Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
Jan 03, 2024 |
referred to alcoholism and substance use disorders |
Sep 11, 2023 |
print number 1976b |
Sep 11, 2023 |
amend and recommit to codes |
May 17, 2023 |
reported and committed to codes |
Feb 14, 2023 |
print number 1976a |
Feb 14, 2023 |
amend and recommit to alcoholism and substance use disorders |
Jan 17, 2023 |
referred to alcoholism and substance use disorders |
Senate Bill S1976B
2023-2024 Legislative Session
Relates to judicial diversion programs; repealer
download bill text pdfSponsored By
(D, WF) 13th Senate District
Current Bill Status - In Senate Committee Alcoholism And Substance Use Disorders Committee
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Delivered to Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
Votes
Bill Amendments
co-Sponsors
(D, WF) 25th Senate District
(D, WF) 55th Senate District
(D) 30th Senate District
(D) 34th Senate District
(D, WF) 12th Senate District
(D, WF) 59th Senate District
(D) 26th Senate District
(D, WF) 40th Senate District
(D, WF) 41st Senate District
(D, WF) 47th Senate District
(D, WF) 31st Senate District
(D, WF) 28th Senate District
(D, WF) 48th Senate District
(D) 20th Senate District
(D, WF) 33rd Senate District
(D, WF) 18th Senate District
(D) 32nd Senate District
(D, WF) 29th Senate District
(D, WF) 52nd Senate District
2023-S1976 - Details
- See Assembly Version of this Bill:
- A1263
- Current Committee:
- Senate Alcoholism And Substance Use Disorders
- Law Section:
- Criminal Procedure Law
- Laws Affected:
- Amd Art 216 Art Head, §§216.00, 216.05, 170.15, 180.20, 230.21 & 160.58, rpld §216.00 sub 1 ¶¶(a) & (b), cl ¶, add §216.10, CP L; amd §212, Judy L
- Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:
-
2019-2020:
S8687
2021-2022: S2881, A8524
2023-S1976 - Sponsor Memo
BILL NUMBER: S1976 SPONSOR: RAMOS TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the criminal procedure law and the judiciary law, in relation to judicial diversion programs; and to repeal certain provisions of the criminal procedure law relating thereto SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 amends the title of Article 216 of the criminal procedure law. Section 2 amends the opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law to include within the definition of "Eligible defendant": Misdemeanor complaint or felony complaint with any offense and has a functional impairment. Section 3 amends the opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law to include within the definition of Eligible defendant: Misdemeanor complaint or felony complaint with any offense and has a functional impairment.
Section 4 repeals paragraphs (a) and (b) and the closing paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law. Section 5 amends existing definitions for judicial diversion courts. Section 6 amends the court procedures for judicial diversion programs in article 216 of the criminal procedure law. Section 7 creates a new subsection that clarifies that each county shall have a diversion part and judges in that part must have additional training, that treatment must come at no cost to the defendant and requires annual reporting by the office of court administration on diversion part outcomes. Section 8 amends section 170.15 of the criminal procedure law to explic- itly authorize judicial diversion court judges to transfer misdemeanor cases in treatment court to the treatment court in the county in which the participant resides so that treatment court participants can receive treatment in the county in which they reside. Section 9 amends section 180.20 of the criminal procedure law to explic- itly authorize judicial diversion court judges to transfer unindicted felonies in treatment court to the treatment court in the county in which the participant resides so that treatment court participants can receive treatment in the county in which they reside. Section 10 amends the title of section 230.21 of the criminal procedure law and amends section 230.21 of the criminal procedure law to explicit- ly authorize judicial diversion court judges to transfer indicted felo- nies in treatment court to the treatment court in the county in which the participant resides so that treatment court participants can receive treatment in the county in which they reside. Section 11 amends section 212 of the judiciary law to reflect the change in the nature of judicial diversion pursuant to the proposed amendments to article 216. Section 12 states that the bill becomes effective within 180 days of signature. LEGISLATIVE INTENT: The legislative intent of the provisions of this article are: 1. To create a judicial diversion program that provides an appropriate therapeutic and trauma-informed response for people with functional impairments; 2. To ensure that treatment provided through the court's judicial diver- sion program is grounded in scientifically validated best practices for recovery and rehabilitation that incorporate harm reduction principles and make harm reduction opportunities in the community available to the participant; 3. To acknowledge that treatment and long-term recovery are most successful when the person seeking treatment is an active and willing participant in their own recovery and that treatment plans are flexible and can be modified throughout the treatment process to meet the partic- ipant's needs; 4. To minimize the harm of incarceration for people with functional impairments by limiting the ability of courts to incarcerate or sanction people who qualify for judicial diversion; and 5. To make judicial diversion programs and treatment accessible to all people with functional impairments who qualify, regardless of where someone lives, their ability to pay for treatment, whether they have attempted treatment in the past or any other barrier to access. JUSTIFICATION: The Treatment Not Jail Act will ensure that New Yorkers with substance use disorders, mental health concerns, and other disabilities have an off-ramp from the criminal legal system to obtain treatment and support in their communities. Currently, mental health or other treatment courts are not available in most counties in the state, and many treatment courts have significant barriers to access that ensure that, often, the people most in need of treatment and support are not able to get them. This bill will expand existing law authorizing drug treatment courts to accept people with mental health concerns, intellectual disabilities and other disabilities that impair their functioning in society. Important- ly, the bill also requires state courts to ensure that people with disa- bilities (as defined by the federal Americans with Disabilities Act) who participate in judicial diversion programs are afforded the protections they are entitled to, pursuant to OLMSTEAD V. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999), while undergoing treatment. This legislation amends Criminal Procedure Law Article 216 to create treatment court alternatives for people with disabilities. This means not only people with substance use disorders or mental illness, but also people with intellectual disabilities, traumatic brain injury, dementia, chronic diseases, significant physical impairments or other conditions that may have contributed to the defendant's involvement in the criminal legal system or that would make jail or prison a crueler outcome than for people without disabilities. The bill also removes significant barriers to entry that ensure that the people most in need of help can get it. The bill increases due process protections for people with cases in these courts to ensure that they are not jailed or remanded summar- ily. Finally, the bill extends treatment courts to people charged with misdemeanor offenses. There are thousands of people who are frequently targeted by police and/or arrested for low-level misdemeanors or violations. To the extent that people are likely to serve jail time related to these charges, these people should also have access to treat- ment courts if they so desire. All participants in judicial diversion programs will be entitled to robust privacy protections afforded by federal law with only limited exceptions. The Treatment Not Jail Act clarifies that admission to a judicial diver- sion program will no longer require a plea of guilty in New York State. A pre-plea, pre-adjudication program preserves due process rights, allows accused people an opportunity to seek treatment, and provides a strong incentive for successful completion. If the participant success- fully completes the program, the charge is dismissed. If the participant does not succeed, the traditional court process can be pursued. This change recognizes the strong body of scientific evidence that shows that long-term success for treatment of addiction or mental illness requires buy-in from the participant. Courts that rely on coercive methods will not achieve the legislature's long-term goal of fostering lasting treat- ment success. Finally, the Treatment Not Jail Act does not exclude participants based on alleged offenses. Data indicates that a person with mental illness is more likely to be a victim of violent crime than the perpetrator. See Noman Ghiasi, Yusra Azhar & Jasbir Singh, "Psychiatric Illness and Criminality," StatPearls (2020). Additionally, studies show that diver- sion programs promote public safety and that people charged with "violent" offenses do just as well in treatment as those charged with "non-violent" ones. Michelle Naples & Henry J. Steadman "Can Persons with Co-occurring Disorders and Violent Charges Be Successfully Diverted?" 2 International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 137-143 (2003). Indeed, most acts of violence committed by people with serious mental illness are carried out when they are not being treated. Treat- ment Advocacy Center, Office of Research and Public Affairs, "Risk Factors For Violence" (June 2016). This bill adopts a smart-on-crime approach to ensuring that people most in need of treatment have access to specialized services they need while also making our communities safer and more resilient. FISCAL IMPACT: TBD EFFECTIVE DATE: Within 180 days being signed into law.
2023-S1976 - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 1976 2023-2024 Regular Sessions I N S E N A T E January 17, 2023 ___________ Introduced by Sens. RAMOS, BRISPORT, BROUK, CLEARE, GIANARIS, GOUNARDES, HARCKHAM, HOYLMAN-SIGAL, JACKSON, KRUEGER, MAY, MYRIE, RIVERA, SALA- ZAR, SEPULVEDA, SERRANO -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Alcoholism and Substance Abuse AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law and the judiciary law, in relation to judicial diversion programs; and to repeal certain provisions of the criminal procedure law relating thereto THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The article heading of article 216 of the criminal proce- dure law, as added by section 4 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows: JUDICIAL DIVERSION [PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN FELONY OFFENDERS] PROGRAMS § 2. The opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by section 1 of chapter 435 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: "Eligible defendant" means any person who stands charged in an indict- ment [or a], superior court information [with a class B, C, D or E felo- ny offense defined in article one hundred seventy-nine, two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-two of the penal law, an offense defined in sections 105.10 and 105.13 of the penal law provided that the underlying crime for the conspiracy charge is a class B, C, D or E felony offense defined in article one hundred seventy-nine, two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-two of the penal law, auto stripping in the second degree as defined in section 165.10 of the penal law, auto stripping in the first degree as defined in section 165.11 of the penal law, identity theft in the second degree as defined in section 190.79 of the penal law, identity theft in the first degree as defined in section 190.80 of the penal law, or any other specified offense as defined in subdivision EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD00666-01-3
S. 1976 2 five of section 410.91 of this chapter, provided, however, a defendant is not an "eligible defendant" if he or she:], MISDEMEANOR COMPLAINT OR FELONY COMPLAINT WITH ANY OFFENSE AND HAS A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT. § 3. The opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by section 2 of chapter 435 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: "Eligible defendant" means any person who stands charged in an indict- ment [or a], superior court information [with a class B, C, D or E felo- ny offense defined in article two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty- two of the penal law, an offense defined in sections 105.10 and 105.13 of the penal law provided that the underlying crime for the conspiracy charge is a class B, C, D or E felony offense defined in article two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-two of the penal law, auto strip- ping in the second degree as defined in section 165.10 of the penal law, auto stripping in the first degree as defined in section 165.11 of the penal law, identity theft in the second degree as defined in section 190.79 of the penal law, identity theft in the first degree as defined in section 190.80 of the penal law, or any other specified offense as defined in subdivision five of section 410.91 of this chapter, provided, however, a defendant is not an "eligible defendant" if he or she:], MISDEMEANOR COMPLAINT OR FELONY COMPLAINT WITH ANY OFFENSE AND HAS A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT. § 4. Paragraphs (a) and (b) and the closing paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law are REPEALED. § 5. Subdivision 2 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 435 of the laws of 2021, is amended and three new subdivisions 3, 5 and 6 are added to read as follows: 2. ["Alcohol and substance use evaluation"] "PARTICIPANT" MEANS AN ELIGIBLE DEFENDANT WHO HAS BEEN ADMITTED INTO THE TREATMENT COURT. 3. "FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT" MEANS A CONDITION THAT IMPAIRS THE ELIGIBLE DEFENDANT'S FUNCTIONING. A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT MAY INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, SUBSTANCE ABUSE OR ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, MENTAL ILLNESS, DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY, TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJU- RY OR OTHER NEUROLOGICAL DISEASE, PERSONALITY DISORDER, COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION, DEMENTIA, EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE OR ANY OTHER DISABILITY. THE COURT SHALL DEFER TO LICENSED HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS AND THE BROADER MEDICAL COMMUNITY CONSENSUS IN DETERMINING WHETHER A PERSON IS DISABLED OR FUNCTIONALLY IMPAIRED. A PERSON MAY HAVE MORE THAN ONE FUNC- TIONAL IMPAIRMENT. 4. "CLINICAL EVALUATION" means a written assessment and report by a [court-approved entity or] licensed [health care professional experi- enced in the treatment of alcohol and substance use disorder, or] CLINI- CIAN QUALIFIED TO IDENTIFY FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS AS DEFINED IN SUBDI- VISION THREE OF THIS SECTION OR AN EVALUATION CONDUCTED by an addiction and substance [abuse] USE DISORDER counselor credentialed by the office of addiction services and supports pursuant to section 19.07 of the mental hygiene law, which shall include: (a) an evaluation as to whether the defendant CURRENTLY has [a history of alcohol or substance use disorder] ONE OR MORE FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS THAT MAY INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO A MENTAL DISORDER, as [such terms are] defined in the MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE diagnostic and statis- tical manual of mental disorders, [fifth edition, and a co-occurring mental disorder or mental illness and the relationship between such use and mental disorder or mental illness,] if any; S. 1976 3 (b) a recommendation as to whether the defendant's [alcohol or substance use] FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS, if any, could be effectively addressed by judicial diversion in accordance with this article; (c) a recommendation as to the treatment modality, level of care and length of any proposed treatment to effectively address the defendant's [alcohol or substance use and any co-occurring mental disorder or illness] FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW REQUIRING THE MOST INTEGRATED SETTING APPROPRIATE TO THE NEEDS OF INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES; and (d) any other information, factor, circumstance, or recommendation deemed relevant by the assessing entity or specifically requested by the court. 5. "TREATMENT" MEANS ONE OR MORE EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS INCLUD- ING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COUNSELING, PSYCHOTHERAPY, PHARMACOTHERAPY, PSYCHIATRIC MEDICATION, HEALTH PROMOTION, AND OVERDOSE PREVENTION EDUCA- TION. FOR SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS, TREATMENT INCLUDES ANY CLINICAL SERVICE OR INTERVENTION THAT ASSISTS INDIVIDUALS TO ACHIEVE RECOVERY IN THE FORM OF: (A) ABSTINENCE FROM ALL OR CERTAIN PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES; (B) A CHANGE OR REDUCTION IN USE; OR (C) IMPROVED WELL-BEING, SOCIAL STABILITY AND THE ALLEVIATION OF ASSOCIATED HARMS. 6. "TREATMENT PROVIDER" MEANS A PERSON OR ORGANIZATION QUALIFIED TO PROVIDE INTERVENTIONS RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS IDENTIFIED BY THE PARTIC- IPANT AND CLINICIAN DURING THE CLINICAL EVALUATION. § 6. Section 216.05 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chap- ter 435 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: § 216.05 Judicial diversion program; court procedures. 1. At any time after the LOCAL CRIMINAL COURT arraignment of an eligi- ble defendant, but prior to the entry of a plea of guilty or the commencement of trial, the court at the request of the eligible defend- ant, [may] SHALL order [an alcohol and substance use] A CLINICAL evalu- ation FOR ALL KNOWN FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS. SUCH EVALUATIONS SHALL TAKE PLACE WITHOUT UNDUE DELAY. (A) THE POSSIBILITY OF BEING EVALUATED SHALL NOT BE CONTINGENT ON A WAIVER OF ANY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CHAPTER EXCEPT SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION 30.30 OF THIS CHAPTER. (B) An eligible defendant may decline to [participate in] UNDERGO such an evaluation at any time. (C) The defendant shall provide a written authorization, in compliance with the requirements of any applicable state or federal laws, rules or regulations authorizing disclosure of the results of the assessment to the defendant's attorney, the prosecutor, the local probation depart- ment, the court, authorized court personnel and other individuals speci- fied in such authorization for the sole purpose of determining whether the defendant should be offered judicial diversion for treatment for [substance use, alcohol use and any co-occurring mental disorder or mental illness] A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT. (D) NO STATEMENT OR OTHER DISCLOSURE, WRITTEN OR OTHERWISE, MADE BY A DEFENDANT TO A PROFESSIONAL COMPLETING THE CLINICAL EVALUATION MAY BE USED BY THE PROSECUTION TO PROVE ANY CRIME OR OFFENSE ALLEGED IN THE PENDING CASE. ALL SUCH STATEMENTS SHALL BE USED ONLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION AND SHALL OTHERWISE REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL. 2. Upon receipt of the completed [alcohol and substance use] CLINICAL evaluation report, the court shall provide a copy of the report to the eligible defendant and the [prosecutor] DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL. S. 1976 4 3. (a) Upon [receipt] REVIEW of the evaluation report [either party] THE DEFENDANT may request a hearing on the issue of whether the [eligi- ble] defendant IS AN ELIGIBLE DEFENDANT AND should be offered [alcohol or substance use] treatment pursuant to this article. AT THE TIME THAT THE DEFENDANT REQUESTS A HEARING, THE DEFENDANT SHALL TURN OVER A COMPLETE COPY OF THE EVALUATION REPORT TO THE PROSECUTOR AND THE COURT. At such a proceeding, which shall be held as soon as practicable so as to facilitate early intervention in the event that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT is found to need [alcohol or substance use] treatment, the court may consider oral and written arguments, [may] take testimony from witnesses offered by either party, and [may] consider any relevant evidence [including, but not limited to, evidence that: (i) the defendant had within the preceding ten years (excluding any time during which the offender was incarcerated for any reason between the time of the acts that led to the youthful offender adjudication and the time of commission of the present offense) been adjudicated a youth- ful offender for: (A) a violent felony offense as defined in section 70.02 of the penal law; or (B) any offense for which a merit time allow- ance is not available pursuant to subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section eight hundred three of the correction law; and (ii) in the case of a felony offense defined in subdivision five of section 410.91 of this chapter, or section 165.10, 165.11, 190.79 or 190.80 of the penal law, any statement of or submitted by the victim, as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision two of section 380.50 of this chapter] EXCEPT SEALED CASES DEFINED IN SECTION 160.50 OF THIS CHAPTER. (b) Upon completion of such a proceeding, the court shall consider and make findings of fact with respect to whether: (i) the defendant is an eligible defendant as defined in subdivision one of section 216.00 of this article; (ii) [the defendant has a history of alcohol or substance use; (iii) such alcohol or substance use] THE DEFENDANT'S FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT is LIKELY a contributing factor to [the defendant's criminal behavior] THEIR CURRENT OR FUTURE INVOLVEMENT IN THE CRIMINAL LEGAL SYSTEM; [(iv)] (III) the defendant's participation in judicial diversion could effectively address such [use] FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT; and [(v) institutional confinement of the defendant is or may not be necessary for the protection of the public] (IV) THE DEFENDANT'S ACCESS TO TREATMENT THROUGH THIS ARTICLE WOULD BENEFIT THE PUBLIC AND THE DEFENDANT. (C) WHERE THERE HAS BEEN A FINDING IN THE CLINICAL EVALUATION THAT THE DEFENDANT HAS A MENTAL DISORDER, AS DEFINED IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS, OR A CLIN- ICAL DIAGNOSIS OF ANOTHER SERIOUS FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT THERE SHALL BE A PRESUMPTION THAT THE DEFENDANT IS AN ELIGIBLE DEFENDANT. 4. (A) When an authorized court determines, pursuant to paragraph (b) of subdivision three of this section, that an eligible defendant should be offered [alcohol or substance use] treatment, or when the parties and the court agree to [an eligible defendant's participation in alcohol or substance use] treatment, an eligible defendant [may] SHALL be allowed to participate in the judicial diversion program offered by this arti- cle. [Prior to the court's issuing an order granting judicial diver- sion, the eligible defendant shall be required to enter a plea of guilty to the charge or charges; provided, however, that no such guilty plea shall be required when: S. 1976 5 (a) the people and the court consent to the entry of such an order without a plea of guilty; or (b) based on a finding of exceptional circumstances, the court deter- mines that a plea of guilty shall not be required. For purposes of this subdivision, exceptional circumstances exist when, regardless of the ultimate disposition of the case, the entry of a plea of guilty is like- ly to result in severe collateral consequences.] (B) ELIGIBLE DEFENDANTS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PARTICIPATE IN JUDICIAL DIVERSION. (C) PRIOR PARTICIPATION IN TREATMENT OR COURT-MANDATED TREATMENT SHALL NOT PRECLUDE FUTURE TREATMENT PARTICIPATION. (D) ELIGIBLE DEFENDANTS SHALL NOT BE PRECLUDED FROM DIVERSION BECAUSE OF A LACK OF RESOURCES IN THE COMMUNITY. (E) AN ELIGIBLE DEFENDANT SHALL NOT BE PRECLUDED FROM DIVERSION BECAUSE OF THEIR GENDER IDENTITY. (F) THERE SHALL BE A PRESUMPTION THAT PARTICIPANTS SHALL BE AFFORDED THE OPPORTUNITY TO REMAIN AT LIBERTY WHILE AWAITING CLINICAL EVALUATION OR TREATMENT PLACEMENT. 5. The [defendant] PARTICIPANT shall agree on the record or in writing to abide by the [release] JUDICIAL DIVERSION PROGRAM conditions set by the court, which[,] shall include[:] participation in a specified period of [alcohol or substance use] treatment at a specified program or programs [identified by the court, which may include periods of detoxi- fication,]. IN SETTING THE PROGRAM CONDITIONS, THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER THE PARTICIPANT'S ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLAN, AS AGREED UPON BY THE PARTICIPANT AND TREATMENT PROVIDER, IN ADDITION TO THE CLINICAL EVALU- ATION. THE COURT SHALL NOT CONSIDER THE NATURE OF A PARTICIPANT'S CHARG- ES. JUDICIAL DIVERSION PROGRAM CONDITIONS MAY INCLUDE: (A) LIMITED OR INTENSIVE OUTPATIENT TREATMENT IN WHICH THE PARTIC- IPANT, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY HAVE PERMANENT HOUSING OR NOT, MAY RESIDE IN THE COMMUNITY; (B) LIMITED PERIODS OF DETOXIFICATION OR INPATIENT REHABILITATION FOR PARTICIPANTS WITH SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS, EXCEPT THAT DETOXIFICATION SHALL NOT BE USED AS A SANCTION AND DETOXIFICATION SHALL ONLY BE REQUIRED AS PREPARATION FOR A TREATMENT ADMISSION OR MEDICATION INDUCTION; (C) residential [or outpatient] treatment[, or both]. IF ORDERING RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT, PLACEMENT SHALL BE IN THE MOST INTEGRATED SETTING APPROPRIATE FOR THE PARTICIPANT'S NEEDS TO AVOID DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW, as determined after taking into account the views of the health care professional who conducted the MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT OR alcohol and substance use evaluation and any health care professionals responsible for providing such treatment or monitoring the defendant's progress in such treatment; [and may include: (i)] (D) periodic court appearances, which may [include periodic urinaly- sis; (ii)] BE AN ELECTRONIC APPEARANCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 182.20 OF THIS PART UPON CONSENT OF THE PARTICIPANT. THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER THE PARTICIPANT'S SERVICE ENGAGEMENT AND TREATMENT NEEDS WHEN SCHEDULING PERIODIC COURT APPEARANCES AND SHALL ATTEMPT TO MINIMIZE TREATMENT DISRUPTION; (E) PERIODIC DRUG SCREENING AS NEEDED, WHEN RECOMMENDED BY THE TREAT- MENT PROVIDER AS PART OF A PARTICIPANT'S TREATMENT PLAN. DRUG SCREENING METHODS SHALL ONLY INCLUDE ORAL SWABS, SWEAT PATCHES, OR NON-OBSERVED URINALYSIS; (F) OTHER TREATMENT AS RECOMMENDED BY THE TREATMENT PROVIDER; AND S. 1976 6 (G) a requirement that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT refrain from engag- ing in criminal behaviors[; (iii) if the defendant needs treatment for opioid use, that he or she]. 5-A. THE COURT SHALL NOT REQUIRE A PARTICIPANT TO CONSENT TO SHARE, OR AUTHORIZE THE TREATMENT PROVIDER TO SHARE, PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT PRIVACY RULE (45 CFR PARTS 160 AND 164), WITH THE COURT. EXCEPTIONS INCLUDE: (A) RECORD OF ATTENDANCE AND RELEVANT BARRIERS TO ATTENDANCE; (B) TREATMENT PLAN AND ANY RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE PLAN DURING PARTICIPATION IN JUDICIAL DIVERSION; AND (C) DRUG TOXICOLOGY RESULTS, WHEN PART OF THE TREATMENT PLAN. 5-B. IF THE PARTICIPANT HAS A CONDITION REQUIRING PRESCRIPTION MEDICA- TION, OR HAS ANOTHER CONDITION REQUIRING PRESCRIPTION MEDICATION, THEY may participate in and receive medically prescribed drug treatments under the care of a health care professional licensed or certified under title eight of the education law, acting within his or her lawful scope of practice[, provided that no]. (A) NO court shall require the use of any specified type or brand of drug during the course of medically prescribed [drug] treatments. (B) NO COURT SHALL PENALIZE OR SANCTION A PARTICIPANT FOR PERIODS OF VOLUNTARY HOSPITALIZATION, RESPITE CARE, OR OTHER FORMS OF SUPPORTIVE CARE. 5-C. TREATMENT PROVIDERS SHALL COLLABORATE WITH THE PARTICIPANT AND CLINICAL COURT STAFF TO CREATE A DISCHARGE PLAN PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF DIVERSION TO INCORPORATE PEER SUPPORT, HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT SUPPORT, AND HOW TO ACCESS OTHER COMMUNITY-BASED HEALTH SERVICES. IF A PARTIC- IPANT FINISHES THEIR INPATIENT OR OUTPATIENT TREATMENT COURSE, THEY SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO HAVE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THEIR OBLIGATION TO THE COURT, REGARDLESS OF THEIR ABILITY TO SECURE PERMANENT HOUSING, EMPLOYMENT, OR OTHER PERSONAL GOALS IDENTIFIED BY THE PARTICIPANT. 6. Upon [an eligible defendant's] A PARTICIPANT'S agreement to abide by the conditions set by the court, the court shall issue a securing order providing for bail or release on the [defendant's] PARTICIPANT'S own recognizance and conditioning any release upon the agreed upon conditions PURSUANT TO ARTICLE FIVE HUNDRED TEN OF THIS CHAPTER. The period of [alcohol or substance use] treatment shall begin as specified by the court and as soon as practicable after the [defendant's] PARTIC- IPANT'S release, taking into account the availability of treatment, so as to facilitate early intervention with respect to the [defendant's substance use or condition] PARTICIPANT'S FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT and the effectiveness of the treatment program. In the event that a treatment program is not immediately available or becomes unavailable during the course of the [defendant's participation] PARTICIPANT'S INVOLVEMENT in the judicial diversion program, the court may release the [defendant] PARTICIPANT pursuant to the securing order. 7. When participating in judicial diversion treatment pursuant to this article, any resident of this state who is covered under a private health insurance policy or contract issued for delivery in this state pursuant to article thirty-two, forty-three or forty-seven of the insur- ance law or article forty-four of the public health law, or who is covered by a self-funded plan which provides coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of [chemical abuse and chemical dependence] FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT however defined in such policy; shall first seek reimburse- ment for such treatment in accordance with the provisions of such policy or contract. THE COURT IN ITS DISCRETION MAY ORDER THE PARTICIPANT TO S. 1976 7 OBTAIN PUBLIC INSURANCE SUCH AS MEDICAID OR MEDICARE IF THEY SO QUALIFY. HOWEVER, THE PARTICIPANT SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO PAY FOR ANY PART OF THE COST OF TREATMENT REQUIRED BY THE COURT THAT IS NOT COVERED BY PRIVATE OR PUBLIC HEALTH INSURANCE. 8. (A) During the period of a [defendant's participation] PARTIC- IPANT'S INVOLVEMENT in the judicial diversion program, the TREATMENT court shall retain jurisdiction of the [defendant] PARTICIPANT, provided, however, that the court [may] SHALL allow such [defendant] PARTICIPANT to (i) reside in another jurisdiction, [or] AND/OR (ii) participate in [alcohol and substance use] treatment and other programs in the jurisdiction where the defendant resides or in any other juris- diction, while participating in a judicial diversion program under conditions set by the court and agreed to by the defendant pursuant to subdivisions five and six of this section. THE COURT MAY TRANSFER THE PARTICIPANT'S CASE TO THE JUDICIAL DIVERSION COURT IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE PARTICIPANT RESIDES PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION FIVE OF SECTION 170.15 OF THIS PART, SUBDIVISION FOUR OF SECTION 180.20 OF THIS PART, OR SECTION 230.21 OF THIS PART TO ENSURE CONTINUITY OF TREATMENT. (B) The court may require the [defendant] PARTICIPANT to appear in court OR REMOTELY at any time to enable the court to monitor the [defendant's] progress in [alcohol or substance use] treatment. The court shall provide notice, reasonable under the circumstances, to the people, the treatment provider, the [defendant] PARTICIPANT and the [defendant's] PARTICIPANT'S counsel whenever it orders or otherwise requires the appearance of the [defendant] PARTICIPANT in court. Failure to appear as required without reasonable cause therefor shall constitute a violation of the conditions of the court's agreement with the [defend- ant] PARTICIPANT. 9. (a) If at any time during the [defendant's participation] PARTIC- IPANT'S ENGAGEMENT in the judicial diversion program, the court has reasonable grounds to believe that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT has violated a [release] PROGRAM condition in an important respect or has willfully failed to appear before the court as requested, the court except as provided in subdivision two of section 510.50 of this chapter regarding a failure to appear, shall direct the [defendant] PARTICIPANT to appear [or issue a bench warrant to a police officer or an appropri- ate peace officer directing him or her to take the defendant into custo- dy and bring the defendant before the court without unnecessary delay; provided, however, that under no circumstances shall a defendant who requires treatment for opioid use be deemed to have violated a release condition on the basis of his or her participation in medically prescribed drug treatments under the care of a health care professional licensed or certified under title eight of the education law, acting within his or her lawful scope of practice] FOR A HEARING ON THE VIOLATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (B) OF THIS SUBDIVISION WITH AT LEAST FORTY-EIGHT HOURS NOTICE TO THE PARTICIPANT OR THE PARTICIPANT'S COUN- SEL, UNLESS NOTICE IS WAIVED BY THE PARTICIPANT. THE COURT MAY NOT MODIFY THE PARTICIPANT'S SECURING ORDER UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE HEARING'S CONCLUSION. The relevant provisions of section 530.60 of this chapter relating to issuance of securing orders shall apply to such proceedings under this subdivision. THERE IS A PRESUMPTION THAT A BENCH WARRANT SHALL NOT BE ISSUED FOR PARTICIPANTS IN JUDICIAL DIVERSION. (b) In determining whether a [defendant] PARTICIPANT violated a condi- tion of [his or her release under] the judicial diversion program OR WILLFULLY FAILED TO APPEAR IN COURT, the court [may] SHALL conduct a [summary] hearing consistent with due process [and sufficient] to satis- S. 1976 8 fy the court that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT has, in fact, violated the condition OR WILLFULLY FAILED TO APPEAR. (I) THE COURT SHALL PROVIDE REASONABLE NOTICE TO THE PARTICIPANT AND THE PARTICIPANT'S COUNSEL, BUT IN NO CIRCUMSTANCE LESS THAN FORTY-EIGHT HOURS NOTICE, UNLESS NOTICE IS WAIVED BY THE PARTICIPANT. (II) THE PEOPLE SHALL BEAR THE BURDEN OF PROVING BY CLEAR AND CONVINC- ING EVIDENCE THAT THE PARTICIPANT HAS VIOLATED A CONDITION OF THE JUDI- CIAL DIVERSION PROGRAM IN AN IMPORTANT RESPECT. THE PARTICIPANT MAY CROSS-EXAMINE WITNESSES AND MAY PRESENT RELEVANT, ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE ON THEIR OWN BEHALF. THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER ALL FACTORS RELATING TO THE PARTICIPANT'S CURRENT MENTAL HEALTH OR COGNITIVE STATUS, THEIR ENGAGE- MENT WITH JUDICIAL DIVERSION PRIOR TO THIS TIME, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER FACTORS THAT MAY HAVE IMPACTED THEIR PARTICIPATION OR ALLEGED VIOLATION. (III) A BENCH WARRANT SHALL NOT BE ISSUED ABSENT A FINDING BY THE COURT THAT THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OR FAILURE TO APPEAR WAS WILLFUL. IN DETERMINING WILLFULNESS, THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER: THE NEXUS BETWEEN THE PARTICIPANT'S VIOLATION OR FAILURE TO APPEAR AND THEIR FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT; WHETHER AN APPROPRIATE TREATMENT PLAN IS CURRENTLY IN PLACE; THE PARTICIPANT'S HISTORY OF MAKING COURT APPEARANCES IN THE INSTANT MATTER; AND A HISTORY OF POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT WITH TREATMENT STAFF OR THE COURT. (IV) UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL A PARTICIPANT WHO REQUIRES TREATMENT FOR A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT BE DEEMED TO HAVE VIOLATED A PROGRAM CONDI- TION ON THE PARTICIPATION IN MEDICALLY PRESCRIBED DRUG TREATMENTS UNDER THE CARE OF A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL LICENSED OR CERTIFIED UNDER TITLE EIGHT OF THE EDUCATION LAW, ACTING WITHIN HIS OR HER LAWFUL SCOPE OF PRACTICE. (V) IF THE COURT FINDS A REASONABLE EXPLANATION OR MITIGATION FOR ANY ALLEGED VIOLATION OR ALLEGED WILLFUL FAILURE TO APPEAR, THE SECURING ORDER SHALL NOT BE MODIFIED. (VI) THE COURT MAY SEAL PORTIONS OF THE PROCEEDING RELATED TO COLLAT- ERAL CONSEQUENCES AT THE REQUEST OF THE PARTICIPANT AND PARTICIPANT'S COUNSEL. (c) If the court determines BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT has violated a condition of his or her release under the judicial diversion program, the court may PERMIT THE PARTIC- IPANT TO CONTINUE THEIR TREATMENT MANDATE AS PREVIOUSLY ORDERED; modify the [conditions thereof, reconsider the order of recognizance or bail pursuant to subdivision two of section 510.30 of this chapter,] TREAT- MENT PLAN PER THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE TREATMENT PROVIDER; HOLD TREAT- MENT IN ABEYANCE UNTIL THE UNDERLYING MATTER THAT CAUSED THE VIOLATION IS RESOLVED; or terminate the [defendant's] PARTICIPANT'S participation in the judicial diversion program[; and when applicable proceed with the defendant's sentencing in accordance with the agreement. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the court may impose any sentence authorized for the crime of conviction in accordance with the plea agreement, or any lesser sentence authorized to be imposed on a felony drug offender pursuant to paragraph (b) or (c) of subdivision two of section 70.70 of the penal law taking into account] IF NO OTHER TREAT- MENT OPTION IS AVAILABLE. THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER: (I) the length of time the [defendant] PARTICIPANT spent in residen- tial treatment and how best to continue treatment [while the defendant is serving that sentence. In determining what action to take for a violation of a release condition, the court shall consider]; (II) all relevant circumstances, including the views of the prosecu- tor, the defense and the [alcohol or substance use] PARTICIPANT'S INTER- S. 1976 9 EST IN CONTINUING treatment [provider, and the extent to which persons who ultimately successfully complete a drug treatment regimen sometimes] OR THE PROGRAM; AND (III) THE ROLE OF relapse [by not abstaining from alcohol or substance use or by failing to comply fully with all requirements imposed by a treatment program] IN RECOVERY AND TREATMENT. (D) The court shall [also consider using] USE a system of graduated and appropriate responses [or sanctions] designed to address such inap- propriate behaviors[, protect public safety] and facilitate, where possible, successful completion of the [alcohol or substance use] treat- ment program. [(d)] (E) Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed [as prevent- ing a court from terminating a defendant's participation in the judicial diversion program for violating a release condition when such a termi- nation is necessary to preserve public safety. Nor shall anything in this subdivision be construed] as precluding the prosecution of a [defendant] PARTICIPANT for the commission of a different offense while participating in the judicial diversion program. PRIOR TO SUCH TERMI- NATION, THE PARTICIPANT SHALL BE ENTITLED TO A HEARING AT WHICH CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE SHALL BE OFFERED TO SUPPORT THAT THERE EXISTS A SUBSTANTIAL RISK TO AN IDENTIFIABLE PERSON. IN THE ABSENCE OF SUCH A HEARING AND SUCH A FINDING, THERE CAN BE NO TERMINATION. [(e)] (F) A [defendant] PARTICIPANT may at any time advise the court that [he or she wishes] THEY WISH to terminate participation in the judicial diversion program, at which time the court shall [proceed with the case and, where applicable, shall impose sentence in accordance with the plea agreement. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contra- ry, the court may impose any sentence authorized for the crime of conviction in accordance with the plea agreement, or any lesser sentence authorized to be imposed on a felony drug offender pursuant to paragraph (b) or (c) of subdivision two of section 70.70 of the penal law taking into account the length of time the defendant spent in residential treatment and how best to continue treatment while the defendant is serving that sentence] TRANSFER THE CASE BACK TO THE APPROPRIATE TRIAL PART. 10. Upon the court's determination that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT has successfully completed the required period of [alcohol or substance use] treatment and has otherwise satisfied the conditions required for successful completion of the judicial diversion program, the court shall [comply with the terms and conditions it set for final disposition when it accepted the defendant's agreement to participate in the judicial diversion program. Such disposition may include, but is not limited to: (a) requiring the defendant to undergo a period of interim probation supervision and, upon the defendant's successful completion of the interim probation supervision term, notwithstanding the provision of any other law, permitting the defendant to withdraw his or her guilty plea and dismissing the indictment; or (b) requiring the defendant to undergo a period of interim probation supervision and, upon successful completion of the interim probation supervision term, notwithstanding the provision of any other law, permitting the defendant to withdraw his or her guilty plea, enter a guilty plea to a misdemeanor offense and sentencing the defendant as promised in the plea agreement, which may include a period of probation supervision pursuant to section 65.00 of the penal law; or (c) allowing the defendant to withdraw his or her guilty plea and dismissing] DISMISS the indictment OR SUPERIOR COURT INFORMATION, FELONY COMPLAINT, MISDEMEANOR COMPLAINT, INFORMATION, S. 1976 10 SIMPLIFIED INFORMATION, OR PROSECUTOR'S INFORMATION AND SEAL THE CASE PURSUANT TO SECTION 160.50 OF THIS CHAPTER. 11. Nothing in this article shall be construed as restricting or prohibiting courts or district attorneys from using other lawful proce- dures or models for placing appropriate persons into [alcohol or substance use] treatment. § 7. The criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new section 216.10 to read as follows: § 216.10 DIVERSION PART ESTABLISHED. 1. THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO ESTAB- LISH, IN EACH COUNTY OF THE STATE, A PART OF THE COURT TO BE KNOWN AS THE DIVERSION PART FOR THE COUNTY IN WHICH SUCH COURT PRESIDES. TO AID IN THEIR WORK, SUCH JUDGES AND DIVERSION COURT PERSONNEL SHALL RECEIVE ANNUAL TRAINING IN SPECIALIZED AREAS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO DISABILITY, MENTAL ILLNESS, AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER NEEDS, INCLUDING CO-OCCURRING DISORDERS, EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICES, AND TRAUMA-INFORMED CARE, AS WELL AS TRAINING IN PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND CULTURAL COMPETENCY AND MEDICAID OR MEDICARE ELIGIBILITY. THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL EMPLOYEES WHO STAFF THE DIVERSION PARTS RECEIVE SPECIALIZED TRAINING IN PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND WORKING WITH PEOPLE WITH COMPLEX NEEDS. 2. EACH CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS SHALL AT THE END OF EACH YEAR PREPARE AND FILE AN ANNUAL REPORT, WHICH THE OFFICE SHALL COMPILE, PUBLISH ON ITS WEBSITE AND MAKE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC. SUCH REPORTS SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMA- TION FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANTS. EACH SUCH REPORT, IN ADDITION TO OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION, SHALL SET FORTH, DISAGGREGATED BY EACH COUN- TY SERVED: (A) THE NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS WITH CASES IN THE DIVERSION PART FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER, RACE AND ETHNICITY: (I) THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR EVALUATION; (II) THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ARE ACCEPTED INTO JUDICIAL DIVERSION; AND (III) THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROGRAM; (B) THE LENGTH OF TIME, IN MONTHS, EACH CASE REMAINED IN THE DIVERSION PART PRIOR TO ACQUITTAL, DISMISSAL, RELEASE ON RECOGNIZANCE, REVOCATION OF RELEASE ON CONDITIONS, AND SENTENCING; (C) THE DEMOGRAPHIC MAKEUP OF PARTICIPANTS IN THE DIVERSION PART, BROKEN DOWN BY RACE, ETHNICITY, AGE AND SEX OF PARTICIPANTS; (D) THE CRIMES WITH WHICH EACH PARTICIPANT WAS CHARGED; (E) WHETHER THE TREATMENT OBTAINED WAS FOR SUBSTANCE USE, MENTAL HEALTH, CO-OCCURRING OR OTHER; (F) THE COURT DISPOSITION IN EACH SUPERVISED CASE, INCLUDING SENTENC- ING INFORMATION; (G) THE COSTS SAVED TO THE COUNTY BY AVOIDING PRE-TRIAL OR POST-CON- VICTION DETENTION IN A COUNTY JAIL OR STATE PRISON; AND (H) A LIST OF SERVICE PROVIDERS, INCLUDING CONTACT INFORMATION, THAT THE DIVERSION PART IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY PARTNERS WITH TO SERVE PARTICIPANTS. § 8. Subdivision 5 of section 170.15 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 91 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: 5. [(a)] Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contra- ry, in any county [outside a city having a population of one million or more], upon or after arraignment of a defendant on an information, a S. 1976 11 simplified information, a prosecutor's information or a misdemeanor complaint pending in a local criminal court, such court [may] SHALL, upon motion of the defendant [and after giving the district attorney an opportunity to be heard], order that the action be removed from the court in which the matter is pending to another local criminal court in the same county, or [with consent of the district attorney and the district attorney of the adjoining county] to another court in [such] AN adjoining county, OR TO A COURT IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT RESIDES that has been designated as a JUDICIAL DIVERSION, human traf- ficking [court], or veterans treatment court by the chief administrator of the courts, and such JUDICIAL DIVERSION, human trafficking [court], or veterans treatment court [may] SHALL then conduct such action to judgment or other final deposition; provided, however, that no court may order removal pursuant to this subdivision to a veterans treatment court of a family offense charge described in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this chapter where the accused and the person alleged to be the victim of such offense charged are members of the same family or household as defined in such subdivision one of section 530.11; and provided further that an order of removal issued under this subdivision shall not take effect until five days after the date the order is issued [unless, prior to such effective date, the human trafficking court or veterans treatment court notifies the court that issued the order that: i. it will not accept the action, in which event the order shall not take effect; or ii. it will accept the action on a date prior to such effective date, in which event the order shall take effect upon such prior date. (b) Upon providing notification pursuant to subparagraph i or ii of paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the human trafficking court or veter- ans treatment court shall promptly give notice to the defendant, his or her counsel, and the district attorney]. § 9. Subdivision 4 of section 180.20 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 91 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: 4. [(a)] Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contra- ry, [in any county outside a city having a population of one million or more,] upon or after arraignment of a defendant on a felony complaint pending in a local criminal court having preliminary jurisdiction there- of, such court [may] SHALL, upon motion of the defendant [and after giving the district attorney an opportunity to be heard], order that the action be removed from the court in which the matter is pending to another local criminal court in the same county, or [with consent of the district attorney and the district attorney of the adjoining county] to another court in such adjoining county, OR TO A COURT IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT RESIDES, that has been designated as a JUDICIAL DIVERSION, human trafficking [court], or veterans treatment court by the chief administrator of the courts, and such JUDICIAL DIVERSION, human trafficking [court], or veterans treatment court may then conduct such action to judgment or other final disposition; provided, however, that no court may order removal pursuant to this subdivision to a veterans treatment court of a family offense charge described in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this chapter where the accused and the person alleged to be the victim of such offense charged are members of the same family or household as defined in such subdivision one of section 530.11; and provided further an order of removal issued under this subdivision shall not take effect until five days after the date the order is issued [unless, prior to such effective date, the human traf- S. 1976 12 ficking court or veterans treatment court notifies the court that issued the order that: i. it will not accept the action, in which event the order shall not take effect; or ii. it will accept the action on a date prior to such effective date, in which event the order shall take effect upon such prior date. (b) Upon providing notification pursuant to subparagraph i or ii of paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the human trafficking court or veter- ans treatment court shall promptly give notice to the defendant, his or her counsel and the district attorney]. § 10. Section 230.21 of the criminal procedure law, as added by chap- ter 91 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: § 230.21 Removal of action to certain courts in an adjoining county OR COUNTY IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT RESIDES. 1. In any county [outside a city having a population of one million or more], [the] UPON OR AFTER ARRAIGNMENT OF A DEFENDANT ON AN INDICTMENT PENDING IN A SUPERIOR COURT HAVING JURISDICTION THEREOF, SUCH court [may] SHALL, upon motion of the defendant [and with consent of the district attorney and the district attorney of the adjoining county that has a superior court designated a human trafficking court or veterans treatment court by the chief administrator of the courts], order that the indictment and action be removed from the court in which the matter is pending to [such] A SUPERIOR COURT IN AN ADJOINING COUNTY OR IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT RESIDES THAT HAS BEEN DESIGNATED A JUDI- CIAL DIVERSION, human trafficking [court], or veterans treatment court, whereupon such court may then conduct such action to judgment or other final disposition; provided, however, that no court may order removal to a veterans treatment court of a family offense charge described in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this chapter pursuant to this section where the accused and the person alleged to be the victim of such offense charged are members of the same family or household as defined in such subdivision one of section 530.11; and provided further that an order of removal issued under this subdivision shall not take effect until five days after the date the order is issued [unless, prior to such effective date, the human trafficking court or veterans treat- ment court notifies the court that issued the order that: (a) it will not accept the action, in which event the order shall not take effect, or (b) it will accept the action on a date prior to such effective date, in which event the order shall take effect upon such prior date. 2. Upon providing notification pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) of subdivision one of this section, the human trafficking court or veterans treatment court shall promptly give notice to the defendant, his or her counsel and the district attorney of both counties]. § 11. Paragraph (r) of subdivision 2 of section 212 of the judiciary law, as added by section 15 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows: (r) Ensure that cases eligible for judicial diversion pursuant to article two hundred sixteen of the criminal procedure law shall be assigned to court parts in the manner provided by the chief administra- tor and that, to the extent practicable, such cases are presided over by judges who, by virtue of the structure, caseload and resources of the parts and the judges' training, are in the best position to provide effective supervision over such cases, such as the [drug] treatment courts. In compliance with these provisions, the chief administrator shall [give due weight to] INDIVIDUALLY ASSESS the need for diverted S. 1976 13 defendants to make regular court appearances, and be closely supervised by the court, for the duration of [drug] treatment and the pendency of the criminal charge. § 12. This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after it shall have become a law; provided, however that the amendments to the opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law made by section two of this act shall be subject to the expiration and reversion of such paragraph pursuant to section 12 of chapter 90 of the laws of 2014, as amended, when upon such date the provisions of section three of this act shall take effect.
co-Sponsors
(R) 43rd Senate District
(D, WF) 46th Senate District
(D, WF) 25th Senate District
(D, WF) 55th Senate District
(D) 30th Senate District
(D) 14th Senate District
(D, WF) 56th Senate District
(D) 34th Senate District
(D, WF) 12th Senate District
(D, WF) 59th Senate District
(D) 26th Senate District
(D, WF) 40th Senate District
(D, WF) 41st Senate District
(D, WF) 47th Senate District
(D, WF) 31st Senate District
(D, WF) Senate District
(D, WF) 28th Senate District
(D, WF) 48th Senate District
(D) 20th Senate District
(D, WF) 21st Senate District
(D, WF) 33rd Senate District
(D, WF) 18th Senate District
(D) 32nd Senate District
(D, WF) 29th Senate District
(D) 6th Senate District
(D, WF) 52nd Senate District
2023-S1976A - Details
- See Assembly Version of this Bill:
- A1263
- Current Committee:
- Senate Alcoholism And Substance Use Disorders
- Law Section:
- Criminal Procedure Law
- Laws Affected:
- Amd Art 216 Art Head, §§216.00, 216.05, 170.15, 180.20, 230.21 & 160.58, rpld §216.00 sub 1 ¶¶(a) & (b), cl ¶, add §216.10, CP L; amd §212, Judy L
- Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:
-
2019-2020:
S8687
2021-2022: S2881, A8524
2023-S1976A - Sponsor Memo
BILL NUMBER: S1976A SPONSOR: RAMOS TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the criminal procedure law and the judiciary law, in relation to judicial diversion programs; and to repeal certain provisions of the criminal procedure law relating thereto SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:: Section 1 amends the title of Article 216 of the criminal procedure law. Section 2 amends the opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law to include within the definition of "Eligible defendant": Misdemeanor complaint or felony complaint with any offense and has a functional impairment. Section 3 amends the opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law to include within the definition of Eligible defendant: Misdemeanor complaint or felony complaint with any offense and has a functional impairment.
Section 4 repeals paragraphs (a) and (b) and the closing paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law. Section 5 amends existing definitions for judicial diversion courts. Section 6 amends the court procedures for judicial diversion programs in article 216 of the criminal procedure law. Section 7 creates a new subsection that clarifies that each county shall have a diversion part and judges in that part must have additional training, that treatment must come at no cost to the defendant and requires annual reporting by the office of court administration on diversion part outcomes. Section 8 amends section 170.15 of the criminal procedure law to explic- itly authorize judicial diversion court judges to transfer misdemeanor cases in treatment court to the treatment court in the county in which the participant resides so that treatment court participants can receive treatment in the county in which they reside. Section 9 amends section 180.20 of the criminal procedure law to explic- itly authorize judicial diversion court judges to transfer unindicted felonies in treatment court to the treatment court in the county in which the participant resides so that treatment court participants can receive treatment in the county in which they reside. Section 10 amends the title of section 230.21 of the criminal procedure law and amends section 230.21 of the criminal procedure law to explicit- ly authorize judicial diversion court judges to transfer indicted felo- nies in treatment court to the treatment court in the county in which the participant resides so that treatment court participants can receive treatment in the county in which they reside. Section 11 amends section 212 of the judiciary law to reflect the change in the nature of judicial diversion pursuant to the proposed amendments to article 216. Section 12 states that the bill becomes effective within 180 days of signature. LEGISLATIVE INTENT: The legislative intent of the provisions of this article are: 1. To create a judicial diversion program that provides an appropriate therapeutic and trauma-informed response for people with functional impairments; 2. To ensure that treatment provided through the court's judicial diver- sion program is grounded in scientifically validated best practices for recovery and rehabilitation that incorporate harm reduction principles and make harm reduction opportunities in the community available to the participant; 3. To acknowledge that treatment and long-term recovery are most successful when the person seeking treatment is an active and willing participant in their own recovery and that treatment plans are flexible and can be Modified throughout the treatment process to meet the partic- ipant's needs; 4. To minimize the harm of incarceration for people with functional impairments by limiting the ability of courts to incarcerate or sanction people who qualify for judicial diversion; and 5. To make judicial diversion programs and treatment accessible to all people with functional impairments who qualify, regardless of where someone lives, their ability to pay for treatment, whether they have attempted treatment in the past or any other barrier to access. JUSTIFICATION:: The Treatment Not Jail Act will ensure that New Yorkers with substance use disorders, mental health concerns, and other disabilities have an off-ramp from the criminal legal system to obtain treatment and support in their communities. Currently, mental health or other treatment courts are not available in most counties in the state, and many treatment courts have significant barriers to access that ensure that, often, the people most in need of treatment and support are not able to get them. This bill will expand existing law authorizing drug treatment courts to accept people with mental health concerns, intellectual disabilities and other disabilities that impair their functioning in society. Important- ly, the bill also requires state courts to ensure that people with disa- bilities (as defined by the federal Americans with Disabilities Act) who participate in judicial diversion programs are afforded the protections they are entitled to, pursuant to OLMSTEAD V. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999), while undergoing treatment. This legislation amends Criminal Procedure Law Article 216 to create treatment court alternatives for people with disabilities. This means not only people with substance use disorders or mental illness, but also people with intellectual disabilities, traumatic brain injury, dementia, chronic diseases, significant physical impairments or other conditions that may have contributed to the defendant's involvement in the criminal legal system or that would make jail or prison a crueler outcome than for people without disabilities. The bill also removes significant barriers to entry that ensure that the people most in need of help can get it. The bill increases due process protections for people with cases in these courts to ensure that they are not jailed or remanded summar- ily. Finally, the bill extends treatment courts to people charged with misdemeanor offenses. There are thousands of people who are frequently targeted by police and/or arrested for low-level misdemeanors or violations. To the extent that people are likely to serve jail time related to these charges, these people should also have access to treat- ment courts if they so desire. All participants in judicial diversion programs will be entitled to robust privacy protections afforded by federal law with only limited exceptions. The Treatment Not Jail Act clarifies that admission to a judicial diver- sion program will no longer require a plea of guilty in New York State. A pre-plea, pre-adjudication program preserves due process rights, allows accused people an opportunity to seek treatment, and provides a strong incentive for successful completion. If the participant success- fully completes the program, the charge is dismissed. If the participant does not succeed, the traditional court process can be pursued. This change recognizes the strong body of scientific evidence that shows that long-term success for treatment of addiction or mental illness requires buy-in from the participant. Courts that rely on coercive methods will not.achieve the legislature's long-term goal of fostering lasting treat- ment success. Finally, the Treatment Not Jail Act does not exclude participants based on alleged offenses. Data indicates that a person with mental illness is more likely to be a victim of violent crime than the perpetrator. See Noman Ghiasi, Yusra Azhar & Jasbir Singh, "Psychiatric Illness and Criminality," StetPearls (2020). Additionally, studies show that diver- sion programs promote public safety and that people charged with "violent" offenses do just as well in treatment as those charged with "non-violent" ones. Michelle Naples & Henry J. Steadman "Can Persons with Co-occurring Disorders and Violent Charges Be Successfully Diverted?" 2 International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 137-143 (2003). Indeed, most acts of violence committed by people with serious mental illness are carried out when they are not being treated. Treat- ment Advocacy Center, Office of Research and Public Affairs, "Risk Factors For Violence" (June 2016). This bill adopts a smart-on-crime approach to ensuring that people most in need of treatment have access to specialized services they need while also making our communities safer and more resilient. FISCAL IMPACT: TBD EFFECTIVE DATE:: Within 180 days being signed into law.
2023-S1976A - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 1976--A 2023-2024 Regular Sessions I N S E N A T E January 17, 2023 ___________ Introduced by Sens. RAMOS, BRISPORT, BROUK, CLEARE, FERNANDEZ, GIANARIS, GONZALEZ, GOUNARDES, HARCKHAM, HINCHEY, HOYLMAN-SIGAL, JACKSON, KRUEG- ER, MAY, MYRIE, RIVERA, SALAZAR, SEPULVEDA, SERRANO, WEBB -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Alcoholism and Substance Abuse -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law and the judiciary law, in relation to judicial diversion programs; and to repeal certain provisions of the criminal procedure law relating thereto THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The article heading of article 216 of the criminal proce- dure law, as added by section 4 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows: JUDICIAL DIVERSION [PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN FELONY OFFENDERS] PROGRAMS § 2. The opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by section 1 of chapter 435 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: "Eligible defendant" means any person who stands charged in an indict- ment [or a], superior court information [with a class B, C, D or E felo- ny offense defined in article one hundred seventy-nine, two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-two of the penal law, an offense defined in sections 105.10 and 105.13 of the penal law provided that the underlying crime for the conspiracy charge is a class B, C, D or E felony offense defined in article one hundred seventy-nine, two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-two of the penal law, auto stripping in the second degree as defined in section 165.10 of the penal law, auto stripping in the first degree as defined in section 165.11 of the penal law, identity theft in the second degree as defined in section 190.79 of the penal EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD00666-02-3
S. 1976--A 2 law, identity theft in the first degree as defined in section 190.80 of the penal law, or any other specified offense as defined in subdivision five of section 410.91 of this chapter, provided, however, a defendant is not an "eligible defendant" if he or she:], MISDEMEANOR COMPLAINT OR FELONY COMPLAINT WITH ANY OFFENSE AND HAS A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT. § 3. The opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by section 2 of chapter 435 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: "Eligible defendant" means any person who stands charged in an indict- ment [or a], superior court information [with a class B, C, D or E felo- ny offense defined in article two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty- two of the penal law, an offense defined in sections 105.10 and 105.13 of the penal law provided that the underlying crime for the conspiracy charge is a class B, C, D or E felony offense defined in article two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-two of the penal law, auto strip- ping in the second degree as defined in section 165.10 of the penal law, auto stripping in the first degree as defined in section 165.11 of the penal law, identity theft in the second degree as defined in section 190.79 of the penal law, identity theft in the first degree as defined in section 190.80 of the penal law, or any other specified offense as defined in subdivision five of section 410.91 of this chapter, provided, however, a defendant is not an "eligible defendant" if he or she:], MISDEMEANOR COMPLAINT OR FELONY COMPLAINT WITH ANY OFFENSE AND HAS A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT. § 4. Paragraphs (a) and (b) and the closing paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law are REPEALED. § 5. Subdivision 2 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 435 of the laws of 2021, is amended and six new subdivisions 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are added to read as follows: 2. ["Alcohol and substance use evaluation"] "PARTICIPANT" MEANS AN ELIGIBLE DEFENDANT WHO HAS BEEN ADMITTED INTO JUDICIAL DIVERSION PURSU- ANT TO THIS ARTICLE. 3. "LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL" MEANS A CLINICIAN WITH PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE, TRAINING AND LICENSURE WHO IS QUALIFIED TO DIAGNOSE OR TREAT PEOPLE WITH MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS, INCLUDING: SUBSTANCE-RELATED AND ADDICTIVE DISORDERS, NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, NEUROCOGNITIVE DISORDERS, OR OTHER DISORDERS AS DEFINED IN THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF THE DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISOR- DERS. 4. "FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT" MEANS A CONDITION THAT INVOLVES CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DISTRESS OR DISABILITY IN SOCIAL, OCCUPATIONAL OR OTHER AREAS OF FUNCTIONING DUE TO A MENTAL HEALTH DISORDER, INCLUDING: SUBSTANCE-RELATED AND ADDICTIVE DISORDERS, NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, NEUROCOGNITIVE DISORDERS, OR OTHER DISORDERS AS DEFINED IN THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF THE DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISOR- DERS. THE COURT SHALL DEFER TO LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH CARE PROFES- SIONALS IN DETERMINING WHETHER A PERSON HAS A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT. A PERSON MAY HAVE MORE THAN ONE FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT. 5. "CLINICAL EVALUATION" means a written assessment and report by a [court-approved entity or] licensed MENTAL health care professional [experienced in the treatment of alcohol and substance use disorder, or] AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION OR AN EVALUATION CONDUCTED by an addiction and substance [abuse] USE DISORDER counselor credentialed by the office of addiction services and supports pursuant to section 19.07 of the mental hygiene law, which shall include: S. 1976--A 3 (a) an evaluation as to whether the defendant CURRENTLY has [a history of alcohol or substance use disorder] ONE OR MORE FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS THAT MAY INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO A MENTAL HEALTH DISORDER, as [such terms are] defined in the MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, [fifth edition, and a co-oc- curring mental disorder or mental illness and the relationship between such use and mental disorder or mental illness,] if any; (b) a recommendation as to whether the defendant's [alcohol or substance use] FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS, if any, could be effectively addressed by judicial diversion in accordance with this article; (c) a recommendation as to the treatment modality, level of care and length of any proposed treatment to effectively address the defendant's [alcohol or substance use and any co-occurring mental disorder or illness] FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS; and (d) any other information, factor, circumstance, or recommendation deemed relevant by the assessing entity or specifically requested by the court. 6. "TREATMENT" MEANS ONE OR MORE EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS INCLUD- ING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COUNSELING, PSYCHOTHERAPY, PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICA- TION, HEALTH PROMOTION, AND OVERDOSE PREVENTION EDUCATION. TREATMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE DOES NOT INCLUDE TREATMENT IN A CARCER- AL SETTING OR IN A FORENSIC HOSPITAL PURSUANT TO ARTICLE SEVEN HUNDRED THIRTY OF THIS CHAPTER. FOR SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS, TREATMENT INCLUDES ANY CLINICAL SERVICE OR INTERVENTION THAT ASSISTS INDIVIDUALS TO ACHIEVE HARM REDUCTION. 7. "TREATMENT PROVIDER" MEANS A PERSON OR ORGANIZATION QUALIFIED TO PROVIDE INTERVENTIONS RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS IDENTIFIED BY THE DEFEND- ANT AND CLINICIAN DURING THE CLINICAL EVALUATION. 8. "HARM REDUCTION" MEANS A SET OF INTERVENTIONS TO REDUCE THE NEGA- TIVE CONSEQUENCES OF SUBSTANCE USE AND DOES NOT REQUIRE ABSTINENCE. 9. "CERTIFIED PEERS" MEANS PROFESSIONALS WHO HAVE THE LIVED EXPERIENCE OF SUCCESSFULLY NAVIGATING RECOVERY-ORIENTED SYSTEMS OF CARE WHO ARE CERTIFIED BY THE OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH OR BY THE OFFICE OF ADDICTION SERVICES AND SUPPORTS TO PROVIDE PEER SUPPORT SERVICES. THE PEER MODEL SHOULD BE INTEGRATED INTO EVERY STAGE OF THE JUDICIAL DIVERSION PROCESS. § 6. Section 216.05 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chap- ter 435 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: § 216.05 Judicial diversion program; court procedures. 1. At any time after the LOCAL CRIMINAL COURT arraignment of an eligi- ble defendant, but prior to the entry of a plea of guilty or the commencement of trial, the court at the request of the [eligible] defendant, [may] SHALL order [an alcohol and substance use] A CLINICAL evaluation FOR ALL KNOWN FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS. SUCH EVALUATIONS SHALL TAKE PLACE WITHOUT UNDUE DELAY. (A) THE POSSIBILITY OF BEING EVALUATED SHALL NOT BE CONTINGENT ON A WAIVER OF ANY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CHAPTER EXCEPT SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION 30.30 OF THIS CHAPTER. [An eligible] (B) A defendant may decline to [participate in] UNDERGO such an evaluation at any time. (C) The defendant shall provide a written authorization, in compliance with the requirements of any applicable state or federal laws, rules or regulations authorizing disclosure of the results of the assessment to the defendant's attorney, the prosecutor, the local probation depart- ment, the court, authorized court personnel and other individuals speci- fied in such authorization for the sole purpose of determining whether the defendant should be offered judicial diversion for treatment for S. 1976--A 4 [substance use, alcohol use and any co-occurring mental disorder or mental illness] A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT. (D) NO STATEMENT OR OTHER DISCLOSURE, WRITTEN OR OTHERWISE, MADE BY A DEFENDANT TO A LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL OR TREATMENT PROVIDER MAY BE USED BY THE PROSECUTION TO PROVE ANY CRIME OR OFFENSE ALLEGED IN THE PENDING CASE. ALL SUCH STATEMENTS SHALL BE USED ONLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION AND SHALL OTHERWISE REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL. 2. Upon receipt of the completed [alcohol and substance use] CLINICAL evaluation [report], the court shall provide a copy of the report to the [eligible] defendant and the [prosecutor] DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL. THE COURT AND THE PROSECUTOR SHALL RECEIVE A COPY OF THE CLINICAL EVALUATION ONLY IF THE DEFENDANT DECIDES TO PROCEED IN REQUESTING JUDICIAL DIVER- SION. 3. (a) Upon [receipt] REVIEW of the CLINICAL evaluation [report], THE PROSECUTOR AND DEFENDANT CAN AGREE TO DIVERSION BASED ON THE RECOMMENDA- TIONS IN THE EVALUATION REPORT. IF THE PARTIES DISAGREE, either party may request a hearing on the issue of whether the [eligible] defendant IS AN ELIGIBLE DEFENDANT AND should be offered [alcohol or substance use] treatment pursuant to this article. At such a proceeding, which shall be held as soon as practicable so as to facilitate early inter- vention in the event that the defendant is found to need [alcohol or substance use] treatment, the court may consider oral and written argu- ments, [may] take testimony from witnesses offered by either party, and [may] consider any relevant evidence [including, but not limited to, evidence that: (i) the defendant had within the preceding ten years (excluding any time during which the offender was incarcerated for any reason between the time of the acts that led to the youthful offender adjudication and the time of commission of the present offense) been adjudicated a youth- ful offender for: (A) a violent felony offense as defined in section 70.02 of the penal law; or (B) any offense for which a merit time allow- ance is not available pursuant to subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section eight hundred three of the correction law; and (ii) in the case of a felony offense defined in subdivision five of section 410.91 of this chapter, or section 165.10, 165.11, 190.79 or 190.80 of the penal law, any statement of or submitted by the victim, as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision two of section 380.50 of this chapter] EXCEPT SEALED CASES DEFINED IN SECTION 160.50 OR 160.55 OF THIS CHAPTER. (b) Upon completion of such a proceeding, the court shall consider and make findings of fact with respect to whether: (i) the defendant is an eligible defendant as defined in subdivision one of section 216.00 of this article; (ii) [the defendant has a history of alcohol or substance use; (iii) such alcohol or substance use] THE DEFENDANT'S FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT is LIKELY a contributing factor to [the defendant's criminal behavior] THEIR CURRENT OR FUTURE INVOLVEMENT IN THE CRIMINAL LEGAL SYSTEM; [(iv)] (III) the defendant's participation in judicial diversion could effectively address such [use] FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT; and [(v) institutional confinement of the defendant is or may not be necessary for the protection of the public] (IV) THE DEFENDANT'S ACCESS TO TREATMENT THROUGH THIS ARTICLE WOULD BENEFIT THE PUBLIC AND THE DEFENDANT. S. 1976--A 5 (C) WHERE THERE HAS BEEN A FINDING IN THE CLINICAL EVALUATION THAT THE DEFENDANT HAS A MENTAL DISORDER, AS DEFINED IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS, OR A CLIN- ICAL DIAGNOSIS OF ANOTHER SERIOUS FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT THERE SHALL BE A PRESUMPTION THAT THE DEFENDANT IS AN ELIGIBLE DEFENDANT. 4. (A) When an authorized court determines, pursuant to paragraph (b) of subdivision three of this section, that an eligible defendant should be offered [alcohol or substance use] treatment, or when the parties and the court agree to [an eligible defendant's participation in alcohol or substance use] treatment, an eligible defendant [may] SHALL be allowed to participate in the judicial diversion program offered by this arti- cle. [Prior to the court's issuing an order granting judicial diver- sion, the eligible defendant shall be required to enter a plea of guilty to the charge or charges; provided, however, that no such guilty plea shall be required when: (a) the people and the court consent to the entry of such an order without a plea of guilty; or (b) based on a finding of exceptional circumstances, the court deter- mines that a plea of guilty shall not be required. For purposes of this subdivision, exceptional circumstances exist when, regardless of the ultimate disposition of the case, the entry of a plea of guilty is like- ly to result in severe collateral consequences.] (B) ELIGIBLE DEFENDANTS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PARTICIPATE IN JUDICIAL DIVERSION. (C) PRIOR PARTICIPATION IN TREATMENT OR COURT-MANDATED TREATMENT SHALL NOT PRECLUDE FUTURE TREATMENT PARTICIPATION. (D) ELIGIBLE DEFENDANTS SHALL NOT BE PRECLUDED FROM DIVERSION BECAUSE OF A LACK OF RESOURCES IN THE COMMUNITY. (E) AN ELIGIBLE DEFENDANT SHALL NOT BE PRECLUDED FROM DIVERSION BECAUSE OF THEIR GENDER IDENTITY. 5. The [defendant] PARTICIPANT shall agree on the record or in writing to abide by the [release] JUDICIAL DIVERSION PROGRAM conditions set by the court, which[,] shall include[:] participation in a specified period of [alcohol or substance use] treatment at a specified program or programs [identified by the court, which may include periods of detoxi- fication,]. IN SETTING THE PROGRAM CONDITIONS, THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER THE PARTICIPANT'S ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLAN, AS AGREED UPON BY THE PARTICIPANT AND TREATMENT PROVIDER, IN ADDITION TO THE CLINICAL EVALU- ATION. JUDICIAL DIVERSION PROGRAM CONDITIONS MAY INCLUDE: (A) LIMITED OR INTENSIVE OUTPATIENT TREATMENT IN WHICH THE PARTICIPANT MAY RESIDE IN THE COMMUNITY, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY HAVE PERMANENT HOUSING OR NOT; (B) LIMITED PERIODS OF DETOXIFICATION OR INPATIENT REHABILITATION FOR PARTICIPANTS WITH SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS AS PREPARATION FOR A TREATMENT ADMISSION OR MEDICATION INDUCTION; (C) residential [or outpatient] treatment[, or both]. IF ORDERING RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT, PLACEMENT SHALL BE IN THE MOST INTEGRATED SETTING APPROPRIATE FOR THE PARTICIPANT'S NEEDS TO AVOID DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW, as determined after taking into account the views of the health care professional who conducted the MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT OR alcohol and substance use evaluation and any health care professionals responsible for providing such treatment or monitoring the [defendant's] PARTICIPANT'S progress in such treatment; [and may include: (i)] (D) periodic court appearances, which may [include periodic urinaly- sis; (ii)] BE AN ELECTRONIC APPEARANCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 182.20 OF S. 1976--A 6 THIS PART UPON CONSENT OF THE PARTICIPANT. THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER THE PARTICIPANT'S SERVICE ENGAGEMENT AND TREATMENT NEEDS WHEN SCHEDULING PERIODIC COURT APPEARANCES AND SHALL ATTEMPT TO MINIMIZE TREATMENT DISRUPTION; (E) PERIODIC DRUG SCREENING AS NEEDED, WHEN RECOMMENDED BY THE TREAT- MENT PROVIDER AS PART OF A PARTICIPANT'S TREATMENT PLAN. DRUG SCREENING METHODS SHALL ONLY INCLUDE ORAL SWABS, SWEAT PATCHES, OR NON-OBSERVED URINALYSIS; (F) OTHER TREATMENT AS RECOMMENDED BY THE TREATMENT PROVIDER; AND (G) a requirement that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT refrain from engag- ing in criminal behaviors[; (iii) if the defendant needs treatment for opioid use, that he or she]. 5-A. THE COURT SHALL NOT REQUIRE A PARTICIPANT TO CONSENT TO SHARE, OR AUTHORIZE THE TREATMENT PROVIDER TO SHARE, PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT PRIVACY RULE (45 CFR PARTS 160 AND 164), WITH THE COURT. EXCEPTIONS INCLUDE: (A) RECORD OF ATTENDANCE AND RELEVANT BARRIERS TO ATTENDANCE; (B) TREATMENT PLAN AND ANY RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE PLAN DURING PARTICIPATION IN JUDICIAL DIVERSION; AND (C) DRUG TOXICOLOGY RESULTS, WHEN PART OF THE TREATMENT PLAN. 5-B. IF THE PARTICIPANT HAS ONE OR MORE CONDITIONS REQUIRING PRESCRIPTION MEDICATION THEY may participate in and receive medically prescribed drug treatments under the care of a health care professional licensed or certified under title eight of the education law, acting within his or her lawful scope of practice[, provided that no]. (A) NO COURT SHALL LIMIT THE MEDICATIONS THAT A LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL RECOMMENDS PRESCRIBING FOR THE PARTICIPANT; (B) NO court shall require the use of any specified type or brand of drug during the course of medically prescribed [drug] treatments[.]; AND (C) NO COURT SHALL PENALIZE OR SANCTION A PARTICIPANT FOR PERIODS OF VOLUNTARY HOSPITALIZATION, RESPITE CARE, OR OTHER FORMS OF SUPPORTIVE CARE. 5-C. TREATMENT PROVIDERS SHALL COLLABORATE WITH THE PARTICIPANT AND CLINICAL COURT STAFF TO CREATE A DISCHARGE PLAN PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF DIVERSION TO INCORPORATE PEER SUPPORT, HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT SUPPORT, AND HOW TO ACCESS OTHER COMMUNITY-BASED HEALTH SERVICES. IF A PARTIC- IPANT FINISHES THEIR TREATMENT PLAN, THEY SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO HAVE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THEIR OBLIGATION TO THE COURT, REGARDLESS OF THEIR ABILITY TO SECURE PERMANENT HOUSING, EMPLOYMENT, OR OTHER PERSONAL GOALS IDENTIFIED BY THE PARTICIPANT. 5-D. UPON REQUEST BY THE DEFENSE, THE COURT SHALL ALLOW PARTICIPANTS TO CONSULT A DIFFERENT MENTAL HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL FOR A SECOND OPINION AND PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT PLAN. ANY ALTERNATIVE OPIN- ION OR ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT PLAN SHALL BE CONSIDERED BY THE COURT WHEN DETERMINING THE TREATMENT PLAN. 6. Upon [an eligible defendant's] A PARTICIPANT'S agreement to abide by the conditions set by the court, the court shall issue a securing order providing for bail or release on the [defendant's] PARTICIPANT'S own recognizance and conditioning any release upon the agreed upon conditions PURSUANT TO ARTICLE FIVE HUNDRED TEN OF THIS CHAPTER. The period of [alcohol or substance use] treatment shall begin as specified by the court and as soon as practicable after the [defendant's] PARTIC- IPANT'S release, taking into account the availability of treatment, so as to facilitate early intervention with respect to the [defendant's substance use or condition] PARTICIPANT'S FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT and the S. 1976--A 7 effectiveness of the treatment program. In the event that a treatment program is not immediately available or becomes unavailable during the course of the [defendant's participation] PARTICIPANT'S INVOLVEMENT in the judicial diversion program, the court may release the [defendant] PARTICIPANT pursuant to the securing order. 7. When participating in judicial diversion treatment pursuant to this article, any resident of this state who is covered under a private health insurance policy or contract issued for delivery in this state pursuant to article thirty-two, forty-three or forty-seven of the insur- ance law or article forty-four of the public health law, or who is covered by a self-funded plan which provides coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of [chemical abuse and chemical dependence] FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT however defined in such policy; shall first seek reimburse- ment for such treatment in accordance with the provisions of such policy or contract. THE COURT IN ITS DISCRETION MAY ORDER THE PARTICIPANT TO APPLY FOR PUBLIC INSURANCE IF THEY SO QUALIFY. THE COURT SHALL NOT DENY ACCESS TO TREATMENT FOR INABILITY TO PAY. 8. (A) During the period of a [defendant's participation] PARTIC- IPANT'S INVOLVEMENT in the judicial diversion program, the TREATMENT court shall retain jurisdiction of the [defendant] PARTICIPANT, provided, however, that the court [may] SHALL allow such [defendant] PARTICIPANT to (i) reside in another jurisdiction, [or] AND/OR (ii) participate in [alcohol and substance use] treatment and other programs in the jurisdiction where the [defendant] PARTICIPANT resides or in any other jurisdiction, while participating in a judicial diversion program under conditions set by the court and agreed to by the [defendant] PARTICIPANT pursuant to subdivisions five and six of this section. THE COURT MAY TRANSFER THE PARTICIPANT'S CASE TO THE JUDICIAL DIVERSION COURT IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE PARTICIPANT RESIDES PURSUANT TO SUBDI- VISION FIVE OF SECTION 170.15 OF THIS PART, SUBDIVISION FOUR OF SECTION 180.20 OF THIS PART, OR SECTION 230.21 OF THIS PART TO ENSURE CONTINUITY OF TREATMENT. (B) The court may require the [defendant] PARTICIPANT to appear in court [at any time] OR REMOTELY to enable the court to monitor the [defendant's] PARTICIPANT'S progress in [alcohol or substance use] treatment. THE FREQUENCY OF APPEARANCES SHALL TAKE INTO ACCOUNT A PERSON'S INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES AND TREATMENT PROGRESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST PRACTICES. The court shall provide notice, reasonable under the circumstances, to the people, the treatment provider, the [defend- ant] PARTICIPANT and the [defendant's] PARTICIPANT'S counsel whenever it orders or otherwise requires the appearance of the [defendant in] PARTICIPATION FOR court APPEARANCES. Failure to appear as required with- out reasonable cause therefor shall constitute a violation of the condi- tions of the court's agreement with the [defendant] PARTICIPANT. 9. (a) If at any time during the [defendant's participation] PARTIC- IPANT'S ENGAGEMENT in the judicial diversion program, the court has reasonable grounds to believe that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT has violated a [release] PROGRAM condition in an important respect or has willfully failed to appear before the court as requested, the court except as provided in subdivision two of section 510.50 of this chapter regarding a failure to appear, shall direct the [defendant] PARTICIPANT to appear [or issue a bench warrant to a police officer or an appropri- ate peace officer directing him or her to take the defendant into custo- dy and bring the defendant before the court without unnecessary delay; provided, however, that under no circumstances shall a defendant who requires treatment for opioid use be deemed to have violated a release S. 1976--A 8 condition on the basis of his or her participation in medically prescribed drug treatments under the care of a health care professional licensed or certified under title eight of the education law, acting within his or her lawful scope of practice] FOR A HEARING ON THE VIOLATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (B) OF THIS SUBDIVISION WITH AT LEAST FORTY-EIGHT HOURS NOTICE TO THE PARTICIPANT OR THE PARTICIPANT'S COUN- SEL, UNLESS NOTICE IS WAIVED BY THE PARTICIPANT. THE COURT MAY NOT MODIFY THE PARTICIPANT'S SECURING ORDER UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE HEARING'S CONCLUSION. The relevant provisions of section 530.60 of this chapter relating to issuance of securing orders shall apply to such proceedings under this subdivision. THERE IS A PRESUMPTION THAT A BENCH WARRANT SHALL NOT BE ISSUED FOR PARTICIPANTS IN JUDICIAL DIVERSION. (b) In determining whether a [defendant] PARTICIPANT violated a condi- tion of [his or her release under] the judicial diversion program OR WILLFULLY FAILED TO APPEAR IN COURT, the court [may] SHALL conduct a [summary] hearing consistent with due process [and sufficient] to satis- fy the court that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT has, in fact, violated the condition OR WILLFULLY FAILED TO APPEAR. (I) THE COURT SHALL PROVIDE REASONABLE NOTICE TO THE PARTICIPANT AND THE PARTICIPANT'S COUNSEL, BUT IN NO CIRCUMSTANCE LESS THAN FORTY-EIGHT HOURS NOTICE, UNLESS NOTICE IS WAIVED BY THE PARTICIPANT. (II) THE PEOPLE SHALL BEAR THE BURDEN OF PROVING BY CLEAR AND CONVINC- ING EVIDENCE THAT THE PARTICIPANT HAS VIOLATED A CONDITION OF THE JUDI- CIAL DIVERSION PROGRAM IN AN IMPORTANT RESPECT. THE PARTICIPANT MAY CROSS-EXAMINE WITNESSES AND MAY PRESENT RELEVANT, ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE ON THEIR OWN BEHALF. THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER ALL FACTORS RELATING TO THE PARTICIPANT'S CURRENT MENTAL HEALTH OR COGNITIVE STATUS, THEIR ENGAGE- MENT WITH JUDICIAL DIVERSION PRIOR TO THIS TIME, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER FACTORS THAT MAY HAVE IMPACTED THEIR PARTICIPATION OR ALLEGED VIOLATION. (III) A BENCH WARRANT SHALL NOT BE ISSUED ABSENT A FINDING BY THE COURT THAT THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OR FAILURE TO APPEAR WAS WILLFUL. IN DETERMINING WILLFULNESS, THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER: THE NEXUS BETWEEN THE PARTICIPANT'S VIOLATION OR FAILURE TO APPEAR AND THEIR FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT; WHETHER AN APPROPRIATE TREATMENT PLAN IS CURRENTLY IN PLACE; THE PARTICIPANT'S HISTORY OF MAKING COURT APPEARANCES IN THE INSTANT MATTER; AND A HISTORY OF POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT WITH TREATMENT STAFF OR THE COURT. (IV) UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL A PARTICIPANT WHO REQUIRES TREATMENT FOR A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT BE DEEMED TO HAVE VIOLATED A PROGRAM CONDI- TION ON THE PARTICIPATION IN MEDICALLY PRESCRIBED DRUG TREATMENTS UNDER THE CARE OF A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL LICENSED OR CERTIFIED UNDER TITLE EIGHT OF THE EDUCATION LAW, ACTING WITHIN HIS OR HER LAWFUL SCOPE OF PRACTICE. (V) IF THE COURT FINDS A REASONABLE EXPLANATION OR MITIGATION FOR ANY ALLEGED VIOLATION OR ALLEGED WILLFUL FAILURE TO APPEAR, THE SECURING ORDER SHALL NOT BE MODIFIED. (VI) THE COURT MAY SEAL PORTIONS OF THE PROCEEDING RELATED TO COLLAT- ERAL CONSEQUENCES AT THE REQUEST OF THE PARTICIPANT AND PARTICIPANT'S COUNSEL. (c) If the court determines BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT has violated a condition of his or her release under the judicial diversion program, the court may PERMIT THE PARTIC- IPANT TO CONTINUE THEIR TREATMENT MANDATE AS PREVIOUSLY ORDERED; modify the [conditions thereof, reconsider the order of recognizance or bail pursuant to subdivision two of section 510.30 of this chapter,] TREAT- MENT PLAN PER THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE TREATMENT PROVIDER; HOLD TREAT- S. 1976--A 9 MENT IN ABEYANCE UNTIL THE UNDERLYING MATTER THAT CAUSED THE VIOLATION IS RESOLVED; or terminate the [defendant's] PARTICIPANT'S participation in the judicial diversion program[; and when applicable proceed with the defendant's sentencing in accordance with the agreement. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the court may impose any sentence authorized for the crime of conviction in accordance with the plea agreement, or any lesser sentence authorized to be imposed on a felony drug offender pursuant to paragraph (b) or (c) of subdivision two of section 70.70 of the penal law taking into account] IF NO OTHER TREAT- MENT OPTION IS AVAILABLE. THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER: (I) the length of time the [defendant] PARTICIPANT spent in residen- tial treatment and how best to continue treatment [while the defendant is serving that sentence. In determining what action to take for a violation of a release condition, the court shall consider]; (II) all relevant circumstances, including the views of the prosecu- tor, the defense and the [alcohol or substance use] PARTICIPANT'S INTER- EST IN CONTINUING treatment [provider, and the extent to which persons who ultimately successfully complete a drug treatment regimen sometimes] OR THE PROGRAM; AND (III) THE ROLE OF relapse [by not abstaining from alcohol or substance use or by failing to comply fully with all requirements imposed by a treatment program] IN RECOVERY AND TREATMENT. (D) The court shall [also consider using] USE a system of graduated and appropriate responses [or sanctions] designed to address such inap- propriate behaviors[, protect public safety] and facilitate, where possible, successful completion of the [alcohol or substance use] treat- ment program. [(d)] (E) Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed [as prevent- ing a court from terminating a defendant's participation in the judicial diversion program for violating a release condition when such a termi- nation is necessary to preserve public safety. Nor shall anything in this subdivision be construed] as precluding the prosecution of a [defendant] PARTICIPANT for the commission of a different offense while participating in the judicial diversion program. PRIOR TO SUCH TERMI- NATION, THE PARTICIPANT SHALL BE ENTITLED TO A HEARING AT WHICH CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE SHALL BE OFFERED TO SUPPORT THAT THERE EXISTS A SUBSTANTIAL RISK TO AN IDENTIFIABLE PERSON. IN THE ABSENCE OF SUCH A HEARING AND SUCH A FINDING, THERE CAN BE NO TERMINATION. [(e)] (F) A [defendant] PARTICIPANT may at any time advise the court that [he or she wishes] THEY WISH to terminate participation in the judicial diversion program, at which time the court shall [proceed with the case and, where applicable, shall impose sentence in accordance with the plea agreement. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contra- ry, the court may impose any sentence authorized for the crime of conviction in accordance with the plea agreement, or any lesser sentence authorized to be imposed on a felony drug offender pursuant to paragraph (b) or (c) of subdivision two of section 70.70 of the penal law taking into account the length of time the defendant spent in residential treatment and how best to continue treatment while the defendant is serving that sentence] TRANSFER THE CASE BACK TO THE APPROPRIATE TRIAL PART. 10. Upon the court's determination that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT has successfully completed the required period of [alcohol or substance use] treatment and has otherwise satisfied the conditions required for successful completion of the judicial diversion program, the court shall [comply with the terms and conditions it set for final disposition when S. 1976--A 10 it accepted the defendant's agreement to participate in the judicial diversion program. Such disposition may include, but is not limited to: (a) requiring the defendant to undergo a period of interim probation supervision and, upon the defendant's successful completion of the interim probation supervision term, notwithstanding the provision of any other law, permitting the defendant to withdraw his or her guilty plea and dismissing the indictment; or (b) requiring the defendant to undergo a period of interim probation supervision and, upon successful completion of the interim probation supervision term, notwithstanding the provision of any other law, permitting the defendant to withdraw his or her guilty plea, enter a guilty plea to a misdemeanor offense and sentencing the defendant as promised in the plea agreement, which may include a period of probation supervision pursuant to section 65.00 of the penal law; or (c) allowing the defendant to withdraw his or her guilty plea and dismissing] DISMISS the indictment OR SUPERIOR COURT INFORMATION, FELONY COMPLAINT, MISDEMEANOR COMPLAINT, INFORMATION, SIMPLIFIED INFORMATION, OR PROSECUTOR'S INFORMATION AND SEAL THE CASE PURSUANT TO SECTION 160.50 OF THIS CHAPTER. 11. Nothing in this article shall be construed as restricting or prohibiting courts or district attorneys from using other lawful proce- dures or models for placing appropriate persons into [alcohol or substance use] treatment. § 7. The criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new section 216.10 to read as follows: § 216.10 DIVERSION PART ESTABLISHED. 1. THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO ESTAB- LISH, IN EACH COUNTY OF THE STATE, A PART OF THE COURT TO BE KNOWN AS THE DIVERSION PART FOR THE COUNTY IN WHICH SUCH COURT PRESIDES. TO AID IN THEIR WORK, SUCH JUDGES AND DIVERSION COURT PERSONNEL SHALL RECEIVE ANNUAL TRAINING IN SPECIALIZED AREAS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO DISABILITY, MENTAL ILLNESS, AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER NEEDS, INCLUDING CO-OCCURRING DISORDERS, EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES, TRAUMA-INFORMED CARE, CERTIFIED PEER PROGRAMS, AND HARM REDUCTION PRINCIPLES, AS WELL AS TRAINING IN PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND CULTURAL COMPETENCY AND MEDICAID OR MEDICARE ELIGIBILITY. THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL EMPLOYEES WHO STAFF THE DIVERSION PARTS RECEIVE SPECIALIZED TRAINING IN PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND WORKING WITH PEOPLE WITH COMPLEX NEEDS. 2. EACH CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS SHALL AT THE END OF EACH YEAR PREPARE AND FILE AN ANNUAL REPORT, WHICH THE OFFICE SHALL COMPILE, PUBLISH ON ITS WEBSITE AND MAKE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC. SUCH REPORTS SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMA- TION FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANTS. EACH SUCH REPORT, IN ADDITION TO OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION, SHALL SET FORTH, DISAGGREGATED BY EACH COUN- TY SERVED: (A) THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WITH CASES IN THE DIVERSION PART FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER, RACE AND ETHNICITY: (I) THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR EVALUATION; (II) THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ARE ACCEPTED INTO JUDICIAL DIVERSION; AND (III) THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROGRAM; (B) THE LENGTH OF TIME, IN MONTHS, EACH CASE REMAINED IN THE DIVERSION PART PRIOR TO ACQUITTAL, DISMISSAL, RELEASE ON RECOGNIZANCE, REVOCATION OF RELEASE ON CONDITIONS, AND SENTENCING; (C) THE DEMOGRAPHIC MAKEUP OF PARTICIPANTS IN THE DIVERSION PART, BROKEN DOWN BY RACE, ETHNICITY, AGE AND SEX OF PARTICIPANTS; S. 1976--A 11 (D) THE CRIMES WITH WHICH EACH PARTICIPANT WAS CHARGED; (E) WHETHER THE TREATMENT OBTAINED WAS FOR SUBSTANCE USE, MENTAL HEALTH, CO-OCCURRING OR OTHER; (F) THE COURT DISPOSITION IN EACH SUPERVISED CASE, INCLUDING SENTENC- ING INFORMATION; (G) THE COSTS SAVED TO THE COUNTY BY AVOIDING PRE-TRIAL OR POST-CON- VICTION DETENTION IN A COUNTY JAIL OR STATE PRISON; AND (H) A LIST OF SERVICE PROVIDERS, INCLUDING CONTACT INFORMATION, THAT THE DIVERSION PART IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY PARTNERS WITH TO SERVE PARTICIPANTS. § 8. Subdivision 5 of section 170.15 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 91 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: 5. (a) Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary, in any county [outside a city having a population of one million or more], upon or after arraignment of a defendant on an information, a simplified information, a prosecutor's information or a misdemeanor complaint pending in a local criminal court, such court [may] SHALL, upon motion of the defendant and after giving the district attorney an opportunity to be heard, order that the action be removed from the court in which the matter is pending to another local criminal court in the same county, or with consent of the district attorney and the district attorney of the adjoining county to another court in [such] AN adjoining county, OR TO A COURT IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT RESIDES that has been designated as a JUDICIAL DIVERSION, human trafficking [court], or veterans treatment court by the chief administrator of the courts, and such JUDICIAL DIVERSION, human trafficking [court], or veterans treatment court [may] SHALL then conduct such action to judgment or other final deposition; provided, however, that no court may order removal pursuant to this subdivision to a veterans treatment court of a family offense charge described in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this chapter where the accused and the person alleged to be the victim of such offense charged are members of the same family or household as defined in such subdivision one of section 530.11; and provided further that an order of removal issued under this subdivision shall not take effect until five days after the date the order is issued unless, prior to such effective date, the human trafficking court or veterans treat- ment court notifies the court that issued the order that: i. it will not accept the action, in which event the order shall not take effect; or ii. it will accept the action on a date prior to such effective date, in which event the order shall take effect upon such prior date. (b) Upon providing notification pursuant to subparagraph i or ii of paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the human trafficking court or veter- ans treatment court shall promptly give notice to the defendant, his or her counsel, and the district attorney. § 9. Subdivision 4 of section 180.20 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 91 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: 4. (a) Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary, [in any county outside a city having a population of one million or more,] upon or after arraignment of a defendant on a felony complaint pending in a local criminal court having preliminary jurisdiction there- of, such court [may] SHALL, upon motion of the defendant and after giving the district attorney an opportunity to be heard, order that the action be removed from the court in which the matter is pending to S. 1976--A 12 another local criminal court in the same county, or with consent of the district attorney and the district attorney of the adjoining county to another court in such adjoining county, OR TO A COURT IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT RESIDES, that has been designated as a JUDICIAL DIVERSION, human trafficking [court], or veterans treatment court by the chief administrator of the courts, and such JUDICIAL DIVERSION, human trafficking [court], or veterans treatment court may then conduct such action to judgment or other final disposition; provided, however, that no court may order removal pursuant to this subdivision to a veterans treatment court of a family offense charge described in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this chapter where the accused and the person alleged to be the victim of such offense charged are members of the same family or household as defined in such subdivision one of section 530.11; and provided further an order of removal issued under this subdivision shall not take effect until five days after the date the order is issued unless, prior to such effective date, the human traf- ficking court or veterans treatment court notifies the court that issued the order that: i. it will not accept the action, in which event the order shall not take effect; or ii. it will accept the action on a date prior to such effective date, in which event the order shall take effect upon such prior date. (b) Upon providing notification pursuant to subparagraph i or ii of paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the human trafficking court or veter- ans treatment court shall promptly give notice to the defendant, his or her counsel and the district attorney. § 10. Section 230.21 of the criminal procedure law, as added by chap- ter 91 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: § 230.21 Removal of action to certain courts in an adjoining county OR COUNTY IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT RESIDES. 1. In any county [outside a city having a population of one million or more], [the] UPON OR AFTER ARRAIGNMENT OF A DEFENDANT ON AN INDICTMENT PENDING IN A SUPERIOR COURT HAVING JURISDICTION THEREOF, SUCH court [may] SHALL, upon motion of the defendant and with consent of the district attorney and the district attorney of the adjoining county that has a superior court designated a human trafficking court or veterans treatment court by the chief administrator of the courts, order that the indictment and action be removed from the court in which the matter is pending to [such] A SUPERIOR COURT IN AN ADJOINING COUNTY OR IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT RESIDES THAT HAS BEEN DESIGNATED A JUDI- CIAL DIVERSION, human trafficking [court], or veterans treatment court, whereupon such court may then conduct such action to judgment or other final disposition; provided, however, that no court may order removal to a veterans treatment court of a family offense charge described in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this chapter pursuant to this section where the accused and the person alleged to be the victim of such offense charged are members of the same family or household as defined in such subdivision one of section 530.11; and provided further that an order of removal issued under this subdivision shall not take effect until five days after the date the order is issued unless, prior to such effective date, the human trafficking court or veterans treat- ment court notifies the court that issued the order that: (a) it will not accept the action, in which event the order shall not take effect, or (b) it will accept the action on a date prior to such effective date, in which event the order shall take effect upon such prior date. S. 1976--A 13 2. Upon providing notification pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) of subdivision one of this section, the human trafficking court or veterans treatment court shall promptly give notice to the defendant, his or her counsel and the district attorney of both counties. § 11. Paragraph (r) of subdivision 2 of section 212 of the judiciary law, as added by section 15 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows: (r) Ensure that cases eligible for judicial diversion pursuant to article two hundred sixteen of the criminal procedure law shall be assigned to court parts in the manner provided by the chief administra- tor and that, to the extent practicable, such cases are presided over by judges who, by virtue of the structure, caseload and resources of the parts and the judges' training, are in the best position to provide effective supervision over such cases, such as the [drug] treatment courts. In compliance with these provisions, the chief administrator shall [give due weight to] INDIVIDUALLY ASSESS the need for diverted defendants to make regular court appearances, and be closely supervised by the court, for the duration of [drug] treatment and the pendency of the criminal charge. § 12. This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after it shall have become a law; provided, however that the amendments to the opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law made by section two of this act shall be subject to the expiration and reversion of such paragraph pursuant to section 12 of chapter 90 of the laws of 2014, as amended, when upon such date the provisions of section three of this act shall take effect.
co-Sponsors
(D, WF) 46th Senate District
(D, WF) 25th Senate District
(D, WF) 55th Senate District
(D) 30th Senate District
(D) 14th Senate District
(D, WF) 56th Senate District
(D) 34th Senate District
(D, WF) 12th Senate District
(D, WF) 59th Senate District
(D) 26th Senate District
(D, WF) 40th Senate District
(D, WF) 41st Senate District
(D, WF) 47th Senate District
(D, WF) 31st Senate District
(D, WF) Senate District
(D, WF) 28th Senate District
(D) 16th Senate District
(D, WF) 48th Senate District
(D) 20th Senate District
(D, WF) 21st Senate District
(D, WF) 33rd Senate District
(D, WF) 18th Senate District
(D) 10th Senate District
(D) 32nd Senate District
(D, WF) 29th Senate District
(D) 6th Senate District
(D, WF) 52nd Senate District
2023-S1976B (ACTIVE) - Details
- See Assembly Version of this Bill:
- A1263
- Current Committee:
- Senate Alcoholism And Substance Use Disorders
- Law Section:
- Criminal Procedure Law
- Laws Affected:
- Amd Art 216 Art Head, §§216.00, 216.05, 170.15, 180.20, 230.21 & 160.58, rpld §216.00 sub 1 ¶¶(a) & (b), cl ¶, add §216.10, CP L; amd §212, Judy L
- Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:
-
2019-2020:
S8687
2021-2022: S2881, A8524
2023-S1976B (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo
BILL NUMBER: S1976B SPONSOR: RAMOS TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the criminal procedure law and the judiciary law, in relation to judicial diversion programs; and to repeal certain provisions of the criminal procedure law relating thereto SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 amends the title of Article 216 of the criminal procedure law. Section 2 amends the opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law to include within the definition of "Eligible defendant": Misdemeanor complaint or felony complaint with any offense and has a functional impairment. Section 3 amends the opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law to include within the definition of Eligible defendant: Misdemeanor complaint or felony complaint with any offense and has a functional impairment.
Section 4 repeals paragraphs (a) and (b) and the closing paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law. Section 5 amends existing definitions for judicial diversion courts. Section 6 amends the court procedures for judicial diversion programs in article 216 of the criminal procedure law. Section 7 creates a new subsection that clarifies that each county shall have a diversion part and judges in that part must have additional training, that treatment must come at no cost to the defendant and requires annual reporting by the office of court administration on diversion part outcomes. Section 8 amends section 170.15 of the criminal procedure law to explicitly authorize judicial diversion court judges to transfer misde- meanor cases in treatment court to the treatment court in the county in which the participant resides so that treatment court participants can receive treatment in the county in which they reside. Section 9 amends section 180.20 of the criminal procedure law to explicitly authorize judicial diversion court judges to transfer unin- dicted felonies in treatment court to the treatment court in the county in which the participant resides so that treatment court participants can receive treatment in the county in which they reside. Section 10 amends the title of section 230.21 of the criminal proce- dure law and amends section 230.21 of the criminal procedure law to explicitly authorize judicial diversion court judges to transfer indicted felonies in treatment court to the treatment court in the coun- ty in which the participant resides so that treatment court participants can receive treatment in the county in which they reside. Section 11 amends section 212 of the judiciary law to reflect the change in the nature of judicial diversion pursuant to the proposed amendments to article 216. Section 12 states that the bill becomes effective within 180 days of signature. LEGISLATIVE INTENT: The legislative intent of the provisions of this article are: 1. To create a judicial diversion program that provides an appropriate therapeutic and trauma-informed response for people with functional impairments; 2. To ensure that treatment provided through the court's judicial diversion program is grounded in scientifically validated best practices for recovery and rehabilitation that incorporate harm reduction princi- ples and make harm reduction opportunities in the community available to the participant; 3. To acknowledge that treatment and long-term recovery are most successful when the person seeking treatment is an active and willing participant in their own recovery and that treatment plans are flexible and can be modified throughout the treatment process to meet the partic- ipant's needs; 4. To minimize the harm of incarceration for people with functional impairments by limiting the ability of courts to incarcerate or sanction people who qualify for judicial diversion; and 5. To make judicial diversion programs and treatment accessible to all people with functional impairments who qualify, regardless of where someone lives, their ability to pay for treatment, whether they have attempted treatment in the past or any other barrier to access. JUSTIFICATION: The Treatment Not Jail Act will ensure that New Yorkers with substance use disorders, mental health concerns, and other disabilities have an off-ramp from the criminal legal system to obtain treatment and support in their communities. Currently, mental health or other treatment courts are not available in most counties in the state, and many treatment courts have significant barriers to access that ensure that, often, the people most in need of treatment and support are not able to get them. This bill will expand existing law authorizing drug treatment courts to accept people with mental health concerns, intellectual disabilities and other disabilities that impair their functioning in society. Important- ly, the bill also requires state courts to ensure that people with disa- bilities (as defined by the federal Americans with Disabilities Act) who participate in judicial diversion programs are afforded the protections they are entitled to, pursuant to OLMSTEAD V. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999), while undergoing treatment. This legislation amends Criminal Procedure Law Article 216 to create treatment court alternatives for people with disabilities. This means not only people with substance use disorders or mental illness, but also people with intellectual disabilities, traumatic brain injury, dementia, chronic diseases, significant physical impairments or other conditions that may have contributed to the defendant's involvement in the criminal legal system or that would make jail or prison a crueler outcome than for people without disabilities. The bill also removes significant barriers to entry that ensure that the people most in need of help can get it. The bill increases due process protections for people with cases in these courts to ensure that they are not jailed or remanded summar- ily. Finally, the bill extends treatment courts to people charged with misdemeanor offenses. There are thousands of people who are frequently targeted by police and/or arrested for low-level misdemeanors or violations. To the extent that people are likely to serve jail time related to these charges, these people should also have access to treat- ment courts if they so desire. All participants in judicial diversion programs will be entitled to robust privacy protections afforded by federal law with only limited exceptions. The Treatment Not Jail Act clarifies that admission to a judicial diver- sion program will no longer require a plea of guilty in New York State. A pre-plea, pre-adjudication program preserves due process rights, allows accused people an opportunity to seek treatment, and provides a strong incentive for successful completion. If the participant success- fully completes the program, the charge is dismissed. If the participant does not succeed, the traditional court process can be pursued. This change recognizes the strong body of scientific evidence that shows that long-term success for treatment of addiction or mental illness requires buy-in from the participant. Courts that rely on coercive methods will not achieve the legislature's long-term goal of fostering lasting treat- ment success. Finally, the Treatment Not Jail Act does not exclude participants based on alleged offenses. Data indicates that a person with mental illness is more likely to be a victim of violent crime than the perpetrator. See Noman Ghiasi, Yusra Azhar & Jasbir Singh, "Psychiatric Illness and Criminality," StatPearls (2020). Additionally, studies show that diver- sion programs promote public safety and that people charged with "violent" offenses do just as well in treatment as those charged with "non-violent" ones. Michelle Naples & Henry J. Steadman "Can Persons with Co-occurring Disorders and Violent Charges Be Successfully Diverted?" 2 International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 137-143 (2003). Indeed, most acts of violence committed by people with serious mental illness are carried out when they are not being treated. Treat- ment Advocacy Center, Office of Research and Public Affairs, "Risk Factors For Violence" (June 2016). This bill adopts a smart-on-crime approach to ensuring that people most in need of treatment have access to specialized services they need while also making our communities safer and more resilient. FISCAL IMPACT: TBD EFFECTIVE DATE: Within 180 days being signed into law.
2023-S1976B (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 1976--B 2023-2024 Regular Sessions I N S E N A T E January 17, 2023 ___________ Introduced by Sens. RAMOS, ASHBY, BRESLIN, BRISPORT, BROUK, CLEARE, COMRIE, COONEY, FERNANDEZ, GIANARIS, GONZALEZ, GOUNARDES, HARCKHAM, HINCHEY, HOYLMAN-SIGAL, JACKSON, KENNEDY, KRUEGER, MAY, MYRIE, PARKER, RIVERA, SALAZAR, SEPULVEDA, SERRANO, THOMAS, WEBB -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Alcoholism and Substance Abuse -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- reported favorably from said committee and committed to the Committee on Codes -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law and the judiciary law, in relation to judicial diversion programs; and to repeal certain provisions of the criminal procedure law relating thereto THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The article heading of article 216 of the criminal proce- dure law, as added by section 4 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows: JUDICIAL DIVERSION [PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN FELONY OFFENDERS] PROGRAMS § 2. The opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by section 1 of chapter 435 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: "Eligible defendant" means any person who stands charged in an indict- ment [or a], superior court information [with a class B, C, D or E felo- ny offense defined in article one hundred seventy-nine, two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-two of the penal law, an offense defined in sections 105.10 and 105.13 of the penal law provided that the underlying crime for the conspiracy charge is a class B, C, D or E felony offense defined in article one hundred seventy-nine, two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-two of the penal law, auto stripping in the second degree EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD00666-04-3
S. 1976--B 2 as defined in section 165.10 of the penal law, auto stripping in the first degree as defined in section 165.11 of the penal law, identity theft in the second degree as defined in section 190.79 of the penal law, identity theft in the first degree as defined in section 190.80 of the penal law, or any other specified offense as defined in subdivision five of section 410.91 of this chapter, provided, however, a defendant is not an "eligible defendant" if he or she:], MISDEMEANOR COMPLAINT OR FELONY COMPLAINT WITH ANY OFFENSE AND HAS A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT. § 3. The opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by section 2 of chapter 435 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: "Eligible defendant" means any person who stands charged in an indict- ment [or a], superior court information [with a class B, C, D or E felo- ny offense defined in article two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty- two of the penal law, an offense defined in sections 105.10 and 105.13 of the penal law provided that the underlying crime for the conspiracy charge is a class B, C, D or E felony offense defined in article two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-two of the penal law, auto strip- ping in the second degree as defined in section 165.10 of the penal law, auto stripping in the first degree as defined in section 165.11 of the penal law, identity theft in the second degree as defined in section 190.79 of the penal law, identity theft in the first degree as defined in section 190.80 of the penal law, or any other specified offense as defined in subdivision five of section 410.91 of this chapter, provided, however, a defendant is not an "eligible defendant" if he or she:], MISDEMEANOR COMPLAINT OR FELONY COMPLAINT WITH ANY OFFENSE AND HAS A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT. § 4. Paragraphs (a) and (b) and the closing paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law are REPEALED. § 5. Subdivision 2 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 435 of the laws of 2021, is amended and eight new subdivisions 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 are added to read as follows: 2. ["Alcohol and substance use evaluation"] "PARTICIPANT" MEANS AN ELIGIBLE DEFENDANT WHO HAS BEEN ADMITTED INTO JUDICIAL DIVERSION PURSU- ANT TO THIS ARTICLE. 3. "LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL" MEANS A CLINICIAN WITH PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE, TRAINING AND LICENSURE PURSUANT TO TITLE EIGHT OF THE EDUCATION LAW WHO IS QUALIFIED TO DIAGNOSE OR TREAT PEOPLE WITH MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS, INCLUDING SUBSTANCE-RELATED AND ADDICTIVE DISORDERS. 4. "FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT" MEANS A CONDITION THAT INVOLVES CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DISTRESS OR DISABILITY IN SOCIAL, OCCUPATIONAL OR OTHER AREAS OF FUNCTIONING DUE TO A MENTAL HEALTH DISORDER, INCLUDING: SUBSTANCE-RELATED AND ADDICTIVE DISORDERS, NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, NEUROCOGNITIVE DISORDERS, OR OTHER DISORDERS AS DEFINED IN THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF THE DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISOR- DERS. THE COURT SHALL DEFER TO LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH CARE PROFES- SIONALS IN DETERMINING WHETHER A PERSON HAS A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT. A PERSON MAY HAVE MORE THAN ONE FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT. 5. "CLINICAL EVALUATION" means a written assessment and report by a [court-approved entity or] licensed MENTAL health care professional [experienced in the treatment of alcohol and substance use disorder, or] AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION OR AN EVALUATION CONDUCTED by an addiction and substance [abuse] USE DISORDER counselor credentialed by the office of addiction services and supports pursuant to section 19.07 of the mental hygiene law[, which]. SUCH EVALUATION MAY S. 1976--B 3 BE CONDUCTED THROUGH TELEHEALTH WHEN PRACTICABLE AND WHEN DELAY WOULD OTHERWISE OCCUR. THE EVALUATION shall include: (a) an evaluation as to whether the defendant CURRENTLY has [a history of alcohol or substance use disorder] ONE OR MORE FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS THAT MAY INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO A MENTAL HEALTH DISORDER, as [such terms are] defined in the MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, [fifth edition, and a co-oc- curring mental disorder or mental illness and the relationship between such use and mental disorder or mental illness,] if any; (b) a recommendation as to whether the defendant's [alcohol or substance use] FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS, if any, could be effectively addressed by judicial diversion in accordance with this article; (c) a recommendation as to the treatment modality, level of care and length of any proposed treatment to effectively address the defendant's [alcohol or substance use and any co-occurring mental disorder or illness] FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS; and (d) any other information, factor, circumstance, or recommendation deemed relevant by the assessing entity or specifically requested by the court. 6. "TREATMENT" MEANS ONE OR MORE EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS INCLUD- ING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COUNSELING, PSYCHOTHERAPY, PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICA- TION OR MEDICATIONS FOR ADDICTION OR SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER TREATMENT, HEALTH PROMOTION, AND OVERDOSE PREVENTION EDUCATION. TREATMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE DOES NOT INCLUDE TREATMENT IN A CARCERAL SETTING OR IN A FORENSIC HOSPITAL PURSUANT TO ARTICLE SEVEN HUNDRED THIRTY OF THIS CHAPTER. FOR SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS, TREATMENT INCLUDES ANY CLINICAL SERVICE OR INTERVENTION THAT ASSISTS INDIVIDUALS IN THEIR RECOVERY IN ACCORDANCE WITH HARM REDUCTION PRINCIPLES. 7. "TREATMENT PROVIDER" MEANS A PERSON OR ORGANIZATION QUALIFIED TO PROVIDE INTERVENTIONS RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS IDENTIFIED BY THE DEFEND- ANT AND CLINICIAN DURING THE CLINICAL EVALUATION. 8. "HARM REDUCTION" MEANS A SET OF PROVEN-EFFECTIVE SUBSTANCE USE INTERVENTION STRATEGIES THAT OFFER LOW-THRESHOLD ACCESS TO TREATMENT WITH THE GOAL OF REDUCING THE NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES OF SUBSTANCE USE, PREVENTING OVERDOSE AND THE TRANSMISSION OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, AND/OR IMPROVING THE PHYSICAL, MENTAL, AND SOCIAL WELL-BEING OF THOSE SERVED. IN SOME CASES, AS IDENTIFIED BY A LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH CARE PROFES- SIONAL OR A TREATMENT PROVIDER, HARM REDUCTION INTERVENTIONS MAY RECOG- NIZE THAT COMPLETE ABSTINENCE IS NOT REALISTICALLY ATTAINABLE AND MAY INSTEAD AIM TO ACHIEVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION OR CHANGE IN USE. 9. "CERTIFIED PEERS" MEANS PROFESSIONALS WHO HAVE THE LIVED EXPERIENCE OF SUCCESSFULLY NAVIGATING RECOVERY-ORIENTED SYSTEMS OF CARE WHO ARE CERTIFIED BY THE OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH OR BY THE OFFICE OF ADDICTION SERVICES AND SUPPORTS TO PROVIDE PEER SUPPORT SERVICES. THE PEER MODEL SHOULD BE INTEGRATED INTO EVERY STAGE OF THE JUDICIAL DIVERSION PROCESS. 10. "TREATMENT PLAN" MEANS AN INDIVIDUALIZED PLAN DEVELOPED BY A LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL OR A TREATMENT PROVIDER IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN ELIGIBLE DEFENDANT, WHICH MAY INCLUDE ANY COMBINA- TION OF TREATMENT INTERVENTIONS IDENTIFIED IN SUBDIVISION SIX OF THIS SECTION. PROVIDED THAT: (A) TREATMENT SHOULD OCCUR IN THE SETTING OR SETTINGS THAT ARE MOST APPROPRIATE TO THE INDIVIDUAL'S MEDICAL NEEDS. (B) SUCH TREATMENT PLAN SHALL TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE BEST PRAC- TICES FOR ADDRESSING ANY FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS IDENTIFIED DURING THE CLINICAL EVALUATION AND ANY EVIDENCE-BASED AND PEER-REVIEWED CLINICAL REVIEW CRITERIA THAT IS RELEVANT TO THE IDENTIFIED FUNCTIONAL IMPAIR- S. 1976--B 4 MENT, APPROPRIATE TO THE AGE OF THE PATIENT AND HAS BEEN DESIGNATED OR APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE STATE AGENCY OR AGENCIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH, THE OFFICE OF ADDICTION SERVICES AND SUPPORTS, AND THE OFFICE FOR PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES. (C) A TREATMENT PLAN MAY INCLUDE TREATMENT THROUGH TELEHEALTH WHEN DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY A LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL OR A TREATMENT PROVIDER. (D) A LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL OR A TREATMENT PROVIDER MAY MODIFY A TREATMENT PLAN AFTER THE PARTICIPANT HAS BEEN ADMITTED TO THE JUDICIAL DIVERSION PROGRAM WITH THE CONSENT OF THE PARTICIPANT WHERE THE LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL OR TREATMENT PROVIDER DEEMS SUCH MODIFICATION TO BE CLINICALLY APPROPRIATE. 11. "PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION" MEANS INFORMATION PROTECTED BY FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE PRIVACY OF PERSON- ALLY-IDENTIFIABLE MEDICAL INFORMATION, INCLUDING THE FEDERAL HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT PRIVACY RULE (45 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PARTS 160 AND 164), 42 UNITED STATES CODE § 290DD-2 (42 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART 2), SECTION 33.13 OF THE MENTAL HYGIENE LAW, ARTICLE TWENTY-SEVEN-F OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW ("HIV AND AIDS RELATED INFORMATION"), AND ANY OTHER RELEVANT HEALTH PRIVACY LAWS AND REGULATIONS. § 6. Section 216.05 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chap- ter 435 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: § 216.05 Judicial diversion program; court procedures. 1. At any time after the LOCAL CRIMINAL COURT arraignment of an eligi- ble defendant, but prior to the entry of a plea of guilty or the commencement of trial, the court, at the request of the [eligible] defendant, [may] SHALL order [an alcohol and substance use] A CLINICAL evaluation FOR ALL KNOWN FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS. SUCH EVALUATIONS SHALL TAKE PLACE WITHOUT UNDUE DELAY. (A) THE POSSIBILITY OF BEING EVALUATED SHALL NOT BE CONTINGENT ON A WAIVER OF ANY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CHAPTER EXCEPT SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION 30.30 OF THIS CHAPTER. [An eligible] (B) A defendant may decline to [participate in] UNDERGO such an evaluation at any time. (C) The defendant shall provide a written authorization, in compliance with the requirements of any applicable state or federal laws, rules or regulations authorizing disclosure of the results of the assessment to the defendant's attorney, the prosecutor, the local probation depart- ment, the court, authorized court personnel and other individuals speci- fied in such authorization for the sole purpose of determining whether the defendant should be offered judicial diversion for treatment for [substance use, alcohol use and any co-occurring mental disorder or mental illness] A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT. (D) NO STATEMENT OR OTHER DISCLOSURE, WRITTEN OR OTHERWISE, MADE BY A DEFENDANT TO A LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL OR TREATMENT PROVIDER MAY BE USED BY THE PROSECUTION TO PROVE ANY CRIME OR OFFENSE ALLEGED IN THE PENDING CASE. ALL SUCH STATEMENTS SHALL BE USED ONLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION AND SHALL OTHERWISE REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL. 2. Upon [receipt of the completed alcohol and substance use] COMPLETION OF THE CLINICAL evaluation [report], the [court] CLINICIAN shall provide a copy of the report to the [eligible] defendant and the [prosecutor] DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL. THE COURT AND THE PROSECUTOR SHALL RECEIVE A COPY OF THE CLINICAL EVALUATION ONLY IF THE DEFENDANT DECIDES S. 1976--B 5 TO PROCEED IN REQUESTING JUDICIAL DIVERSION. WHERE THE DEFENDANT DECIDES TO PROCEED IN REQUESTING JUDICIAL DIVERSION, THEY SHALL CONSENT TO DISCLOSURE OF THEIR PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION WITH THE COURT AND PROSECUTOR. 3. (a) Upon [receipt] REVIEW of the CLINICAL evaluation [report], THE PROSECUTOR AND DEFENDANT CAN AGREE TO DIVERSION BASED ON THE RECOMMENDA- TIONS IN THE EVALUATION REPORT. IF THE PARTIES DISAGREE, either party may request a hearing on the issue of whether the [eligible] defendant IS AN ELIGIBLE DEFENDANT AND should be offered [alcohol or substance use treatment] JUDICIAL DIVERSION pursuant to this article. At such a proceeding, which shall be held as soon as practicable so as to facili- tate early intervention in the event that the defendant is found to need [alcohol or substance use] treatment, the court may consider oral and written arguments, [may] take testimony from witnesses offered by either party, and [may] consider any relevant evidence [including, but not limited to, evidence that: (i) the defendant had within the preceding ten years (excluding any time during which the offender was incarcerated for any reason between the time of the acts that led to the youthful offender adjudication and the time of commission of the present offense) been adjudicated a youth- ful offender for: (A) a violent felony offense as defined in section 70.02 of the penal law; or (B) any offense for which a merit time allow- ance is not available pursuant to subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section eight hundred three of the correction law; and (ii) in the case of a felony offense defined in subdivision five of section 410.91 of this chapter, or section 165.10, 165.11, 190.79 or 190.80 of the penal law, any statement of or submitted by the victim, as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision two of section 380.50 of this chapter] EXCEPT SEALED CASES DEFINED IN SECTION 160.50 OR 160.55 OF THIS CHAPTER. (b) Upon completion of such a proceeding, the court shall consider and make findings of fact with respect to whether: (i) the defendant is an eligible defendant as defined in subdivision one of section 216.00 of this article; (ii) [the defendant has a history of alcohol or substance use; (iii) such alcohol or substance use] THE DEFENDANT'S FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT is LIKELY a contributing factor to [the defendant's criminal behavior] THEIR CURRENT OR FUTURE INVOLVEMENT IN THE CRIMINAL LEGAL SYSTEM; [(iv)] (III) the defendant's participation in judicial diversion could effectively address such [use] FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT; and [(v) institutional confinement of the defendant is or may not be necessary for the protection of the public] (IV) THE DEFENDANT'S ACCESS TO TREATMENT THROUGH THIS ARTICLE WOULD BENEFIT THE PUBLIC AND THE DEFENDANT. 4. (A) When an authorized court determines, pursuant to paragraph (b) of subdivision three of this section, that an eligible defendant should be offered [alcohol or substance use] treatment, or when the parties and the court agree to [an eligible defendant's participation in alcohol or substance use] treatment, an eligible defendant [may] SHALL be allowed to participate in the judicial diversion program offered by this arti- cle. [Prior to the court's issuing an order granting judicial diver- sion, the eligible defendant shall be required to enter a plea of guilty to the charge or charges; provided, however, that no such guilty plea shall be required when: S. 1976--B 6 (a) the people and the court consent to the entry of such an order without a plea of guilty; or (b) based on a finding of exceptional circumstances, the court deter- mines that a plea of guilty shall not be required. For purposes of this subdivision, exceptional circumstances exist when, regardless of the ultimate disposition of the case, the entry of a plea of guilty is like- ly to result in severe collateral consequences.] (B) ELIGIBLE DEFENDANTS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A PLEA OF GUILTY TO PARTICIPATE IN JUDICIAL DIVERSION. (C) PRIOR PARTICIPATION IN TREATMENT OR COURT-MANDATED TREATMENT SHALL NOT PRECLUDE FUTURE TREATMENT PARTICIPATION. (D) ELIGIBLE DEFENDANTS SHALL NOT BE PRECLUDED FROM DIVERSION BECAUSE OF A LACK OF RESOURCES IN THE COMMUNITY. (E) AN ELIGIBLE DEFENDANT SHALL NOT BE PRECLUDED FROM DIVERSION BECAUSE OF THEIR GENDER IDENTITY. 5. The [defendant] PARTICIPANT shall agree on the record or in writing to abide by the [release] JUDICIAL DIVERSION PROGRAM conditions set by the court, which[, shall] MAY include: [participation in a specified period of alcohol or substance use treatment at a specified program or programs identified by the court, which may include periods of detoxifi- cation residential or outpatient treatment, or both, as determined after taking into account the views of the health care professional who conducted the alcohol and substance use evaluation and any health care professionals responsible for providing such treatment or monitoring the defendant's progress in such treatment; and may include: (i)] (A) PARTICIPATION IN THE TREATMENT PLAN; (B) periodic court appearances, which, UPON CONSENT OF THE PARTIC- IPANT, may [include periodic urinalysis; (ii)] BE AN ACCESSIBLE AUDIO OR VIDEO APPEARANCE. WHEN SCHEDULING COURT APPEARANCES AND DETERMINING THE TYPE OF APPEARANCE REQUIRED, THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER THE PARTICIPANT'S TREATMENT PROGRESS AND SHALL ATTEMPT TO AVOID UNDUE HARDSHIP, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, TREATMENT INTERRUPTIONS, THE COST OF TRANSPORTATION, MOBILITY ISSUES, CHILDCARE AND EMPLOYMENT DISRUPTIONS. UPON APPLICATION BY DEFENSE COUNSEL AND WITH THE CONSENT OF THE PARTICIPANT, THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER WAIVING THE APPEARANCE OF THE PARTICIPANT; (C) PERIODIC DRUG SCREENING AS NEEDED, WHEN RECOMMENDED BY THE TREAT- MENT PROVIDER AS PART OF A PARTICIPANT'S TREATMENT PLAN. DRUG SCREENING METHODS SHALL ONLY INCLUDE ORAL SWABS, SWEAT PATCHES, OR NON-OBSERVED URINALYSIS AND SHALL COMPORT WITH THE OFFICE OF ADDICTION SERVICES AND SUPPORTS' GUIDANCE ON TOXICOLOGY USE; (D) a requirement that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT refrain from engag- ing in criminal behaviors[; (iii) if the defendant needs treatment for opioid use, that he or she]. 5-A. THE COURT SHALL NOT DISCLOSE A PARTICIPANT'S PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION WITHOUT THE PARTICIPANT'S CONSENT OR AUTHORIZATION; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT A COURT MAY REQUIRE A PARTICIPANT TO CONSENT TO SHARE THE FOLLOWING PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION AS A CONDITION OF PARTICIPATING IN JUDICIAL DIVERSION: (A) RECORD OF ATTENDANCE AND RELEVANT BARRIERS TO ATTENDANCE; (B) TREATMENT PLAN AND ANY RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE PLAN DURING PARTICIPATION IN JUDICIAL DIVERSION; (C) DRUG TOXICOLOGY RESULTS, WHEN PART OF THE TREATMENT PLAN; AND (D) RELEVANT UPDATES REGARDING ENGAGEMENT IN THE TREATMENT PLAN. 5-B. IF A PARTICIPANT HAS ONE OR MORE CONDITIONS REQUIRING PRESCRIPTION MEDICATION OR CERTIFIED DRUG TREATMENTS THEY may partic- ipate in and receive [medically prescribed] SUCH MEDICATION OR drug S. 1976--B 7 treatments under the care of a health care professional licensed or certified under title eight of the education law, acting within his or her lawful scope of practice[, provided that no]. (A) NO COURT SHALL LIMIT THE MEDICATIONS THAT A LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL HAS PRESCRIBED OR CERTIFIED FOR A PARTICIPANT; (B) NO court shall require the use of any specified type or brand of drug during the course of medically prescribed [drug] treatments[.]; AND (C) NO COURT SHALL PENALIZE OR SANCTION A PARTICIPANT FOR PERIODS OF VOLUNTARY HOSPITALIZATION, RESPITE CARE, OR OTHER FORMS OF SUPPORTIVE CARE. 5-C. EVERY EFFORT SHOULD BE MADE TO MAXIMIZE THE USE OF CERTIFIED PEERS IN EVERY STAGE OF THE JUDICIAL DIVERSION PROCESS. 5-D. UPON REQUEST BY THE DEFENSE, THE COURT SHALL ALLOW PARTICIPANTS TO CONSULT A DIFFERENT MENTAL HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL FOR A SECOND OPINION AND PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT PLAN. ANY ALTERNATIVE OPIN- ION OR ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT PLAN SHALL BE CONSIDERED BY THE COURT WHEN DETERMINING THE TREATMENT PLAN. 6. Upon [an eligible defendant's] A PARTICIPANT'S agreement to abide by the conditions set by the court, the court shall issue a securing order providing for bail or release on the [defendant's] PARTICIPANT'S own recognizance and conditioning any release upon the agreed upon conditions PURSUANT TO ARTICLE FIVE HUNDRED TEN OF THIS CHAPTER. The period of [alcohol or substance use] treatment shall begin as specified by the court and as soon as practicable after the [defendant's] PARTIC- IPANT'S release, taking into account the availability of treatment, so as to facilitate early intervention with respect to the [defendant's substance use or condition] PARTICIPANT'S FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT and the effectiveness of the treatment program. In the event that a treatment program is not immediately available or becomes unavailable during the course of the [defendant's participation] PARTICIPANT'S INVOLVEMENT in the judicial diversion program, the court may release the [defendant] PARTICIPANT pursuant to the securing order. 7. When participating in judicial diversion treatment pursuant to this article, any resident of this state who is covered under a private health insurance policy or contract issued for delivery in this state pursuant to article thirty-two, forty-three or forty-seven of the insur- ance law or article forty-four of the public health law, or who is covered by a self-funded plan which provides coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of [chemical abuse and chemical dependence] FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT however defined in such policy; shall first seek reimburse- ment for such treatment in accordance with the provisions of such policy or contract. THE COURT IN ITS DISCRETION MAY ORDER THE PARTICIPANT TO APPLY FOR PUBLIC INSURANCE IF THEY SO QUALIFY. THE COURT SHALL NOT DENY ACCESS TO TREATMENT FOR INABILITY TO PAY. 8. (A) During the period of a [defendant's participation] PARTIC- IPANT'S INVOLVEMENT in the judicial diversion program, the TREATMENT court shall retain jurisdiction of the [defendant] PARTICIPANT, provided, however, that the court [may] SHALL allow such [defendant] PARTICIPANT to (i) reside in another jurisdiction, [or] AND/OR (ii) participate in [alcohol and substance use] treatment and other programs in the jurisdiction where the [defendant] PARTICIPANT resides or in any other jurisdiction, while participating in a judicial diversion program under conditions set by the court and agreed to by the [defendant] PARTICIPANT pursuant to subdivisions five and six of this section. THE COURT MAY TRANSFER THE PARTICIPANT'S CASE TO THE JUDICIAL DIVERSION COURT IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE PARTICIPANT RESIDES PURSUANT TO SUBDI- S. 1976--B 8 VISION FIVE OF SECTION 170.15 OF THIS PART, SUBDIVISION FOUR OF SECTION 180.20 OF THIS PART, OR SECTION 230.21 OF THIS PART TO ENSURE CONTINUITY OF TREATMENT. (B) The court may require the [defendant] PARTICIPANT to appear in court [at any time] OR, UPON THE REQUEST OF THE PARTICIPANT, MAKE AUDIO OR VIDEO APPEARANCES PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (B) OF SUBDIVISION FIVE OF THIS SECTION to enable the court to [monitor] PROMOTE the [defendant's] PARTICIPANT'S progress in [alcohol or substance use] treatment. The court shall provide notice, reasonable under the circumstances, to the people, the treatment provider, the [defendant] PARTICIPANT and the [defendant's] PARTICIPANT'S counsel whenever it orders or otherwise requires the appearance of the [defendant in] PARTICIPATION FOR court APPEARANCES. Failure to appear as required without reasonable cause therefor shall constitute a violation of the conditions of the court's agreement with the [defendant] PARTICIPANT. 9. (a) If at any time during the [defendant's participation] PARTIC- IPANT'S ENGAGEMENT in the judicial diversion program, the court has reasonable grounds to believe that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT has violated a [release] PROGRAM condition in an important respect or has willfully failed to appear before the court as requested, the court except as provided in subdivision two of section 510.50 of this chapter regarding a failure to appear, shall direct the [defendant] PARTICIPANT to appear [or issue a bench warrant to a police officer or an appropri- ate peace officer directing him or her to take the defendant into custo- dy and bring the defendant before the court without unnecessary delay; provided, however, that under no circumstances shall a defendant who requires treatment for opioid use be deemed to have violated a release condition on the basis of his or her participation in medically prescribed drug treatments under the care of a health care professional licensed or certified under title eight of the education law, acting within his or her lawful scope of practice] FOR A HEARING ON THE VIOLATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (B) OF THIS SUBDIVISION WITH AT LEAST FORTY-EIGHT HOURS NOTICE TO THE PARTICIPANT OR THE PARTICIPANT'S COUN- SEL, UNLESS NOTICE IS WAIVED BY THE PARTICIPANT. THE COURT MAY NOT MODIFY THE PARTICIPANT'S SECURING ORDER UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE HEARING'S CONCLUSION. The relevant provisions of section 530.60 of this chapter relating to issuance of securing orders shall apply to such proceedings under this subdivision. (b) In determining whether a [defendant] PARTICIPANT violated a condi- tion of [his or her release under] the judicial diversion program IN AN IMPORTANT RESPECT OR WILLFULLY FAILED TO APPEAR IN COURT, the court [may] SHALL conduct a [summary] hearing consistent with due process [and sufficient] to satisfy the court that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT has, in fact, violated the condition OR WILLFULLY FAILED TO APPEAR. (I) THE PEOPLE SHALL BEAR THE BURDEN OF PROVING BY CLEAR AND CONVINC- ING EVIDENCE THAT THE PARTICIPANT HAS VIOLATED A CONDITION OF THE JUDI- CIAL DIVERSION PROGRAM IN AN IMPORTANT RESPECT OR HAS WILLFULLY FAILED TO APPEAR. THE PARTICIPANT MAY CROSS-EXAMINE WITNESSES AND MAY PRESENT RELEVANT, ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE ON THEIR OWN BEHALF. (II) AT THE REQUEST OF THE PARTICIPANT OR THE PARTICIPANT'S COUNSEL, THE COURT MAY CONDUCT PROCEEDINGS OFF THE RECORD FOR PORTIONS OF THE PROCEEDINGS THAT WILL LIKELY RESULT IN ADVERSE COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES, INCLUDING IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES. IN THE ALTERNATIVE, THE COURT SHALL SEAL PORTIONS OF THE PROCEEDING THAT MAY RESULT IN SUCH CONSEQUENCES. (c) If the court determines BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT has violated a PROGRAM condition [of his or her S. 1976--B 9 release under the judicial diversion program, the] IN AN IMPORTANT RESPECT OR WILLFULLY FAILED TO APPEAR, THE COURT SHALL RESPOND BY USING A SYSTEM OF GRADUATED AND APPROPRIATE RESPONSES DESIGNED TO ADDRESS SUCH INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIORS AND FACILITATE, WHERE POSSIBLE, SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE TREATMENT PROGRAM. THE court may PERMIT THE PARTIC- IPANT TO CONTINUE THEIR TREATMENT MANDATE AS PREVIOUSLY ORDERED; modify the [conditions thereof, reconsider the order of recognizance or bail pursuant to subdivision two of section 510.30 of this chapter,] TREAT- MENT PLAN ACCORDING TO THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE TREATMENT PROVIDER; or terminate the [defendant's] PARTICIPANT'S participation in the judicial diversion program[; and when applicable proceed with the defendant's sentencing in accordance with the agreement. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the court may impose any sentence authorized for the crime of conviction in accordance with the plea agreement, or any lesser sentence authorized to be imposed on a felony drug offender pursuant to paragraph (b) or (c) of subdivision two of section 70.70 of the penal law taking into account] IF NO OTHER TREAT- MENT OPTION IS AVAILABLE. IF THE COURT FINDS A REASONABLE EXPLANATION OR MITIGATION FOR ANY ALLEGED VIOLATION OR ALLEGED WILLFUL FAILURE TO APPEAR, THE SECURING ORDER SHALL NOT BE MODIFIED. THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER: (I) the length of time the [defendant] PARTICIPANT HAS spent in [resi- dential] treatment and how best to continue treatment [while the defend- ant is serving that sentence. In determining what action to take for a violation of a release condition, the court shall consider]; (II) all relevant circumstances, including the views of the prosecu- tor, the defense and the [alcohol or substance use] PARTICIPANT'S INTER- EST IN CONTINUING treatment [provider, and the extent to which persons who ultimately successfully complete a drug treatment regimen sometimes] OR THE PROGRAM; (III) THE ROLE OF relapse [by not abstaining from alcohol or substance use or by failing to comply fully with all requirements imposed by a treatment program. The court shall also consider using a system of graduated and appropriate responses or sanctions designed to address such inappropriate behaviors, protect public safety and facilitate, where possible, successful completion of the alcohol or substance use treatment program] IN RECOVERY AND TREATMENT; AND (IV) ANY OTHER MITIGATING FACTORS THAT MAY HAVE IMPACTED THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OR WILLFUL FAILURE TO APPEAR. (d) Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed [as preventing a court from terminating a defendant's participation in the judicial diversion program for violating a release condition when such a termi- nation is necessary to preserve public safety. Nor shall anything in this subdivision be construed] as precluding the prosecution of a [defendant] PARTICIPANT for the commission of a different offense while participating in the judicial diversion program. (e) A [defendant] PARTICIPANT may at any time advise the court that [he or she wishes] THEY WISH to terminate participation in the judicial diversion program, at which time the court shall [proceed with the case and, where applicable, shall impose sentence in accordance with the plea agreement. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the court may impose any sentence authorized for the crime of conviction in accordance with the plea agreement, or any lesser sentence authorized to be imposed on a felony drug offender pursuant to paragraph (b) or (c) of subdivision two of section 70.70 of the penal law taking into account the length of time the defendant spent in residential treatment and how S. 1976--B 10 best to continue treatment while the defendant is serving that sentence] TRANSFER THE CASE BACK TO THE APPROPRIATE TRIAL PART. 10. Upon the court's determination that the [defendant] PARTICIPANT has successfully completed the required period of [alcohol or substance use] treatment and has otherwise satisfied the conditions required for successful completion of the judicial diversion program, the court shall [comply with the terms and conditions it set for final disposition when it accepted the defendant's agreement to participate in the judicial diversion program. Such disposition may include, but is not limited to: (a) requiring the defendant to undergo a period of interim probation supervision and, upon the defendant's successful completion of the interim probation supervision term, notwithstanding the provision of any other law, permitting the defendant to withdraw his or her guilty plea and dismissing the indictment; or (b) requiring the defendant to undergo a period of interim probation supervision and, upon successful completion of the interim probation supervision term, notwithstanding the provision of any other law, permitting the defendant to withdraw his or her guilty plea, enter a guilty plea to a misdemeanor offense and sentencing the defendant as promised in the plea agreement, which may include a period of probation supervision pursuant to section 65.00 of the penal law; or (c) allowing the defendant to withdraw his or her guilty plea and dismissing] DISMISS the indictment OR SUPERIOR COURT INFORMATION, FELONY COMPLAINT, MISDEMEANOR COMPLAINT, INFORMATION, SIMPLIFIED INFORMATION, OR PROSECUTOR'S INFORMATION AND SEAL THE CASE PURSUANT TO SECTION 160.50 OF THIS CHAPTER. PARTICIPANTS WHO SUCCESS- FULLY COMPLETE JUDICIAL DIVERSION SHALL ALSO BE ELIGIBLE TO APPLY FOR SEALING OF PRIOR CONVICTIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 160.58 OF THIS CHAPTER. UPON SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF JUDICIAL DIVERSION, THE COURT SHALL NOTIFY THE PARTICIPANT OF THEIR POTENTIAL ELIGIBILITY FOR SEALING PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION TWO OF SECTION 160.58 OF THIS CHAPTER. NO PARTICIPANT SHALL BE REQUIRED OR PERMITTED TO WAIVE ELIGIBILITY FOR SEALING AS A CONDITION OF PARTICIPATION IN JUDICIAL DIVERSION. 10-A. TREATMENT PROVIDERS SHALL COLLABORATE WITH THE PARTICIPANT AND THE COURT TO CREATE A POST-GRADUATION PLAN PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF JUDI- CIAL DIVERSION. SUCH PLAN SHALL MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO ASSIST THE PARTIC- IPANT IN OBTAINING STABLE HOUSING AND MEETING THEIR SELF-IDENTIFIED LONG-TERM GOALS AFTER GRADUATION. HOWEVER, WHEN A PARTICIPANT FINISHES THEIR TREATMENT PLAN, THEY SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO HAVE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THEIR OBLIGATION TO THE COURT, REGARDLESS OF THEIR ABILITY TO SECURE HOUSING, EMPLOYMENT, OR OTHER PERSONAL GOALS IDENTIFIED. 11. Nothing in this article shall be construed as restricting or prohibiting courts or district attorneys from using other lawful proce- dures or models for placing appropriate persons into [alcohol or substance use] treatment. § 7. The criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new section 216.10 to read as follows: § 216.10 DIVERSION PART ESTABLISHED. 1. THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO ESTAB- LISH, IN EACH COUNTY OF THE STATE, A PART OF THE COURT TO BE KNOWN AS THE DIVERSION PART FOR THE COUNTY IN WHICH SUCH COURT PRESIDES. TO AID IN THEIR WORK, SUCH JUDGES AND DIVERSION COURT PERSONNEL SHALL RECEIVE ANNUAL TRAINING IN SPECIALIZED AREAS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO DISABILITY, MENTAL ILLNESS, AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER NEEDS, INCLUDING CO-OCCURRING DISORDERS, EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES, TRAUMA-INFORMED CARE, THE IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF PARTICIPATION IN JUDICIAL DIVERSION FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE NOT UNITED STATES CITIZENS, CERTIFIED PEER PROGRAMS, S. 1976--B 11 HARM REDUCTION PRINCIPLES, AND PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION, AS WELL AS TRAINING IN PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND CULTURAL COMPETENCY AND MEDICAID OR MEDICARE ELIGIBILITY. THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL EMPLOYEES WHO STAFF THE DIVERSION PARTS RECEIVE SPECIALIZED TRAINING IN PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND WORKING WITH PEOPLE WITH COMPLEX NEEDS. 2. EACH CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS SHALL AT THE END OF EACH YEAR PREPARE AND FILE AN ANNUAL REPORT, WHICH THE OFFICE SHALL COMPILE, PUBLISH ON ITS WEBSITE AND MAKE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC. SUCH REPORTS SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMA- TION FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANTS. EACH SUCH REPORT, IN ADDITION TO OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION, SHALL SET FORTH THE FOLLOWING, DISAGGREGATED BY EACH COUNTY SERVED: (A) THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WITH CASES IN THE DIVERSION PART FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER, SEX, RACE AND ETHNICI- TY: (I) THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR EVALUATION; (II) THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ARE ACCEPTED INTO JUDICIAL DIVERSION; AND (III) THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROGRAM; (B) THE LENGTH OF TIME, IN MONTHS, EACH CASE REMAINED IN THE DIVERSION PART PRIOR TO ACQUITTAL, DISMISSAL, RELEASE ON RECOGNIZANCE, REVOCATION OF RELEASE ON CONDITIONS, AND SENTENCING; (C) THE CRIMES WITH WHICH EACH PARTICIPANT WAS CHARGED; (D) THE SPECIFIC FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT OR IMPAIRMENTS FOR WHICH THE PARTICIPANT RECEIVED TREATMENT WHILE PARTICIPATING IN THE JUDICIAL DIVERSION PROGRAM; (E) THE FINAL DISPOSITION, INCLUDING THE SENTENCE, OF EACH CASE CONSIDERED FOR JUDICIAL DIVERSION; AND (F) A LIST OF SERVICE PROVIDERS, INCLUDING CONTACT INFORMATION, THAT THE DIVERSION PART IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY PARTNERS WITH TO SERVE PARTICIPANTS. § 8. Subdivision 5 of section 170.15 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 91 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: 5. (a) Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary, in any county [outside a city having a population of one million or more], upon or after arraignment of a defendant on an information, a simplified information, a prosecutor's information or a misdemeanor complaint pending in a local criminal court, such court [may] SHALL, upon motion of the defendant and after giving the district attorney an opportunity to be heard, order that the action be removed from the court in which the matter is pending to another local criminal court in the same county, or with consent of the district attorney and the district attorney of the adjoining county to another court in [such] AN adjoining county, OR TO A COURT IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT RESIDES that has been designated as a JUDICIAL DIVERSION, human trafficking [court], or veterans treatment court by the chief administrator of the courts, and such JUDICIAL DIVERSION, human trafficking [court], or veterans treatment court [may] SHALL then conduct such action to judgment or other final deposition; provided, however, that no court may order removal pursuant to this subdivision to a veterans treatment court of a family offense charge described in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this chapter where the accused and the person alleged to be the victim of such offense charged are members of the same family or household as defined in such subdivision one of section 530.11; and provided further S. 1976--B 12 that an order of removal issued under this subdivision shall not take effect until five days after the date the order is issued unless, prior to such effective date, the human trafficking court or veterans treat- ment court notifies the court that issued the order that: i. it will not accept the action, in which event the order shall not take effect; or ii. it will accept the action on a date prior to such effective date, in which event the order shall take effect upon such prior date. (b) Upon providing notification pursuant to subparagraph i or ii of paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the human trafficking court or veter- ans treatment court shall promptly give notice to the defendant, his or her counsel, and the district attorney. § 9. Subdivision 4 of section 180.20 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 91 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: 4. (a) Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary, [in any county outside a city having a population of one million or more,] upon or after arraignment of a defendant on a felony complaint pending in a local criminal court having preliminary jurisdiction there- of, such court [may] SHALL, upon motion of the defendant and after giving the district attorney an opportunity to be heard, order that the action be removed from the court in which the matter is pending to another local criminal court in the same county, or with consent of the district attorney and the district attorney of the adjoining county to another court in such adjoining county, OR TO A COURT IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT RESIDES, that has been designated as a JUDICIAL DIVERSION, human trafficking [court], or veterans treatment court by the chief administrator of the courts, and such JUDICIAL DIVERSION, human trafficking [court], or veterans treatment court may then conduct such action to judgment or other final disposition; provided, however, that no court may order removal pursuant to this subdivision to a veterans treatment court of a family offense charge described in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this chapter where the accused and the person alleged to be the victim of such offense charged are members of the same family or household as defined in such subdivision one of section 530.11; and provided further an order of removal issued under this subdivision shall not take effect until five days after the date the order is issued unless, prior to such effective date, the human traf- ficking court or veterans treatment court notifies the court that issued the order that: i. it will not accept the action, in which event the order shall not take effect; or ii. it will accept the action on a date prior to such effective date, in which event the order shall take effect upon such prior date. (b) Upon providing notification pursuant to subparagraph i or ii of paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the human trafficking court or veter- ans treatment court shall promptly give notice to the defendant, his or her counsel and the district attorney. § 10. Section 230.21 of the criminal procedure law, as added by chap- ter 91 of the laws of 2021, is amended to read as follows: § 230.21 Removal of action to certain courts in an adjoining county OR COUNTY IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT RESIDES. 1. In any county [outside a city having a population of one million or more], [the] UPON OR AFTER ARRAIGNMENT OF A DEFENDANT ON AN INDICTMENT PENDING IN A SUPERIOR COURT HAVING JURISDICTION THEREOF, SUCH court [may] SHALL, upon motion of the defendant and with consent of the S. 1976--B 13 district attorney and the district attorney of the adjoining county that has a superior court designated a human trafficking court or veterans treatment court by the chief administrator of the courts, order that the indictment and action be removed from the court in which the matter is pending to [such] A SUPERIOR COURT IN AN ADJOINING COUNTY OR IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT RESIDES THAT HAS BEEN DESIGNATED A JUDI- CIAL DIVERSION, human trafficking [court], or veterans treatment court, whereupon such court may then conduct such action to judgment or other final disposition; provided, however, that no court may order removal to a veterans treatment court of a family offense charge described in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this chapter pursuant to this section where the accused and the person alleged to be the victim of such offense charged are members of the same family or household as defined in such subdivision one of section 530.11; and provided further that an order of removal issued under this subdivision shall not take effect until five days after the date the order is issued unless, prior to such effective date, the human trafficking court or veterans treat- ment court notifies the court that issued the order that: (a) it will not accept the action, in which event the order shall not take effect, or (b) it will accept the action on a date prior to such effective date, in which event the order shall take effect upon such prior date. 2. Upon providing notification pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) of subdivision one of this section, the human trafficking court or veterans treatment court shall promptly give notice to the defendant, his or her counsel and the district attorney of both counties. § 11. Paragraph (r) of subdivision 2 of section 212 of the judiciary law, as added by section 15 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows: (r) Ensure that cases eligible for judicial diversion pursuant to article two hundred sixteen of the criminal procedure law shall be assigned to court parts in the manner provided by the chief administra- tor and that, to the extent practicable, such cases are presided over by judges who, by virtue of the structure, caseload and resources of the parts and the judges' training, are in the best position to provide effective supervision over such cases, such as the [drug] treatment courts. In compliance with these provisions, the chief administrator shall [give due weight to] INDIVIDUALLY ASSESS the need for diverted defendants to make regular court appearances, and be closely supervised by the court, for the duration of [drug] treatment and the pendency of the criminal charge. § 12. The section heading, subdivision 1, and the opening paragraph of subdivision 2 of section 160.58 of the criminal procedure law, as added by section 3 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, are amended to read as follows: Conditional sealing of certain [controlled substance, marihuana or specified offense] convictions FOR PEOPLE WHO COMPLETE JUDICIAL DIVER- SION OR A JUDICIALLY SANCTIONED DRUG TREATMENT PROGRAM. 1. A [defendant convicted of any offense defined in article two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-one of the penal law or a specified offense defined in subdivision five of section 410.91 of this chapter] PERSON who has successfully completed a judicial diversion program under article two hundred sixteen of this chapter, or one of the programs heretofore known as drug treatment alternative to prison or another judicially sanctioned drug treatment program of similar duration, requirements and level of supervision, and [has completed the sentence S. 1976--B 14 imposed for the offense or offenses,] WAS SENTENCED FOR AN OFFENSE OR OFFENSES UPON COMPLETION OF SUCH PROGRAM is eligible to have such offense or offenses CONDITIONALLY sealed pursuant to this section. FOR SUCH OFFENSES, THE COURT THAT SENTENCED THE DEFENDANT TO A JUDICIALLY SANCTIONED DRUG TREATMENT PROGRAM MAY, ON ITS OWN MOTION OR ON THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION, ORDER THAT ALL OFFICIAL RECORDS AND PAPERS RELATING TO THE ARREST, PROSECUTION AND CONVICTION WHICH RESULTED IN THE DEFEND- ANT'S PARTICIPATION IN THE JUDICIALLY SANCTIONED DRUG TREATMENT PROGRAM BE CONDITIONALLY SEALED. [The court that sentenced the defendant to a judicially sanctioned drug treatment program may on its own motion, or on the defendant's motion, order that all official records and papers relating to the arrest, prosecution and conviction which resulted in the defendant's participation in the judicially sanctioned drug treatment program be conditionally sealed. In such case, the court may also] WHERE A PERSON HAS COMPLETED A JUDICIAL DIVERSION PROGRAM PURSUANT TO ARTICLE TWO HUNDRED SIXTEEN OF THIS CHAPTER OR A DRUG TREATMENT ALTERNA- TIVE TO PRISON PROGRAM OR ANOTHER JUDICIALLY SANCTIONED DRUG TREATMENT PROGRAM, THE COURT THAT SUPERVISED THE PERSON'S PARTICIPATION IN THE PROGRAM MAY, ON ITS OWN MOTION OR ON THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION, condi- tionally seal the arrest, prosecution and conviction records for no more than three of the [defendant's] PERSON'S prior eligible misdemeanors, which for purposes of this subdivision shall be limited to misdemeanor offenses defined in article two hundred twenty [or], two hundred twen- ty-one, OR TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO of the penal law. The court may only seal the records of the defendant's arrests, prosecutions and convictions when: § 13. This act shall take effect one year after it shall have become a law; provided, however that the amendments to the opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law made by section two of this act shall be subject to the expiration and reversion of such paragraph pursuant to section 12 of chapter 90 of the laws of 2014, as amended, when upon such date the provisions of section three of this act shall take effect.
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.