NY State Senate Bill 2023-S7444

Senate Bill S7444

Signed By Governor

2023-2024 Legislative Session

Relates to the sealing and expungement of records in persons in need of supervision cases in family court

download bill text pdf

Current Bill Status Via A6544 - Signed by Governor

Introduced
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
Delivered to Governor
Signed By Governor

Please enter your contact information

First Name

Last Name

Email Address

A valid email address is required.

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Actions

View Actions

	Assembly Actions - Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Dec 08, 2023	approval memo.41 signed chap.691
Nov 29, 2023	delivered to governor
Jun 09, 2023	returned to assembly passed senate 3rd reading cal.1860 substituted for s7444
Jun 09, 2023	substituted by a6544 ordered to third reading cal.1860 committee discharged and committed to rules
May 26, 2023	referred to children and families

Votes

- Jun 9, 2023 - Floor Vote
  A6544
  
  61
  
  Aye
  
  1
  
  Nay
  
  0
  
  Absent
  
  1
  
  Excused
  
  0
  
  Abstained
  - - Floor Vote: Jun 9, 2023
      
      aye (61)
      
      Addabbo Jr.
      
      Ashby
      
      Bailey
      
      Borrello
      
      Breslin
      
      Brisport
      
      Brouk
      
      Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick
      
      Chu
      
      Cleare
      
      Comrie
      
      Cooney
      
      Fernandez
      
      Gallivan
      
      Gianaris
      
      Gonzalez
      
      Gounardes
      
      Harckham
      
      Helming
      
      Hinchey
      
      Hoylman-Sigal
      
      Jackson
      
      Kavanagh
      
      Kennedy
      
      Krueger
      
      Lanza
      
      Liu
      
      Mannion
      
      Martinez
      
      Martins
      
      Mattera
      
      May
      
      Mayer
      
      Murray
      
      Myrie
      
      O'Mara
      
      Oberacker
      
      Ortt
      
      Palumbo
      
      Parker
      
      Persaud
      
      Ramos
      
      Rhoads
      
      Rivera
      
      Rolison
      
      Ryan
      
      Salazar
      
      Sanders Jr.
      
      Scarcella-Spanton
      
      Sepúlveda
      
      Serrano
      
      Skoufis
      
      Stavisky
      
      Stec
      
      Stewart-Cousins
      
      Tedisco
      
      Thomas
      
      Walczyk
      
      Webb
      
      Weber
      
      Weik
      
      nay (1)
      
      Griffo
      
      excused (1)
      
      Felder
      
      The following Member(s) participated via videoconferencing: Cooney
  Jun 9, 2023 - Rules Committee Vote
  S7444
  
  16
  
  Aye
  
  2
  
  Nay
  
  3
  
  Aye with Reservations
  
  0
  
  Absent
  
  0
  
  Excused
  
  0
  
  Abstained
  - - Rules Committee Vote: Jun 9, 2023
      
      aye (16)
      
      Addabbo Jr.
      
      Bailey
      
      Breslin
      
      Comrie
      
      Fernandez
      
      Gianaris
      
      Kennedy
      
      Krueger
      
      Lanza
      
      Liu
      
      Mayer
      
      Ortt
      
      Parker
      
      Sepúlveda
      
      Stewart-Cousins
      
      Thomas
      
      nay (2)
      
      Griffo
      
      Stec
      
      aye wr (3)
      
      Gallivan
      
      Helming
      
      O'Mara

2023-S7444 (ACTIVE) - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A6544
Law Section:: Family Court Act
Laws Affected:: Amd §§783 & 784, Fam Ct Act
Versions Introduced in 2021-2022 Legislative Session:: S9391, A7621

2023-S7444 (ACTIVE) - Summary

Relates to expungement of records in persons in need of supervision cases in family court.

2023-S7444 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

                                 
BILL NUMBER: S7444

SPONSOR: BRISPORT
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the family court act, in relation to expungement of
records in persons in need of supervision cases in the family court

This is one in a series of measures being introduced at the request of
the Acting Chief Administrative Judge upon the recommendation of her
Family Court Advisory and Rules Committee.

This measure would amend the Family Court Act ("FCA") to correct an
anomaly in its provisions relating to the sealing and expungement of
records in PINS cases.

When Article 3 of the FCA, the juvenile delinquency ("JD") procedure
statute, was enacted nearly four decades ago, applicable provisions of
the Criminal Procedure Law deemed essential for due process and fairness
were incorporated into it. However, the same was not done as to the
remaining provisions of FCA Article 7, which thereafter would apply only
to PINS cases. Among the most glaring omissions is the provision regard-
ing confidentiality of records. Article 3, modeled after CPL § 160.50,
which has afforded youth accused of JD, like adults accused of crimes,

far more protections than those available to the subjects of PINS
proceedings. Likewise, the PINS statute has not yet been modified to
incorporate a 2019 amendment that provides automatic sealing of records
of petty offense-level marijuana offenses, notwithstanding the fact that
violations of Penal Law § 221.05 are specifically included in FCA § 712
as grounds for PINS.

Professor Merril Sobie noted this disparity in his Practice Commentaries
to FCA § 751 :

(Family Court Act) Article 7, unlike Article 3 (the juvenile delinquency
statute), does not provide for the automatic sealing of records when a
petition is dismissed or withdrawn (see Section 375.1). Hence, the
records remain relatively open, subject only to the generalized, impre-
cise  
FAMILY COURT ACT Section 166 stipulation that "(t)he records of
any proceeding in the family court shall not be open to indiscriminate
public inspection". Ironically, children who are falsely accused of
non-criminal "status offense" conduct are afforded less protection than
youths who are accused of engaging in criminal activities.

Most recently, he has noted the ever more serious, anomalous disparity
between the confidentiality protections afforded criminal records and
far more limited protections afforded to both JD and PINS records:

In recent years the New York Legislature has enacted criminal procedure
law measures to strengthen confidentiality and to seal and expunge many
records, thereby barring or limiting accessibility to less egregious
criminal findings. Astonishingly, the measures have excluded the young.
Today, Family Court juvenile delinquency records (crimes committed by
children) and status offense records (non-criminal youthful behavior,
such as truancy) are far more open and available than similar adult
criminal files.

few examples illustrate the dichotomy. The records of adults who have
formerly been convicted of cannabis possession have been expunged (part
of the legalization of marijuana). However, children below the age of 16
are excluded. See FCA § 712. Even cases where the child had been found
to be innocent are never sealed remaining open together with cases where
the child has been found to be guilty.  Similarly, the records of a
child who has been accused of illegal noncriminal behavior, such as
truancy, remains unsealed indefinitely and hence widely available indef-
initely.

M. Sobie, "A Life Sentence for Children: NY's Antiquated Prejudicial
Juvenile Justice Records Provisions," NYLJ, Dec. 16, 2021.

This measure would correct that anomaly. First, closely tracking section
375.1 of the FCA and section 160.50 of the CPL, the measure would amend
FCA § 783 to provide that court records in actions terminated favorably
to the accused - i.e., actions diverted (diverted without petition),
withdrawn or dismissed - would automatically be expunged. In light of
the 2019 amendment to Criminal Procedure Law § 160.50(3) (U. 2019, c.
131), providing that convictions for petty offense-level marijuana
possession under Penal Law § 221.05 are deemed to be terminations of
actions in favor of the accused requiring mandatory sealing, PINS find-
ings for violations of Penal Law § 221.05 would be subject to automatic
expungement following the conclusion of any disposition or period of
extension. Likewise, since the Federal Trafficking Victims Protection
Act defines "severe forms of trafficking in persons," inter alia, as
"sex trafficking in which ...the person induced to perform such act has
not attained 18 years of age," the measure would require expungement at
the conclusion of any disposition or extension based upon a finding for
a prostitution offense under Penal Law § 230.00. Notices would be
required to be sent to presentment or law enforcement agencies, if
either have been involved, directing them to expunge their records as
well.

At the same time, recognizing that designated lead agencies for PINS
diversion, that is, local departments of social services or probation
departments, have certain statutory requirements for internal access to
their records for limited purposes, the notices to those agencies would
be for them to seal their records, thus permitting access simply for
enumerated statuary purposes but barring public access.

This measure authorizes designated lead diversion agencies to check
their records if a juvenile returns on a subsequent PINS and, where the
diversion agency is the local Department of Social Services, it may have
access to its own records where necessary for service determinations and
where the Commissioner determines the information is necessary to comply
with Social Services Law § 422-a regarding disclosure of fatality-relat-
ed information.

Second, in cases in which a juvenile has been adjudicated a PINS, the
juvenile would be permitted to make a motion for expungement of the
record in the interests of justice at any time subsequent to the conclu-
sion of the period of a disposition. If granted, notices would be sent
to agencies involved in the case to seal their records.  Further, youth
where cases have been favorably terminated prior to the effective date
of the statute would be permitted to move for expungement upon twenty
days' notice. Significantly consistent with Professor Sobie's suggestion
in "A Life Sentence for Children: NY's Antiquated Prejudicial Juvenile
Justice Record Provisions, supra; PINS

Records would be required to be automatically expunged once the juvenile
reaches the age of 21, if not expunged sooner, assuming the period of
any disposition has concluded.

As under FCA § 375.3, the Family Court would retain its inherent author-
ity to expunge, rather than simply seal, its records. See Matter of
Dorothy D. v. New York City Probation Department, 49 N.Y.2d 212
(1980)(juvenile delinquency); Matter of Richard S. v. City of New York,
32 N.Y.2d 592 (1973)(PINS); Matter of Daniel PP., 224 A.D.2d 906 (3d
Dept., 1996)(PINS). As the Court of Appeals held in Matter of Dorothy D.
supra at 215:

That the very existence of such records, despite provisions for confi-
dentiality, may constitute a substantial impediment to entry into insti-
tutions of higher learning, government or private employment, the armed
services, or the professions, cannot be seriously questioned. For this
reason, it would be antithetical to the purpose of the Family Court Act
to maintain records which would not benefit society and would result in
bringing unwarranted discrimination to a child's future. (Matter of
Richard S. v. City of New York, 32 N.Y.2d 592, 595-596, 347 N.Y.S.2d 54,
56, 300 N.E.2d 426, 427).

Many states, in fact, include expungement, not simply sealing, as their
mechanism for ensuring the confidentiality of juvenile records.  See,
e.g.,West's Colorado Revised Statutes § 19- 1306; Illinois Compiled
Statutes § 405/5-915 (juvenile delinquency) and § 405/1-9 (juvenile
court records other than juvenile delinquency); Ohio Revised Code §§
2I51.355, 2151.356, 2151.358 (juvenile delinquency and "unruly children"
records); Revised Code of Washington § 13.50.050; Delaware Code §§
1014-1018; North Carolina General Statutes §§ 7B-3200, 3201 (juvenile
delinquency and "undisciplined" children); Arizona Revised Statutes §
13-921; Arkansas Code §§ 927-309(b)(1)(A), (b)(2); West's California
Code, Div. 2, C. 2, Art. 22, § 826(a); Connecticut General Statutes §§
46b-133a,46b-146; West's Florida Statutes § 943.0582; Minnesota Statutes
§ 260B.235 
9; Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes § 9123; West's Code of
Virginia § 16-1-306.

Finally, recognizing that PINS behavior consists of conduct that would
not be criminal if committed by adults, this measure would amend
sections 783 and 784 of the FCA to bar use of PINS records in other
courts. The language in section 783, permitting use of such records in
criminal sentencing proceedings, as well as the reference in section 784
to criminal courts taking action regarding police records, are vestiges
of days when juvenile delinquency and PINS proceedings were both covered
by Article 7 and now are more appropriately applied solely to juvenile
FCA delinquency records. Indeed, these provisions have been incorporated
into Article 3. See FCA §§ 381.2, 381.3(2). This measure appropriately
deletes these provisions from FCA Article 7.

The need to keep confidential records of juvenile misbehavior, both
criminal and noncriminal in nature, has long been a central feature of
the juvenile justice system. As former Chief Justice Rehnquist noted, in
his concurring opinion in Smith v. Daily Mail, 443 U.S. 97, 107 (1979):

It is a hallmark of our juvenile justice system in the United States
that, virtually from its inception at the end of the last century, its
proceedings have been conducted outside of the public's full gaze and
the youths brought before our juvenile courts have been shielded from
publicity. See H. Lou, Juvenile Courts in the United States 131-133
(1927); Geis, Publicity and Juvenile Court Proceedings, 30 Rocky
Mt.L.Rev. 101, 102, 116 (1958). This insistence on confidentiality is
born of a tender concern for the welfare of the child, to hide his
youthful errors and "bury them in the graveyard of the forgotten past.'"
In re Gault, 387 U. S. 1, 387 U. S. 24-25 (1967).

This measure recognizes that non-criminal conduct, the gravamen of PINS
cases, no less than the criminal conduct that forms the basis of juve-
nile delinquency proceedings, needs the protections that have long been
deemed essential to fulfilling the goals of the juvenile justice system.

This measure would take effect 90 days after becoming law.

 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 2021-22:

A7621 A (M/A Hevesi) (Amended on 3rd Rdg)

S9391 (Sen Brisport) (Ref to Children/Families)

 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 2019-20:

A8021 (M/A. Jaffee) (Ref to Rules)

(OCA 46R2)

 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 2017-18:

S4766 (Sen Avella) (Committed to Rules)

A7552 (M/A Jaffee) (Passed)

 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 2015-16:

S5020 (Sen Felder) (Ref to Children & Families)

A7049 (M/A Lupardo (Ref to Children & Families)

 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 2014:

S6814A (Sen Felder) (Committed to Rules)

A9916A (M/A Lupardo) (Passed)

2023-S7444 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

                             
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                   7444
 
                        2023-2024 Regular Sessions
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                               May 26, 2023
                                ___________
 
 Introduced by Sen. BRISPORT -- (at request of the Office of Court Admin-
   istration)  --  read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be
   committed to the Committee on Children and Families
 
 AN ACT to amend the family court act,  in  relation  to  expungement  of
   records in persons in need of supervision cases in the family court

   THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section 1. Section 783 of the family court act is amended to  read  as
 follows:
   § 783. Use of [record] RECORDS in other court; EXPUNGEMENT OF RECORDS.
 (A)  Neither  the  fact  that a person was before the family court under
 this article for a hearing nor any confession,  admission  or  statement
 made  by  him OR HER to the court or to any officer thereof in any stage
 of the proceeding is admissible as evidence against him or HER OR his OR
 HER interests in any other court.  [Another court, in imposing  sentence
 upon an adult after conviction, may receive and consider the records and
 information on file with the family court concerning such person when he
 was a child.]
   (B)  FOR  PURPOSES  OF THIS SECTION, "EXPUNGEMENT" SHALL MEAN THAT ALL
 OFFICIAL RECORDS AND PAPERS,  INCLUDING  JUDGMENTS  AND  ORDERS  OF  THE
 COURT,  BUT  NOT INCLUDING PUBLIC COURT DECISIONS OR OPINIONS OR RECORDS
 AND BRIEFS ON APPEAL, RELATING TO  THE  ARREST,  PROSECUTION  AND  COURT
 PROCEEDINGS  AND  RECORDS  OF  THE PROBATION SERVICE AND DESIGNATED LEAD
 AGENCY, INCLUDING ALL DUPLICATES OR COPIES THEREOF,  ON  FILE  WITH  THE
 COURT,  POLICE DEPARTMENT AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, PROBATION SERVICE,
 DESIGNATED  LEAD  AGENCY  AND  PRESENTMENT  AGENCY,  IF  ANY,  SHALL  BE
 DESTROYED  AND,  EXCEPT FOR RECORDS SEALED AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPHS (V)
 AND (VI) OF SUBDIVISION (C) OF THIS SECTION, SHALL NOT BE MADE AVAILABLE
 TO ANY PERSON OR PUBLIC OR PRIVATE AGENCY.
   (C) AUTOMATIC EXPUNGEMENT OF RECORDS OF A PROCEEDING UNDER THIS  ARTI-
 CLE  THAT IS TERMINATED IN FAVOR OF THE RESPONDENT. (I) UPON TERMINATION
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                            LBD08943-01-3

 S. 7444                             2
 
 OF A PROCEEDING UNDER THIS ARTICLE IN FAVOR OF THE RESPONDENT, THE CLERK
 OF THE COURT SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY AND DIRECT THE  DIRECTORS  OF  THE
 APPROPRIATE  PROBATION  DEPARTMENT,  DESIGNATED  LEAD AGENCY PURSUANT TO
 SECTION  SEVEN HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE OF THIS ARTICLE AND, IF A PRESENTMENT
 AGENCY REPRESENTED THE PETITIONER IN THE PROCEEDING, SUCH  AGENCY,  THAT
 THE  PROCEEDING  HAS  TERMINATED IN FAVOR OF THE RESPONDENT AND THAT THE
 RECORDS, IF ANY, OF SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING ON FILE WITH SUCH  OFFICES
 SHALL  BE  EXPUNGED. IF THE RESPONDENT HAD BEEN THE SUBJECT OF A WARRANT
 OR AN ARREST IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROCEEDING, OR LAW  ENFORCEMENT  WAS
 THE  REFERRING  AGENCY  OR  PETITIONER PURSUANT TO SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED
 THIRTY-THREE OF THIS ARTICLE, THE NOTICE  SHALL  ALSO  BE  SENT  TO  THE
 APPROPRIATE POLICE DEPARTMENT OR LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY. UPON RECEIPT OF
 SUCH  NOTIFICATION,  THE  RECORDS  SHALL  BE EXPUNGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SUBDIVISION (B) OF THIS SECTION. THE ATTORNEY FOR THE  RESPONDENT  SHALL
 BE  NOTIFIED  BY THE CLERK OF THE COURT IN WRITING OF THE DATE AND AGEN-
 CIES AND DEPARTMENTS TO WHICH SUCH NOTIFICATIONS WERE SENT.
   (II) FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, A PROCEEDING UNDER THIS ARTICLE
 SHALL BE CONSIDERED TERMINATED  IN  FAVOR  OF  A  RESPONDENT  WHERE  THE
 PROCEEDING HAS BEEN:
   (A) DIVERTED PRIOR TO THE FILING OF A PETITION PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION
 (G)  OF  SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE OF THIS ARTICLE OR SUBSEQUENT
 TO THE FILING OF A PETITION PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (B) OF SECTION SEVEN
 HUNDRED FORTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE; OR
   (B) WITHDRAWN OR DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, OR FOR ANY  OTHER
 REASON AT ANY STAGE; OR
   (C)  DISMISSED  FOLLOWING AN ADJOURNMENT IN CONTEMPLATION OF DISMISSAL
 PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (A) OF SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED FORTY-NINE OF  THIS
 ARTICLE; OR
   (D)  RESULTED  IN  AN  ADJUDICATION  WHERE  THE ONLY FINDING WAS FOR A
 VIOLATION OF FORMER SECTION 221.05 OR SECTION 230.00 OF THE  PENAL  LAW;
 PROVIDED,  HOWEVER,  THAT WITH RESPECT TO FINDINGS UNDER THIS PARAGRAPH,
 THE EXPUNGEMENT REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION SHALL NOT TAKE PLACE UNTIL  THE
 CONCLUSION  OF  THE  PERIOD  OF  ANY DISPOSITION OR EXTENSION UNDER THIS
 ARTICLE.
   (III) IF, WITH RESPECT TO A RESPONDENT WHO HAD BEEN THE SUBJECT  OF  A
 WARRANT  OR AN ARREST IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROCEEDING, OR LAW ENFORCE-
 MENT WAS THE REFERRING AGENCY, THE DESIGNATED LEAD AGENCY DIVERTS A CASE
 EITHER PRIOR TO OR SUBSEQUENT TO THE FILING OF  A  PETITION  UNDER  THIS
 ARTICLE,  THE  DESIGNATED  LEAD  AGENCY  SHALL  NOTIFY  THE  APPROPRIATE
 PROBATION SERVICE AND POLICE DEPARTMENT OR  LAW  ENFORCEMENT  AGENCY  IN
 WRITING  OF  SUCH  DIVERSION.    SUCH  NOTIFICATION  MAY  BE  ON  A FORM
 PRESCRIBED BY THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS.   UPON  RECEIPT  OF
 SUCH  NOTIFICATION,  THE  PROBATION SERVICE AND POLICE DEPARTMENT OR LAW
 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY SHALL EXPUNGE ANY RECORDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIVI-
 SION (B) OF THIS SECTION IN THE SAME MANNER AS  IS  REQUIRED  THEREUNDER
 WITH RESPECT TO AN ORDER OF A COURT.
   (IV) IF, FOLLOWING THE REFERRAL OF A PROCEEDING UNDER THIS ARTICLE FOR
 THE  FILING  OF  A  PETITION,  THE  PETITIONER  OR,  IF REPRESENTED BY A
 PRESENTMENT AGENCY, SUCH AGENCY, ELECTS NOT TO  FILE  A  PETITION  UNDER
 THIS  ARTICLE, THE PETITIONER OR, IF APPLICABLE, THE PRESENTMENT AGENCY,
 SHALL NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE PROBATION SERVICE AND DESIGNATED LEAD AGEN-
 CY OF SUCH DETERMINATION. SUCH NOTIFICATION MAY BE ON A FORM  PRESCRIBED
 BY THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS AND MAY BE TRANSMITTED BY ELEC-
 TRONIC  MEANS. IF THE RESPONDENT HAD BEEN THE SUBJECT OF A WARRANT OR AN
 ARREST IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROCEEDING, OR  LAW  ENFORCEMENT  WAS  THE
 REFERRING AGENCY, THE NOTIFICATION SHALL ALSO BE SENT TO THE APPROPRIATE
 S. 7444                             3
 
 POLICE  DEPARTMENT  OR  LAW  ENFORCEMENT  AGENCY.  UPON  RECEIPT OF SUCH
 NOTIFICATION, THE RECORDS SHALL BE EXPUNGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH  SUBDIVI-
 SION  (B)  OF  THIS SECTION IN THE SAME MANNER AS IS REQUIRED THEREUNDER
 WITH  RESPECT TO AN ORDER OF A COURT, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE DESIG-
 NATED LEAD AGENCY MAY HAVE ACCESS TO ITS OWN RECORDS IN ACCORDANCE  WITH
 PARAGRAPH (V) OF THIS SUBDIVISION.
   (V)  WHERE A PROCEEDING HAS BEEN DIVERTED PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (A)
 OF PARAGRAPH (II) OF THIS SUBDIVISION OR WHERE  A  PROCEEDING  HAS  BEEN
 REFERRED  FOR  THE FILING OF A PETITION BUT THE POTENTIAL PETITIONER OR,
 IF REPRESENTED BY A PRESENTMENT AGENCY, SUCH AGENCY, ELECTS NOT TO  FILE
 A  PETITION  IN  ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH (IV) OF THIS SUBDIVISION, THE
 DESIGNATED LEAD AGENCY SHALL SEAL ITS RECORDS UNDER  THIS  SECTION,  BUT
 SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO ITS OWN RECORDS SOLELY FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES:
   (A)  WHERE  THERE  IS  CONTINUING OR SUBSEQUENT CONTACT WITH THE CHILD
 UNDER THIS ARTICLE; OR
   (B) WHERE THE INFORMATION IS NECESSARY FOR SUCH DEPARTMENT  TO  DETER-
 MINE  WHAT SERVICES HAD BEEN ARRANGED OR PROVIDED TO THE FAMILY OR WHERE
 THE COMMISSIONER DETERMINES THAT THE INFORMATION IS NECESSARY  IN  ORDER
 FOR  THE  COMMISSIONER  OF  SUCH  DEPARTMENT TO COMPLY WITH SECTION FOUR
 HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO-A OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW.
   (VI) RECORDS EXPUNGED OR SEALED  UNDER  THIS  SECTION  SHALL  BE  MADE
 AVAILABLE  TO THE JUVENILE OR HIS OR HER AGENT AND, WHERE THE PETITIONER
 OR POTENTIAL PETITIONER IS A PARENT OR OTHER PERSON LEGALLY  RESPONSIBLE
 FOR  THE JUVENILE'S CARE, SUCH PARENT OR OTHER PERSON. NO STATEMENT MADE
 TO A DESIGNATED LEAD AGENCY BY THE JUVENILE OR  HIS  OR  HER  PARENT  OR
 OTHER  PERSON LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE THAT IS CONTAINED IN A RECORD EXPUNGED
 OR SEALED UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE ADMISSIBLE IN ANY  COURT  PROCEED-
 ING,  EXCEPT  UPON  THE  CONSENT OR AT THE REQUEST, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE
 JUVENILE OR HIS OR HER PARENT OR OTHER PERSON  LEGALLY  RESPONSIBLE  FOR
 THE JUVENILE'S CARE.
   (VII) A RESPONDENT IN WHOSE FAVOR A PROCEEDING WAS TERMINATED PRIOR TO
 THE  EFFECTIVE  DATE  OF  THIS  PARAGRAPH MAY, UPON MOTION, APPLY TO THE
 COURT, UPON NOT LESS THAN TWENTY DAYS NOTICE TO THE PETITIONER OR (WHERE
 THE PETITIONER IS REPRESENTED BY A PRESENTMENT AGENCY) SUCH AGENCY,  FOR
 AN ORDER GRANTING THE RELIEF SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS SUBDIVI-
 SION.  WHERE  A PROCEEDING UNDER THIS ARTICLE WAS TERMINATED IN FAVOR OF
 THE RESPONDENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH (III) OR (IV) OF THIS SUBDI-
 VISION PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS PARAGRAPH, THE RESPONDENT MAY
 APPLY TO THE DESIGNATED LEAD AGENCY, PETITIONER OR  PRESENTMENT  AGENCY,
 AS APPLICABLE, FOR A NOTIFICATION AS DESCRIBED IN SUCH PARAGRAPHS GRANT-
 ING THE RELIEF SET FORTH THEREIN AND SUCH NOTIFICATION SHALL BE GRANTED.
   (D) MOTION TO EXPUNGE AFTER AN ADJUDICATION AND DISPOSITION. (I) IF AN
 ACTION  HAS RESULTED IN AN ADJUDICATION AND DISPOSITION UNDER THIS ARTI-
 CLE, THE COURT MAY, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND UPON  MOTION  OF  THE
 RESPONDENT, ORDER THE EXPUNGEMENT OF THE RECORDS AND PROCEEDINGS.
   (II)  SUCH  MOTION  MUST  BE  IN  WRITING AND MAY BE FILED AT ANY TIME
 SUBSEQUENT TO THE CONCLUSION OF  THE  DISPOSITION,  INCLUDING,  BUT  NOT
 LIMITED  TO,  THE EXPIRATION OF THE PERIOD OF PLACEMENT, SUSPENDED JUDG-
 MENT, ORDER OF PROTECTION OR PROBATION OR ANY EXTENSION THEREOF.  NOTICE
 OF  SUCH  MOTION  SHALL  BE SERVED NOT LESS THAN EIGHT DAYS PRIOR TO THE
 RETURN DATE OF THE MOTION UPON THE PETITIONER OR, IF THE PETITIONER  WAS
 REPRESENTED  BY  A PRESENTMENT AGENCY, SUCH AGENCY. ANSWERING AFFIDAVITS
 SHALL BE SERVED AT LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE THE RETURN DATE.
   (III) THE COURT SHALL SET FORTH IN A WRITTEN  ORDER  ITS  REASONS  FOR
 GRANTING  OR  DENYING  THE  MOTION.  IF THE COURT GRANTS THE MOTION, ALL
 COURT RECORDS, AS WELL AS ALL RECORDS IN THE POSSESSION  OF  THE  DESIG-
 S. 7444                             4
 
 NATED  LEAD  AGENCY,  THE  PROBATION SERVICE, THE PRESENTMENT AGENCY, IF
 ANY, AND, IF THE RESPONDENT HAD BEEN THE SUBJECT  OF  A  WARRANT  OR  AN
 ARREST  IN  CONNECTION  WITH  THE  PROCEEDING,  OR  IF THE POLICE OR LAW
 ENFORCEMENT  AGENCY  WAS  THE REFERRING AGENCY OR PETITIONER PURSUANT TO
 SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED THIRTY-THREE  OF  THIS  ARTICLE,  THE  APPROPRIATE
 POLICE  OR  LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, SHALL BE EXPUNGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SUBDIVISION (B) OF THIS SECTION.
   (E) AUTOMATIC EXPUNGEMENT OF COURT RECORDS.   ALL RECORDS  UNDER  THIS
 ARTICLE  SHALL  BE  AUTOMATICALLY EXPUNGED UPON THE RESPONDENT'S TWENTY-
 FIRST BIRTHDAY UNLESS EARLIER EXPUNGED UNDER THIS SECTION, PROVIDED THAT
 EXPUNGEMENT UNDER THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL NOT TAKE PLACE UNTIL THE  CONCLU-
 SION OF THE PERIOD OF ANY DISPOSITION OR EXTENSION UNDER THIS ARTICLE.
   (F)  EXPUNGEMENT  OF COURT RECORDS; INHERENT POWER.  NOTHING CONTAINED
 IN THIS ARTICLE SHALL PRECLUDE THE COURT'S USE OF ITS INHERENT POWER  TO
 ORDER THE EXPUNGEMENT OF COURT RECORDS.
   §  2.  Section  784  of  the  family  court  act is amended to read as
 follows:
   § 784. Use of police records.  All  police  records  relating  to  the
 arrest and disposition of any person under this article shall be kept in
 files  separate  and apart from the arrests of adults and shall be with-
 held  from  public  inspection,  but  such  records  shall  be  open  to
 inspection upon good cause shown by the parent, guardian, next friend or
 attorney  of that person upon the written order of a judge of the family
 court in the county in which the order was made [or, if  the  person  is
 subsequently  convicted  of a crime, of a judge of the court in which he
 was convicted].
   § 3. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day  after  it  shall
 have become a law.

Comments

Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.

Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.