S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
2970--A
2023-2024 Regular Sessions
I N A S S E M B L Y
February 1, 2023
___________
Introduced by M. of A. FAHY, KELLES, FORREST, SIMONE, SOLAGES, CUNNING-
HAM, GIBBS, LEVENBERG, HYNDMAN, EPSTEIN, REYES, LUNSFORD, SIMON, WALK-
ER, DE LOS SANTOS, McDONALD, WEPRIN, BURGOS, JACKSON, SHIMSKY, RIVERA,
RAGA, STIRPE, MEEKS, COLTON, DeSTEFANO, L. ROSENTHAL, O'DONNELL,
ZINERMAN, BRONSON, DICKENS, THIELE, LUPARDO, PRETLOW, LUCAS, GONZA-
LEZ-ROJAS -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. STECK -- read once and
referred to the Committee on Judiciary -- reported and referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means -- recommitted to the Committee on Judici-
ary in accordance with Assembly Rule 3, sec. 2 -- committee
discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted
to said committee
AN ACT to amend the debtor and creditor law, in relation to restructur-
ing unsustainable sovereign and subnational debt
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as
the "sovereign debt stability act".
§ 2. The debtor and creditor law is amended by adding a new article 8
to read as follows:
ARTICLE 8
SOVEREIGN AND SUBNATIONAL DEBT
SECTION 220. LEGISLATIVE INTENT.
221. DEFINITIONS.
222. ELECTION TO BE COVERED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE.
223. PETITION FOR RELIEF; RECOGNITION.
224. NOTIFICATION OF CREDITORS.
225. DEBT RECONCILIATION.
226. SUBMISSION, CONTENTS AND VOTING ON PLAN.
227. FINANCING THE RESTRUCTURING.
228. PRIORITY OF REPAYMENT.
229. ADJUDICATION OF DISPUTES.
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD04458-02-4
A. 2970--A 2
230. RECOVERABILITY OF SECTION 230 CLAIMS.
231. APPLICATION; OPT IN.
232. SEVERABILITY.
§ 220. LEGISLATIVE INTENT. THE LEGISLATURE FINDS THAT IT IS A LONG-
STANDING POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE STATE OF NEW YORK, AS THE
WORLD'S LEADING FINANCIAL CENTER, TO SUPPORT ORDERLY, COLLABORATIVE AND
EFFECTIVE INTERNATIONAL SOVEREIGN DEBT RELIEF FOR COUNTRIES WITH UNSUS-
TAINABLE LEVELS OF DEBT. DEBT DISTRESS, DEBT CRISES, AND DISORDERLY
DEFAULT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH UNACCEPTABLE HUMAN SUFFERING, ECONOMIC
DECLINE, AND FINANCIAL MARKET AND PAYMENT SYSTEMS DISRUPTION. MOREOVER,
DEBT RESTRUCTURING IS INEFFECTIVE AND DOES NOT LEAD TO SUSTAINABLE
OUTCOMES WHEN IT IS NOT PERCEIVED AS EQUITABLE OR LEGITIMATE BY STAKE-
HOLDERS IN BORROWING AND LENDING COUNTRIES. ADDITIONALLY, PUBLIC CREDI-
TORS ARE UNLIKELY TO PARTICIPATE IN DEBT RESTRUCTURING INITIATIVES
UNLESS THERE IS FAIR BURDEN SHARING AMONG ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CREDI-
TORS, WHICH IS ESSENTIAL TO THE LEGITIMACY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF DEBT
RELIEF INITIATIVES. THEREFORE, THE LEGISLATURE FINDS AND DECLARES THAT
IT SHALL BE THE POLICY OF NEW YORK STATE TO SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL DEBT
RELIEF INITIATIVES FOR COUNTRIES TO ENSURE THAT THE COST OF SUCH DEBT
RELIEF IS ALLOCATED IN A FAIR AND EQUITABLE MANNER, AND THAT SUCH COSTS
DO NOT FALL DISPROPORTIONATELY ON THE RESIDENTS AND TAXPAYERS OF NEW
YORK STATE, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO
PROVIDE EFFECTIVE MECHANISMS FOR RESTRUCTURING SOVEREIGN AND SUBNATIONAL
DEBT SO AS TO:
1. REDUCE THE SOCIAL COSTS OF SOVEREIGN AND SUBNATIONAL DEBT CRISES TO
RESIDENTS OF NEW YORK STATE;
2. REDUCE SYSTEMIC RISK TO THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM, A SYSTEM THAT IS
CONCENTRATED IN NEW YORK STATE;
3. REDUCE CREDITOR UNCERTAINTY, INCLUDING TO THE NUMEROUS HOLDERS OF
SOVEREIGN DEBT THAT ARE RESIDENTS IN NEW YORK STATE;
4. STRENGTHEN THE ROLE OF NEW YORK STATE AS A PRIMARY LOCATION FOR THE
ISSUING AND TRADING OF SOVEREIGN DEBT;
5. REDUCE THE NEED FOR SOVEREIGN AND SUBNATIONAL DEBT BAILOUTS, WHICH
CREATE MORAL HAZARD AND ARE COSTLY TO RESIDENTS OF NEW YORK STATE;
6. OTHERWISE PROTECT ECONOMIC ACTIVITY WITHIN NEW YORK STATE'S
BORDERS, BY REDUCING THE LIKELIHOOD OF A SOVEREIGN DEBT DEFAULT WHICH
COULD ADVERSELY IMPACT NEW YORK STATE'S ECONOMY;
7. REDUCE, OUT OF UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND HUMANITARIAN IMPERATIVES,
THE SOCIAL COST OF UNRESOLVED SOVEREIGN DEBT CRISES IMPOSED ON THE
PEOPLE OF NATIONS WITH UNSUSTAINABLE DEBT, ESPECIALLY THE POOREST AMONG
THEM, TAKING DUE ACCOUNT OF CREDITOR RIGHTS; AND
8. ENABLE DEBTOR STATES TO CHOOSE A DEBT RESTRUCTURING OPTION THAT
APPROPRIATELY SUITS ITS CIRCUMSTANCES AND NEEDS.
§ 221. DEFINITIONS. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE:
1. "CREDITOR" MEANS A PERSON OR ENTITY THAT HAS A CLAIM AGAINST A
DEBTOR STATE;
2. "CLAIM" MEANS A PAYMENT CLAIM AGAINST A DEBTOR STATE FOR MONIES
BORROWED OR FOR THE DEBTOR STATE'S GUARANTEE OF, OR OTHER CONTINGENT
OBLIGATION ON, MONIES BORROWED; THE TERM "MONIES BORROWED" SHALL INCLUDE
THE FOLLOWING, WHETHER OR NOT IT REPRESENTS THE BORROWING OF MONEY:
MONIES OWING UNDER BONDS; DEBENTURES; NOTES, OR SIMILAR INSTRUMENTS OF
ORIGINAL MATURITY OF AT LEAST ONE YEAR; MONIES OWING FOR THE DEFERRED
PURCHASE PRICE OF PROPERTY OR SERVICES, OTHER THAN TRADE ACCOUNTS PAYA-
BLE ARISING IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS; MONIES
OWING ON CAPITALIZED LEASE OBLIGATIONS; MONIES OWING ON OR WITH RESPECT
A. 2970--A 3
TO LETTERS OF CREDIT, BANKERS' ACCEPTANCES, OR OTHER EXTENSIONS OF CRED-
IT OF ORIGINAL MATURITY OF AT LEAST ONE YEAR;
3. "PLAN" MEANS A DEBT RESTRUCTURING PLAN PURSUANT TO SECTION TWO
HUNDRED TWENTY-SIX OF THIS ARTICLE;
4. "DEBTOR STATE" MEANS A SOVEREIGN NATION; OR UNINCORPORATED TERRITO-
RY; OR ANY SUBNATIONAL UNIT THEREOF, EXCLUDING ANY MUNICIPALITY WHOSE
ADJUSTMENT OR DEBTS IS GOVERNED BY 11 U.S.C. 9;
5. "INDEPENDENT MONITOR" MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL APPOINTED BY THE GOVER-
NOR, IN CONSULTATION WITH THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,
ACCEPTABLE TO THE SOVEREIGN DEBTOR AND TO THE HOLDERS, OR THEIR AGENTS,
OF A MAJORITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS ISSUED UNDER NEW YORK LAW. THE INDE-
PENDENT MONITOR IS MEANT TO FACILITATE AND ENCOURAGE AN EFFECTIVE,
PROMPT AND FAIR AGREEMENT BY THE PARTIES, AS INTENDED BY THIS ARTICLE.
THE DEBTOR STATE SHALL PAY THE INDEPENDENT MONITOR'S REASONABLE COSTS
AND EXPENSES;
6. "INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVE" MEANS ANY MECHANISM, FRAMEWORK OR INITI-
ATIVE IN WHICH THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND OTHER SOVEREIGN STATES
HAVE ENGAGED WITH INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND OFFICIAL AND
COMMERCIAL CREDITORS TO ADVANCE THE IMPLEMENTATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF
PROMPT AND EFFECTIVE DEBT RELIEF AMONG ELIGIBLE STATES, INCLUDING BUT
NOT LIMITED TO THE HEAVILY INDEBTED POOR COUNTRIES INITIATIVE OF THE
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND AND THE WORLD BANK, THE DEBT SERVICE SUSPEN-
SION INITIATIVE OF THE GROUP OF 20, THE COMMON FRAMEWORK FOR DEBT TREAT-
MENTS BEYOND THE DSSI, ALSO KNOWN AS THE "COMMON FRAMEWORK", THE PARIS
CLUB, AND ANY SUCCESSOR OR SIMILAR INTERNATIONAL MECHANISM, FRAMEWORK OR
INITIATIVES;
7. "ELIGIBLE CLAIM" SHALL MEAN A CLAIM AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION TWO
OF THIS SECTION AND ANY JUDICIAL OR OTHER OFFICIAL DOMESTIC OR FOREIGN
JUDGMENT WITH RESPECT TO SUCH A CLAIM AGAINST AN ELIGIBLE STATE PARTIC-
IPATING IN ONE OR MORE OF THE INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES;
8. "ELIGIBLE STATE" SHALL MEAN A SOVEREIGN STATE ELIGIBLE TO PARTIC-
IPATE IN ONE OR MORE OF THE INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES;
9. "BURDEN-SHARING STANDARDS" SHALL MEAN STANDARDS SET BY THE RELEVANT
INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVE OR INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES FOR EQUITABLE
BURDEN-SHARING AMONG ALL CREDITORS WITH MATERIAL CLAIMS ON EACH PARTIC-
IPATING DEBTOR WITHOUT REGARD FOR THEIR OFFICIAL, PRIVATE, OR HYBRID
STATUS;
10. "SECTION 223 CLAIM" SHALL MEAN, AS APPLICABLE, A CLAIM WITH
RESPECT TO WHICH THE DEBTOR STATE HAS ELECTED FOR ITS CLAIMS TO BE
COVERED BY SECTION TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-THREE THROUGH SECTION TWO HUNDRED
TWENTY-NINE OF THIS ARTICLE; AND
11. "SECTION 230 CLAIM" SHALL MEAN AN ELIGIBLE CLAIM WITH RESPECT TO
WHICH THE DEBTOR STATE ISSUING SUCH CLAIM HAS ELECTED TO BE COVERED BY
SECTION TWO HUNDRED THIRTY OF THIS ARTICLE, AND NOT TO BE COVERED BY
SECTION TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-THREE THROUGH SECTION TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-NINE
OF THIS ARTICLE INCLUSIVE.
§ 222. ELECTION TO BE COVERED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE. 1.
ANY DEBTOR STATE AGAINST WHICH THERE ARE ONE OR MORE CLAIMS GOVERNED BY
OR ENFORCED UNDER NEW YORK LAW SHALL HAVE THE OPTION TO APPLY THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE TO SUCH CLAIMS BY FILING A NOTICE THEREOF
WITH THE STATE OF NEW YORK. IN SUCH NOTICE, THE DEBTOR STATE SHALL
CHOOSE WHETHER THOSE CLAIMS SHALL, TO THE EXTENT GOVERNED BY NEW YORK
LAW, BE COVERED AS SECTION 223 CLAIMS OR, TO THE EXTENT ENFORCED UNDER
NEW YORK LAW, AS SECTION 230 CLAIMS. WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER GIVING
SUCH NOTICE, THE DEBTOR STATE SHALL NOTIFY THE HOLDERS OF SUCH CLAIMS
AND THE STATE OF NEW YORK OF ITS CHOICE. IN THE CASE OF A CHOICE TO HAVE
A. 2970--A 4
THOSE CLAIMS BE COVERED AS A SECTION 223 CLAIM, THE DEBTOR STATE SHALL
ALSO MAKE THE CERTIFICATIONS SPECIFIED IN SUBDIVISION TWO OF SECTION TWO
HUNDRED TWENTY-THREE OF THIS ARTICLE. ANY WAIVER OF THE PROVISIONS OF
THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE INEFFECTIVE.
2. A DEBTOR STATE THAT MAKES A CHOICE UNDER SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS
SECTION SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO CHANGE THAT CHOICE ONCE, AT ANY TIME
PRIOR TO A PLAN BECOMING EFFECTIVE AND BINDING ON THE DEBTOR STATE AND
ITS CREDITORS, BY NOTIFYING THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND THE HOLDERS OF ALL
CLAIMS AFFECTED BY THAT CHOICE.
§ 223. PETITION FOR RELIEF; RECOGNITION. 1. THE NOTIFICATION UNDER
SECTION TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE THAT CLAIMS AGAINST A
DEBTOR STATE SHALL BE COVERED AS A SECTION 223 CLAIM SHALL CONSTITUTE A
VOLUNTARY PETITION FOR RELIEF WITH THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
2. SUCH NOTICE SHALL CERTIFY THAT THE DEBTOR STATE:
(A) SEEKS RELIEF AS A SECTION 223 CLAIM UNDER THIS ARTICLE, AND HAS
NOT PREVIOUSLY SOUGHT RELIEF UNDER THIS ARTICLE, OR UNDER ANY OTHER LAW
THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF THIS ARTICLE, DURING THE PAST FIVE
YEARS;
(B) NEEDS RELIEF AS A SECTION 223 CLAIM UNDER THIS ARTICLE TO RESTRUC-
TURE CLAIMS THAT, ABSENT SUCH RELIEF, WOULD CONSTITUTE UNSUSTAINABLE
DEBT OF THE DEBTOR STATE;
(C) AGREES TO RESTRUCTURE THOSE CLAIMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION
THROUGH SECTION TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-NINE OF THIS ARTICLE;
(D) AGREES TO ALL OTHER TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS
SECTION THROUGH SECTION TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-NINE OF THIS ARTICLE;
(E) HAS DULY ENACTED ANY NATIONAL OR SUBNATIONAL LAW NEEDED TO EFFEC-
TUATE THESE AGREEMENTS. IF REQUESTED BY THE INDEPENDENT MONITOR, SUCH
PETITION SHALL ALSO ATTACH DOCUMENTS AND LEGAL OPINIONS EVIDENCING
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SUBDIVISION; AND
(F) IS COOPERATING WITH THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND TO DEVISE AN
EFFECTIVE, EFFICIENT, TIMELY AND FAIR PATH BACK TO SUSTAINABILITY.
3. IMMEDIATELY AFTER SUCH A PETITION FOR RELIEF HAS BEEN FILED, AND SO
LONG AS SUCH FILING HAS NOT BEEN DISMISSED BY THE INDEPENDENT MONITOR
FOR LACK OF GOOD FAITH OR THE DEBTOR STATE HAS NOT CHANGED ITS CHOICE
UNDER SUBDIVISION TWO OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE
TO HAVE ITS CLAIMS COVERED BY SECTION TWO HUNDRED THIRTY OF THIS ARTI-
CLE, THE TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL:
(A) APPLY TO THE DEBTOR-CREDITOR RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DEBTOR STATE
AND ITS CREDITORS TO THE EXTENT SUCH RELATIONSHIP IS GOVERNED BY THE LAW
OF THIS JURISDICTION;
(B) APPLY TO THE DEBTOR-CREDITOR RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DEBTOR STATE
AND ITS CREDITORS TO THE EXTENT SUCH RELATIONSHIP IS GOVERNED BY THE LAW
OF ANOTHER JURISDICTION THAT HAS ENACTED LAW SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM
OF THIS ARTICLE; AND
(C) BE RECOGNIZED IN, AND BY, ALL OTHER JURISDICTIONS THAT HAVE
ENACTED LAW SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF THIS ARTICLE.
§ 224. NOTIFICATION OF CREDITORS. 1. WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER FILING
ITS PETITION FOR RELIEF, THE DEBTOR STATE SHALL NOTIFY ALL OF ITS KNOWN
CREDITORS OF ITS INTENTION TO NEGOTIATE A PLAN UNDER SECTION TWO HUNDRED
TWENTY-THREE THROUGH SECTION TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-NINE OF THIS ARTICLE.
2. THE INDEPENDENT MONITOR SHALL PREPARE AND MAINTAIN A CURRENT LIST
OF CREDITORS OF THE DEBTOR STATE AND VERIFY CLAIMS FOR THE PURPOSES OF
SUPERVISING VOTING UNDER SECTION TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-THREE THROUGH
SECTION TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-NINE OF THIS ARTICLE.
A. 2970--A 5
§ 225. DEBT RECONCILIATION. THE CREDITOR CLAIMS SHALL BE RECONCILED
AGAINST DEBTOR RECORDS AND ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE ADDRESSED BETWEEN
THE PARTIES.
§ 226. SUBMISSION, CONTENTS AND VOTING ON PLAN. 1. THE DEBTOR STATE
MAY SUBMIT A PLAN TO ITS CREDITORS AT ANY TIME, AND MAY SUBMIT ALTERNA-
TIVE PLANS FROM TIME TO TIME.
2. NO OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY MAY SUBMIT A PLAN ON BEHALF OF THE DEBTOR
STATE.
3. A PLAN SHALL:
(A) DESIGNATE CLASSES OF CLAIMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIVISION SIX OF
THIS SECTION;
(B) SPECIFY THE PROPOSED TREATMENT OF EACH CLASS OF CLAIMS;
(C) PROVIDE THE SAME TREATMENT FOR EACH CLAIM OF A PARTICULAR CLASS,
UNLESS THE HOLDER OF A CLAIM AGREES TO A LESS FAVORABLE TREATMENT;
(D) DISCLOSE ANY CLAIMS NOT INCLUDED IN THE PLAN'S CLASSES OF CLAIMS;
(E) PROVIDE ADEQUATE MEANS FOR THE PLAN'S IMPLEMENTATION INCLUDING,
WITH RESPECT TO ANY CLAIMS, CURING OR WAIVING ANY DEFAULTS OR CHANGING
THE MATURITY DATES, PRINCIPAL AMOUNT, INTEREST RATE, OR OTHER TERMS OR
CANCELING OR MODIFYING ANY LIENS OR ENCUMBRANCES; AND
(F) CERTIFY THAT, IF THE PLAN BECOMES EFFECTIVE AND BINDING ON THE
DEBTOR STATE AND ITS CREDITORS UNDER SUBDIVISION FOUR OF THIS SECTION,
THE DEBTOR STATE'S DEBT WILL BECOME SUSTAINABLE.
4. A PLAN SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AND BINDING ON THE DEBTOR STATE AND
ITS CREDITORS WHEN IT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED BY THE DEBTOR STATE AND AGREED
TO BY EACH CLASS OF SUCH CREDITORS' CLAIMS DESIGNATED IN THE PLAN UNDER
SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION. THEREUPON, THE DEBTOR STATE SHALL BE
DISCHARGED FROM ALL CLAIMS INCLUDED IN THOSE CLASSES OF CLAIMS, EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED IN THE PLAN.
5. A CLASS OF CLAIMS HAS AGREED TO A PLAN IF CREDITORS HOLDING AT
LEAST TWO-THIRDS IN AMOUNT AND MORE THAN ONE-HALF IN NUMBER OF THE
CLAIMS OF SUCH CLASS VOTING ON SUCH PLAN AGREE TO THE PLAN, WITHOUT
COUNTING CLAIMS OWNED BY THE DEBTOR STATE OR ENTITIES IT CONTROLS.
6. EACH CLASS OF CLAIMS SHALL CONSIST OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEBTOR
STATE THAT ARE EQUAL IN PRIORITY, PROVIDED THAT:
(A) EQUAL PRIORITY CLAIMS NEED NOT ALL BE INCLUDED IN THE SAME CLASS;
(B) CLAIMS OF GOVERNMENTAL OR MULTI-GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES HOLDING
CLAIMS EACH SHALL BE CLASSED SEPARATELY;
(C) CLAIMS THAT ARE GOVERNED BY THIS ARTICLE OR THE LAW OF ANOTHER
JURISDICTION THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL NOT
BE CLASSED WITH OTHER CLAIMS; AND
(D) THE FACT THAT A CLAIM ARISES UNDER, OR IS SUPPORTED OR EVIDENCED
BY, A JUDICIAL OR OTHER OFFICIAL DOMESTIC OR FOREIGN JUDGMENT SHALL NOT
IN AND OF ITSELF MEAN THAT SUCH CLAIM IS NOT EQUAL IN PRIORITY TO OTHER
CLAIMS.
§ 227. FINANCING THE RESTRUCTURING. 1. SUBJECT TO SUBDIVISION THREE OF
THIS SECTION THE DEBTOR STATE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO BORROW MONEY ON
SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS IT DEEMS APPROPRIATE.
2. THE DEBTOR STATE SHALL NOTIFY ALL OF ITS KNOWN CREDITORS OF ITS
INTENTION TO BORROW UNDER SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION, THE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF THE BORROWING, AND THE PROPOSED USE OF THE LOAN PROCEEDS.
SUCH NOTICE SHALL ALSO DIRECT THOSE CREDITORS TO RESPOND TO THE INDE-
PENDENT MONITOR WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AS TO WHETHER THEY APPROVE OR DISAP-
PROVE OF SUCH LOAN.
3. ANY SUCH LOAN SHALL BE APPROVED BY CREDITORS HOLDING AT LEAST TWO-
THIRDS IN AMOUNT OF THE CLAIMS OF CREDITORS RESPONDING TO THE INDEPEND-
ENT MONITOR WITHIN THAT THIRTY-DAY PERIOD.
A. 2970--A 6
4. IN ORDER FOR THE PRIORITY OF REPAYMENT, AND CORRESPONDING SUBORDI-
NATION, UNDER SECTION TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-EIGHT OF THIS ARTICLE TO BE
EFFECTIVE, ANY SUCH LOAN SHALL ADDITIONALLY BE APPROVED BY CREDITORS
HOLDING AT LEAST TWO-THIRDS IN PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE COVERED CLAIMS OF
THE CREDITORS RESPONDING TO THE INDEPENDENT MONITOR WITHIN THAT THIRTY-
DAY PERIOD. CLAIMS SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE COVERED IF THEY ARE GOVERNED BY
THIS ARTICLE OR BY THE LAW OF ANOTHER JURISDICTION THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY
IN THE FORM OF THIS ARTICLE.
§ 228. PRIORITY OF REPAYMENT. 1. THE DEBTOR STATE SHALL REPAY LOANS
APPROVED UNDER SECTION TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-SEVEN OF THIS ARTICLE PRIOR TO
PAYING ANY OTHER CLAIMS.
2. THE CLAIMS OF CREDITORS OF THE DEBTOR STATE ARE SUBORDINATED TO THE
EXTENT NEEDED TO EFFECTUATE THE PRIORITY PAYMENT UNDER THIS SECTION.
SUCH CLAIMS ARE NOT SUBORDINATED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE.
3. THE PRIORITY OF PAYMENT, AND CORRESPONDING SUBORDINATION, UNDER
THIS SECTION IS EXPRESSLY SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL BY CREDITORS UNDER
SUBDIVISION FOUR OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-SEVEN OF THIS ARTICLE.
§ 229. ADJUDICATION OF DISPUTES. THE INDEPENDENT MONITOR MAY REQUEST
THAT A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION APPOINT A REFEREE OR A SPECIAL
MASTER TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE COURT REGARDING THE RESOLUTION OF
ANY DISPUTES ARISING UNDER A SECTION 223 CLAIM UNDER THIS ARTICLE.
§ 230. RECOVERABILITY OF SECTION 230 CLAIMS. ANY SECTION 230 CLAIM
INCURRED PRIOR TO THE DATE OF AN ELIGIBLE STATE'S APPLICATION TO PARTIC-
IPATE IN ONE OR MORE INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES SHALL ONLY BE RECOVERA-
BLE:
1. TO THE EXTENT THAT IT COMPORTS WITH BURDEN-SHARING STANDARDS;
2. PROVIDED IT MEETS ROBUST DISCLOSURE STANDARDS, INCLUDING INTERCRED-
ITOR DATA SHARING AND A BROAD PRESUMPTION IN FAVOR OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
OF MATERIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH CLAIMS; AND
3. ONLY UP TO THE PROPORTION OF THE ELIGIBLE CLAIM THAT WOULD HAVE
BEEN RECOVERABLE BY THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT UNDER THE
APPLICABLE INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVE IF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERN-
MENT HAD BEEN THE CREDITOR HOLDING THE ELIGIBLE CLAIM, AND WITHOUT
REGARD TO DE MINIMIS CLAUSES.
§ 231. APPLICATION; OPT IN. 1. WHERE THIS ARTICLE APPLIES, IT SHALL
OPERATE BOTH RETROACTIVELY AND PROSPECTIVELY AND, WITHOUT LIMITING THE
FOREGOING, SHALL WITH RESPECT TO SECTION 223 CLAIMS OVERRIDE ANY
CONTRACTUAL PROVISIONS THAT ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS
ARTICLE. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE
SHALL NOT OPERATE RETROACTIVELY AS TO DEBTOR STATES THAT ARE NOT SOVER-
EIGN NATIONS.
2. ANY CREDITORS OF A DEBTOR STATE WHOSE CLAIMS ARE NOT OTHERWISE
GOVERNED BY THIS ARTICLE MAY CONTRACTUALLY OPT IN TO THIS ARTICLE'S
TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND PROVISIONS.
3. THE TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL APPLY
TO THE DEBTOR-CREDITOR RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DEBTOR STATE AND CREDI-
TORS OPTING IN UNDER SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION AS IF SUCH
RELATIONSHIP WERE GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF NEW YORK STATE UNDER SUBDIVI-
SION THREE OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-THREE OF THIS ARTICLE.
§ 232. SEVERABILITY. IF ANY PROVISION OF THIS ARTICLE OR ITS APPLICA-
TION TO ANY PERSON OR CIRCUMSTANCE IS HELD INVALID, THE INVALIDITY
SHALL NOT AFFECT OTHER PROVISIONS OR APPLICATIONS OF THIS ARTICLE WHICH
CAN BE GIVEN EFFECT WITHOUT THE INVALID PROVISION OR APPLICATION, AND
TO THIS END, THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE ARE SEVERABLE. WITHOUT
LIMITING THE FOREGOING, A DEBTOR STATE'S CHOICE TO HAVE CLAIMS COVERED
AS A SECTION 223 CLAIM SHALL BE VALID EVEN IF ITS CHOICE TO HAVE CLAIMS
A. 2970--A 7
COVERED AS A SECTION 230 CLAIM OF THIS ARTICLE WOULD BE INVALID, AND
VICE VERSA.
§ 3. This act shall take effect immediately.