LBD01706-01-3
A. 30 2
ARTICLE 13-E
WIRELESS FACILITIES
SECTION 300. DEFINITIONS.
301. GENERAL MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OVER SITING OF WIRELESS FACILI-
TIES.
302. ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUESTS.
303. APPLICATION TO SUPREME COURT BY AGGRIEVED PERSONS.
304. PREEMPTION.
§ 300. DEFINITIONS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE, THE FOLLOWING
TERMS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING MEANINGS UNLESS THE CONTEXT INDICATES
OTHERWISE.
1. "APPLICANT" SHALL MEAN ANY PERSON WHO FILES AN APPLICATION FOR
WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE PURSUANT TO A MUNICIPAL ZONING LAW ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE OR AN ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUEST WITH THE
MUNICIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR.
2. "APPLICATION" SHALL MEAN A ZONING APPLICATION FILED WITH A MUNICI-
PALITY FOR APPROVALS TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A WIRELESS
FACILITY, AN ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUEST OR AN APPLICATION PURSUANT TO
THE STATE UNIFORM FIRE PREVENTION AND BUILDING CODE.
3. "BASE STATION" SHALL MEAN A STRUCTURE OR EQUIPMENT AT A FIXED
LOCATION THAT ENABLES FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION LICENSED OR
AUTHORIZED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN USER EQUIPMENT AND A COMMUNI-
CATIONS NETWORK. SUCH TERM SHALL NOT ENCOMPASS A TOWER OR ANY EQUIPMENT
ASSOCIATED WITH A TOWER.
(A) SUCH TERM SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO:
(1) EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES SUCH AS
PRIVATE, BROADCAST AND PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES, AS WELL AS UNLICENSED
WIRELESS SERVICES AND FIXED WIRELESS SERVICES SUCH AS MICROWAVE BACK-
HAUL;
(2) RADIO TRANSCEIVERS, ANTENNAS, COAXIAL OR FIBER-OPTIC CABLE, REGU-
LAR AND BACKUP POWER SUPPLIES, AND COMPARABLE EQUIPMENT, REGARDLESS OF
TECHNOLOGICAL CONFIGURATION (INCLUDING DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS AND
SMALL-CELL NETWORKS); AND
(3) ANY STRUCTURE OTHER THAN A TOWER THAT, AT THE TIME THE RELEVANT
PERMIT APPLICATION IS FILED WITH THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR,
SUPPORTS OR HOUSES EQUIPMENT DESCRIBED IN SUBPARAGRAPH ONE OR TWO OF
THIS PARAGRAPH THAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED UNDER THE APPLICABLE
ZONING OR SITING PROCESS, OR UNDER ANOTHER STATE OR LOCAL REGULATORY
REVIEW PROCESS, EVEN IF THE STRUCTURE WAS NOT BUILT FOR THE SOLE OR
PRIMARY PURPOSE OF PROVIDING SUCH SUPPORT.
(B) SUCH TERM SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY STRUCTURE THAT, AT THE TIME THE
RELEVANT PERMIT APPLICATION IS FILED WITH THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING INSPEC-
TOR, DOES NOT SUPPORT OR HOUSE EQUIPMENT DESCRIBED IN SUBPARAGRAPH ONE
OR TWO OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION.
4. "COLLOCATION" SHALL MEAN THE MOUNTING OR INSTALLATION OF TRANS-
MISSION EQUIPMENT ON AN ELIGIBLE SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR THE PURPOSE OF
TRANSMITTING AND/OR RECEIVING RADIO FREQUENCY SIGNALS FOR COMMUNICATIONS
PURPOSES.
5. "ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUEST" SHALL MEAN ANY REQUEST FOR MODIFICA-
TION OF AN EXISTING TOWER OR BASE STATION THAT DOES NOT SUBSTANTIALLY
CHANGE THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OF SUCH TOWER OR BASE STATION, INVOLVING:
(A) THE COLLOCATION OF NEW TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT;
(B) THE REMOVAL OF TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT; OR
(C) THE REPLACEMENT OF TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT.
A. 30 3
6. "ELIGIBLE SUPPORT STRUCTURE" SHALL MEAN ANY TOWER OR BASE STATION,
PROVIDED THAT IT IS EXISTING AT THE TIME A PERMIT APPLICATION IS FILED
WITH A MUNICIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR.
7. "EXISTING" SHALL MEAN THAT A CONSTRUCTED TOWER OR BASE STATION HAS
BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED UNDER THE APPLICABLE ZONING OR SITING PROC-
ESS, OR UNDER ANOTHER STATE OR LOCAL REGULATORY REVIEW PROCESS, PROVIDED
THAT A TOWER THAT HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BUT WAS LAWFULLY
CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO THE CURRENT APPLICABLE ZONING OR SITING PROCESS,
SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE EXISTING.
8. "MODIFICATION" SHALL MEAN THE IMPROVEMENT, UPGRADE OR EXPANSION OF
AN EXISTING WIRELESS FACILITY, BASE STATION OR WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUC-
TURE THAT IS NOT A REPAIR, MAINTENANCE OR IN KIND REPLACEMENT OF EXIST-
ING TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT.
9. "MUNICIPALITY" SHALL MEAN A CITY, TOWN OR VILLAGE, INCLUDING ANY
AGENT, BOARD, AUTHORITY, COMMISSION, AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OR OTHER INSTRU-
MENTALITY THEREOF.
10. "MUNICIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR" SHALL MEAN THE OFFICIAL CHARGED
WITH ISSUING BUILDING PERMITS OR ENFORCING THE STATE UNIFORM FIRE
PREVENTION AND BUILDING CODE WITHIN A MUNICIPALITY. IN THE EVENT A
MUNICIPALITY DOES NOT HAVE A MUNICIPAL OFFICIAL CHARGED WITH ISSUING
BUILDING PERMITS OR ENFORCING THE STATE UNIFORM FIRE PREVENTION AND
BUILDING CODE, SUCH TERM SHALL BE DEEMED TO REFER TO THE ENTITY CHARGED
WITH ENFORCING THE BUILDING CODE PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION TWO OF SECTION
THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY-ONE OF THE EXECUTIVE LAW.
11. "MUNICIPAL ZONING LAW" SHALL MEAN ANY LOCAL LAW, ORDINANCE, RULE,
REGULATION, POLICY OR GUIDELINE WHICH REGULATES OR GOVERNS THE LOCATION
OR USE OF STRUCTURES OR LAND ADOPTED BY A MUNICIPALITY PURSUANT TO THIS
CHAPTER, THE GENERAL CITY LAW, THE TOWN LAW, THE VILLAGE LAW AND/OR ANY
OTHER APPLICABLE AUTHORITY.
12. "SITE" SHALL MEAN, FOR TOWERS OTHER THAN TOWERS IN THE PUBLIC
RIGHTS-OF-WAY, THE CURRENT BOUNDARIES OF THE LEASED OR OWNED PROPERTY
SURROUNDING THE TOWER AND ANY ACCESS OR UTILITY EASEMENTS RELATED TO THE
SITE, AND, FOR OTHER ELIGIBLE SUPPORT STRUCTURES, FURTHER RESTRICTED TO
THAT AREA IN PROXIMITY TO THE STRUCTURE AND TO OTHER TRANSMISSION EQUIP-
MENT DEPLOYED ON THE GROUND.
13. "SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE" SHALL MEAN A MODIFICATION SUBSTANTIALLY
CHANGES THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OF AN ELIGIBLE SUPPORT STRUCTURE IF IT
MEETS ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA:
(A) FOR TOWERS OTHER THAN TOWERS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, IT
INCREASES THE HEIGHT OF THE TOWER BY MORE THAN TEN PERCENT OR BY THE
HEIGHT OF ONE ADDITIONAL ANTENNA ARRAY WITH SEPARATION FROM THE NEAREST
EXISTING ANTENNA NOT TO EXCEED TWENTY FEET, WHICHEVER IS GREATER; AND
FOR OTHER ELIGIBLE SUPPORT STRUCTURES, IT INCREASES THE HEIGHT OF THE
STRUCTURE BY MORE THAN TEN PERCENT OR MORE THAN TEN FEET, WHICHEVER IS
GREATER. FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS PARAGRAPH, CHANGES IN HEIGHT SHALL BE
MEASURED FROM THE ORIGINAL SUPPORT STRUCTURE IN CASES WHERE DEPLOYMENTS
ARE OR WILL BE SEPARATED HORIZONTALLY, SUCH AS ON BUILDINGS' ROOFTOPS;
AND IN OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES, CHANGES IN HEIGHT SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE
DIMENSIONS OF THE TOWER OR BASE STATION, INCLUSIVE OF ORIGINALLY
APPROVED APPURTENANCES AND ANY MODIFICATIONS THAT WERE APPROVED PRIOR TO
THE ENACTMENT OF THE MIDDLE CLASS TAX RELIEF AND JOB CREATION ACT OF
2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-96);
(B) FOR TOWERS OTHER THAN TOWERS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, IT
INVOLVES ADDING AN APPURTENANCE TO THE BODY OF THE TOWER THAT WOULD
PROTRUDE FROM THE EDGE OF THE TOWER MORE THAN TWENTY FEET, OR MORE THAN
THE WIDTH OF THE TOWER STRUCTURE AT THE LEVEL OF THE APPURTENANCE,
A. 30 4
WHICHEVER IS GREATER; AND FOR OTHER ELIGIBLE SUPPORT STRUCTURES, IT
INVOLVES ADDING AN APPURTENANCE TO THE BODY OF THE STRUCTURE THAT WOULD
PROTRUDE FROM THE EDGE OF THE STRUCTURE BY MORE THAN SIX FEET;
(C) FOR ANY ELIGIBLE SUPPORT STRUCTURE, IT INVOLVES INSTALLATION OF
MORE THAN THE STANDARD NUMBER OF NEW EQUIPMENT CABINETS FOR THE TECHNOL-
OGY INVOLVED, BUT NOT TO EXCEED FOUR CABINETS; OR, FOR TOWERS IN THE
PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND BASE STATIONS, IT INVOLVES INSTALLATION OF ANY
NEW EQUIPMENT CABINETS ON THE GROUND IF THERE ARE NO PRE-EXISTING GROUND
CABINETS ASSOCIATED WITH THE STRUCTURE, OR ELSE INVOLVES INSTALLATION OF
GROUND CABINETS THAT ARE MORE THAN TEN PERCENT LARGER IN HEIGHT OR OVER-
ALL VOLUME THAN ANY OTHER GROUND CABINETS ASSOCIATED WITH THE STRUCTURE;
(D) IT ENTAILS ANY EXCAVATION OR DEPLOYMENT OUTSIDE THE CURRENT SITE;
(E) IT WOULD DEFEAT THE CONCEALMENT ELEMENTS OF THE ELIGIBLE SUPPORT
STRUCTURE; OR
(F) IT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SITING
APPROVAL OF THE CONSTRUCTION OR MODIFICATION OF THE ELIGIBLE SUPPORT
STRUCTURE OR BASE STATION EQUIPMENT; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THIS LIMI-
TATION SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY MODIFICATION THAT IS NON-COMPLIANT ONLY IN
A MANNER THAT WOULD NOT EXCEED THE THRESHOLDS IDENTIFIED IN PARAGRAPHS
(A) THROUGH (D) OF THIS SUBDIVISION.
14. "TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT" SHALL MEAN EQUIPMENT THAT FACILITATES
TRANSMISSION FOR ANY FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION LICENSED OR
AUTHORIZED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
TO, RADIO TRANSCEIVERS, ANTENNAS, COAXIAL OR FIBER-OPTIC CABLE, AND
REGULAR AND BACKUP POWER SUPPLY. SUCH TERM SHALL INCLUDE EQUIPMENT ASSO-
CIATED WITH WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
TO, PRIVATE, BROADCAST AND PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES, AS WELL AS UNLICENSED
WIRELESS SERVICES AND FIXED WIRELESS SERVICES SUCH AS MICROWAVE BACK-
HAUL.
15. "TOWER" SHALL MEAN ANY STRUCTURE BUILT FOR THE SOLE OR PRIMARY
PURPOSE OF SUPPORTING ANY FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION LICENSED OR
AUTHORIZED ANTENNAS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED FACILITIES, INCLUDING STRUC-
TURES THAT ARE CONSTRUCTED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INCLUD-
ING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PRIVATE, BROADCAST AND PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES,
AS WELL AS UNLICENSED WIRELESS SERVICES AND FIXED WIRELESS SERVICES SUCH
AS MICROWAVE BACKHAUL, AND THE ASSOCIATED SITE.
16. "WIRELESS FACILITY" SHALL MEAN THE WIRELESS SERVICES EQUIPMENT
INCLUDING TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT, BASE STATION, TOWER AND ACCESSORY
EQUIPMENT, UTILITIES AND OTHER SITE DEVELOPMENT COMPONENTS.
17. "WIRELESS SERVICES" SHALL MEAN THE USE OF ANY WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY,
INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, COMMERCIAL MOBILE SERVICES, COMMERCIAL
MOBILE RADIO SERVICES, UNLICENSED WIRELESS SERVICES, COMMON CARRIER
WIRELESS EXCHANGE ACCESS SERVICES, CELLULAR RADIOTELEPHONE, SPECIALIZED
MOBILE RADIO SYSTEMS, PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, ADVANCED WIRE-
LESS SERVICES, TWO-WAY PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICES, AND ANY SUCH OTHER
WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES THAT MAY FROM TIME TO TIME BE UTILIZED, IN ORDER
TO TRANSMIT AND/OR RECEIVE RADIO WAVES.
§ 301. GENERAL MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OVER SITING OF WIRELESS FACILITIES.
1. A MUNICIPALITY MAY ENACT MUNICIPAL ZONING LAWS REGULATING THE SITING
AND INSTALLATION OF BASE STATIONS AND TOWERS PROVIDED THAT SUCH MUNICI-
PAL ZONING LAWS COMPLY WITH FEDERAL LAWS, INCLUDING THE PROVISIONS OF 47
U.S.C. § 332(C)(7), THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION CELL TOWER
SHOT CLOCK ORDER, THE MIDDLE CLASS TAX RELIEF AND JOB CREATION ACT OF
2012 AND THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE.
A. 30 5
2. EVERY MUNICIPALITY SHALL ACT ON AN APPLICATION FOR A WIRELESS
FACILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS AND ORDERS OF THE FEDERAL
COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS FOR:
(A) A BASE STATION WITHIN NINETY DAYS OF THE APPLICATION BEING FILED
WITH THE MUNICIPALITY;
(B) A TOWER WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FIFTY DAYS OF THE APPLICATION BEING
FILED WITH THE MUNICIPALITY; OR
(C) AN ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUEST WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF THE APPLICA-
TION BEING FILED WITH THE MUNICIPALITY, AS SET FORTH IN SECTION THREE
HUNDRED TWO OF THIS ARTICLE.
§ 302. ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUESTS. 1. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER
PROVISION OF LAW TO THE CONTRARY, A MUNICIPALITY SHALL NOT REQUIRE
ZONING, LAND USE OR OTHER DISCRETIONARY PERMITS FOR ANY ELIGIBLE FACILI-
TIES REQUEST.
2. ALL ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUESTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE MUNICI-
PAL BUILDING INSPECTOR FOR REVIEW WITH ANY APPLICATION OR APPLICATIONS
FOR PERMITS THAT MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE STATE UNIFORM FIRE PREVENTION
AND BUILDING CODE, AND SHALL NOT OTHERWISE BE SUBJECT TO ANY MUNICIPAL
ZONING LAW WHICH MAY OTHERWISE APPLY TO WIRELESS FACILITIES.
3. ALL ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUESTS SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY REVIEW PURSUANT TO ARTICLE EIGHT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVA-
TION LAW ON THE BASIS THAT ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF AN ELIGIBLE FACILI-
TIES REQUEST IS AN OFFICIAL ACT OF A MINISTERIAL NATURE INVOLVING NO
EXERCISE OF DISCRETION, AND THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ASSOCIATED ADMINISTRA-
TIVE APPROVAL BY THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR PREDICATED SOLELY ON
COMPLIANCE OR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION. NO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS-
MENT FORM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR REVIEW OF AN ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REVIEW.
4. WHEN A PERSON FILES AN ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REVIEW AND ASSERTS IN
WRITING THAT A REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION IS COVERED BY THIS SECTION, THE
MUNICIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR MAY ONLY REQUIRE DOCUMENTATION OR INFORMA-
TION CUSTOMARILY REQUIRED IN A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION AND SUCH
OTHER INFORMATION REASONABLY RELATED TO DETERMINING WHETHER THE REQUEST
MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE. A MUNICIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR
MAY ADOPT A FORM FOR USE IN ASSESSING ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REVIEW FILINGS
IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER CUSTOMARY FORMS USED FOR THE PROCESSING OF
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS.
5. THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR SHALL REVIEW AND APPROVE AN APPLI-
CATION OF ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REVIEW AND ISSUE ANY NECESSARY BUILDING
AND/OR ELECTRICAL PERMITS WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF THE SUBMISSION, SUBJECT
TO TOLLING AS SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION SIX OF THIS SECTION, UNLESS THE
MUNICIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR DETERMINES THAT THE MODIFICATION DOES NOT
MEET THE CRITERIA FOR AN ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REVIEW IN WHICH CASE A
WRITTEN DENIAL THEREOF SHALL BE TRANSMITTED WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF THE
FILING DATE. IF THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR DETERMINES THAT THE
MODIFICATION DOES NOT MEET THE CRITERIA FOR AN ELIGIBLE FACILITIES
REVIEW, THE REASONS SHALL BE STATED IN THE WRITTEN DENIAL AND INCLUDE A
DETERMINATION OF WHAT IF ANY APPLICATION SHALL BE REQUIRED UNDER ANY
MUNICIPAL ZONING LAW.
6. THE SIXTY DAY REVIEW PERIOD BEGINS TO RUN WHEN THE APPLICATION FOR
AN ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REVIEW AND APPLICATION FOR ANY NECESSARY PERMITS
ARE FILED, AND MAY BE TOLLED ONLY (A) BY MUTUAL AGREEMENT OF THE MUNICI-
PAL BUILDING INSPECTOR AND THE APPLICANT OR (B) WHERE THE MUNICIPAL
BUILDING INSPECTOR DETERMINES THAT THE ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REVIEW AND/OR
ANY NECESSARY PERMIT APPLICATIONS ARE INCOMPLETE AND PROVIDES WRITTEN
NOTICE TO THE APPLICANT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF RECEIPT OF SUCH PERMIT
APPLICATIONS SPECIFICALLY DELINEATING ALL MISSING SUPPORTING INFORMATION
A. 30 6
OR DOCUMENTATION THAT IS REQUIRED. THE TIMEFRAME FOR REVIEW BEGINS
RUNNING AGAIN WHEN THE APPLICANT MAKES A SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION IN
RESPONSE TO ANY NOTICE OF INCOMPLETENESS. FOLLOWING A SUPPLEMENTAL
SUBMISSION, THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE APPLICANT
WITHIN TEN DAYS IF THE SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION DID NOT PROVIDE THE
INFORMATION IDENTIFIED IN THE ORIGINAL NOTICE DELINEATING MISSING INFOR-
MATION AND THESE TOLLING PROCEDURES. SECOND OR SUBSEQUENT NOTICES OF
INCOMPLETENESS SHALL ONLY TOLL THE TIMEFRAME FOR REVIEW TO THE EXTENT
THEY REQUEST DOCUMENTS OR INFORMATION THAT WERE DELINEATED IN THE
ORIGINAL NOTICE OF INCOMPLETENESS.
7. IN THE EVENT THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR FAILS TO APPROVE OR
DENY AN APPLICATION FOR ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REVIEW AND ISSUE ANY NECES-
SARY PERMITS WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION FIVE OF THIS
SECTION, SUBJECT TO TOLLING SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION SIX OF THIS
SECTION, THE ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REVIEW AND ANY NECESSARY PERMITS SHALL
BE DEEMED GRANTED. THE DEEMED GRANT APPROVAL WILL BECOME EFFECTIVE WHEN
THE APPLICANT NOTIFIES THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR IN WRITING THAT
THE SIXTY DAY PERIOD, AND ANY APPLICABLE TOLLING, HAS EXPIRED AND THE
PERMITS HAVE BEEN DEEMED GRANTED BY OPERATION OF LAW. THE MUNICIPALITY
SHALL ISSUE ANY NECESSARY PERMITS WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS OF THE DATE THE
MUNICIPALITY RECEIVES NOTICE OF THE DEEMED GRANT APPROVAL.
§ 303. APPLICATION TO SUPREME COURT BY AGGRIEVED PERSONS. ANY PERSON
OR PERSONS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY AGGRIEVED BY ANY ACT OF A MUNICIPALITY
THAT IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE OR A FAILURE TO
ACT IN A MANNER CONSISTENT THEREWITH, MAY, WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER SUCH
ACTION OR FAILURE TO ACT, COMMENCE AN ACTION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE SEVEN-
TY-EIGHT OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR
THE COUNTY IN WHICH SUCH MUNICIPALITY IS SITUATE. THE SUPREME COURT
SHALL HEAR AND DECIDE SUCH ACTION ON AN EXPEDITED BASIS.
§ 304. PREEMPTION. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL SUPERSEDE ANY
INCONSISTENT PROVISION OF LAW RELATING TO THE PLACEMENT, COLLOCATION,
MODIFICATION OR MAINTENANCE OF WIRELESS FACILITIES.
§ 4. This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall
have become a law.