S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
9430--B
I N A S S E M B L Y
March 14, 2024
___________
Introduced by M. of A. OTIS, SANTABARBARA, REYES, HEVESI, L. ROSENTHAL,
SLATER -- read once and referred to the Committee on Science and Tech-
nology -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as
amended and recommitted to said committee -- reported and referred to
the Committee on Rules -- Rules Committee discharged, bill amended,
ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to the Committee on Rules
AN ACT to amend the state technology law, in relation to automated deci-
sion-making by state agencies
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as
the "legislative oversight of automated decision-making in government
act (LOADinG Act)".
§ 2. The state technology law is amended by adding a new article 4 to
read as follows:
ARTICLE IV
AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING IN STATE GOVERNMENT
SECTION 401. DEFINITIONS.
402. USE OF AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEMS BY AGENCIES.
403. IMPACT ASSESSMENTS.
404. SUBMISSION TO THE GOVERNOR AND LEGISLATURE.
§ 401. DEFINITIONS. FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE:
1. "AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM" SHALL MEAN ANY SOFTWARE THAT
USES ALGORITHMS, COMPUTATIONAL MODELS, OR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECH-
NIQUES, OR A COMBINATION THEREOF, TO AUTOMATE, SUPPORT, OR REPLACE HUMAN
DECISION-MAKING AND SHALL INCLUDE, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SYSTEMS THAT
PROCESS DATA, AND APPLY PREDEFINED RULES OR MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS
TO ANALYZE SUCH DATA, AND GENERATE CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS,
OUTCOMES, ASSUMPTIONS, PROJECTIONS, OR PREDICTIONS WITHOUT MEANINGFUL
HUMAN DISCRETION. "AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM" SHALL NOT INCLUDE
ANY SOFTWARE USED PRIMARILY FOR BASIC COMPUTERIZED PROCESSES, SUCH AS
CALCULATORS, SPELLCHECK TOOLS, AUTOCORRECT FUNCTIONS, SPREADSHEETS,
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS, OR ANY TOOL THAT RELATES ONLY TO INTERNAL
MANAGEMENT AFFAIRS SUCH AS ORDERING OFFICE SUPPLIES OR PROCESSING
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD11734-10-4
A. 9430--B 2
PAYMENTS, AND THAT DO NOT MATERIALLY AFFECT THE RIGHTS, LIBERTIES, BENE-
FITS, SAFETY OR WELFARE OF ANY INDIVIDUAL WITHIN THE STATE.
2. "MEANINGFUL HUMAN REVIEW" MEANS REVIEW, OVERSIGHT AND CONTROL OF
THE AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING PROCESS BY ONE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS WHO
UNDERSTAND THE RISKS, LIMITATIONS, AND FUNCTIONALITY OF, AND ARE TRAINED
TO USE, THE AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM AND WHO HAVE THE AUTHORITY
TO INTERVENE OR ALTER THE DECISION UNDER REVIEW, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO THE ABILITY TO APPROVE, DENY, OR MODIFY ANY DECISION RECOM-
MENDED OR MADE BY THE AUTOMATED SYSTEM.
3. "STATE AGENCY" SHALL MEAN ANY DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC AUTHORITY, BOARD,
BUREAU, COMMISSION, DIVISION, OFFICE, COUNCIL, COMMITTEE OR OFFICER OF
THE STATE. SUCH TERMS SHALL NOT INCLUDE THE LEGISLATURE OR JUDICIARY.
4. "PUBLIC ASSISTANCE BENEFIT" SHALL MEAN ANY SERVICE OR PROGRAM WITH-
IN THE CONTROL OF THE STATE, OR BENEFIT PROVIDED BY THE STATE TO INDI-
VIDUALS OR HOUSEHOLDS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PUBLIC ASSISTANCE,
CASH ASSISTANCE, GRANTS, CHILD CARE ASSISTANCE, HOUSING ASSISTANCE,
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS, TRANSPORTATION BENEFITS, EDUCATION ASSISTANCE,
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES, AND ANY OTHER ASSISTANCE OR BENEFIT WITHIN
THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE TO GRANT TO INDIVIDUALS WITHIN THE STATE.
THIS SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY FEDERAL PROGRAM THAT IS ADMINISTERED BY THE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OR THE STATE.
§ 402. USE OF AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEMS BY AGENCIES. 1. NO
STATE AGENCY, OR ANY ENTITY ACTING ON BEHALF OF SUCH AGENCY, WHICH
UTILIZES OR APPLIES ANY AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM, DIRECTLY OR
INDIRECTLY, IN PERFORMING ANY FUNCTION THAT: (A) IS RELATED TO THE
DELIVERY OF ANY PUBLIC ASSISTANCE BENEFIT; (B) WILL HAVE A MATERIAL
IMPACT ON THE RIGHTS, CIVIL LIBERTIES, SAFETY OR WELFARE OF ANY INDIVID-
UAL WITHIN THE STATE; OR (C) AFFECTS ANY STATUTORILY OR CONSTITUTIONALLY
PROVIDED RIGHT OF AN INDIVIDUAL, SHALL UTILIZE SUCH AUTOMATED DECISION-
MAKING SYSTEM, UNLESS SUCH AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM IS SUBJECT
TO CONTINUED AND OPERATIONAL MEANINGFUL HUMAN REVIEW.
2. NO STATE AGENCY SHALL AUTHORIZE ANY PROCUREMENT, PURCHASE OR ACQUI-
SITION OF ANY SERVICE OR SYSTEM UTILIZING, OR RELYING ON, AUTOMATED
DECISION-MAKING SYSTEMS IN PERFORMING ANY FUNCTION THAT IS: (A) RELATED
TO THE DELIVERY OF ANY PUBLIC ASSISTANCE BENEFIT; (B) WILL HAVE A MATE-
RIAL IMPACT ON THE RIGHTS, CIVIL LIBERTIES, SAFETY OR WELFARE OF ANY
INDIVIDUAL WITHIN THE STATE; OR (C) AFFECTS ANY STATUTORILY OR CONSTITU-
TIONALLY PROVIDED RIGHT OF AN INDIVIDUAL UNLESS SUCH AUTOMATED DECI-
SION-MAKING SYSTEM IS SUBJECT TO CONTINUED AND OPERATIONAL MEANINGFUL
HUMAN REVIEW.
3. THE USE OF AN AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM SHALL NOT AFFECT (A)
THE EXISTING RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES PURSUANT TO AN EXISTING COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING AGREEMENT, OR (B) THE EXISTING REPRESENTATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS
AMONG EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS OR THE BARGAINING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE
EMPLOYER AND AN EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION. THE USE OF AN AUTOMATED DECI-
SION-MAKING SYSTEM SHALL NOT RESULT IN THE: (1) DISCHARGE, DISPLACEMENT
OR LOSS OF POSITION, INCLUDING PARTIAL DISPLACEMENT SUCH AS A REDUCTION
IN THE HOURS OF NON-OVERTIME WORK, WAGES, OR EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS, OR
RESULT IN THE IMPAIRMENT OF EXISTING COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS;
(2) TRANSFER OF EXISTING DUTIES AND FUNCTIONS CURRENTLY PERFORMED BY
EMPLOYEES OF THE STATE OR ANY AGENCY OR PUBLIC AUTHORITY THEREOF TO AN
AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM; OR (3) TRANSFER OF FUTURE DUTIES AND
FUNCTIONS ORDINARILY PERFORMED BY EMPLOYEES OF THE STATE OR ANY AGENCY
OR PUBLIC AUTHORITY. THE USE OF AN AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM
SHALL NOT ALTER THE RIGHTS OR BENEFITS, AND PRIVILEGES, INCLUDING BUT
NOT LIMITED TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT, CIVIL SERVICE STATUS,
A. 9430--B 3
AND COLLECTIVE BARGAINING UNIT MEMBERSHIP STATUS OF ALL EXISTING EMPLOY-
EES OF THE STATE OR ANY AGENCY OR PUBLIC AUTHORITY THEREOF SHALL BE
PRESERVED AND PROTECTED.
§ 403. IMPACT ASSESSMENTS. 1. STATE AGENCIES SEEKING TO UTILIZE OR
APPLY AN AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM PERMITTED UNDER SECTION FOUR
HUNDRED TWO OF THIS ARTICLE WITH CONTINUED AND OPERATIONAL MEANINGFUL
HUMAN REVIEW SHALL CONDUCT OR HAVE CONDUCTED AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT
SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED AND BEARING THE SIGNATURE OF ONE OR MORE INDI-
VIDUALS RESPONSIBLE FOR MEANINGFUL HUMAN REVIEW FOR THE LAWFUL APPLICA-
TION AND USE OF SUCH AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM. FOLLOWING THE
FIRST IMPACT ASSESSMENT, AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AT LEAST ONCE EVERY TWO YEARS. AN IMPACT
ASSESSMENT SHALL BE CONDUCTED PRIOR TO ANY MATERIAL CHANGE TO THE AUTO-
MATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM THAT MAY CHANGE THE OUTCOME OR EFFECT OF
SUCH SYSTEM. SUCH IMPACT ASSESSMENTS SHALL INCLUDE:
(A) A DESCRIPTION OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING
SYSTEM;
(B) AN EVALUATION OF THE ABILITY OF THE AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING
SYSTEM TO ACHIEVE ITS STATED OBJECTIVES;
(C) A DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION OF THE OBJECTIVES AND DEVELOPMENT OF
THE AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING INCLUDING:
(I) A SUMMARY OF THE UNDERLYING ALGORITHMS, COMPUTATIONAL MODES, AND
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS THAT ARE USED WITHIN THE AUTOMATED DECI-
SION-MAKING SYSTEM; AND
(II) THE DESIGN AND TRAINING DATA USED TO DEVELOP THE AUTOMATED DECI-
SION-MAKING SYSTEM PROCESS;
(D) TESTING FOR:
(I) ACCURACY, FAIRNESS, BIAS AND DISCRIMINATION, AND AN ASSESSMENT OF
WHETHER THE USE OF THE AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM PRODUCES DISCRI-
MINATORY RESULTS ON THE BASIS OF A CONSUMER'S OR A CLASS OF CONSUMERS'
ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RACE, COLOR, ETHNICITY, RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN,
SEX, GENDER, GENDER IDENTITY, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, BIOM-
ETRIC INFORMATION, LAWFUL SOURCE OF INCOME, OR DISABILITY AND OUTLINES
MITIGATIONS FOR ANY IDENTIFIED PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCES IN OUTCOMES
ACROSS RELEVANT GROUPS IMPACTED BY SUCH USE;
(II) ANY CYBERSECURITY VULNERABILITIES AND PRIVACY RISKS RESULTING
FROM THE DEPLOYMENT AND USE OF THE AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM, AND
THE DEVELOPMENT OR EXISTENCE OF SAFEGUARDS TO MITIGATE THE RISKS;
(III) ANY PUBLIC HEALTH OR SAFETY RISKS RESULTING FROM THE DEPLOYMENT
AND USE OF THE AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM;
(IV) ANY REASONABLY FORESEEABLE MISUSE OF THE AUTOMATED DECISION-MAK-
ING SYSTEM AND THE DEVELOPMENT OR EXISTENCE OF SAFEGUARDS AGAINST SUCH
MISUSE;
(E) THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE DEPLOYMENT AND USE OF THE AUTOMATED DECI-
SION-MAKING SYSTEM REQUIRES INPUT OF SENSITIVE AND PERSONAL DATA, HOW
THAT DATA IS USED AND STORED, AND ANY CONTROL USERS MAY HAVE OVER THEIR
DATA; AND
(F) THE NOTIFICATION MECHANISM OR PROCEDURE, IF ANY, BY WHICH INDIVID-
UALS IMPACTED BY THE UTILIZATION OF THE AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM
MAY BE NOTIFIED OF THE USE OF SUCH AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM AND
OF THE INDIVIDUAL'S PERSONAL DATA, AND INFORMED OF THEIR RIGHTS AND
OPTIONS RELATING TO SUCH USE.
2. NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE OR ANY OTHER LAW, IF
AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT FINDS THAT THE AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM
PRODUCES DISCRIMINATORY OR BIASED OUTCOMES, THE STATE AGENCY SHALL CEASE
A. 9430--B 4
ANY UTILIZATION, APPLICATION, OR FUNCTION OF SUCH AUTOMATED DECISION-
MAKING SYSTEM, AND OF ANY INFORMATION PRODUCED USING SUCH SYSTEM.
§ 404. SUBMISSION TO THE GOVERNOR AND LEGISLATURE. 1. EACH IMPACT
ASSESSMENT CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
GOVERNOR, THE TEMPORARY PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, AND THE SPEAKER OF THE
ASSEMBLY AT LEAST THIRTY DAYS PRIOR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AUTO-
MATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF SUCH ASSESSMENT.
2. (A) THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF AN AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM
SHALL BE PUBLISHED ON THE WEBSITE OF THE RELEVANT STATE AGENCY.
(B) IF THE STATE AGENCY MAKES A DETERMINATION THAT THE DISCLOSURE OF
ANY INFORMATION REQUIRED IN THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT WOULD RESULT IN A
SUBSTANTIAL NEGATIVE IMPACT ON HEALTH OR SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC, INFRINGE
UPON THE PRIVACY RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS, OR SIGNIFICANTLY IMPAIR THE
STATE AGENCY'S ABILITY TO PROTECT ITS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OR OPERA-
TIONAL ASSETS, SUCH STATE AGENCY MAY REDACT SUCH INFORMATION, PROVIDED
THAT AN EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ON THE PROCESS BY WHICH THE STATE AGENCY
MADE SUCH DETERMINATION IS PUBLISHED ALONG WITH THE REDACTED IMPACT
ASSESSMENT.
(C) IF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT COVERS ANY AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING
SYSTEM THAT INCLUDES TECHNOLOGY THAT IS USED TO PREVENT, DETECT, PROTECT
AGAINST OR RESPOND TO SECURITY INCIDENTS, IDENTITY THEFT, FRAUD,
HARASSMENT, MALICIOUS OR DECEPTIVE ACTIVITIES OR OTHER ILLEGAL ACTIVITY,
PRESERVE THE INTEGRITY OR SECURITY OF SYSTEMS, OR TO INVESTIGATE,
REPORT OR PROSECUTE THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY SUCH MALICIOUS OR DECEP-
TIVE ACTION, SUCH STATE AGENCY MAY REDACT SUCH INFORMATION FOR THE
PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION, PROVIDED THAT AN EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ON
THE PROCESS BY WHICH THE STATE AGENCY MADE SUCH DETERMINATION IS
PUBLISHED ALONG WITH THE REDACTED IMPACT ASSESSMENT.
§ 3. Disclosure of existing automated decision-making systems. Any
state agency, that directly or indirectly, utilizes an automated deci-
sion-making system, as defined in section 401 of the state technology
law, shall submit to the legislature a disclosure on the use of such
system, no later than one year after the effective date of this section.
Such disclosure shall include:
(a) a description of the automated decision-making system utilized by
such agency;
(b) a list of any software vendors related to such automated deci-
sion-making system;
(c) the date that the use of such system began;
(d) a summary of the purpose and use of such system, including a
description of human decision-making and discretion supported or
replaced by the automated decision-making system;
(e) whether any impact assessments for the automated decision-making
system were conducted and the dates and summaries of the results of such
assessments where applicable; and
(f) any other information deemed relevant by the agency.
§ 4. This act shall take effect immediately, provided that section two
of this act shall take effect one year after it shall have become a law.