S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
3957
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
I N A S S E M B L Y
January 30, 2025
___________
Introduced by M. of A. ROSENTHAL -- read once and referred to the
Committee on Housing
AN ACT to amend the multiple dwelling law, in relation to rent impairing
violations; and to amend the real property actions and proceedings
law, in relation to eviction proceedings
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subdivision 3 of section 302-a of the multiple dwelling
law, as added by chapter 911 of the laws of 1965, is amended to read as
follows:
3. a. If (i) the official records of the department shall note that a
rent impairing violation exists OR EXISTED in respect to a multiple
dwelling and that notice of such violation has been given by the depart-
ment, by mail, to the owner last registered with the department and (ii)
such note of the violation [is] WAS not cancelled or removed of record
within [six] THREE months after the date of such notice of such
violation, then for the period that such violation remains uncorrected
after the expiration of said [six] THREE months, no rent shall be recov-
ered by any owner for any premises in such multiple dwelling used by a
resident thereof for human habitation in which the condition constitut-
ing such rent impairing violation exists, provided, however, that if the
violation is one that requires approval of plans by the department for
the corrective work and if plans for such corrective work shall have
been duly filed within [three months] ONE MONTH from the date of notice
of such violation by the department to the owner last registered with
the department, the [six-months] THREE MONTH period aforementioned shall
not begin to run until the date that plans for the corrective work are
approved by the department; if plans are not filed within said [three-
months] ONE MONTH period or if so filed, they are disapproved and amend-
ments are not duly filed within thirty days after the date of notifica-
tion of the disapproval by the department to the person having filed the
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD04185-01-5
A. 3957 2
plans, the [six-months] THREE MONTH period shall be computed as if no
plans whatever had been filed under this proviso. If a condition consti-
tuting a rent impairing violation exists in the part of a multiple
dwelling used in common by the residents or in the part under the
control of the owner thereof, the violation shall be deemed to exist in
the respective premises of each resident of the multiple dwelling.
b. The provisions of subparagraph a shall not apply if (i) the condi-
tion referred to in the department's notice to the owner last registered
with the department did not in fact exist, notwithstanding the notation
thereof in the records of the department; (ii) the condition which is
the subject of the violation has in fact been corrected WITHIN THE THREE
MONTH PERIOD REQUIRED BY SUBPARAGRAPH A OF THIS SUBDIVISION, though the
note thereof in the department has not been removed or cancelled; (iii)
the violation has been caused by the resident from whom rent is sought
to be collected or by members of [his] SUCH RESIDENT'S family or by
[his] SUCH RESIDENT'S guests or by another resident of the multiple
dwelling or the members of the family of such other resident or by [his]
SUCH OTHER RESIDENT'S guests, or (iv) the resident proceeded against for
rent has refused entry to the owner for the purpose of correcting the
condition giving rise to the violation.
c. To raise a defense under subparagraph a in any action to recover
rent or in any special proceeding for the recovery of possession because
of non-payment of rent, the resident must affirmatively plead and prove
the material facts under subparagraph a[, and must also deposit with the
clerk of the court in which the action or proceeding is pending at the
time of filing of the resident's answer the amount of rent sought to be
recovered in the action or upon which the proceeding to recover
possession is based, to be held by the clerk of the court until final
disposition of the action or proceeding at which time the rent deposited
shall be paid to the owner, if the owner prevails, or be returned to the
resident if the resident prevails. Such deposit of rent shall vitiate
any right on the part of the owner to terminate the lease or rental
agreement of the resident because of nonpayment of rent].
d. If a resident voluntarily pays rent or an installment of rent when
[he] SUCH RESIDENT would be privileged to withhold the same under
subparagraph a, [he] SUCH RESIDENT shall [not thereafter] have [any] A
claim or cause of action to recover back the rent or installment of rent
so paid. A voluntary payment within the meaning hereof shall mean
payment other than one made pursuant to a judgment in an action or
special proceeding.
e. [If upon the trial of any action to recover rent or any special
proceeding for the recovery of possession because of non-payment of rent
it shall appear that the resident has raised a defense under this
section in bad faith, or has caused the violation or has refused entry
to the owner for the purpose of correcting the condition giving rise to
the violation, the court, in its discretion, may impose upon the resi-
dent the reasonable costs of the owner, including counsel fees, in main-
taining the action or proceeding not to exceed one hundred dollars.] THE
DEPARTMENT SHALL NOTIFY THE RESIDENT AND OWNER WHEN A RENT IMPAIRING
VIOLATION HAS BEEN PLACED IN THEIR APARTMENT. THE NOTIFICATION SHALL
INCLUDE A LIST OF THE RENT IMPAIRING VIOLATIONS PLACED AND AN EXPLANA-
TION OF THE RESIDENT'S RIGHT TO RAISE THE RENT IMPAIRING VIOLATIONS AS A
DEFENSE IN ANY ACTION TO RECOVER RENT OR IN ANY SPECIAL PROCEEDING FOR
THE RECOVERY OF POSSESSION BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF RENT.
§ 2. Subdivisions 10 and 11 of section 713 of the real property
actions and proceedings law, subdivision 10 as amended by chapter 467 of
A. 3957 3
the laws of 1981 and subdivision 11 as added by chapter 312 of the laws
of 1962, are amended to read as follows:
10. The person in possession has entered the property or remains in
possession by force or unlawful means and [he or his] SUCH PERSON OR
SUCH PERSON'S predecessor in interest was not in quiet possession for
three years before the time of the forcible or unlawful entry or detain-
er and the petitioner was peaceably in actual possession at the time of
the forcible or unlawful entry or in constructive possession at the time
of the forcible or unlawful detainer. ANY LAWFUL OCCUPANT, PHYSICALLY OR
CONSTRUCTIVELY IN POSSESSION, WHO HAS BEEN EVICTED OR DISPOSSESSED WITH-
OUT THE COURT PROCESS MANDATED BY SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN OF THIS
ARTICLE, MAY COMMENCE A PROCEEDING UNDER THIS SUBDIVISION TO BE RESTORED
TO POSSESSION, AND SHALL BE SO RESTORED UPON PROOF THAT THEIR EVICTION
WAS UNLAWFUL; no notice to quit shall be required in order to maintain a
proceeding under this subdivision.
11. The person in possession entered into possession as an incident to
employment by petitioner, and the time agreed upon for such possession
has expired or, if no such time was agreed upon, the employment has been
terminated[; no notice to quit shall be required in order to maintain
the proceeding under this subdivision].
§ 3. Subdivisions 2 and 3 of section 732 of the real property actions
and proceedings law, as amended by section 14 of part M of chapter 36 of
the laws of 2019, are amended to read as follows:
2. If the respondent answers, the clerk shall fix a date for trial or
hearing not less than three nor more than eight days after joinder of
issue, and shall immediately notify by mail the parties or their attor-
neys of such date. If the determination be for the petitioner, the issu-
ance of a warrant shall not be stayed for more than five days from such
determination, except as provided in section seven hundred fifty-three
of this article. IF THE RESPONDENT FAILS TO APPEAR ON SUCH DATE, THE
COURT, AFTER MAKING AN ASSESSMENT, PURSUANT TO SECTION THIRTY-TWO
HUNDRED FIFTEEN OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES, MAY ISSUE A JUDG-
MENT IN FAVOR OF THE PETITIONER AND THE ISSUANCE OF THE WARRANT SHALL BE
STAYED FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED TEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE,
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY-THREE OF THIS ARTICLE.
3. If the respondent fails to answer within ten days from the date of
service, as shown by the affidavit or certificate of service of the
notice of petition and petition, [the judge shall render judgment in
favor of the petitioner and] THE PETITIONER MAY MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR
A DEFAULT JUDGMENT. UPON THIS APPLICATION, THE CLERK SHALL FIX A DATE
FOR INQUEST AND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY BY MAIL THE PARTIES OR THEIR ATTOR-
NEYS OF SUCH DATE. IF THE RESPONDENT FAILS TO APPEAR ON SUCH DATE, THE
COURT, AFTER MAKING AN ASSESSMENT, PURSUANT TO SECTION THIRTY-TWO
HUNDRED FIFTEEN OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES, MAY ISSUE A JUDG-
MENT IN FAVOR OF THE PETITIONER AND may stay the issuance of the warrant
for a period of not to exceed ten days from the date of service, except
as provided in section seven hundred fifty-three of this article.
§ 4. This act shall take effect immediately and shall apply to all
pending proceedings on and after such date.