S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
3453
2023-2024 Regular Sessions
I N A S S E M B L Y
February 3, 2023
___________
Introduced by M. of A. DINOWITZ -- read once and referred to the Commit-
tee on Judiciary
AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to manda-
tory settlement conference in cooperative apartment unit foreclosure
actions
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a
new rule 3411 to read as follows:
RULE 3411. MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN COOPERATIVE APARTMENT
UNIT FORECLOSURE ACTIONS. (A) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION "A COOPER-
ATIVE APARTMENT UNIT LOAN" MEANS A LOAN SECURED BY RIGHTS TO A COOPER-
ATIVE APARTMENT REQUIRED TO RECEIVE AN ADDITIONAL PRE-DISPOSITION NOTICE
PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (F) OF SECTION 9--611 OF THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL
CODE.
IN ADDITION TO SUCH OTHER NOTIFICATIONS AS MAY BE REQUIRED PURSUANT TO
THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE, IN ANY FORECLOSURE ACTION INVOLVING A COOP-
ERATIVE APARTMENT UNIT LOAN, IN WHICH THE BORROWER IS A RESIDENT OF THE
PROPERTY SUBJECT TO FORECLOSURE, THE LENDER SHALL FILE A PETITION WITH
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE COOPERATIVE APARTMENT IS
LOCATED STATING THE LOAN IS IN DEFAULT AND THE REASON FOR THE DEFAULT.
THE PETITION MUST BE SERVED ON THE BORROWER PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE
HUNDRED EIGHT OF THIS CHAPTER. THE LENDER SHALL FILE PROOF OF SERVICE
WITHIN TWENTY DAYS OF SUCH SERVICE AND THE COURT SHALL HOLD A MANDATORY
CONFERENCE WITHIN SIXTY DAYS AFTER THE DATE WHEN PROOF OF SERVICE UPON
THE BORROWER IS FILED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OR ON SUCH ADJOURNED DATE AS
HAS BEEN AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES, FOR THE PURPOSE OF HOLDING SETTLEMENT
DISCUSSIONS PERTAINING TO THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE
PARTIES UNDER THE LOAN DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO:
1. DETERMINING WHETHER THE PARTIES CAN REACH A MUTUALLY AGREEABLE
RESOLUTION TO HELP THE BORROWER AVOID LOSING THEIR HOME, AND EVALUATING
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD08498-01-3
A. 3453 2
THE POTENTIAL FOR A RESOLUTION IN WHICH PAYMENT SCHEDULES OR AMOUNTS MAY
BE MODIFIED OR OTHER WORKOUT OPTIONS MAY BE AGREED TO, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, A LOAN MODIFICATION OR ANY OTHER LOSS MITIGATION OPTION; OR
2. WHATEVER OTHER PURPOSES THE COURT DEEMS APPROPRIATE.
(B) AT THE INITIAL CONFERENCE HELD PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, ANY
BORROWER CURRENTLY APPEARING PRO SE, SHALL BE DEEMED TO HAVE MADE A
MOTION TO PROCEED AS A POOR PERSON UNDER SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ONE OF
THIS CHAPTER. THE COURT SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER SUCH PERMISSION SHALL BE
GRANTED PURSUANT TO STANDARDS SET FORTH IN SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ONE OF
THIS CHAPTER. IF THE COURT APPOINTS DEFENDANT COUNSEL PURSUANT TO SUBDI-
VISION (A) OF SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED TWO OF THIS CHAPTER, IT SHALL
ADJOURN THE CONFERENCE TO A DATE CERTAIN FOR APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND
SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (A) OF THIS RULE, AND
OTHERWISE SHALL PROCEED WITH THE CONFERENCE.
(C) AT ANY CONFERENCE HELD PURSUANT TO THIS RULE, THE LENDER AND THE
BORROWER SHALL APPEAR IN PERSON OR BY COUNSEL, AND EACH PARTY'S REPRE-
SENTATIVE AT THE MEETING SHALL BE FULLY AUTHORIZED TO DISPOSE OF THE
MATTER. IF THE BORROWER IS APPEARING WITHOUT COUNSEL, THE COURT SHALL
INFORM THE BORROWER OF THE NATURE OF THE ACTION AND HIS OR HER RIGHTS
AND RESPONSIBILITIES. WHERE APPROPRIATE, THE COURT MAY PERMIT THE
BORROWER OR A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE BORROWER OR THE DEFENDANT TO ATTEND
THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE TELEPHONICALLY OR BY VIDEO-CONFERENCE.
(D) UPON THE FILING OF A REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL INTERVENTION IN ANY
ACTION BROUGHT PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, THE COURT SHALL SEND EITHER A
COPY OF SUCH REQUEST OR THE BORROWER'S NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE
NUMBER (IF AVAILABLE) TO A HOUSING COUNSELING AGENCY OR AGENCIES ON A
LIST DESIGNATED BY THE DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL FOR THE
JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN WHICH THE BORROWER RESIDES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL
BE USED BY THE DESIGNATED HOUSING COUNSELING AGENCY OR AGENCIES EXCLU-
SIVELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING THE BORROWER AWARE OF HOUSING COUN-
SELING AND FORECLOSURE PREVENTION SERVICES AND OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO
THEM.
(E) THE COURT SHALL PROMPTLY SEND A NOTICE TO PARTIES ADVISING THEM OF
THE TIME AND PLACE OF THE MEETING, THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING AND THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THIS RULE. THE NOTICE SHALL BE IN A FORM PRESCRIBED BY
THE COURT, AND SHALL ADVISE THE PARTIES OF THE DOCUMENTS THAT THEY SHALL
BRING TO THE CONFERENCE.
1. FOR THE LENDER, SUCH DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED
TO: (I) THE PAYMENT HISTORY; (II) AN ITEMIZATION OF THE AMOUNTS NEEDED
TO CURE AND PAY OFF THE LOAN; (III) THE MORTGAGE AND NOTE OR COPIES OF
THE SAME; (IV) STANDARD APPLICATION FORMS AND A DESCRIPTION OF LOSS
MITIGATION OPTIONS, IF ANY, WHICH MAY BE AVAILABLE TO THE BORROWER; AND
(V) ANY OTHER DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED BY THE PRESIDING JUDGE. IF THE
LENDER IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE MORTGAGE AND NOTE, THE LENDER SHALL
PROVIDE THE NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE LEGAL OWNER OF THE
MORTGAGE AND NOTE. FOR CASES IN WHICH THE LENDER OR ITS SERVICING AGENT
HAS EVALUATED OR IS EVALUATING ELIGIBILITY FOR HOME LOAN MODIFICATION
PROGRAMS OR OTHER LOSS MITIGATION OPTIONS, IN ADDITION TO THE DOCUMENTS
LISTED ABOVE, THE LENDER SHALL BRING A SUMMARY OF THE STATUS OF THE
LENDER'S OR SERVICING AGENT'S EVALUATION FOR SUCH MODIFICATIONS OR OTHER
LOSS MITIGATION OPTIONS, INCLUDING, WHERE APPLICABLE, A LIST OF
OUTSTANDING ITEMS REQUIRED FOR THE BORROWER TO COMPLETE ANY MODIFICATION
APPLICATION, AN EXPECTED DATE OF COMPLETION OF THE LENDER'S OR SERVICER
AGENT'S EVALUATION, AND, IF THE MODIFICATION OR MODIFICATIONS WERE
DENIED, A DENIAL LETTER OR ANY OTHER DOCUMENT EXPLAINING THE REASON OR
REASONS FOR DENIAL AND THE DATA INPUT FIELDS AND VALUES USED IN THE NET
A. 3453 3
PRESENT VALUE EVALUATION. IF THE MODIFICATION WAS DENIED ON THE BASIS OF
AN INVESTOR RESTRICTION, THE PLAINTIFF SHALL BRING THE DOCUMENTARY
EVIDENCE WHICH PROVIDES THE BASIS FOR THE DENIAL, SUCH AS A POOLING AND
SERVICING AGREEMENT.
2. FOR THE BORROWER, SUCH DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED
TO, IF APPLICABLE, INFORMATION ON CURRENT INCOME TAX RETURNS, EXPENSES,
PROPERTY TAXES AND PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS FOR LOSS MITI-
GATION; BENEFITS INFORMATION; RENTAL AGREEMENTS OR PROOF OF RENTAL
INCOME; AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENTATION RELEVANT TO THE PROCEEDING REQUIRED
BY THE PRESIDING JUDGE.
(F) BOTH THE LENDER AND THE BORROWER SHALL NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH TO
REACH A MUTUALLY AGREEABLE RESOLUTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO A
RE-PAYMENT AGREEMENT, OR ANY OTHER LOSS MITIGATION, IF POSSIBLE.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE OBLIGATION TO NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH PURSUANT TO
THIS RULE SHALL BE MEASURED BY THE TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING FACTORS:
1. COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS RULE AND APPLICABLE COURT
RULES, COURT ORDERS, AND DIRECTIVES BY THE COURT OR ITS DESIGNEE
PERTAINING TO THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCESS;
2. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LENDING MORTGAGE SERVICING LAWS, RULES,
REGULATIONS, INVESTOR DIRECTIVES, AND LOSS MITIGATION STANDARDS OR
OPTIONS CONCERNING LOAN MODIFICATIONS; AND
3. CONDUCT CONSISTENT WITH EFFORTS TO REACH A MUTUALLY AGREEABLE
RESOLUTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, AVOIDING UNREASONABLE DELAY,
APPEARING AT THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH AUTHORITY TO FULLY DISPOSE
OF THE MATTER, AVOIDING MOVING FORWARD WITH A JUDICIAL OR A NON-JUDICIAL
FORECLOSURE PROCEEDING WHILE LOSS MITIGATION APPLICATIONS AND ATTEMPTS
ARE PENDING, AND PROVIDING ACCURATE INFORMATION TO THE COURT AND
PARTIES.
NEITHER OF THE PARTIES' FAILURE TO MAKE THE OFFER OR ACCEPT THE OFFER
MADE BY THE OTHER PARTY IS SUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH A FAILURE TO NEGOTI-
ATE IN GOOD FAITH.
(G) THE LENDER MUST FILE A NOTICE OF DISCONTINUANCE WITHIN NINETY DAYS
AFTER ANY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OR LOAN MODIFICATION HAS BEEN FULLY
EXECUTED OR A DETERMINATION BY THE COURT THAT THE SETTLEMENT FORECLOSURE
CONFERENCE PROCESS HAS CONCLUDED IF THE LENDER ELECTS TO USE THE NON-JU-
DICIAL FORECLOSURE METHOD.
(H) A PARTY TO A DEFAULT ACTION MAY NOT CHARGE, IMPOSE, OR OTHERWISE
REQUIRE PAYMENT FROM THE OTHER PARTY FOR ANY COST, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO ATTORNEYS' FEES, FOR APPEARANCE AT OR PARTICIPATION IN THE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCESS.
(I) THE COURT MAY DETERMINE WHETHER EITHER PARTY FAILS TO COMPLY WITH
THE DUTY TO NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (F) OF THIS
RULE AND ORDER REMEDIES PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISIONS (J) AND (K) OF THIS
RULE, EITHER ON MOTION OF ANY PARTY OR SUA SPONTE ON NOTICE TO THE
PARTIES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUCH PROCEDURES AS MAY BE ESTABLISHED BY THE
COURT OR OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION. A REFEREE, JUDICIAL HEARING
OFFICER, OR OTHER STAFF DESIGNATED BY THE COURT TO OVERSEE THE SETTLE-
MENT CONFERENCE PROCESS MAY HEAR AND REPORT FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLU-
SIONS OF LAW, AND MAY MAKE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RELIEF TO THE
COURT CONCERNING ANY PARTY'S FAILURE TO NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH PURSUANT
TO SUBDIVISION (F) OF THIS RULE.
(J) UPON A FINDING BY THE LENDER FAILED TO NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH
PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (F) OF THIS SECTION, AND ORDER REMEDIES PURSUANT
TO THIS SUBDIVISION AND SUBDIVISION (K) OF THIS SECTION THE COURT SHALL,
AT A MINIMUM, TOLL THE ACCUMULATION AND COLLECTION OF INTEREST, COSTS,
A. 3453 4
AND FEES DURING ANY UNDUE DELAY CAUSED BY THE LENDER, AND WHERE APPRO-
PRIATE, THE COURT MAY ALSO IMPOSE ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:
1. COMPEL PRODUCTION OF ANY DOCUMENTS REQUESTED BY THE COURT PURSUANT
TO SUBDIVISION (E) OF THIS RULE OR THE COURT'S DESIGNEE DURING THE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE;
2. IMPOSE A CIVIL PENALTY PAYABLE TO THE STATE THAT IS SUFFICIENT TO
DETER REPETITION OF THE CONDUCT AND IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED TWENTY-
FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS;
3. THE COURT MAY AWARD ACTUAL DAMAGES, FEES, INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES
AND EXPENSES TO THE BORROWER AS A RESULT OF LENDER'S FAILURE TO NEGOTI-
ATE IN GOOD FAITH; OR
4. AWARD ANY OTHER RELIEF THAT THE COURT DEEMS JUST AND PROPER.
(K) UPON A FINDING BY THE COURT THAT THE BORROWER FAILED TO NEGOTIATE
IN GOOD FAITH PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (F) OF THIS RULE, THE COURT SHALL,
AT A MINIMUM, REMOVE THE CASE FROM THE CONFERENCE CALENDAR. IN CONSIDER-
ING SUCH A FINDING, THE COURT SHALL TAKE INTO ACCOUNT EQUITABLE FACTORS
INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WHETHER THE BORROWER WAS REPRESENTED BY
COUNSEL.
(L) AT THE FIRST SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE HELD PURSUANT TO THIS RULE, IF
THE BORROWER HAS NOT FILED AN ANSWER OR MADE A PRE-ANSWER MOTION TO
DISMISS, THE COURT SHALL:
1. ADVISE THE BORROWER OF THE REQUIREMENT TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT;
2. EXPLAIN WHAT IS REQUIRED TO ANSWER A COMPLAINT IN COURT;
3. ADVISE THAT IF AN ANSWER IS NOT INTERPOSED THE ABILITY TO CONTEST
THE FORECLOSURE ACTION AND ASSERT DEFENSES MAY BE LOST; AND
4. PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT AVAILABLE RESOURCES FOR FORECLOSURE
PREVENTION ASSISTANCE.
(M) A DEFENDANT WHO APPEARS AT THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BUT WHO
FAILED TO FILE A TIMELY ANSWER, PURSUANT TO RULE THREE HUNDRED TWENTY OF
THIS CHAPTER, SHALL BE PRESUMED TO HAVE A REASONABLE EXCUSE FOR THE
DEFAULT AND SHALL BE PERMITTED TO SERVE AND FILE AN ANSWER, WITHOUT ANY
SUBSTANTIVE DEFENSES DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN WAIVED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF
INITIAL APPEARANCE AT THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. THE DEFAULT SHALL BE
DEEMED VACATED UPON SERVICE AND FILING OF AN ANSWER.
(N) ANY MOTIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PLAINTIFF OR DEFENDANT SHALL BE HELD
IN ABEYANCE WHILE THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCESS IS ONGOING, EXCEPT
FOR MOTIONS CONCERNING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS RULE AND ITS IMPLEMENTING
RULES.
NOTHING IN THIS RULE SHALL IMPAIR A LENDER WHO HAS COMPLIED WITH THIS
SECTION FROM PROCEEDING WITH A JUDICIAL OR A NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE NINE OF THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE.
ยง 2. This act shall take effect immediately.