4. "APPLICATION" MEANS A REQUEST SUBMITTED BY AN APPLICANT TO A LOCAL
GOVERNMENT FOR A PERMIT TO COLLOCATE SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES; OR TO
APPROVE THE INSTALLATION OR MODIFICATION OF A UTILITY POLE OR WIRELESS
SUPPORT STRUCTURE.
5. "APPLICATION FEE" MEANS THE ONE TIME FEE CHARGED TO AN APPLICANT BY
A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR REVIEW OF AN APPLICATION. THE APPLICATION
FEE MAY NOT EXCEED THE ACTUAL REASONABLE COSTS INCURRED BY THE MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION IN CONNECTION WITH ITS REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION.
6. "POLE" MEANS: (I) A UTILITY POLE, OTHER THAN A UTILITY POLE FOR
DESIGNATED SERVICES, OWNED OR OPERATED BY A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN THE
RIGHT OF WAY, INCLUDING A UTILITY POLE THAT PROVIDES LIGHTING OR TRAFFIC
CONTROL FUNCTIONS, INCLUDING LIGHT POLES, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, AND STRUC-
TURES FOR SIGNAGE; AND (II) A POLE OR SIMILAR STRUCTURE OWNED OR OPER-
ATED BY A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN THE RIGHT OF WAY THAT SUPPORTS ONLY
WIRELESS FACILITIES.
7. "BASE STATION" MEANS WIRELESS FACILITIES OR A WIRELESS SUPPORT
STRUCTURE OR UTILITY POLE THAT CURRENTLY SUPPORTS WIRELESS FACILITIES.
THE TERM DOES NOT INCLUDE A TOWER, AS DEFINED IN 47 C.F.R. § 1.
40001(B)(9), OR ASSOCIATED WIRELESS FACILITIES.
8. "COLLOCATE" MEANS TO INSTALL, MOUNT, MAINTAIN, MODIFY, OPERATE, OR
REPLACE WIRELESS FACILITIES ON OR ADJACENT TO A WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUC-
TURE OR UTILITY POLE. THE TERM "COLLOCATION" HAS A CORRESPONDING MEAN-
ING.
9. "COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDER" MEANS A CABLE OPERATOR, AS
DEFINED IN 47 U.S.C. § 522(5); A PROVIDER OF INFORMATION SERVICE, AS
DEFINED IN 47 U.S.C. § 153(24); A TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER, AS DEFINED
IN 47 U.S.C. § 153(51); OR A WIRELESS PROVIDER.
10. "FCC" MEANS THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION OF THE UNITED
STATES.
11. "FEE" MEANS A ONE-TIME CHARGE.
12. "LAW" MEANS FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL LAW, STATUTE, COMMON LAW,
CODE, RULE, REGULATION, ORDER, OR ORDINANCE.
13. "MICRO WIRELESS FACILITY" MEANS A WIRELESS FACILITY THAT MEETS THE
FOLLOWING QUALIFICATIONS: (I) IS NOT LARGER IN DIMENSION THAN TWENTY-
FOUR INCHES IN LENGTH, FIFTEEN INCHES IN WIDTH, AND TWELVE INCHES IN
HEIGHT; AND (II) ANY EXTERIOR ANTENNA IS NO LONGER THAN ELEVEN INCHES.
14. "PERMIT" MEANS A WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED BY A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION TO PERFORM AN ACTION OR INITIATE, CONTINUE, OR COMPLETE A
PROJECT RELATING TO THE INSTALLATION OR MODIFICATION OF WIRELESS FACILI-
TIES.
15. "PERSON" MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL, CORPORATION, LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY, PARTNERSHIP, ASSOCIATION, TRUST, OR OTHER ENTITY OR ORGANIZA-
TION.
16. "RATE" MEANS A RECURRING CHARGE.
17. "RIGHT OF WAY" OR "ROW" MEANS THE AREA ON, BELOW, OR ABOVE A
PUBLIC ROADWAY, HIGHWAY, STREET, SIDEWALK, ALLEY, UTILITY EASEMENT, OR
SIMILAR PROPERTY, BUT NOT INCLUDING A FEDERAL INTERSTATE HIGHWAY.
18. "SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY" MEANS A WIRELESS FACILITY THAT MEETS
BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING QUALIFICATIONS: (I) EACH ANTENNA IS LOCATED INSIDE
AN ENCLOSURE OF NO MORE THAN SIX CUBIC FEET IN VOLUME OR, IN THE CASE OF
AN ANTENNA THAT HAS EXPOSED ELEMENTS, THE ANTENNA AND ALL OF ITS EXPOSED
ELEMENTS COULD FIT WITHIN AN IMAGINARY ENCLOSURE OF NO MORE THAN SIX
CUBIC FEET; AND (II) ALL OTHER WIRELESS EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE
FACILITY IS CUMULATIVELY NO MORE THAN TWENTY-EIGHT CUBIC FEET IN VOLUME.
THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF ASSOCIATED ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT ARE NOT INCLUDED
IN THE CALCULATION OF EQUIPMENT VOLUME: ELECTRIC METER, CONCEALMENT
S. 4600 3
ELEMENTS, TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEMARCATION BOX, GROUND-BASED ENCLOSURES,
GROUNDING EQUIPMENT, POWER TRANSFER SWITCH, CUT-OFF SWITCH, AND VERTICAL
CABLE RUNS FOR THE CONNECTION OF POWER AND OTHER SERVICES.
19. "SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION" MEANS A PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO AN
EXISTING WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUCTURE OR BASE STATION WHICH WILL SUBSTAN-
TIALLY CHANGE THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OF THE WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUCTURE
OR BASE STATION UNDER THE OBJECTIVE STANDARD FOR SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE
ADOPTED BY THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION PURSUANT TO 47 C.F.R. §
1.40001.
20. "UTILITY POLE" MEANS A POLE OR SIMILAR STRUCTURE THAT IS USED IN
WHOLE OR IN PART BY A COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDER OR FOR ELECTRIC
DISTRIBUTION, LIGHTING, TRAFFIC CONTROL, SIGNAGE, OR A SIMILAR FUNCTION.
SUCH TERM SHALL NOT INCLUDE STRUCTURES SUPPORTING ONLY WIRELESS FACILI-
TIES.
21. "UTILITY POLE FOR DESIGNATED SERVICES" MEANS A UTILITY POLE OWNED
OR OPERATED IN THE ROW BY A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, A PUBLIC UTILITY
DISTRICT, AN ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, OR A RURAL ELECTRIC COOP-
ERATIVE THAT IS DESIGNED TO, OR USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART FOR THE PURPOSE
OF CARRYING ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINES OR CABLES OR WIRES FOR TELECOM-
MUNICATIONS, CABLE, OR ELECTRIC SERVICE.
22. "WIRELESS FACILITY" MEANS EQUIPMENT AT A FIXED LOCATION THAT
ENABLES WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN USER EQUIPMENT AND A COMMUNI-
CATIONS NETWORK, INCLUDING: (I) EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH WIRELESS
COMMUNICATIONS; AND (II) RADIO TRANSCEIVERS, ANTENNAS, COAXIAL OR
FIBER-OPTIC CABLE, REGULAR AND BACKUP POWER SUPPLIES, AND COMPARABLE
EQUIPMENT, REGARDLESS OF TECHNOLOGICAL CONFIGURATION. THE TERM INCLUDES
SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES AND MICRO WIRELESS FACILITIES. THE TERM DOES
NOT INCLUDE THE STRUCTURE OR IMPROVEMENTS ON, UNDER, OR WITHIN WHICH THE
EQUIPMENT IS COLLOCATED. THE TERM DOES NOT INCLUDE: (I) THE STRUCTURE OR
IMPROVEMENTS ON, UNDER, OR WITHIN WHICH THE EQUIPMENT IS COLLOCATED; OR
(II) COAXIAL OR FIBER-OPTIC CABLE THAT IS BETWEEN WIRELESS STRUCTURES OR
UTILITY POLES OR THAT IS OTHERWISE NOT IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO OR
DIRECTLY ASSOCIATED WITH A PARTICULAR ANTENNA.
23. "WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE PROVIDER" MEANS ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A
PERSON AUTHORIZED TO PROVIDE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE IN THE STATE,
THAT BUILDS OR INSTALLS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT,
WIRELESS FACILITIES OR WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUCTURES, BUT THAT IS NOT A
WIRELESS SERVICES PROVIDER.
24. "WIRELESS PROVIDER" MEANS A WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE PROVIDER OR A
WIRELESS SERVICES PROVIDER.
25. "WIRELESS SERVICES" MEANS ANY SERVICES, WHETHER AT A FIXED
LOCATION OR MOBILE, PROVIDED USING WIRELESS FACILITIES.
26. "WIRELESS SERVICES PROVIDER" MEANS ANY PERSON OR ENTITY THAT
PROVIDES WIRELESS SERVICES.
27. "WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUCTURE" MEANS A FREESTANDING STRUCTURE, SUCH
AS A MONOPOLE; TOWER, EITHER GUYED OR SELF-SUPPORTING; BILLBOARD; OR,
OTHER EXISTING OR PROPOSED STRUCTURE DESIGNED TO SUPPORT OR CAPABLE OF
SUPPORTING WIRELESS FACILITIES. SUCH TERM SHALL NOT INCLUDE A UTILITY
POLE.
§ 301. USE OF RIGHT OF WAY. 1. APPLICABILITY. THIS SECTION SHALL ONLY
APPLY TO THE ACTIVITIES OF A WIRELESS PROVIDER WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
2. EXCLUSIVE USE PROHIBITED. A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MAY NOT ENTER
INTO AN EXCLUSIVE ARRANGEMENT WITH ANY PERSON FOR USE OF THE RIGHT OF
WAY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MARKETING, OR MAINTENANCE OF WIRE-
LESS FACILITIES OR WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUCTURES OR THE COLLOCATION OF
SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES OR MICRO WIRELESS FACILITIES.
S. 4600 4
3. RIGHT OF WAY RATES AND FEES. A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MAY ONLY
CHARGE A WIRELESS PROVIDER A RATE OR FEE FOR THE USE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY
WITH RESPECT TO THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, MOUNTING, MAINTENANCE,
MODIFICATION, OPERATION, OR REPLACEMENT OF A WIRELESS FACILITY OR WIRE-
LESS SUPPORT STRUCTURE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY, INCLUDING COLLOCATION IN
SUCH RIGHT OF WAY, IF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION CHARGES OTHER COMMUNI-
CATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS OR PUBLICLY, COOPERATIVELY, OR MUNICIPALLY
OWNED UTILITIES FOR THE USE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY. IF A MUNICIPAL CORPO-
RATION IS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE LAW TO CHARGE A RATE OR FEE TO THOSE
PERSONS OR ENTITIES, AND DOES SO, ANY SUCH RATE OR FEE FOR A WIRELESS
PROVIDER MUST BE: (I) LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN THE DIRECT AND ACTUAL COST
OF MANAGING THE RIGHT OF WAY; AND (II) COMPETITIVELY NEUTRAL WITH REGARD
TO OTHER USERS OF THE RIGHT OF WAY, INCLUDING INVESTOR, MUNICIPAL CORPO-
RATION, OR COOPERATIVELY OWNED ENTITIES. NO RATE OR FEE MAY: (I) RESULT
IN A DOUBLE RECOVERY WHERE EXISTING RATES, FEES, OR TAXES ALREADY
RECOVER THE DIRECT AND ACTUAL COSTS OF MANAGING THE RIGHTS OF WAY; (II)
BE IN THE FORM OF A FRANCHISE OR OTHER FEE BASED ON REVENUE OR CUSTOMER
COUNTS; (III) BE UNREASONABLE OR DISCRIMINATORY; (IV) VIOLATE ANY APPLI-
CABLE LAW; OR (V) EXCEED AN ANNUAL AMOUNT EQUAL TO TWENTY DOLLARS TIMES
THE NUMBER OF UTILITY POLES OR WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUCTURES IN THE MUNIC-
IPAL CORPORATION'S GEOGRAPHIC JURISDICTION ON WHICH THE WIRELESS PROVID-
ER HAS COLLOCATED A SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY ANTENNA. NOTWITHSTANDING THE
FOREGOING, IN RECOGNITION OF THE PUBLIC BENEFITS OF THE DEPLOYMENT OF
WIRELESS SERVICES, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IS PERMITTED, ON A NONDISCRI-
MINATORY BASIS, TO REFRAIN FROM CHARGING ANY RATE OR FEE TO A WIRELESS
PROVIDER FOR THE USE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY.
4. RATE OR FEE ADJUSTMENT. SHOULD A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HAVE AN
EXISTING RATE OR FEE TO CONSTRUCT, INSTALL, MOUNT, MAINTAIN, MODIFY,
OPERATE, OR REPLACE A WIRELESS FACILITY OR WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUCTURE IN
THE ROW, INCLUDING COLLOCATION IN SUCH ROW, CONTROLLED BY THE MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION AND SUCH RATE OR FEE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
IN SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION, NOT LATER THAN SIX MONTHS FOLLOW-
ING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ARTICLE, THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL
IMPLEMENT A REVISED RATE OR FEE TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH SUBDIVI-
SION THREE FOR ALL AFFECTED PERSONS.
5. RIGHT OF ACCESS. SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION AND
APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION, IF REQUIRED, A WIRELESS PROVIDER SHALL HAVE
THE RIGHT, AS A PERMITTED USE NOT SUBJECT TO ZONING REVIEW OR APPROVAL,
BUT SUBJECT TO THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BY THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AS
PROVIDED IN THIS ARTICLE, TO COLLOCATE WIRELESS FACILITIES AND
CONSTRUCT, MODIFY, MAINTAIN, AND OPERATE UTILITY POLES, WIRELESS SUPPORT
STRUCTURES, CONDUIT, CABLE, AND RELATED APPURTENANCES AND FACILITIES
ALONG, ACROSS, UPON, AND UNDER THE ROW. SUCH STRUCTURES AND FACILITIES
SHALL BE SO CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED AS NOT TO OBSTRUCT OR HINDER THE
USUAL TRAVEL OR PUBLIC SAFETY ON SUCH ROW OR OBSTRUCT THE LEGAL USE OF
SUCH ROW BY OTHER UTILITIES. EACH NEW OR MODIFIED UTILITY POLE AND WIRE-
LESS SUPPORT STRUCTURE INSTALLED IN THE ROW SHALL NOT EXCEED THE GREATER
OF (I) TEN FEET IN HEIGHT ABOVE THE TALLEST EXISTING UTILITY POLE IN
PLACE AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ARTICLE LOCATED WITHIN FIVE
HUNDRED FEET OF THE NEW POLE IN THE SAME ROW; OR (II) FIFTY FEET ABOVE
GROUND LEVEL. NEW WIRELESS FACILITIES IN THE ROW MAY NOT EXTEND (I) MORE
THAN TEN FEET ABOVE AN EXISTING UTILITY POLE OR WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUC-
TURE IN PLACE AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ARTICLE; OR (II) ABOVE
THE HEIGHT PERMITTED FOR A NEW UTILITY POLE OR WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUC-
TURE UNDER THIS SECTION. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING:
S. 4600 5
A. SUBJECT TO THIS ARTICLE, A WIRELESS PROVIDER SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT
TO CONSTRUCT, MODIFY AND MAINTAIN A UTILITY POLE, WIRELESS SUPPORT
STRUCTURE, OR WIRELESS FACILITY THAT EXCEEDS THESE SIZE LIMITS ALONG,
ACROSS, UPON AND UNDER THE ROW, SUBJECT TO REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH
APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL ZONING REGULATIONS; AND
B. APPLICANTS SHALL COMPLY WITH NONDISCRIMINATORY UNDERGROUNDING
REQUIREMENTS AFTER OBTAINING PRIOR ZONING APPROVAL IN AREAS ZONED FOR
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE, PROVIDED THAT SUCH REQUIREMENTS SHALL NOT
PROHIBIT THE REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING STRUCTURES OR RESULT IN AN EFFEC-
TIVE PROHIBITION OF SERVICES. IN ALL OTHER ZONING DISTRICTS, PRIOR
ZONING APPROVAL SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED FOR UNDERGROUNDING NEW INFRASTRUC-
TURE ASSOCIATED WITH SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES.
6. NO DISCRIMINATION. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, IN THE EXERCISE OF
ITS ADMINISTRATION AND REGULATION RELATED TO THE MANAGEMENT OF THE ROW
MUST BE COMPETITIVELY NEUTRAL WITH REGARD TO OTHER USERS OF THE ROW,
INCLUDING THAT TERMS MAY NOT BE UNREASONABLE OR DISCRIMINATORY AND MAY
NOT VIOLATE ANY APPLICABLE LAW.
7. DAMAGE AND REPAIR. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MAY REQUIRE A WIRELESS
PROVIDER TO REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO THE ROW DIRECTLY CAUSED BY THE ACTIV-
ITIES OF THE WIRELESS PROVIDER, WHILE OCCUPYING, INSTALLING, REPAIRING
OR MAINTAINING WIRELESS FACILITIES, WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUCTURES, OR
UTILITY POLES IN THE ROW AND TO RETURN THE ROW TO ITS FUNCTIONAL EQUIV-
ALENCE BEFORE THE DAMAGE PURSUANT TO THE COMPETITIVELY NEUTRAL, REASON-
ABLE REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. IF
THE WIRELESS PROVIDER FAILS TO MAKE THE REPAIRS REASONABLY REQUIRED BY
THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME AFTER WRITTEN NOTICE,
THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MAY EFFECT THOSE REPAIRS AND CHARGE THE APPLI-
CABLE PARTY THE REASONABLE, DOCUMENTED ACTUAL COST OF SUCH REPAIRS.
§ 302. COLLOCATION OF SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES AND MICRO WIRELESS
FACILITIES. 1. APPLICABILITY. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL APPLY
TO ACTIVITIES OF A WIRELESS PROVIDER WITHIN OR OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT OF
WAY.
2. EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN THIS ARTICLE, NO MUNICIPAL CORPO-
RATION MAY REGULATE, PROHIBIT OR CHARGE FOR THE COLLOCATION OF
SMALL/MICRO WIRELESS FACILITIES.
3. SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES AND MICRO WIRELESS FACILITIES SHALL BE
CLASSIFIED AS PERMITTED USES AND NOT SUBJECT TO ZONING REVIEW OR
APPROVAL IF THEY ARE COLLOCATED: (I) IN THE RIGHT OF WAY IN ANY ZONING
DISTRICT; OR (II) OUTSIDE THE RIGHT OF WAY IN PROPERTY NOT ZONED EXCLU-
SIVELY FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE.
4. A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MAY REQUIRE AN APPLICANT TO OBTAIN ONE OR
MORE PERMITS TO COLLOCATE A SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY, PROVIDED SUCH
PERMITS ARE OF GENERAL APPLICABILITY AND DO NOT APPLY EXCLUSIVELY TO
WIRELESS FACILITIES. A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL RECEIVE APPLICATIONS
FOR, PROCESS, AND ISSUE SUCH PERMITS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIRE-
MENTS: (I) NO MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MAY, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, REQUIRE
AN APPLICANT TO PERFORM SERVICES UNRELATED TO THE COLLOCATION FOR WHICH
APPROVAL IS SOUGHT, SUCH AS IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION, INCLUDING RESERVING FIBER, CONDUIT, OR POLE SPACE FOR THE
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; (II) NO APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE
MORE INFORMATION TO OBTAIN A PERMIT THAN COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVID-
ERS THAT ARE NOT WIRELESS PROVIDERS; (III) WITHIN TEN DAYS OF RECEIVING
AN APPLICATION, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL DETERMINE AND NOTIFY THE
APPLICANT WHETHER THE APPLICATION IS COMPLETE. IF AN APPLICATION IS
INCOMPLETE, THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFY WHAT
INFORMATION IS MISSING; (IV) AN APPLICATION SHALL BE PROCESSED ON A
S. 4600 6
NONDISCRIMINATORY BASIS AND SHALL BE DEEMED APPROVED IF THE MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION FAILS TO OTHERWISE APPROVE OR DENY THE APPLICATION WITHIN
SIXTY DAYS OF RECEIPT; AND (V) A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL APPROVE AN
APPLICATION UNLESS IT DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE.
THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL DOCUMENT THE BASIS FOR ANY DENIAL,
INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC CODE PROVISIONS ON WHICH THE DENIAL WAS BASED,
AND SEND THE DOCUMENTATION TO THE APPLICANT ON OR BEFORE THE DAY THE
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DENIES THE APPLICATION. THE APPLICANT MAY CURE THE
DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED BY THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND RESUBMIT THE
APPLICATION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE DENIAL WITHOUT PAYING AN ADDI-
TIONAL APPLICATION FEE. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL APPROVE OR DENY
THE REVISED APPLICATION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS. ANY SUBSEQUENT REVIEW SHALL
BE LIMITED TO THE DEFICIENCIES CITED IN THE DENIAL; (VI) AN APPLICANT
SEEKING TO COLLOCATE SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES WITHIN THE JURISDICTION
OF A SINGLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL BE ALLOWED, AT THE APPLICANT'S
DISCRETION, TO FILE A CONSOLIDATED APPLICATION AND RECEIVE A SINGLE
PERMIT FOR THE COLLOCATION OF MULTIPLE SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES; (VII)
COLLOCATION FOR WHICH A PERMIT HAS BEEN GRANTED SHALL COMMENCE WITHIN
ONE YEAR OF APPROVAL AND SHALL BE PURSUED TO COMPLETION; AND (VIII) NO
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MAY INSTITUTE, EITHER EXPRESSLY OR DE FACTO, A
MORATORIUM ON: A. FILING, RECEIVING, OR PROCESSING APPLICATIONS; OR B.
ISSUING PERMITS OR OTHER APPROVALS, IF ANY, FOR THE COLLOCATION OF SMALL
WIRELESS FACILITIES.
5. APPLICATION FEES SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:
(I) A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MAY CHARGE AN APPLICATION FEE ONLY IF SUCH
FEE IS REQUIRED FOR SIMILAR TYPES OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION'S JURISDICTION; (II) A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL
ONLY CHARGE A FEE FOR THE ACTUAL, DIRECT, AND REASONABLE COSTS INCURRED
BY THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION RELATING TO THE GRANTING OR PROCESSING OF
AN APPLICATION. SUCH FEES SHALL BE REASONABLY RELATED IN TIME TO THE
INCURRING OF SUCH COSTS. WHERE SUCH COSTS ARE ALREADY RECOVERED BY
EXISTING FEES, RATES, OR TAXES PAID BY A WIRELESS PROVIDER, NO APPLICA-
TION FEE SHALL BE ASSESSED TO RECOVER SUCH COSTS; (III) A FEE MAY NOT
INCLUDE: A. TRAVEL EXPENSES INCURRED BY A THIRD PARTY IN ITS REVIEW OF
AN APPLICATION; OR B. DIRECT PAYMENT OR REIMBURSEMENT OF THIRD PARTY
RATES OR FEES CHARGED ON A CONTINGENCY BASIS OR A RESULT-BASED ARRANGE-
MENT; (IV) IN ANY CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE APPROPRIATENESS OF A FEE,
THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL HAVE THE BURDEN OF PROVING THAT THE FEE
IS REASONABLY RELATED TO THE ACTUAL, DIRECT, AND REASONABLE COSTS
INCURRED BY THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; (V) TOTAL APPLICATION FEES, WHERE
PERMITTED, SHALL NOT EXCEED THE LESSER OF THE AMOUNT CHARGED BY THE
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR: A. A BUILDING PERMIT FOR ANY SIMILAR COMMER-
CIAL CONSTRUCTION, ACTIVITY, OR LAND USE DEVELOPMENT; OR B. ONE HUNDRED
DOLLARS EACH FOR UP TO FIVE SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES ADDRESSED IN AN
APPLICATION AND FIFTY DOLLARS FOR EACH ADDITIONAL SMALL WIRELESS FACILI-
TY ADDRESSED IN THE APPLICATION.
6. NO MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL REQUIRE AN APPLICATION FOR: (I)
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE; (II) THE REPLACEMENT OF WIRELESS FACILITIES WITH
WIRELESS FACILITIES THAT ARE SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR OR THE SAME SIZE OR
SMALLER; OR (III) THE INSTALLATION, PLACEMENT, MAINTENANCE, OPERATION OR
REPLACEMENT OF MICRO WIRELESS FACILITIES THAT ARE STRUNG ON CABLES
BETWEEN EXISTING UTILITY POLES, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ELEC-
TRICAL SAFETY CODE. A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MAY REQUIRE A PERMIT TO WORK
WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR SUCH ACTIVITIES, IF APPLICABLE. ANY SUCH
PERMITS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION.
S. 4600 7
§ 303. ACCESS TO MUNICIPAL CORPORATION STRUCTURES. 1. COLLOCATION OF
SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES ON OR ADJACENT TO MUNICIPAL CORPORATION POLES
AND UTILITY POLES FOR DESIGNATED SERVICES. (I) EXCLUSIVE ARRANGEMENTS
PROHIBITED. A PERSON OWNING OR CONTROLLING MUNICIPAL POLES OR UTILITY
POLES FOR DESIGNATED SERVICES MAY NOT ENTER INTO AN EXCLUSIVE ARRANGE-
MENT WITH ANY PERSON FOR THE RIGHT TO ATTACH TO OR ADJACENT TO SUCH
POLES.
(II) RATES. A. THE RATES AND FEES FOR COLLOCATIONS ON OR ADJACENT TO
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION POLES OR UTILITY POLES FOR DESIGNATED SERVICES
SHALL BE NONDISCRIMINATORY REGARDLESS OF THE SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE
COLLOCATING PERSON; B. THE RATE TO COLLOCATE ON OR ADJACENT TO UTILITY
POLES FOR DESIGNATED SERVICES MAY NOT EXCEED THE ANNUAL RECURRING RATE
THAT WOULD BE PERMITTED UNDER RULES ADOPTED BY THE FCC UNDER 47 U.S.C. §
224(E) IF THE RATES WERE REGULATED BY THE FCC OR TWENTY DOLLARS PER YEAR
PER WOODEN UTILITY POLE OR TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER YEAR PER METAL,
CONCRETE, OR FIBERGLASS UTILITY POLE, WHICHEVER IS LESS; C. THE RATE TO
COLLOCATE ON MUNICIPAL CORPORATION POLES SHALL RECOVER THE ACTUAL,
DIRECT, AND REASONABLE COSTS RELATED TO THE APPLICANT'S APPLICATION FOR
AND USE OF SPACE ON THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION POLE; D. THE TOTAL ANNUAL
RATE FOR COLLOCATIONS AND ANY ACTIVITIES RELATED TO SUCH COLLOCATIONS
SHALL NOT EXCEED THE LESSER OF ACTUAL, DIRECT, AND REASONABLE COSTS
RELATED TO THE COLLOCATION ON OR ADJACENT TO THE POLE OR TWENTY DOLLARS
PER YEAR PER WOODEN UTILITY POLE OR TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER YEAR PER
METAL, CONCRETE, OR FIBERGLASS UTILITY POLE, WHICHEVER IS LESS; E. IN
ANY CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE APPROPRIATENESS OF A RATE FOR A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION'S POLE, THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL HAVE THE BURDEN OF
PROVING THAT THE RATES ARE REASONABLY RELATED TO THE ACTUAL, DIRECT, AND
REASONABLE COSTS INCURRED FOR USE OF SPACE ON THE POLE FOR SUCH PERIOD;
F. SHOULD A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MUNICIPALLY-OWNED OR OPERATED-PER-
SON, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT, OR COOPERATIVE HAVE AN EXISTING POLE
ATTACHMENT RATE, FEE, OR OTHER TERM THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION, THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MUNICIPALLY-
OWNED OR OPERATED PERSON, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT, OR COOPERATIVE SHALL,
NOT LATER THAN SIX MONTHS FOLLOWING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ARTICLE,
REFORM SUCH RATE, FEE, OR TERM IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SUBDIVISION.
(III) RATES, FEES, AND TERMS TO BE OFFERED. PERSONS OWNING OR CONTROL-
LING MUNICIPAL CORPORATION POLES AND UTILITY POLES FOR DESIGNATED
SERVICES SHALL OFFER RATES, FEES, AND OTHER TERMS THAT COMPLY WITH THE
PROVISION SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION WITHIN THE LATER OF SIX MONTHS OF
THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ARTICLE OR THREE MONTHS AFTER RECEIVING A
REQUEST TO COLLOCATE ITS FIRST SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY ON A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION POLE OR A UTILITY POLE FOR DESIGNATED SERVICES OWNED OR
CONTROLLED BY A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION.
2. COLLOCATION ON OR ADJACENT TO MUNICIPAL CORPORATION WIRELESS
SUPPORT STRUCTURES AND UTILITY POLES OUTSIDE THE RIGHT OF WAY. A MUNICI-
PAL CORPORATION SHALL AUTHORIZE THE COLLOCATION OF SMALL WIRELESS FACIL-
ITIES AND MICRO WIRELESS FACILITIES ON OR ADJACENT TO WIRELESS SUPPORT
STRUCTURES AND UTILITY POLES OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY A MUNICIPAL CORPO-
RATION THAT ARE NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY TO THE SAME EXTENT
THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PERMITS ACCESS TO SUCH STRUCTURES FOR OTHER
COMMERCIAL PROJECTS OR USES. SUCH COLLOCATIONS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO
REASONABLE AND NONDISCRIMINATORY RATES, FEES, AND TERMS AS PROVIDED IN
AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND THE WIRELESS PROVID-
ER.
§ 304. LOCAL AUTHORITY. SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE AND
APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAW, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MAY CONTINUE TO EXERCISE
S. 4600 8
ZONING, LAND USE, PLANNING AND PERMITTING AUTHORITY WITHIN ITS TERRITO-
RIAL BOUNDARIES, INCLUDING WITH RESPECT TO WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUCTURE
AND UTILITY POLES; EXCEPT THAT NO MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL HAVE OR
EXERCISE ANY JURISDICTION OR AUTHORITY OVER THE DESIGN, ENGINEERING,
CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, OR OPERATION OF ANY SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY
OR MICRO WIRELESS FACILITY LOCATED IN AN INTERIOR STRUCTURE OR UPON THE
SITE OF ANY CAMPUS, STADIUM, OR ATHLETIC FACILITY NOT OTHERWISE OWNED OR
CONTROLLED BY THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, OTHER THAN TO COMPLY WITH
APPLICABLE CODES. NOTHING IN THIS ARTICLE AUTHORIZES THE STATE OR ANY
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, TO REQUIRE
WIRELESS FACILITY DEPLOYMENT OR TO REGULATE WIRELESS SERVICES.
§ 305. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. COURTS OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION SHALL HAVE
JURISDICTION TO DETERMINE ALL DISPUTES ARISING UNDER THIS ARTICLE.
§ 306. INDEMNIFICATION. NO MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL REQUIRE A
WIRELESS PROVIDER TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND
ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES HARMLESS AGAINST ANY CLAIMS, LAWSUITS, JUDG-
MENTS, COSTS, LIENS, LOSSES, EXPENSES OR FEES, EXCEPT WHEN A COURT OF
COMPETENT JURISDICTION HAS FOUND THAT THE NEGLIGENCE OF THE WIRELESS
PROVIDER WHILE INSTALLING, REPAIRING OR MAINTAINING CAUSED THE HARM THAT
CREATED SUCH CLAIMS, LAWSUITS, JUDGMENTS, COSTS, LIENS, LOSSES,
EXPENSES, OR FEES OR TO REQUIRE A WIRELESS PROVIDER TO OBTAIN INSURANCE
NAMING THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OR ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES AN ADDI-
TIONAL INSURED AGAINST ANY OF THE FOREGOING.
§ 2. This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall
have become a law.