NY State Senate Bill 2021-S1793

Senate Bill S1793

2021-2022 Legislative Session

Provides that certain entities may not require a person to provide a copy of his or her criminal history record under certain circumstances

download bill text pdf

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Investigations And Government Operations Committee

Introduced
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
Delivered to Governor
Signed By Governor

Please enter your contact information

First Name

Last Name

Email Address

A valid email address is required.

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Actions

View Actions

	Assembly Actions - Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Jan 05, 2022	referred to investigations and government operations
Jan 15, 2021	referred to investigations and government operations

co-Sponsors

2021-S1793 (ACTIVE) - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A697
Current Committee:: Senate Investigations And Government Operations
Law Section:: Executive Law
Laws Affected:: Amd §296, Exec L; amd §313, Ed L
Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:: 2013-2014: A7593
2015-2016: A158
2017-2018: S8689, A1270
2019-2020: S2164, A5279
2023-2024: S940, A6637

2021-S1793 (ACTIVE) - Summary

Provides that certain entities may not require a person to provide a copy of his or her criminal history record under certain circumstances.

2021-S1793 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

                                
 
BILL NUMBER: S1793

SPONSOR: BAILEY
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the executive law and the education law, in relation to
prohibiting mandatory disclosure of a criminal history record in certain
circumstances

 
PURPOSE:

To make it unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer to require a
job applicant to disclose his or her criminal history record obtained
from the Division of Criminal Justice Services as a requirement for
consideration of employment.

 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section I of the bill amends subdivision 15 of section 256 of the execu-
tive law to make it an unlawful discriminatory practice for a person,
agency, bureau, corporation, state or political subdivision to require

an individual to provide a copy of his or her criminal history record
obtained from the Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS).

Section II of the bill adds a new paragraph (0 to subdivision 3 of
section 313 of the education law to prohibit an institution of education
to require an individual provide his or her DCJS criminal history record
to such institution.

Section III sets forth the effective date.

 
JUSTIFICATION:

As the central repository of criminal history information in New York,
the Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) is charged with main-
taining finger-print based criminal history records of individuals
arrested for criminal offenses in New York State. See generally, Execu-
tive Law § 837. The DCJS criminal history record (DCJS record.) is
confidential and is available to law enforcement agencies, courts and
entities that have statutory access to the records. See Executive Law §
836(6),(8). In addition, individuals can obtain their personal DCJS
record. See 9 NYCRP. 60.50.1 (establishing procedures for people who are
not incarcerated to access their personal record); Executive Law § 837
(8-a) (establishing the right for incarcerated people to access their
personal DCJS records without having to pay a fee), The personal DCJS
record that is disclosed to individuals is unsuppressed, and therefore
includes arrests that have been scaled under Criminal Procedure Law
(CPL) § 160.55, or § 160,58, and arrests that have resulted in Youthful
Offender adjudication and deemed confidential under CPL § 720.35, to
ensure the confidentiality of the personal DCJS record; DCJS permits
individuals to authorize re-disclosure of their personal record only to
their attorneys.

The confidential nature of the DCJS record is reinforced by those stat-
utes that authorize disclosure to non-law enforcement entities.  For
example, Executive law § 837-n allows certain employers to access DCJS
of applicants for caregiver positions. Subsection (2) (b) of this
provision specifically states that the DCJS record is not to be redis-
closed, and that "any person who rediscloses such reports in violation
of this section shall be guilty of a class A misdemeanor."  In addition,
DCJS's website includes warnings about the confidentiality of its crimi-
nal history record, stating for example the following: "Note: a personal
record review cannot be requested for another person in order to deter-
mine if that person has a criminal history."

Despite the clear import of these laws and policies, a growing number of
entities are trying to bypass the confidential nature of the DCJS record
by requiring applicants to obtain and redisclose their personal DCJS
records. For example, at least two colleges, Empire State College and
SUNY Plattsburgh, require applicants to re-disclose their personal DCJS
records as a condition of admission, and the Office of Alcohol and
Substance Abuse Services (OASAS) had maintained a policy requiring
applicants for certification or recertification as an alcohol and
substance abuse counselor to redisclose their personal DCJS record.
Because the personal DCJS record is unsuppressed, the entities engaging
in this practice improperly obtain information about sealed or confiden-
tial arrests.

Taken as a whole, the existing laws seem to prohibit this practice.  But
there is not one provision than an applicant can point to in rebuffing
an entity's request or requirement that the personal DCJS record be
redisclosed. Nor do entities that undermine the confidentiality of the
DCJS record in this. manner incur a penalty.  In addition, because there
is not one provision explicitly prohibiting this practice, many appli-
cants are not aware of the illegal nature of the request disclose their
personal DCJS records and comply without fully understanding the conse-
quences of doing so.

This proposed legislation seeks to protect the confidentiality of the
DCJS record explicitly providing that entities cannot ask or require
applicants to re-disclose their personal DCJS records. Specifically, the
proposed legislation:

1. Amends Executive Law g 837 by including new subsection (8-d) which
explicitly prohibits any entity from asking or requiring applicants to
re-disclose their personal DCJS record.

2. Ensures that "entity" is broadly defined by looking to Executive
(Human Rights) Law for definitions of entities in the domains of employ-
ment and housing, and to the regulations promulgated pursuant to the
Education Law for the definition of institutions of higher education.

3. Provides for full enforcement of this prohibition by making it a
class A misdemeanor for any "person" who fails to comply. "Person" is
defined by penal Law f 10.00(7) to include not only human beings, but
also public or private corporations, unincorporated associations, part-
nerships, the governments and governmental instrumentalities,- See
generally People v. Highgate LTC management, 09 A.D,3d 135 (2009) (noth-
ing how broadly "person" is defined under Penal Law f 10,00(7)).  This
penalty parallels the penalty set forth in Executive Law f 637-n for
unauthorized redisclosure of the DCJS record.

 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

2017-18: S.3669/A.1270(Rozic) - Referred to Investigation and Government
Operations

2019-20: S.2164/A.5279(Rozic) - Referred to Investigation and Government
Operations

 
FISCAL IMPACT ON THE STATE:

None.

 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect one hundred twenty days after it shall have
become law.

2021-S1793 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

                            
 
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                   1793
 
                        2021-2022 Regular Sessions
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                             January 15, 2021
                                ___________
 
 Introduced by Sens. BAILEY, MYRIE -- read twice and ordered printed, and
   when  printed  to  be committed to the Committee on Investigations and
   Government Operations
 
 AN ACT to amend the executive law and the education law, in relation  to
   prohibiting  mandatory  disclosure  of  a  criminal  history record in
   certain circumstances

   THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section  1.  Subdivision  15  of  section 296 of the executive law, as
 amended by chapter 534 of the laws  of  2008,  is  amended  to  read  as
 follows:
   15.  It  shall  be an unlawful discriminatory practice for any person,
 agency, bureau, corporation or association, including the state and  any
 political  subdivision thereof, to deny any license or employment to any
 individual by reason of his or her having been convicted of one or  more
 criminal  offenses,  or  by reason of a finding of a lack of "good moral
 character" which is based upon his or her having been convicted  of  one
 or  more  criminal  offenses,  when  such  denial is in violation of the
 provisions of article twenty-three-A of  the  correction  law.  Further,
 there  shall  be  a  rebuttable  presumption  in favor of excluding from
 evidence the prior incarceration or conviction of any person, in a  case
 alleging  that the employer has been negligent in hiring or retaining an
 applicant or employee, or supervising a hiring manager, if after  learn-
 ing  about  an applicant or employee's past criminal conviction history,
 such employer has evaluated the  factors  set  forth  in  section  seven
 hundred  fifty-two  of  the  correction law, and made a reasonable, good
 faith determination that such factors  militate  in  favor  of  hire  or
 retention  of  that  applicant  or  employee. NO PERSON, AGENCY, BUREAU,
 CORPORATION, ASSOCIATION, THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION  THERE-
 OF, SHALL REQUIRE AN INDIVIDUAL TO PROVIDE A COPY OF HIS OR HER CRIMINAL

  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                            LBD03305-01-1

 S. 1793                             2
 
 HISTORY  RECORD  THAT HE OR SHE OBTAINED PURSUANT TO THE RULES AND REGU-
 LATIONS OF THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES.
   §  2.  Subdivision 3 of section 313 of the education law is amended by
 adding a new paragraph (f) to read as follows:
   (F) NO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION SHALL REQUIRE AN INDIVIDUAL TO  PROVIDE
 A  COPY  OF  HIS  OR HER CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORD THAT HE OR SHE OBTAINED
 PURSUANT TO THE RULES  AND  REGULATIONS  OF  THE  DIVISION  OF  CRIMINAL
 JUSTICE SERVICES.
   § 3. This act shall take effect on the one hundred twentieth day after
 it shall have become a law.

Comments

Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.

Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Senate Bill S1793

Share this bill

Sponsored By

Jamaal T. Bailey