ENTITY. IF ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION IN WHICH A BOARD
OF ELECTIONS HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED CONTAINS A COVERED ENTITY FULLY WITHIN
ITS BORDERS, THAT POLITICAL SUBDIVISION AND THAT BOARD OF ELECTIONS
SHALL BOTH BE DEEMED A COVERED ENTITY.
4. PRECLEARANCE BY PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION. A COVERED ENTITY MAY
OBTAIN PRECLEARANCE FOR A COVERED POLICY FROM THE PRECLEARANCE COMMIS-
SION PURSUANT TO THE FOLLOWING PROCESS:
(A) THE COVERED ENTITY SHALL SUBMIT THE COVERED POLICY IN WRITING TO
THE PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION. IF THE COVERED ENTITY IS A COUNTY OR CITY
BOARD OF ELECTIONS, IT SHALL CONTEMPORANEOUSLY PROVIDE A COPY OF THE
COVERED POLICY TO THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS.
(B) UPON SUBMISSION OF A COVERED POLICY FOR PRECLEARANCE, THE COMMIS-
SION SHALL PUBLISH THE SUBMISSION ON ITS WEBSITE.
(C) AFTER PUBLICATION OF A SUBMISSION, THERE SHALL BE AN OPPORTUNITY
FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO COMMENT ON THE SUBMISSION TO THE CIVIL
RIGHTS BUREAU WITHIN THE TIME PERIODS SET FORTH BELOW. TO FACILITATE
PUBLIC COMMENT, THE COMMISSION SHALL PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS
OF THE PUBLIC TO SIGN UP TO RECEIVE NOTIFICATIONS OR ALERTS REGARDING
SUBMISSION OF A COVERED POLICY FOR PRECLEARANCE.
(D) UPON SUBMISSION OF A COVERED POLICY FOR PRECLEARANCE, THE CIVIL
RIGHTS BUREAU SHALL REVIEW THE SUBMISSION AND SHALL, WITHIN THE TIME
PERIODS SET FORTH BELOW, WHICH SHALL BE CONCURRENT WITH THE TIME PERIODS
FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, PROVIDE A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE COMMIS-
SION, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE A RECOMMENDATION AS TO WHETHER, UNDER THIS
TITLE, PRECLEARANCE SHOULD BE GRANTED OR DENIED TO THE COVERED POLICY.
THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU MAY NOT SUBMIT ITS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
UNTIL THE PERIOD FOR PUBLIC COMMENT IS CLOSED. THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU
MAY REQUEST MORE INFORMATION FROM A JURISDICTION SUBMITTING A COVERED
A. 6678--B 15
POLICY AT ANY TIME DURING ITS REVIEW TO AID IN DEVELOPING ITS REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION. THE FAILURE TO TIMELY COMPLY WITH REASONABLE REQUESTS
FOR MORE INFORMATION MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE DENIAL OF PRECLEARANCE. THE
CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU'S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATION SHALL BE POSTED PUBLIC-
LY ON THE PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION'S WEBSITE PROMPTLY AFTER THEY ARE
RECEIVED BY THE COMMISSION. HOWEVER, COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN THE CIVIL
RIGHTS BUREAU AND THE COMMISSION OR ITS MEMBERS OTHER THAN THE CIVIL
RIGHTS BUREAU'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC
DISCLOSURE UNDER ARTICLE SIX OF THE PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW.
(E) UPON RECEIPT OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDA-
TION REGARDING A COVERED POLICY SUBMITTED FOR PRECLEARANCE, THE
PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION SHALL REVIEW THE COVERED POLICY, THE CIVIL
RIGHTS BUREAU'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND ANY PUBLIC COMMENT, AND
SHALL, WITHIN THE TIME PERIODS SET FORTH BELOW, DENY OR GRANT PRECLEAR-
ANCE. IN DETERMINING WHETHER TO DENY OR GRANT PRECLEARANCE, THE COMMIS-
SION SHALL GIVE DEFERENCE TO THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU'S RECOMMENDATION
UNDER AN "ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS" STANDARD OF REVIEW. IN ANY DETERMI-
NATION AS TO PRECLEARANCE, THE COMMISSION SHALL IDENTIFY IN WRITING
WHETHER IT IS APPROVING OR REJECTING THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU'S RECOMMEN-
DATION. IF THE PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION GRANTS PRECLEARANCE, IT MAY, IN
ITS DISCRETION, DESIGNATE PRECLEARANCE AS "PRELIMINARY" IN WHICH CASE
THE COMMISSION MAY DENY PRECLEARANCE WITHIN SIXTY DAYS FOLLOWING THE
RECEIPT OF SUBMISSION OF THE COVERED POLICY.
(I) THE COMMISSION SHALL GRANT PRECLEARANCE ONLY IF IT DETERMINES,
UPON REVIEW OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU'S RECOMMENDATION, THAT THE
COVERED POLICY WILL NOT DIMINISH THE ABILITY OF MINORITY GROUPS TO
PARTICIPATE IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS AND TO ELECT THEIR PREFERRED CANDI-
DATES TO OFFICE. IF THE COMMISSION GRANTS PRECLEARANCE, THE COVERED
ENTITY MAY ENACT OR IMPLEMENT THE COVERED POLICY IMMEDIATELY.
(II) IF THE COMMISSION DENIES PRECLEARANCE, THE COMMISSION SHALL
INTERPOSE OBJECTIONS EXPLAINING ITS BASIS AND THE COVERED POLICY SHALL
NOT BE ENACTED OR IMPLEMENTED.
(III) IF THE COMMISSION FAILS TO RESPOND WITHIN THE TIME FOR RESPONSE
AS ESTABLISHED IN THIS SECTION, THE COVERED POLICY SHALL BE DEEMED
PRECLEARED, AND THE COVERED ENTITY MAY ENACT OR IMPLEMENT THE COVERED
POLICY.
(IV) IF THE COMMISSION'S MEMBERSHIP FALLS BELOW A QUORUM AT ANY TIME,
OR DURING ANY TIME PERIOD THAT MAY ELAPSE BETWEEN THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF
THIS SECTION AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A QUORUM ON THE COMMISSION, THE
CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU'S RECOMMENDATION AS TO WHETHER PRECLEARANCE SHOULD
BE GRANTED OR DENIED SHALL HAVE THE FORCE OF FINAL PRECLEARANCE DETERMI-
NATION UNTIL THE COMMISSION'S QUORUM IS ESTABLISHED OR RESTORED.
(F) THE TIME PERIODS FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU REVIEW,
AND THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSION TO GRANT OR DENY PRECLEARANCE ON
SUBMISSION SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
(I) FOR ANY COVERED POLICY CONCERNING THE DESIGNATION OF POLL SITES OR
THE ASSIGNMENT OF ELECTION DISTRICTS TO POLL SITES, WHETHER FOR ELECTION
DAY OR EARLY VOTING, THE PERIOD FOR PUBLIC COMMENT SHALL BE FIVE BUSI-
NESS DAYS, THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU SHALL SUBMIT ITS REPORT AND RECOMMEN-
DATION TO THE COMMISSION WITHIN TWENTY-FIVE DAYS FOLLOWING THE RECEIPT
OF SUBMISSION, AND A SINGLE COMMISSIONER, ASSIGNED ON A ROTATING BASIS,
SHALL REVIEW THE SUBMISSION, THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU'S RECOMMENDATION,
AND ANY PUBLIC COMMENT, AND SHALL, WITHIN FIVE DAYS, EITHER: (A) APPROVE
THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU'S RECOMMENDATION; OR (B) REFER THE SUBMISSION
AND THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU'S RECOMMENDATION TO THE COMMISSION FOR A
DETERMINATION AS TO WHETHER PRECLEARANCE SHALL BE DENIED OR GRANTED. IF
A. 6678--B 16
THE COMMISSIONER INITIALLY ASSIGNED REFERS THE SUBMISSION AND THE CIVIL
RIGHTS BUREAU'S RECOMMENDATION TO THE COMMISSION FOR A DETERMINATION,
THE COMMISSION SHALL DENY OR GRANT PRECLEARANCE WITHIN FIVE DAYS FROM
THE DATE OF REFERRAL.
(II) FOR ANY COVERED POLICY CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
DISTRICT-BASED OR ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF ELECTION, DISTRICTING OR REDIS-
TRICTING PLANS, OR A CHANGE TO THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT OF A POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION, THE PERIOD FOR PUBLIC COMMENT SHALL BE FIFTEEN BUSINESS
DAYS, THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU SHALL SUBMIT ITS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
TO THE COMMISSION WITHIN SEVENTY-FIVE DAYS, AND A PANEL OF THREE COMMIS-
SIONERS, ASSIGNED ON A ROTATING BASIS, SHALL REVIEW THE SUBMISSION, THE
CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU'S RECOMMENDATION, AND ANY PUBLIC COMMENT, AND SHALL,
WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS, DENY OR GRANT PRECLEARANCE. SUBJECT TO THE STAND-
ARDS OF REVIEW AND REQUIREMENT OF A WRITTEN STATEMENT IDENTIFYING THE
REASONS FOR APPROVING OR REJECTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CIVIL
RIGHTS BUREAU, THE VOTE OF ANY COMMISSIONER TO DENY PRECLEARANCE SHALL
BE SUFFICIENT TO DENY PRECLEARANCE. IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CIVIL
RIGHTS BUREAU, THE COMMISSION MAY INVOKE UP TO TWO EXTENSIONS OF NINETY
DAYS EACH.
(III) FOR ANY OTHER COVERED POLICY, THE PERIOD FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
SHALL BE TEN BUSINESS DAYS, THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU SHALL SUBMIT ITS
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE COMMISSION WITHIN FIFTY DAYS, AND A
SINGLE COMMISSIONER, ASSIGNED ON A ROTATING BASIS, SHALL REVIEW THE
SUBMISSION, THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU'S RECOMMENDATION, AND ANY PUBLIC
COMMENT, AND SHALL, WITHIN FIVE DAYS, EITHER: (A) APPROVE THE CIVIL
RIGHTS BUREAU'S RECOMMENDATION; OR (B) REFER THE SUBMISSION AND THE
CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU'S RECOMMENDATION TO THE COMMISSION FOR A DETERMI-
NATION AS TO WHETHER PRECLEARANCE SHALL BE DENIED OR GRANTED. IF THE
COMMISSIONER INITIALLY ASSIGNED REFERS THE SUBMISSION AND THE CIVIL
RIGHTS BUREAU'S RECOMMENDATION TO THE COMMISSION FOR A DETERMINATION,
THE COMMISSION SHALL DENY OR GRANT PRECLEARANCE WITHIN TEN DAYS FROM THE
DATE OF REFERRAL. IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU, THE
COMMISSION MAY INVOKE UP TO TWO EXTENSIONS OF NINETY DAYS EACH.
(G) APPEAL OF ANY DENIAL BY THE PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION MAY BE HEARD
IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN A PROCEEDING
COMMENCED AGAINST THE COMMISSION, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE SEVENTY-EIGHT OF
THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES, FROM WHICH APPEAL MAY BE TAKEN ACCORD-
ING TO THE ORDINARY RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE. DUE TO THE FREQUENCY
AND URGENCY OF ELECTIONS, ACTIONS BROUGHT PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION SHALL
BE SUBJECT TO EXPEDITED PRETRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEEDINGS AND RECEIVE AN
AUTOMATIC CALENDAR PREFERENCE ON APPEAL.
5. PRECLEARANCE BY A DESIGNATED COURT. A COVERED ENTITY MAY OBTAIN
PRECLEARANCE FOR A COVERED POLICY FROM A COURT PURSUANT TO THE FOLLOWING
PROCESS:
(A) THE COVERED ENTITY SHALL SUBMIT THE COVERED POLICY IN WRITING TO
THE FOLLOWING DESIGNATED COURT IN THE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT WITHIN WHICH
THE COVERED ENTITY IS LOCATED: (I) FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT: NEW YORK
COUNTY; (II) SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT: WESTCHESTER COUNTY; (III)
THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT: ALBANY COUNTY; AND (IV) FOURTH JUDICIAL
DEPARTMENT: ERIE COUNTY. IF THE COVERED ENTITY IS A COUNTY OR CITY
BOARD OF ELECTIONS, IT SHALL CONTEMPORANEOUSLY PROVIDE A COPY OF THE
COVERED POLICY TO THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS.
(B) THE COVERED ENTITY SHALL CONTEMPORANEOUSLY PROVIDE A COPY OF THE
COVERED POLICY TO THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU. THE FAILURE OF THE COVERED
ENTITY TO PROVIDE A COPY OF THE COVERED POLICY TO THE CIVIL RIGHTS
BUREAU WILL RESULT IN AN AUTOMATIC DENIAL OF PRECLEARANCE.
A. 6678--B 17
(C) THE COURT SHALL GRANT OR DENY PRECLEARANCE WITHIN SIXTY DAYS
FOLLOWING THE RECEIPT OF SUBMISSION OF THE COVERED POLICY.
(D) THE COURT SHALL GRANT PRECLEARANCE ONLY IF IT DETERMINES THAT THE
COVERED POLICY WILL NOT DIMINISH THE ABILITY OF MINORITY GROUPS TO
PARTICIPATE IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS AND TO ELECT THEIR PREFERRED CANDI-
DATES TO OFFICE. IF THE COURT GRANTS PRECLEARANCE, THE COVERED ENTITY
MAY ENACT OR IMPLEMENT THE COVERED POLICY IMMEDIATELY.
(E) IF THE COURT DENIES PRECLEARANCE, OR FAILS TO RESPOND WITHIN SIXTY
DAYS, THE COVERED POLICY SHALL NOT BE ENACTED OR IMPLEMENTED.
(F) APPEAL OF ANY DENIAL MAY BE TAKEN ACCORDING TO THE ORDINARY RULES
OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE. DUE TO THE FREQUENCY AND URGENCY OF ELECTIONS,
ACTIONS BROUGHT PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO EXPEDITED
PRETRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEEDINGS AND RECEIVE AN AUTOMATIC CALENDAR PREFER-
ENCE ON APPEAL.
6. FAILURE TO SEEK OR OBTAIN PRECLEARANCE. IF ANY COVERED ENTITY
ENACTS OR IMPLEMENTS A COVERED POLICY WITHOUT SEEKING PRECLEARANCE
PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, OR ENACTS OR IMPLEMENTS A COVERED POLICY
NOTWITHSTANDING THE DENIAL OF PRECLEARANCE, EITHER THE CIVIL RIGHTS
BUREAU OR ANY OTHER PARTY WITH STANDING TO BRING AN ACTION UNDER THIS
TITLE MAY BRING AN ACTION TO ENJOIN THE COVERED POLICY AND TO SEEK SANC-
TIONS AGAINST THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION AND OFFICIALS IN VIOLATION.
7. LOOKBACK REVIEW. (A) FOR A PERIOD OF ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY DAYS BEGIN-
NING ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION, THE COMMISSION OR THE CIVIL
RIGHTS BUREAU MAY, IN ITS DISCRETION, INITIATE A LOOKBACK REVIEW IN
WHICH IT MAY DENY CLEARANCE TO CERTAIN COVERED POLICIES THAT HAD BEEN
PREVIOUSLY ENACTED BY COVERED JURISDICTIONS.
(B) THE COMMISSION MAY ONLY INITIATE A LOOKBACK REVIEW OF COVERED
POLICIES THAT WERE ENACTED OR IMPLEMENTED BY A COVERED JURISDICTION ON
OR AFTER THE DATE ON WHICH THIS TITLE TAKES EFFECT AND PRIOR TO THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION.
(C) IN ORDER TO INITIATE A LOOKBACK REVIEW, THE COMMISSION MUST
PROVIDE NOTICE TO A COVERED ENTITY OF ITS DECISION TO REVIEW A COVERED
POLICY ENACTED OR IMPLEMENTED BY THAT COVERED ENTITY. UPON RECEIPT OF
SUCH NOTICE, THE COVERED ENTITY SHALL SUBMIT THE COVERED POLICY IN WRIT-
ING TO THE PRECLEARANCE COMMISSION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS.
(D) UPON RECEIPT OF A COVERED POLICY FOR LOOKBACK REVIEW, THE COMMIS-
SION SHALL PUBLISH THE SUBMISSION ON ITS WEBSITE. THE SCHEDULE AND
PROCEDURES FOR RECEIVING PUBLIC COMMENT AND EVALUATING A SUBMISSION
THROUGH LOOKBACK REVIEW SHALL REFLECT THE SCHEDULE AND PROCEDURES
PROVIDED BY PARAGRAPH (F) OF SUBDIVISION FOUR OF THIS SECTION, BASED ON
THE TYPE OF POLICY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THE SUBMISSION.
8. RULES AND REGULATIONS. THE CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU MAY PROMULGATE SUCH
RULES AND REGULATIONS PURSUANT TO THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT
AS ARE NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION.
§ 17-214. RIGHT OF ACTION AGAINST VOTER INTIMIDATION, DECEPTION OR
OBSTRUCTION. 1. (A) NO PERSON, WHETHER ACTING UNDER COLOR OF LAW OR
OTHERWISE, MAY ENGAGE IN ACTS OF INTIMIDATION, DECEPTION, OR OBSTRUCTION
THAT AFFECTS THE RIGHT OF VOTERS TO ACCESS THE ELECTIVE FRANCHISE.
(B) A VIOLATION OF THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE:
(I) ESTABLISHED IF A PERSON USES OR THREATENS TO USE ANY FORCE,
VIOLENCE, RESTRAINT, ABDUCTION OR DURESS, OR INFLICTS OR THREATENS TO
INFLICT ANY INJURY, DAMAGE, HARM OR LOSS, OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PRAC-
TICES INTIMIDATION THAT CAUSES OR WILL REASONABLY HAVE THE EFFECT OF
CAUSING ANY PERSON TO VOTE OR REFRAIN FROM VOTING IN GENERAL OR FOR OR
AGAINST ANY PARTICULAR PERSON OR FOR OR AGAINST ANY PROPOSITION SUBMIT-
TED TO VOTERS AT SUCH ELECTION; TO PLACE OR REFRAIN FROM PLACING THEIR
A. 6678--B 18
NAME UPON A REGISTRY OF VOTERS; OR TO REQUEST OR REFRAIN FROM REQUESTING
AN ABSENTEE BALLOT; OR
(II) ESTABLISHED IF A PERSON KNOWINGLY USES ANY DECEPTIVE OR FRAUDU-
LENT DEVICE, CONTRIVANCE OR COMMUNICATION, THAT IMPEDES, PREVENTS OR
OTHERWISE INTERFERES WITH THE FREE EXERCISE OF THE ELECTIVE FRANCHISE BY
ANY PERSON, OR THAT CAUSES OR WILL REASONABLY HAVE THE EFFECT OF CAUSING
ANY PERSON TO VOTE OR REFRAIN FROM VOTING IN GENERAL OR FOR OR AGAINST
ANY PARTICULAR PERSON OR FOR OR AGAINST ANY PROPOSITION SUBMITTED TO
VOTERS AT SUCH ELECTION; TO PLACE OR REFRAIN FROM PLACING THEIR NAME
UPON A REGISTRY OF VOTERS; OR TO REQUEST OR REFRAIN FROM REQUESTING AN
ABSENTEE BALLOT; OR
(III) ESTABLISHED IF A PERSON OBSTRUCTS, IMPEDES, OR OTHERWISE INTER-
FERES WITH ACCESS TO ANY POLLING PLACE OR ELECTIONS OFFICE, OR
OBSTRUCTS, IMPEDES, OR OTHERWISE INTERFERES WITH ANY VOTER IN ANY MANNER
THAT CAUSES OR WILL REASONABLY HAVE THE EFFECT OF CAUSING ANY DELAY IN
VOTING OR THE VOTING PROCESS, INCLUDING THE CANVASSING AND TABULATION OF
BALLOTS.
2. STANDING. ANY AGGRIEVED PERSONS, ORGANIZATION WHOSE MEMBERSHIP
INCLUDES OR IS LIKELY TO INCLUDE AGGRIEVED PERSONS, ORGANIZATION WHOSE
MISSION WOULD BE FRUSTRATED BY A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION, ORGANIZATION
THAT WOULD EXPEND RESOURCES IN ORDER TO FULFILL ITS MISSION AS A RESULT
OF A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION, OR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY FILE AN
ACTION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COUNTY IN
WHICH THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION OCCURRED.
3. REMEDIES. UPON A FINDING OF A VIOLATION OF ANY PROVISION OF THIS
SECTION, THE COURT SHALL IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE REMEDIES THAT ARE
TAILORED TO REMEDY THE VIOLATION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PROVIDING
FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO CAST A BALLOT THAT MAY BE COUNTED IN THE ELECTION
AT ISSUE. THIS TITLE GIVES THE COURT AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT REMEDIES
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF STATE OR LOCAL LAW, INCLUDING ANY
OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW. ANY PARTY WHO SHALL VIOLATE ANY OF THE
PROVISIONS OF THE FOREGOING SECTION OR WHO SHALL AID THE VIOLATION OF
ANY OF SAID PROVISIONS SHALL BE LIABLE TO ANY PREVAILING PLAINTIFF PARTY
FOR DAMAGES, INCLUDING NOMINAL DAMAGES FOR ANY VIOLATION, AND COMPENSA-
TORY OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES FOR ANY INTENTIONAL VIOLATION.
§ 17-216. AUTHORITY TO ISSUE SUBPOENAS. IN ANY ACTION OR INVESTIGATION
TO ENFORCE ANY PROVISION OF THIS TITLE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL HAVE
THE AUTHORITY TO TAKE PROOF AND DETERMINE RELEVANT FACTS AND TO ISSUE
SUBPOENAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES.
§ 17-218. EXPEDITED JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AND PRELIMINARY RELIEF.
BECAUSE OF THE FREQUENCY OF ELECTIONS, THE SEVERE CONSEQUENCES AND IRRE-
PARABLE HARM OF HOLDING ELECTIONS UNDER UNLAWFUL CONDITIONS, AND THE
EXPENDITURE TO DEFEND POTENTIALLY UNLAWFUL CONDITIONS THAT BENEFIT
INCUMBENT OFFICIALS, ACTIONS BROUGHT PURSUANT TO THIS TITLE SHALL BE
SUBJECT TO EXPEDITED PRETRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEEDINGS AND RECEIVE AN AUTO-
MATIC CALENDAR PREFERENCE. IN ANY ACTION ALLEGING A VIOLATION OF THIS
SECTION IN WHICH A PLAINTIFF PARTY SEEKS PRELIMINARY RELIEF WITH RESPECT
TO AN UPCOMING ELECTION, THE COURT SHALL GRANT RELIEF IF IT DETERMINES
THAT: (A) PLAINTIFFS ARE MORE LIKELY THAN NOT TO SUCCEED ON THE MERITS;
AND (B) IT IS POSSIBLE TO IMPLEMENT AN APPROPRIATE REMEDY THAT WOULD
RESOLVE THE ALLEGED VIOLATION IN THE UPCOMING ELECTION.
§ 17-220. ATTORNEYS' FEES. IN ANY ACTION TO ENFORCE ANY PROVISION OF
THIS TITLE, THE COURT SHALL ALLOW THE PREVAILING PLAINTIFF PARTY, OTHER
THAN THE STATE OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, A REASONABLE ATTORNEYS'
FEE, LITIGATION EXPENSES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EXPERT WITNESS
FEES AND EXPENSES AS PART OF THE COSTS. A PLAINTIFF WILL BE DEEMED TO
A. 6678--B 19
HAVE PREVAILED WHEN, AS A RESULT OF LITIGATION, THE DEFENDANT PARTY
YIELDS MUCH OR ALL OF THE RELIEF SOUGHT IN THE SUIT. PREVAILING DEFEND-
ANT PARTIES SHALL NOT RECOVER ANY COSTS, UNLESS THE COURT FINDS THE
ACTION TO BE FRIVOLOUS, UNREASONABLE, OR WITHOUT FOUNDATION.
§ 17-222. APPLICABILITY. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS TITLE SHALL APPLY TO
ALL ELECTIONS FOR ANY ELECTED OFFICE OR ELECTORAL CHOICE WITHIN THE
STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS TITLE SHALL
APPLY NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, INCLUDING ANY OTHER
STATE LAW OR LOCAL LAW.
§ 17-224. SEVERABILITY. IF ANY PROVISION OF THIS TITLE OR ITS APPLICA-
TION TO ANY PERSON, POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, OR CIRCUMSTANCE IS HELD
INVALID, THE INVALIDITY SHALL NOT AFFECT OTHER PROVISIONS OR APPLICA-
TIONS OF THIS TITLE WHICH CAN BE GIVEN EFFECT WITHOUT THE INVALID
PROVISION OR APPLICATION, AND TO THIS END THE PROVISIONS OF THIS TITLE
ARE SEVERABLE.
§ 5. This act shall take effect immediately; provided, however, that
paragraph (c) of subdivision seven of section 17-206 of the election law
as added by section four of this act shall take effect one year after it
shall have become a law; and provided further, however, that section
17-208 of the election law as added by section four of this act shall
take effect three years after it shall have become a law; and provided
further, however, that section 17-212 of the election law, as added by
section four of this act, shall take effect one year after the attorney
general certifies that the office of the attorney general is prepared to
execute the duties assigned in section four of this act, if after the
expiration of one year the attorney general requires more time to certi-
fy that the office of the attorney general is prepared to execute the
duties assigned in section four of this act, the attorney general, may,
for good cause shown, apply to the governor for such an extension of
time. The governor may grant or deny an extension of up to one year
according to his or her discretion. The attorney general shall notify
the legislative bill drafting commission upon the occurrence of the
enactment of the legislation provided for in section four of this act in
order that the commission may maintain an accurate and timely effective
data base of the official text of the laws of the state of New York in
furtherance of effectuating the provisions of section 44 of the legisla-
tive law and section 70-b of the public officers law.