Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
Jan 03, 2024 |
referred to crime victims, crime and correction |
Jan 20, 2023 |
referred to crime victims, crime and correction |
Senate Bill S2423
2023-2024 Legislative Session
Sponsored By
(D, WF) 47th Senate District
Current Bill Status - In Senate Committee Crime Victims, Crime And Correction Committee
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Delivered to Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
co-Sponsors
(D) 36th Senate District
(D, WF) 46th Senate District
(D, WF) 25th Senate District
(D, WF) 55th Senate District
2023-S2423 (ACTIVE) - Details
2023-S2423 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo
BILL NUMBER: S2423 SPONSOR: HOYLMAN-SIGAL TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the executive law, in relation to parole eligibility for certain incarcerated persons aged fifty-five or older SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 of the bill adds new subdivisions 18 and 19 to section 259-c of the Executive Law ("State board of parole; functions, powers and duties"). -Sub. 18: provides that a person 55 or older who has served at least 15 years of a sentence shall have an interview with the Board of Parole to determine whether they should be released to community supervision with- in 60 days of their 55th birthday or the last day of the 15th year of their sentence, whichever is later. If release is not granted, the person shall have a subsequent interview no more than 24 months later. -Sub. 19: requires the Board of Parole to report quarterly to the Gover- nor, Legislature and public about the outcomes of elder parole.
2023-S2423 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 2423 2023-2024 Regular Sessions I N S E N A T E January 20, 2023 ___________ Introduced by Sens. HOYLMAN-SIGAL, BAILEY, BRESLIN, BRISPORT, BROUK, CLEARE, COMRIE, COONEY, GIANARIS, HARCKHAM, HINCHEY, JACKSON, KAVANAGH, KENNEDY, KRUEGER, LIU, MAYER, MYRIE, PARKER, PERSAUD, RAMOS, RIVERA, SALAZAR, SANDERS, SEPULVEDA, SERRANO, STAVISKY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Crime Victims, Crime and Correction AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to parole eligibility for certain incarcerated persons aged fifty-five or older THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 259-c of the executive law is amended by adding two new subdivisions 18 and 19 to read as follows: 18. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER SECTION OF LAW, WHERE A PERSON SERVING A SENTENCE OF INCARCERATION HAS SERVED AT LEAST FIFTEEN YEARS OF THEIR SENTENCE OR SENTENCES AND HAS REACHED THE AGE OF FIFTY-FIVE OR GREATER, CONDUCT AN INTERVIEW WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE PERSON'S FIFTY-FIFTH BIRTHDAY OR THE LAST DAY OF THE FIFTEENTH YEAR OF THEIR SENTENCE, WHICHEVER IS LATER, PURSUANT TO SECTION TWO HUNDRED FIFTY- NINE-I OF THIS ARTICLE TO DETERMINE WHETHER SUCH PERSON SHOULD BE RELEASED TO COMMUNITY SUPERVISION. IF THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT RELEASE IS APPROPRIATE PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED FIFTY-NINE-I OF THIS ARTICLE, THEN THE BOARD SHALL RELEASE THE PERSON TO COMMUNITY SUPERVISION. IF RELEASE TO COMMUNITY SUPERVISION IS NOT GRANTED, THE PERSON SHALL BE INFORMED IN WRITING WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF SUCH APPEARANCE OF THE FACTORS AND REASONS FOR THE DENIAL OF SUCH RELEASE AND THE BOARD SHALL SPECIFY A DATE NOT MORE THAN TWENTY-FOUR MONTHS FROM SUCH DETERMINATION FOR RECONSIDERATION, AND THE PROCEDURES TO BE FOLLOWED UPON RECONSIDERATION SHALL BE THE SAME. IF RELEASE TO COMMUNITY SUPERVISION IS GRANTED, THE BOARD SHALL SET RELEASE CONDITIONS AND THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL OTHERWISE APPLY AS THOUGH THE PERSON WAS RELEASED AFTER THE COMPLETION OF HIS OR HER MINIMUM SENTENCE. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD02069-01-3
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.
I would like to know where these numbers come from. NYS is one of the most populous states yet we rank around 10-11 for incarceration.
I wonder WHICH crimes would be considered under this law. What will the victim receive? They get a “life” sentence, no mater how you justify this ruling. Many 55 year olds are quite healthy and still able to create considerable damage.
No, I oppose this ruling.
This is ridiculous, why even give a person a life sentence? It is an absolute slap in the face to their victims and families and loved ones to even consider an age limit of incarceration. Those victims are permanently serving a life sentence of what the criminal has imposed.
I oppose this bill, this is absurd considering the rate of crime in this state.
Please do not pass this Bill. NY, Rochester specifically, is already feeling the effects of other laws passed that do not punish criminals. Appearance tickets...ridiculous. Car thefts, murders, assults...this city is out of control. Now you want to allow the most dangerous criminals a chance at parole just because of age and time served? Mr. Cooney you are very out of touch with the people you represent if you think this is what your constituents want.
Please we can not have this bill passed. A family member was beaten raped then strangled left naked to die in an alley in the cold of February 1995. Her murder lived his life for 15 years until a DNA match in 2008 surfaced. He was successfully convicted and given a life sentence. This man should not be released. Can not believe any one would want to support this bill and give a cold blooded murderer a chance at getting an early parole possibility . New York State we must do better!!!!