Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
May 10, 2024 |
referred to codes |
Assembly Bill A10194
2023-2024 Legislative Session
Sponsored By
SOLAGES
Current Bill Status - In Assembly Committee
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Delivered to Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
co-Sponsors
Monique Chandler-Waterman
Chris Burdick
Rebecca Seawright
Nily Rozic
2023-A10194 (ACTIVE) - Details
- See Senate Version of this Bill:
- S9225
- Current Committee:
- Assembly Codes
- Law Section:
- Penal Law
- Laws Affected:
- Amd §§265.00, 265.02, 265.10 & 265.20, Pen L
2023-A10194 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 10194 I N A S S E M B L Y May 10, 2024 ___________ Introduced by COMMITTEE ON RULES -- (at request of M. of A. Solages) -- read once and referred to the Committee on Codes AN ACT to amend the penal law, in relation to the regulation of pistol converters and convertible pistols THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Subdivision 1 of section 265.00 of the penal law is amended and two new subdivisions 36 and 37 are added to read as follows: 1. "Machine-gun" means a weapon of any description, irrespective of size, by whatever name known, loaded or unloaded, from which a number of shots or bullets may be rapidly or automatically discharged from a maga- zine with one continuous pull of the trigger and includes a sub-machine gun, AND ALSO INCLUDES ANY CONVERTIBLE PISTOL THAT IS EQUIPPED WITH A PISTOL CONVERTER. 36. "PISTOL CONVERTER" MEANS ANY DEVICE OR INSTRUMENT THAT WHEN INSTALLED IN OR ATTACHED TO THE SLIDE OF A SEMI-AUTOMATIC PISTOL INTER- FERES WITH THE TRIGGER MECHANISM AND THEREBY ENABLES THE PISTOL TO DISCHARGE A NUMBER OF SHOTS OR BULLETS RAPIDLY OR AUTOMATICALLY WITH ONE CONTINUOUS PULL OF THE TRIGGER. 37. "CONVERTIBLE PISTOL" MEANS ANY SEMI-AUTOMATIC PISTOL THAT CAN BE CONVERTED INTO A MACHINE-GUN SOLELY BY THE INSTALLATION OR ATTACHMENT OF A PISTOL CONVERTER. § 2. Subdivision 10 of section 265.02 of the penal law, as added by chapter 1 of the laws of 2013, is amended and a new subdivision 11 is added to read as follows: (10) Such person possesses an unloaded firearm and also commits any violent felony offense as defined in subdivision one of section 70.02 of this chapter as part of the same criminal transaction[.]; OR (11) SUCH PERSON KNOWINGLY POSSESSES ANY PISTOL CONVERTER. § 3. Subdivisions 1 and 2 of section 265.10 of the penal law, as sepa- rately amended by chapters 34, 130, and 146 of the laws of 2019, are amended and a new subdivision 10 is added to read as follows: 1. Any person who manufactures or causes to be manufactured any machine-gun, PISTOL CONVERTER, assault weapon, large capacity ammunition EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted.
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.
This bill is unconstitutional on its face (see Caetano v Massachusetts, Heller v Washington DC & NYSR&PA v Bruen). This bill goes after the most common type of pistol (semi-automatic) and the most common manufacturer of semi-auto pistols (Glock) which are used for legal purposes. It's already against the law to convert a semi-auto firearm to full auto and it also already against the law to possess any part to make such a conversion. This bill is redundant to those laws. This bill will have a much more negative effect on lawful pistol owners than it will on career criminals who ignore all gun laws. Rather than propose or pass a bill that targets lawful gun owners, how about enforce existing laws and put career criminals behind bars rather than release them without bond to continue their assault on decent citizens.
This is explicitly unconstitutional in light of Bruen, Heller, and Caetano - the authors do not even attempt to justify this bill as constitutional (not that they could), even though that is their burden.
I am a registered democrat in NYS; go have your staffers check. It's these bills that have made me say: no more. The legislators and governor in this state do not care about our rights and do not even try to uphold their oaths to the constitution. They are sellouts to Bloomberg and his billionaire friends attempting to destroy our rights by disarming us.
Never again will I vote for a Democrat after these last few years of tyrannical legislation. This is extremely offensive to any law abiding citizen that understands the way government is supposed to function and that these legislators are supposed to work to protect our rights, not destroy them.
I am writing to you to express my strong opposition to this bill, and it's implications to ban semi-auto pistols that easily convert to automatic fire (allegedly). As I am sure that you are aware, since in or around 1986, it has been a federal crime to manufacture/register new machine guns in the U.S. New York state also has similar laws regulating the use of machine guns. Given that it is already illegal to produce devices that convert semi-auto pistols like a Glock Pistol into a machine gun, I fail to see how banning all such pistols that can easily accept those devices (allegedly) is a solution in keeping with the second amendment, as applied to the states via the fourteenth amendment. Advocates of gun control always state that these laws are made to keep the people safer, and yet here we are proposing another law because the existing gun laws have not lived up to the promise to protect us at the costs of our rights. If gun control works so well, and laws against devices from converting pistols into machine guns already exist, then why do we need to ban an entire class of pistols. Perhaps we should be enforcing existing laws, not letting criminals get off easy so that they can be released and kill police officers like Jonathan Diller and so many other innocents. We need to design laws that punish criminals, and we need to strictly enforce them. We do not need laws that target honest, law abiding citizens that have done nothing wrong. This legislation serves only to burden law abiding gun owners such as myself, who have already jumped through significant hoops to secure pistol permits via extensive background checks and other requirements. Additionally, this legislation will fail constitutional challenges. I cannot imagine any argument that semi-auto pistols are not in common use for lawful purposes, including but not limited to self-defense. I cannot see how it would survive a Bruen analysis. This proposed law is set up to fail. It is an insult to the bill of rights, and the people of New York State. I ask that you stand up for the rights of your constituents, and oppose this heinous bill.