S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
5394
2023-2024 Regular Sessions
I N A S S E M B L Y
March 10, 2023
___________
Introduced by M. of A. JOYNER -- read once and referred to the Committee
on Judiciary
AN ACT to amend the family court act and the social services law, in
relation to establishing procedures regarding orders of post-termina-
tion visitation and/or contact between a child and such child's parent
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 634 of the family court act, as amended by chapter
666 of the laws of 1976, is amended to read as follows:
§ 634. Commitment of guardianship and custody; further orders. The
court may enter an order under section six hundred thirty-one OF THIS
PART committing the guardianship and custody of the child to the peti-
tioner on such conditions, if any, as it deems proper, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, AN ORDER OF POST-TERMINATION VISITATION AND/OR CONTACT
PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY-FOUR-B OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES
LAW.
§ 2. Section 384-b of the social services law is amended by adding
five new subdivisions 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 to read as follows:
14. (A) UPON APPLICATION BY ANY PARTY TO A PROCEEDING UNDER THIS
SECTION, (I) THE COURT SHALL ORDER POST-TERMINATION VISITATION AND/OR
CONTACT BETWEEN THE CHILD AND SUCH CHILD'S PARENT WHO IS A PARTY TO SUCH
PROCEEDING ON SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS MAY BE AGREED UPON BY THE
PARENT, THE CHILD, AND THE FOSTER PARENT OR AUTHORIZED AGENCY PRIOR TO
THE ENTRY OF AN ORDER COMMITTING THE GUARDIANSHIP AND CUSTODY OF THE
CHILD; OR (II) IF ANY PARTY DOES NOT CONSENT, THE COURT MAY ORDER POST-
TERMINATION VISITATION AND/OR CONTACT BETWEEN THE CHILD AND THE CHILD'S
PARENT AFTER A HEARING AT WHICH THE COURT HAS DETERMINED THAT (A) THE
PARTY'S CONSENT IS BEING UNREASONABLY WITHHELD; AND (B) POST-TERMINATION
VISITATION AND/OR CONTACT WOULD BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD.
(B) THE HEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE COURT SHOULD ENTER AN ORDER
OF POST-TERMINATION VISITATION AND/OR CONTACT SHALL BE HELD EITHER (I)
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD04475-01-3
A. 5394 2
CONCURRENTLY WITH A DISPOSITIONAL HEARING HELD IN THE PROCEEDINGS TO
TERMINATE THE PARENT'S RIGHTS PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION; OR (II) IF NO
DISPOSITIONAL HEARING IS HELD, SUBSEQUENT TO THE CLOSE OF THE FACT-FIND-
ING HEARING ON THE UNDERLYING PETITION TO TERMINATE THE PARENT'S RIGHTS
AND PRIOR TO THE COURT'S ENTRY OF AN ORDER COMMITTING THE GUARDIANSHIP
AND CUSTODY OF THE CHILD. THE COURT SHALL NOT HOLD SUCH A HEARING AT
ANY OTHER TIME.
(C) PARENTS AND CHILDREN WHO ARE PARTIES TO A TERMINATION PROCEEDING
UNDER ARTICLE SIX OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT OR THIS SECTION, AS WELL AS
SUCH CHILD'S FOSTER PARENTS, OR, IN THE CASE OF A CHILD WHO IS NOT IN
THE CARE OF A FOSTER PARENT, THE AUTHORIZED AGENCY, SHALL HAVE NOTICE OF
AND STANDING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE BEST INTEREST POST-TERMINATION VISI-
TATION AND/OR CONTACT HEARING.
(D) THE APPLICANT SHALL HAVE THE BURDEN OF PROOF THAT (I) THE OPPOSING
PARTY'S CONSENT HAS BEEN UNREASONABLY WITHHELD; AND (II) POST-TERMINA-
TION VISITATION AND/OR CONTACT IS IN THE CHILD'S BEST INTEREST.
(E) IF THE APPLICATION FOR POST-TERMINATION CONTACT IS DENIED AFTER
THIS HEARING, THE APPLICANT SHALL NOT HAVE STANDING TO BRING THE SAME
APPLICATION IN ANY OTHER PROCEEDING REGARDING THE SAME CHILD. HOWEVER,
IF THE COURT GRANTS ANY VISITATION AND/OR CONTACT, AN APPLICATION TO
MODIFY THE ORDER, UPON A SHOWING OF SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE IN CIRCUMSTANCES,
MAY STILL BE BROUGHT, PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION FIFTEEN OF THIS SECTION.
(F) THE COURT SHALL HAVE DISCRETION, DEPENDING ON THE BEST INTERESTS
OF THE CHILD, TO DETERMINE THE NATURE OF ANY POST-TERMINATION VISITATION
AND/OR CONTACT.
(G) NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVI-
SION, IN NO EVENT SHALL AN ORDER OF POST-TERMINATION VISITATION AND/OR
CONTACT BE ENTERED WHERE A COURT HAS ENTERED A FINDING PURSUANT TO PARA-
GRAPH (A) OR (B) OF SUBDIVISION EIGHT OF THIS SECTION THAT A PARENT
SEVERELY OR REPEATEDLY ABUSED THE CHILD, EXCEPT WHERE A COURT HAS DETER-
MINED THAT THE PARENT SEEKING POST-TERMINATION VISITATION AND/OR CONTACT
WAS NOT THE PERPETRATOR OF SUCH SEVERE OR REPEATED ABUSE OF SUCH CHILD.
(H) IF THE CHILD IS OVER FOURTEEN YEARS OF AGE, THE CONSENT OF SUCH
CHILD TO POST-TERMINATION VISITATION AND/OR CONTACT IS REQUIRED.
(I) THE COURT IN ITS ORDER SHALL INDICATE SUCH PERSON OR PERSONS WHO
WERE GIVEN NOTICE OF THE PROCEEDING AND WHETHER SUCH PERSON OR PERSONS
APPEARED.
15. ALL PARTIES TO A POST-TERMINATION VISITATION AND/OR CONTACT ORDER
ENTERED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION FOURTEEN OF THIS SECTION, AS WELL AS ANY
PERSON WHO SUBSEQUENTLY BECOMES THE CHILD'S LEGAL GUARDIAN, CUSTODIAN OR
ADOPTIVE PARENT, MAY MOVE THE COURT TO ENFORCE OR MODIFY SUCH ORDER.
UPON MOTION FOR MODIFICATION BY ANY SUCH PARTY, (I) THE COURT SHALL
ENTER AN ORDER MODIFYING SUCH POST-TERMINATION VISITATION AND/OR CONTACT
ORDER ON SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS MAY BE AGREED UPON BY THE PARTIES,
OR, (II) IF ANY PARTY DOES NOT CONSENT, THE COURT MAY ENTER AN ORDER
MODIFYING SUCH POST-TERMINATION VISITATION AND/OR CONTACT ORDER, AFTER A
HEARING AT WHICH THE COURT HAS DETERMINED THAT (A) THE PARTY'S CONSENT
IS BEING UNREASONABLY WITHHELD; AND (B) THE MODIFICATION WOULD BE BASED
ON A SHOWING OF A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE IN CIRCUMSTANCES AND THE BEST
INTERESTS OF THE CHILD.
16. NOTHING IN SUBDIVISION FOURTEEN OR FIFTEEN OF THIS SECTION SHALL
BE CONSTRUED TO LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF HALF-SIBLINGS OR SIBLINGS TO SEEK
CONTACT PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION NINE OF THIS SECTION OR SECTION SEVEN-
TY-ONE OF THE DOMESTIC RELATIONS LAW FOLLOWING A TERMINATION OF PARENTAL
RIGHTS OR ADOPTION.
A. 5394 3
17. THE FAILURE OF AN AUTHORIZED AGENCY OR A CHILD'S FOSTER PARENT OR
ANY OTHER PERSON WHO SUBSEQUENTLY BECOMES THE CHILD'S LEGAL GUARDIAN,
CUSTODIAN OR ADOPTIVE PARENT TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE ORDER OF
POST-TERMINATION VISITATION AND/OR CONTACT SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A BASIS
FOR INVALIDATING EITHER THE ORDER COMMITTING THE GUARDIANSHIP AND CUSTO-
DY OF THE CHILD TO THE PETITIONER OR ANY SUBSEQUENT ORDER OF ADOPTION
REGARDING SUCH CHILD.
18. UNLESS A STAY OF ADOPTION PROCEEDINGS IS GRANTED BY A JUDGE OF THE
FAMILY COURT OR APPELLATE COURT, AN APPEAL FROM ANY ORDER REGARDING THE
APPLICATION FOR POST-TERMINATION VISITATION AND/OR CONTACT SHALL NOT
PROVIDE A BASIS FOR DELAYING THE FINALIZATION OF A CHILD'S ADOPTION.
§ 3. This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after
it shall have become a law.