NY State Senate Bill 2023-S4269A

Current Bill Status - In Senate Committee Codes Committee

Introduced
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
Delivered to Governor
Signed By Governor

Please enter your contact information

First Name

Last Name

Email Address

A valid email address is required.

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Actions

View Actions

	Assembly Actions - Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Jan 03, 2024	referred to codes
Feb 23, 2023	print number 4269a
Feb 23, 2023	amend and recommit to codes
Feb 07, 2023	referred to codes

Bill Amendments

Original

A (Active)

2023-S4269 - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A2845
Current Committee:: Senate Codes
Law Section:: Civil Rights Law
Laws Affected:: Add §52-e, Civ Rts L; amd §6530, Ed L
Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:: 2019-2020: A11141
2021-2022: S9073, A1091

2023-S4269 - Summary

Establishes a cause of action for fertility fraud; allows patients who have undergone assisted reproduction procedures to bring a cause of action if human reproductive material other than that which was consented to by the patient is used in such procedure; allows for compensatory and punitive damages.

2023-S4269 - Sponsor Memo

                                 
BILL NUMBER: S4269

SPONSOR: CLEARE
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the civil rights law and the education law, in relation
to establishing a cause of action for fertility fraud

 
PURPOSE:

To provide civil recourse to patients, spouses, and children when a.
physician service provider, or donor commits fertility fraud.

 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section one adds a new section 52-d to the civil rights law, creating a
private right of action for fertility fraud.

Subdivision one provides that any patient who has undergone an assisted
reproduction procedure with a health care provider, any intended parent,
their spouse, and a child or person born as a result of such assisted
reproductive procedure shall have a private right of action for damages

against such health care provider when: (a) such health care provider
knowingly or intentionally performs an assisted reproduction procedure
using the human reproductive material of the health care provider or any
other donor without the patient's informed written consent, or from any
donor other than a donor from whom the patient consented in writing; or
(b) such health care provider intentionally performs an assisted reprod-
uction procedure and such health care provider knows or reasonably
should have known that the human reproductive material was used: (i)
without the donor's consent; or (ii) in a manner or to an extent other
than that to which the donor consented.

Subdivision two provides that any patient who has undergone an assisted
reproduction procedure, any intended parent, their spouse, or a child or
person born as a result of such assisted reproduction procedure shall
have a private right of action for damages against a donor or assisted
reproductive service provider where (a) such donor or assisted reproduc-
tive service provider knowingly provides false or misleading information
about the donor's medical history including but not limited to an
illness at the time of donation, any past illness, of the donor, or
genetic or family history of the donor for the past two generations
which is known to the donor at the time of donation; or such assisted
reproductive service provider knowingly uses or provides human reproduc-
tive material for an assisted reproduction procedure in a manner or to
an extent other than that to which the patient consented.

Subdivision three provides that a donor of human reproductive material
shall have a cause of action against a health care provider or assisted
reproductive service provider, if the donor's human reproductive materi-
al was used: (i) without the donor's consent; or (ii) in a manner or to
an extent other than that to which the donor consented.

Subdivision four provides that damages recovered by a plaintiff pursuant
to this section shall include compensatory damages. In addition, the
trier of fact may award punitive damages and such other non-monetary
relief as may be appropriate. In awarding damages, the court may consid-
er the emotional impact of the defendant's conduct.

Subdivision five provides that nothing in this section shall be deemed
to abrogate or otherwise limit any right or remedy otherwise conferred
by federal or state law including but not limited to, any right or reme-
dy related to child support, nor shall any award under this section be
used to offset child support obligations that may arise in connection
with this section.

Subdivision six provides that a cause of action under this section shall
be commenced no later than six years from the date a person discovers,
or reasonably should have discovered, the fertility fraud.

Subdivision seven defines terms used in this section.

Section three amend section 6530 of the education law to provide that a
physician is guilty of profession misconduct if they commit fertility
fraud.

Section three provides the effective date.

 
JUSTIFICATION:

Several recent high-profile cases of doctors using their own sperm to
inseminate patients have brought attention to the issue of fertility
fraud. One Indiana doctor used his sperm instead of the intended donor
sperm and has been found to have fathered at least sixty children, born
in the 1970s and 1980s. Vocal patients who were victims of a doctor's
fraud in Texas exposed his actions and were successful in advocating for
the passage of fertility fraud legislation in their state. Currently,
Indiana, California, and Texas have enacted laws creating a civil right
of action for fertility fraud. Civil bills have also been introduced and
are pending in.  Colorado, Nebraska, Ohio, and Florida.

New York law must protect the dignity of women undergoing assisted
reproduction procedures. If a doctor violates their professional oath
and takes advantage of a patient's confidence by using reproductive
material without prior consent, there must be judicial recourse avail-
able to victims. Learning that one has received unintended reproductive
material without consent is the ultimate betrayal of trust and would
leave a patient feeling nothing less than deceit and violation.

This legislation creates a civil right of action against a health care
provider when such provider knowingly or intentionally performs an
assisted reproductive procedure using their own human reproductive mate-
rial, or that of any other donor, without the patient's informed written
consent. It will also afford a civil remedy against donors and fertility
clinics.

Patients must feel confident that the reproductive material used to have
their child is the material that they have consented to using.  Estab-
lishing a right to sue for the act of fertility fraud will validate a
victim's experience and will make it easier to seek justice when they
have been wronged.

 
PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

A.1091a of 2021 and 2022, referred to judiciary. Same as S.9073 of 2022,
referred to codes.

A.11141 of 2020, referred to judiciary.

 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None.

 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
On the ninetieth day after it shall have become law.

2023-S4269 - Bill Text download pdf

                             
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                   4269
 
                        2023-2024 Regular Sessions
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                             February 7, 2023
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by  Sen.  CLEARE -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
   printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes
 
 AN ACT to amend the civil rights law and the education law, in  relation
   to establishing a cause of action for fertility fraud
 
   THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section 1. Article 5 of the civil rights law is amended  by  adding  a
 new section 52-e to read as follows:
   §  52-E.  PRIVATE  RIGHT OF ACTION FOR FERTILITY FRAUD. 1. ANY PATIENT
 WHO HAS UNDERGONE AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE WITH A HEALTH  CARE
 PROVIDER,  ANY INTENDED PARENT, THE SPOUSE OF ANY PATIENT WHO HAS UNDER-
 GONE AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE WITH A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER, THE
 SPOUSE OF ANY INTENDED PARENT, OR A CHILD OR PERSON BORN AS A RESULT  OF
 SUCH  ASSISTED  REPRODUCTION  PROCEDURE  SHALL  HAVE  A PRIVATE RIGHT OF
 ACTION FOR DAMAGES AGAINST SUCH HEALTH CARE PROVIDER UNDER  ANY  OF  THE
 FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
   (A)  SUCH  HEALTH CARE PROVIDER KNOWINGLY OR INTENTIONALLY PERFORMS AN
 ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE USING THE HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL OF
 THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER  OR  ANY  OTHER  DONOR  WITHOUT  THE  PATIENT'S
 INFORMED  WRITTEN CONSENT TO TREATMENT USING HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL
 FROM THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER OR FROM ANY DONOR OTHER THAN A DONOR  FROM
 WHOM THE PATIENT CONSENTED TO IN WRITING; OR
   (B)  SUCH  HEALTH  CARE  PROVIDER  INTENTIONALLY  PERFORMS AN ASSISTED
 REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE AND SUCH HEALTH CARE PROVIDER KNOWS OR REASONABLY
 SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT THE HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL WAS  USED:    (I)
 WITHOUT  THE  DONOR'S CONSENT; OR (II) IN A MANNER OR TO AN EXTENT OTHER
 THAN THAT TO WHICH THE DONOR CONSENTED.
   2. ANY PATIENT WHO HAS UNDERGONE AN ASSISTED  REPRODUCTION  PROCEDURE,
 ANY  INTENDED  PARENT,  THE  SPOUSE  OF ANY PATIENT WHO HAS UNDERGONE AN
 ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE, THE SPOUSE OF ANY INTENDED PARENT, OR A
 CHILD OR PERSON BORN AS A RESULT OF SUCH ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                            LBD07114-01-3

 S. 4269                             2
 
 SHALL HAVE A PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION FOR  DAMAGES  AGAINST  A  DONOR  OR
 ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE SERVICE PROVIDER UNDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CONDI-
 TIONS:
   (A)  SUCH  DONOR  OR  ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE SERVICE PROVIDER KNOWINGLY
 PROVIDES FALSE OR  MISLEADING  INFORMATION  ABOUT  THE  DONOR'S  MEDICAL
 HISTORY INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO AN ILLNESS AT THE TIME OF DONATION,
 ANY  PAST  ILLNESS OF THE DONOR, OR THE GENETIC OR FAMILY HISTORY OF THE
 DONOR FOR THE PAST TWO GENERATIONS WHICH IS KNOWN TO THE  DONOR  AT  THE
 TIME OF DONATION; OR
   (B)  SUCH  ASSISTED  REPRODUCTIVE  SERVICE  PROVIDER KNOWINGLY USES OR
 PROVIDES HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL FOR AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCE-
 DURE IN A MANNER OR TO AN EXTENT OTHER THAN THAT TO  WHICH  THE  PATIENT
 CONSENTED.
   3. A DONOR OF HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A CAUSE OF ACTION
 AGAINST  A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER OR ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE SERVICE PROVID-
 ER, IF THE DONOR'S HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL WAS USED: (A) WITHOUT THE
 DONOR'S CONSENT; OR (B) IN A MANNER OR TO AN EXTENT OTHER THAN  THAT  TO
 WHICH THE DONOR CONSENTED.
   4.  DAMAGES  RECOVERED  BY  A PLAINTIFF PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION SHALL
 INCLUDE COMPENSATORY DAMAGES. IN ADDITION THERETO, THE TRIER OF FACT MAY
 AWARD PUNITIVE DAMAGES AND SUCH OTHER  NON-MONETARY  RELIEF  AS  MAY  BE
 APPROPRIATE.  IN  AWARDING DAMAGES, THE COURT MAY CONSIDER THE EMOTIONAL
 IMPACT OF THE DEFENDANT'S CONDUCT.
   5. NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE DEEMED TO  ABROGATE  OR  OTHERWISE
 LIMIT  ANY  RIGHT OR REMEDY OTHERWISE CONFERRED BY FEDERAL OR STATE LAW,
 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY  RIGHT  OR  REMEDY  RELATED  TO  CHILD
 SUPPORT,  NOR SHALL ANY AWARD UNDER THIS SECTION BE USED TO OFFSET CHILD
 SUPPORT OBLIGATIONS THAT MAY ARISE IN CONNECTION WITH THIS SECTION.
   6. A CAUSE OF ACTION UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE  COMMENCED  NO  LATER
 THAN  SIX  YEARS  FROM THE DATE A PERSON DISCOVERS, OR REASONABLY SHOULD
 HAVE DISCOVERED, THE FERTILITY FRAUD.
   7. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, THE FOLLOWING TERMS  SHALL  HAVE  THE
 FOLLOWING MEANINGS:
   (A)  "DONOR"  SHALL  MEAN  AN  INDIVIDUAL  WHO DOES NOT INTEND TO BE A
 PARENT, WHO PRODUCES HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL AND PROVIDES SUCH HUMAN
 REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL TO ANOTHER PERSON,  OTHER  THAN  THE  INDIVIDUAL'S
 SPOUSE, FOR USE IN AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE;
   (B) "HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL" SHALL MEAN:
   (I) A HUMAN SPERMATOZOON OR OVUM; OR
   (II) A HUMAN ORGANISM AT ANY STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT FROM FERTILIZED OVUM
 TO EMBRYO;
   (C)  "PATIENT"  SHALL  MEAN  ANY INDIVIDUAL INJECTED OR IMPLANTED WITH
 HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL; AND
   (D) "INTENDED PARENT" SHALL HAVE THE SAME MEANING  AS  IN  SUBDIVISION
 (L) OF SECTION 581-102 OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT.
   §  2.  Section  6530  of  the education law is amended by adding a new
 subdivision 51 to read as follows:
   51. (A) KNOWINGLY OR INTENTIONALLY PERFORMING AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION
 PROCEDURE USING THE HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL OF THE LICENSEE  OR  ANY
 OTHER  DONOR WITHOUT THE PATIENT'S INFORMED WRITTEN CONSENT TO TREATMENT
 USING HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL FROM THE LICENSEE OR  FROM  ANY  DONOR
 OTHER THAN A DONOR FROM WHOM THE PATIENT CONSENTED TO IN WRITING; OR
   (B)  INTENTIONALLY  PERFORMING  AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE AND
 SUCH LICENSEE KNOWS OR REASONABLY  SHOULD  HAVE  KNOWN  THAT  THE  HUMAN
 REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL WAS USED:
   (I) WITHOUT THE DONOR'S CONSENT; OR
 S. 4269                             3
 
   (II)  IN  A  MANNER OR TO AN EXTENT OTHER THAN THAT TO WHICH THE DONOR
 CONSENTED.
   §  3.  This  act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
 have become a law, and shall apply to acts occurring on  or  after  such
 date.

2023-S4269A (ACTIVE) - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A2845
Current Committee:: Senate Codes
Law Section:: Civil Rights Law
Laws Affected:: Add §52-e, Civ Rts L; amd §6530, Ed L
Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:: 2019-2020: A11141
2021-2022: S9073, A1091

2023-S4269A (ACTIVE) - Summary

2023-S4269A (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

                                 
BILL NUMBER: S4269A

SPONSOR: CLEARE
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the civil rights law and the education law, in relation
to establishing a cause of action for fertility fraud

 
PURPOSE:

To provide civil recourse to patients, spouses, and children when a.
physician service provider, or donor commits fertility fraud.

 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section one adds a new section 52-d to the civil rights law, creating a
private right of action for fertility fraud. Subdivision one provides
that any patient who has undergone an assisted reproduction procedure
with a health care provider, any intended parent, their spouse, and a
child or person born as a result of such assisted reproductive procedure
shall have a private right of action for damages against such health
care provider when: (a) such health care provider knowingly or inten-

tionally performs an assisted reproduction procedure using the human
reproductive material of the health care provider or any other donor
without the patient's informed written consent, or from any donor other
than a donor from whom the patient consented in writing; or (b) such
health care provider intentionally performs an assisted reproduction
procedure and such health care provider knows or reasonably should have
known that the human reproductive material was used: (i) without the
donor's consent; or (ii) in a manner or to an extent other than that to
which the donor consented.

Subdivision two provides that any patient who has undergone an assisted
reproduction procedure, any intended parent, their spouse, or a child or
person born as a result of such assisted reproduction procedure shall
have a private right of action for damages against a donor or assisted
reproductive service provider where (a) such donor or assisted reproduc-
tive service provider knowingly provides false or misleading information
about the donor's medical history including but not limited to an
illness at the time of donation, any past illness, of the donor, or
genetic or family history of the donor for the past two generations
which is known to the donor at the time of donation; or such assisted
reproductive service provider knowingly uses or provides human reproduc-
tive material for an assisted reproduction procedure in a manner or to
an extent other than that to which the patient consented.

Subdivision three provides that a donor of human reproductive material
shall have a cause of action against a health care provider or assisted
reproductive service provider, if the donor's human reproductive materi-
al was used: (i) without the donor's consent; or (ii) in a manner or to
an extent other than that to which the donor consented.

Subdivision four provides that damages recovered by a plaintiff pursuant
to this section shall include compensatory damages. In addition, the
trier of fact may award punitive damages and such other non-monetary
relief as may be appropriate.

Subdivision five provides that nothing in this section shall be deemed
to abrogate or otherwise limit any right or remedy otherwise conferred
'by federal or state law including but not limited to, any right or
remedy related to child support, nor shall any award under this section
be used to offset child support obligations that may arise in connection
with this section.

Subdivision six provides that a cause of action under this section shall
be commenced no later than six years from the date a person discovers,
or reasonably should have discovered, the fertility fraud.  Subdivision
seven defines terms used in this section.

Section two amend section 6530 of the education law to provide that a
physician is guilty of profession misconduct if they commit fertility
fraud.

Section three provides the effective date.

 
JUSTIFICATION:

Several recent high-profile cases of doctors using their own sperm to
inseminate patients have brought attention to the issue of fertility
fraud. One Indiana doctor used his sperm instead of the intended donor
sperm and has been found to have fathered at least sixty children, born
in the 1970s and 1980s. Vocal patients who were victims of a doctor's
fraud in Texas exposed his actions and were successful in advocating for
the passage of fertility fraud legislation in their state. Currently,
Indiana, California, and Texas have enacted laws creating a civil right
of action for fertility fraud. Civil bills have also been introduced and
are pending in Colorado, -Nebraska, Ohio, and Florida.

New York law must protect the dignity of women undergoing assisted
reproduction procedures. If a doctor violates their professional oath
and takes advantage of a patient's confidence by using reproductive
material without prior consent, there must be judicial recourse avail-
able to victims. Learning that one has received unintended reproductive
material without consent is the ultimate betrayal of trust and would
leave a patient feeling nothing less than deceit and violation. This
legislation creates a civil right of action against a health care
provider when such provider knowingly or intentionally performs an
assisted reproductive procedure using their own human reproductive mate-
rial, or that of any other donor, without the patient's informed written
consent. It will also afford a civil remedy against donors and fertility
clinics.

Patients must feel confident that the reproductive material used to have
their child is the material that they have consented to using.  Estab-
lishing a right to sue for the act of fertility fraud will validate a
victim's experience and will make it easier to seek justice when they
have been wronged.

 
PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

A.1091a of 2021 and 2022, referred to judiciary. Same as 5.9073 of 2022,
referred to codes.

A.11141, 2020, referred to judiciary.

 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None.

 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
On the ninetieth day after it shall have become law.

2023-S4269A (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

                             
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                  4269--A
 
                        2023-2024 Regular Sessions
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                             February 7, 2023
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by  Sen.  CLEARE -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
   printed to be  committed  to  the  Committee  on  Codes  --  committee
   discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted
   to said committee
 
 AN  ACT to amend the civil rights law and the education law, in relation
   to establishing a cause of action for fertility fraud
 
   THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section  1.  Article  5 of the civil rights law is amended by adding a
 new section 52-e to read as follows:
   § 52-E. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION FOR FERTILITY FRAUD.  1.  ANY  PATIENT
 WHO  HAS UNDERGONE AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE WITH A HEALTH CARE
 PROVIDER, ANY INTENDED PARENT, THE SPOUSE OF ANY PATIENT WHO HAS  UNDER-
 GONE AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE WITH A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER, THE
 SPOUSE  OF ANY INTENDED PARENT, OR A CHILD OR PERSON BORN AS A RESULT OF
 SUCH ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE  SHALL  HAVE  A  PRIVATE  RIGHT  OF
 ACTION  FOR  DAMAGES  AGAINST SUCH HEALTH CARE PROVIDER UNDER ANY OF THE
 FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
   (A) SUCH HEALTH CARE PROVIDER KNOWINGLY OR INTENTIONALLY  PERFORMS  AN
 ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE USING THE HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL OF
 THE  HEALTH  CARE  PROVIDER  OR  ANY  OTHER  DONOR WITHOUT THE PATIENT'S
 INFORMED WRITTEN CONSENT TO TREATMENT USING HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE  MATERIAL
 FROM  THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER OR FROM ANY DONOR OTHER THAN A DONOR FROM
 WHOM THE PATIENT CONSENTED TO IN WRITING; OR
   (B) SUCH HEALTH  CARE  PROVIDER  INTENTIONALLY  PERFORMS  AN  ASSISTED
 REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE AND SUCH HEALTH CARE PROVIDER KNOWS OR REASONABLY
 SHOULD  HAVE  KNOWN  THAT THE HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL WAS USED:  (I)
 WITHOUT THE DONOR'S CONSENT; OR (II) IN A MANNER OR TO AN  EXTENT  OTHER
 THAN THAT TO WHICH THE DONOR CONSENTED.
   2.  ANY  PATIENT WHO HAS UNDERGONE AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE,
 ANY INTENDED PARENT, THE SPOUSE OF ANY  PATIENT  WHO  HAS  UNDERGONE  AN
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                            LBD07114-06-3

 S. 4269--A                          2
 
 ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE, THE SPOUSE OF ANY INTENDED PARENT, OR A
 CHILD OR PERSON BORN AS A RESULT OF SUCH ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE
 SHALL  HAVE  A  PRIVATE  RIGHT  OF ACTION FOR DAMAGES AGAINST A DONOR OR
 ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE SERVICE PROVIDER UNDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CONDI-
 TIONS:
   (A)  SUCH  DONOR  OR  ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE SERVICE PROVIDER KNOWINGLY
 PROVIDES FALSE OR  MISLEADING  INFORMATION  ABOUT  THE  DONOR'S  MEDICAL
 HISTORY INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO AN ILLNESS AT THE TIME OF DONATION,
 ANY  PAST  ILLNESS OF THE DONOR, OR THE GENETIC OR FAMILY HISTORY OF THE
 DONOR FOR THE PAST TWO GENERATIONS WHICH IS KNOWN TO THE  DONOR  AT  THE
 TIME OF DONATION; OR
   (B)  SUCH  ASSISTED  REPRODUCTIVE  SERVICE  PROVIDER KNOWINGLY USES OR
 PROVIDES HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL FOR AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCE-
 DURE IN A MANNER OR TO AN EXTENT OTHER THAN THAT TO  WHICH  THE  PATIENT
 CONSENTED.
   3. A DONOR OF HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A CAUSE OF ACTION
 AGAINST  A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER OR ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE SERVICE PROVID-
 ER, IF THE DONOR'S HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL WAS USED: (A) WITHOUT THE
 DONOR'S CONSENT; OR (B) IN A MANNER OR TO AN EXTENT OTHER THAN  THAT  TO
 WHICH THE DONOR CONSENTED.
   4.  DAMAGES  RECOVERED  BY  A PLAINTIFF PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION SHALL
 INCLUDE COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, INCLUDING PLAINTIFF'S  EMOTIONAL  DISTRESS
 ARISING    FROM DEFENDANT'S CONDUCT.   IN ADDITION THERETO, THE TRIER OF
 FACT MAY AWARD PUNITIVE DAMAGES AND SUCH OTHER  NON-MONETARY  RELIEF  AS
 MAY BE APPROPRIATE.
   5.  NOTHING  IN  THIS SECTION SHALL BE DEEMED TO ABROGATE OR OTHERWISE
 LIMIT ANY RIGHT OR REMEDY OTHERWISE CONFERRED BY FEDERAL OR  STATE  LAW,
 INCLUDING  BUT  NOT  LIMITED  TO,  ANY  RIGHT OR REMEDY RELATED TO CHILD
 SUPPORT, NOR SHALL ANY AWARD UNDER THIS SECTION BE USED TO OFFSET  CHILD
 SUPPORT OBLIGATIONS THAT MAY ARISE IN CONNECTION WITH THIS SECTION.
   6.  A  CAUSE  OF ACTION UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE COMMENCED NO LATER
 THAN SIX YEARS FROM THE DATE A PERSON DISCOVERS,  OR  REASONABLY  SHOULD
 HAVE DISCOVERED, THE FERTILITY FRAUD.
   7.  FOR  PURPOSES  OF THIS SECTION, THE FOLLOWING TERMS SHALL HAVE THE
 FOLLOWING MEANINGS:
   (A) "DONOR" SHALL MEAN AN INDIVIDUAL WHO  DOES  NOT  INTEND  TO  BE  A
 PARENT, WHO PRODUCES HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL AND PROVIDES SUCH HUMAN
 REPRODUCTIVE  MATERIAL  TO  ANOTHER  PERSON, OTHER THAN THE INDIVIDUAL'S
 SPOUSE, FOR USE IN AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE;
   (B) "HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL" SHALL MEAN:
   (I) A HUMAN SPERMATOZOON OR OVUM; OR
   (II) A HUMAN ORGANISM AT ANY STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT FROM FERTILIZED OVUM
 TO EMBRYO;
   (C) "PATIENT" SHALL MEAN ANY INDIVIDUAL  INJECTED  OR  IMPLANTED  WITH
 HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL; AND
   (D)  "INTENDED  PARENT"  SHALL HAVE THE SAME MEANING AS IN SUBDIVISION
 (L) OF SECTION 581-102 OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT.
   § 2. Section 6530 of the education law is  amended  by  adding  a  new
 subdivision 51 to read as follows:
   51. (A) KNOWINGLY OR INTENTIONALLY PERFORMING AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION
 PROCEDURE  USING  THE HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL OF THE LICENSEE OR ANY
 OTHER DONOR WITHOUT THE PATIENT'S INFORMED WRITTEN CONSENT TO  TREATMENT
 USING  HUMAN  REPRODUCTIVE  MATERIAL FROM THE LICENSEE OR FROM ANY DONOR
 OTHER THAN A DONOR FROM WHOM THE PATIENT CONSENTED TO IN WRITING; OR
 S. 4269--A                          3
 
   (B) INTENTIONALLY PERFORMING AN ASSISTED  REPRODUCTION  PROCEDURE  AND
 SUCH  LICENSEE  KNOWS  OR  REASONABLY  SHOULD  HAVE KNOWN THAT THE HUMAN
 REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL WAS USED:
   (I) WITHOUT THE DONOR'S CONSENT; OR
   (II)  IN  A  MANNER OR TO AN EXTENT OTHER THAN THAT TO WHICH THE DONOR
 CONSENTED.
   § 3. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day  after  it  shall
 have  become  a  law, and shall apply to acts occurring on or after such
 date.

Comments

Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.

Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Senate Bill S4269A

Sponsored By

Current Bill Status - In Senate Committee Codes Committee

Bill Amendments

2023-S4269 - Details

2023-S4269 - Summary

2023-S4269 - Sponsor Memo

2023-S4269 - Bill Text download pdf

2023-S4269A (ACTIVE) - Details

2023-S4269A (ACTIVE) - Summary

2023-S4269A (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

2023-S4269A (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments

Senate Bill S4269A

Share this bill

Sponsored By

Cordell Cleare

Current Bill Status - In Senate Committee Codes Committee

Bill Amendments

2023-S4269 - Details

2023-S4269 - Summary

2023-S4269 - Sponsor Memo

2023-S4269 - Bill Text download pdf

2023-S4269A (ACTIVE) - Details

2023-S4269A (ACTIVE) - Summary

2023-S4269A (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

2023-S4269A (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments