S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
2416
2023-2024 Regular Sessions
I N A S S E M B L Y
January 26, 2023
___________
Introduced by M. of A. BYRNES, MORINELLO -- read once and referred to
the Committee on Children and Families
AN ACT to amend the social services law and the family court act, in
relation to allowing certain previous investigations to be re-examined
using a fair preponderance of the evidence standard
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subdivisions 6 and 7 of section 412 of the social services
law, as amended by section 1 of part R of chapter 56 of the laws of
2020, are amended to read as follows:
6. An "unfounded report" means any report made pursuant to this title
unless an investigation: (i) commenced on or before December thirty-
first, two thousand twenty-one determines that some credible evidence of
the alleged abuse or maltreatment exists; or (ii) commenced on or after
January first, two thousand twenty-two determines that a fair preponder-
ance of the evidence of the alleged abuse or maltreatment exists; OR
(III) COMMENCED AT ANY TIME IN WHICH THE SUBJECT OF THE REPORT IS A
VICTIM OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THE SOLE BASIS FOR SUCH REPORT IS THAT
SUCH SUBJECT FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE GUARDIANSHIP DUE TO ENGAGING IN
ACTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DETERMINES THAT A FAIR PREPONDERANCE OF THE
EVIDENCE OF THE ALLEGED ABUSE OR MALTREATMENT EXISTS;
7. An "indicated report" means a report made pursuant to this title if
an investigation: (i) commenced on or before December thirty-first, two
thousand twenty-one determines that some credible evidence of the
alleged abuse or maltreatment exists; or (ii) commenced on or after
January first, two thousand twenty-two determines that a fair preponder-
ance of the evidence of the alleged abuse or maltreatment exists; OR
(III) COMMENCED AT ANY TIME IN WHICH THE SUBJECT OF THE REPORT IS A
VICTIM OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THE SOLE BASIS FOR SUCH REPORT IS THAT
SUCH SUBJECT FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE GUARDIANSHIP DUE TO ENGAGING IN
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD03972-01-3
A. 2416 2
ACTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DETERMINES THAT A FAIR PREPONDERANCE OF THE
EVIDENCE OF THE ALLEGED ABUSE OR MALTREATMENT EXISTS;
§ 2. The opening paragraph of paragraph (a) of subdivision 5 of
section 422 of the social services law, as amended by section 3 of part
R of chapter 56 of the laws of 2020, is amended to read as follows:
Unless an investigation of a report conducted pursuant to this title
that is commenced on or before December thirty-first, two thousand twen-
ty-one determines that there is some credible evidence of the alleged
abuse or maltreatment or unless an investigation of a report conducted
pursuant to this title that is commenced on or after January first, two
thousand twenty-two determines that there is a fair preponderance of the
evidence that the alleged abuse or maltreatment occurred OR UNLESS AN
INVESTIGATION OF A REPORT CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO THIS TITLE THAT IS
COMMENCED AT ANY TIME IN WHICH THE SUBJECT OF THE REPORT IS A VICTIM OF
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THE SOLE BASIS FOR SUCH REPORT IS THAT SUCH
SUBJECT FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE GUARDIANSHIP DUE TO ENGAGING IN ACTS
OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DETERMINES THAT A FAIR PREPONDERANCE OF THE
EVIDENCE OF THE ALLEGED ABUSE OR MALTREATMENT OCCURRED, all information
identifying the subjects of the report and other persons named in the
report shall be legally sealed forthwith by the central register and any
local child protective services which investigated the report. Such
unfounded reports may only be unsealed and made available:
§ 3. Paragraph (c) of subdivision 5 of section 422 of the social
services law, as amended by section 4 of part R of chapter 56 of the
laws of 2020, is amended to read as follows:
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the office of children
and family services may, in its discretion, grant a request to expunge
an unfounded report where: (i) the source of the report was convicted of
a violation of subdivision three of section 240.55 of the penal law in
regard to such report; or (ii) the subject of the report presents clear
and convincing evidence that affirmatively refutes the allegation of
abuse or maltreatment; provided however, that the absence of a fair
preponderance of the evidence supporting the allegation of abuse or
maltreatment shall not be the sole basis to expunge the report, EXCEPT
THAT ANY REPORT IN WHICH THE SUBJECT OF SUCH REPORT IS A VICTIM OF
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THE SOLE BASIS FOR SUCH REPORT IS THAT SUCH
SUBJECT FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE GUARDIANSHIP DUE TO ENGAGING IN ACTS
OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE MAY BE EXPUNGED WHERE THE ABSENCE OF A FAIR PREPON-
DERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE ALLEGATION OF ABUSE OR MALTREAT-
MENT IS THE SOLE BASIS TO EXPUNGE SUCH REPORT. Nothing in this para-
graph shall require the office of children and family services to hold
an administrative hearing in deciding whether to expunge a report. Such
office shall make its determination upon reviewing the written evidence
submitted by the subject of the report and any records or information
obtained from the state or local agency which investigated the allega-
tions of abuse or maltreatment.
§ 4. Section 651-a of the family court act, as amended by section 10
of part R of chapter 56 of the laws of 2020, is amended to read as
follows:
§ 651-a. Reports of child abuse and maltreatment; admissibility. In
any proceeding brought pursuant to this section to determine the custody
or visitation of minors, a report made to the statewide central register
of child abuse and maltreatment, pursuant to title six of article six of
the social services law, or a portion thereof, which is otherwise admis-
sible as a business record pursuant to rule forty-five hundred eighteen
of the civil practice law and rules shall not be admissible in evidence,
A. 2416 3
notwithstanding such rule, unless an investigation of such report
conducted pursuant to title six of article six of the social services
law commenced on or before December thirty-first, two thousand twenty-
one has determined that there is some credible evidence of the alleged
abuse or maltreatment, or unless an investigation of such report
conducted pursuant to title six of article six of the social services
law commenced on or after January first, two thousand twenty-two deter-
mines that there is a fair preponderance of the evidence of the alleged
abuse or maltreatment, OR UNLESS AN INVESTIGATION OF SUCH REPORT
CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO TITLE SIX OF ARTICLE SIX OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES
LAW COMMENCED AT ANY TIME IN WHICH THE SUBJECT OF THE REPORT IS A VICTIM
OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THE SOLE BASIS FOR SUCH REPORT IS THAT SUCH
SUBJECT FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE GUARDIANSHIP DUE TO ENGAGING IN ACTS
OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DETERMINES THAT THERE IS A FAIR PREPONDERANCE OF
THE EVIDENCE OF THE ALLEGED ABUSE OR MALTREATMENT, that the subject of
the report has been notified that the report is indicated. In addition,
if such report has been reviewed by the state commissioner of social
services or his designee and has been determined to be unfounded, it
shall not be admissible in evidence. If such report has been so reviewed
and has been amended to delete any finding, each such deleted finding
shall not be admissible. If the state commissioner of social services or
his designee has amended the report to add any new finding, each such
new finding, together with any portion of the original report not
deleted by the commissioner or his designee, shall be admissible if it
meets the other requirements of this section and is otherwise admissible
as a business record. If such a report, or portion thereof, is admissi-
ble in evidence but is uncorroborated, it shall not be sufficient to
make a fact finding of abuse or maltreatment in such proceeding. Any
other evidence tending to support the reliability of such report shall
be sufficient corroboration.
§ 5. Subparagraph (i) of paragraph (a) of subdivision 8 of section 422
of the social services law, as amended by chapter 12 of the laws of
1996, is amended and a new subparagraph (vi) is added to read as
follows:
(i) At any time subsequent to the completion of the investigation but
in no event later than ninety days after the subject of the report is
notified that the report is indicated, EXCEPT WHERE THE INVESTIGATION
WAS COMPLETED PRIOR TO JANUARY FIRST, TWO THOUSAND TWENTY-FOUR AND THE
SUBJECT OF SUCH REPORT IS A VICTIM OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THE SOLE
BASIS FOR SUCH REPORT IS THAT SUCH SUBJECT FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE
GUARDIANSHIP DUE TO ENGAGING IN ACTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, AND THE
SUBJECT REQUESTS THAT SUCH REPORT BE RE-OPENED PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH
(VI) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, the subject may request the commissioner to
amend the record of the report. If the commissioner does not amend the
report in accordance with such request within ninety days of receiving
the request, the subject shall have the right to a fair hearing, held in
accordance with paragraph (b) of this subdivision, to determine whether
the record of the report in the central register should be amended on
the grounds that it is inaccurate or it is being maintained in a manner
inconsistent with this title.
(VI) IN CASES WHERE THE INVESTIGATION WAS COMPLETED PRIOR TO JANUARY
FIRST, TWO THOUSAND TWENTY-FOUR AND IT WAS DETERMINED AT A FAIR HEARING
THAT THERE WAS CREDIBLE EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD TO FIND THAT THE SUBJECT
COMMITTED AN ACT OR ACTS OF CHILD ABUSE OR MALTREATMENT, AND THE SUBJECT
OF THE REPORT IS A VICTIM OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THE SOLE BASIS FOR
SUCH REPORT IS THAT SUCH SUBJECT FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE GUARDIANSHIP
A. 2416 4
DUE TO ENGAGING IN ACTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, THE SUBJECT OF SUCH REPORT
MAY REQUEST THAT SUCH CASE BE RE-OPENED AND RE-EXAMINED USING A STANDARD
OF A FAIR PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD TO FIND THAT THE
SUBJECT COMMITTED AN ACT OR ACTS OF CHILD ABUSE OR MALTREATMENT WITHIN
ONE YEAR OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH.
§ 6. Items (I) and (II) of clause (A) of subparagraph (i) and subpara-
graph (ii) of paragraph (e) of subdivision 1 of section 424-a of the
social services law, as amended by section 9 of part R of chapter 56 of
the laws of 2020, are amended to read as follows:
(I) the time for the subject of the report to request an amendment OR
RE-OPENING of the record of the report pursuant to subdivision eight of
section four hundred twenty-two has expired without any such request
having been made; or
(II) such request was made within such time and a fair hearing regard-
ing the request has been finally determined by the commissioner and the
record of the report has not been amended OR RE-OPENED to unfound the
report or delete the person as a subject of the report; and
(ii) If the subject of an indicated report of child abuse or maltreat-
ment has not requested an amendment OR RE-OPENING of the record of the
report and an inquiry is made to the office of children and family
services pursuant to this subdivision concerning the subject of the
report, such office shall, as expeditiously as possible but within no
more than ten working days of receipt of the inquiry, determine whether,
in fact, the person about whom an inquiry is made is the subject of an
indicated report. Upon making a determination that the person about whom
the inquiry is made is the subject of an indicated report of child abuse
and maltreatment, the office of children and family services shall imme-
diately send a written request to the child protective service or state
agency which was responsible for investigating the allegations of abuse
or maltreatment for all records, reports and other information main-
tained by the service or state agency on the subject. The service or
state agency shall, as expeditiously as possible but within no more than
twenty working days of receiving such request, forward all records,
reports and other information it maintains on the indicated report to
the office of children and family services, including a copy of any
petition or court order based on the allegations that were indicated.
Where a proceeding pursuant to article ten of the family court act is
pending based on the same allegations that were indicated, the office of
children and family services shall stay determination of whether there
is a fair preponderance of the evidence to support the indication until
the disposition of such family court proceeding. Unless such determi-
nation has been stayed, the office of children and family services
shall, within fifteen working days of receiving such records, reports
and other information from the child protective service or state agency,
review all records, reports and other information in its possession
concerning the subject and determine whether there is a fair preponder-
ance of the evidence to find that the subject had committed the act or
acts of child abuse or maltreatment giving rise to the indicated report.
§ 7. This act shall take effect immediately and shall apply to all
reports filed in the statewide central register of child abuse and
maltreatment.