(C) WORKPLACE BULLYING, MOBBING AND NON-DISCRIMINATORY HARASSMENT CAN
INFLICT SERIOUS HEALTH HARMS UPON TARGETED EMPLOYEES, INCLUDING INSOMNIA
AND CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME, ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION DISORDERS,
MIGRAINES, SUICIDAL IDEATION, IMPAIRED IMMUNE SYSTEMS, HYPERTENSION AND
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE, COMPLEX POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS SYNDROME, AND
DETERIORATION OF FAMILIAL RELATIONSHIPS;
(D) COWORKERS WHO WITNESS ABUSIVE MISTREATMENT OF OTHER EMPLOYEES CAN
BE NEGATIVELY IMPACTED IN SIMILAR WAYS;
(E) ABUSIVE WORK ENVIRONMENTS CAN HAVE SERIOUS AND COSTLY CONSEQUENCES
FOR EMPLOYERS, INCLUDING REDUCED EMPLOYEE PRODUCTIVITY AND MORALE, HIGH
ABSENTEEISM RATES, INCREASED MEDICAL AND WORKERS' EXPENSES, AND
INCREASED EMPLOYEE TURNOVER WITH CONCOMITANT REPLACEMENT AND TRAINING
COSTS;
(F) EXISTING HARASSMENT LAWS ARE ONLY APPLICABLE IF THE ABUSIVE
MISTREATMENT IN THE WORKPLACE IS MOTIVATED BY DISCRIMINATORY ANIMUS
TOWARDS THE TARGET'S RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SEX, SEXUAL
ORIENTATION, AGE, DISABILITY, OR MILITARY STATUS;
(G) LEGAL PROTECTION FROM ABUSIVE MISTREATMENT IN THE WORKPLACE SHOULD
NOT BE LIMITED TO BEHAVIORS PREDICATED ON PROTECTED CLASS STATUS; AND
(H) EXISTING WORKERS' COMPENSATION PLANS, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND
HEALTH LAWS, AND COMMON LAW TORT ACTIONS DO NOT ADEQUATELY PREVENT WORK-
PLACE BULLYING, NOR DO THEY PROVIDE ADEQUATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR REDRESS
AND RELIEF TO EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE BEEN HARMED BY WORKPLACE BULLYING.
2. IT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE:
(A) TO PROVIDE AN INCENTIVE FOR EMPLOYERS AND WORKERS TO REFRAIN FROM
MISTREATING THEIR WORKERS AND COWORKERS IN AN ABUSIVE MANNER;
(B) TO PROVIDE AN INCENTIVE FOR EMPLOYERS TO PREVENT AND RESPOND TO
WORKPLACE BULLYING IN THEIR WORKPLACE; AND
(C) TO PROVIDE LEGAL REDRESS FOR EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE BEEN HARMED
PSYCHOLOGICALLY, PHYSICALLY OR ECONOMICALLY BY WORKPLACE BULLYING.
§ 761. DEFINITIONS. AS USED IN THIS ARTICLE, THE FOLLOWING TERMS SHALL
HAVE THE FOLLOWING MEANINGS:
1. "ABUSIVE CONDUCT" MEANS ACTS, OMISSIONS, OR BOTH, THAT A REASONABLE
PERSON WOULD FIND ABUSIVE, BASED ON THE SEVERITY, NATURE, AND FREQUENCY
OF THE CONDUCT, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO: REPEATED VERBAL ABUSE
SUCH AS THE USE OF DEROGATORY REMARKS, INSULTS, AND EPITHETS; VERBAL,
NON-VERBAL, OR PHYSICAL CONDUCT OF A THREATENING, INTIMIDATING, OR
HUMILIATING NATURE; OR THE SABOTAGE OR UNDERMINING OF AN EMPLOYEE'S WORK
PERFORMANCE. IT SHALL BE CONSIDERED AN AGGRAVATING FACTOR IF THE CONDUCT
EXPLOITED AN EMPLOYEE'S KNOWN PSYCHOLOGICAL OR PHYSICAL ILLNESS OR DISA-
BILITY. A SINGLE ACT NORMALLY SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE ABUSIVE CONDUCT, BUT
AN ESPECIALLY SEVERE AND EGREGIOUS ACT MAY MEET THIS STANDARD.
2. "ABUSIVE WORK ENVIRONMENT" MEANS AN EMPLOYMENT CONDITION WHEN AN
EMPLOYER OR ONE OR MORE OF ITS EMPLOYEES, ACTING WITH INTENT TO CAUSE
PAIN OR DISTRESS TO AN EMPLOYEE, SUBJECTS THAT EMPLOYEE TO ABUSIVE
CONDUCT THAT CAUSES PHYSICAL HARM, PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM OR BOTH.
3. "ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION" MEANS AN OUTCOME WHICH NEGATIVELY
IMPACTS AN EMPLOYEE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, A TERMINATION,
DEMOTION, UNFAVORABLE REASSIGNMENT, FAILURE TO PROMOTE, DISCIPLINARY
ACTION OR REDUCTION IN COMPENSATION.
4. "CONSTRUCTIVE DISCHARGE" MEANS AN ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION WHERE:
(A) THE EMPLOYEE REASONABLY BELIEVED SUCH EMPLOYEE WAS SUBJECTED TO AN
ABUSIVE WORK ENVIRONMENT;
(B) THE EMPLOYEE RESIGNED BECAUSE OF THAT CONDUCT; AND
(C) THE EMPLOYER WAS AWARE OF THE ABUSIVE CONDUCT PRIOR TO THE RESIG-
NATION AND FAILED TO STOP IT.
S. 1893 3
5. "PHYSICAL HARM" MEANS THE IMPAIRMENT OF A PERSON'S PHYSICAL HEALTH
OR BODILY INTEGRITY, AS ESTABLISHED BY COMPETENT EVIDENCE.
6. "PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM" MEANS THE IMPAIRMENT OF A PERSON'S MENTAL
HEALTH, AS ESTABLISHED BY COMPETENT EVIDENCE.
7. "INJURY" MEANS PHYSICAL OR MENTAL INJURIES ARISING OUT OF AND IN
THE COURSE OF EMPLOYMENT AND SUCH DISEASE OR INFECTION AS MAY NATURALLY
AND UNAVOIDABLY RESULT THEREFROM. THE TERM "INJURY" SHALL NOT INCLUDE AN
INJURY WHICH IS SOLELY MENTAL AND IS BASED ON WORK-RELATED STRESS IF
SUCH MENTAL INJURY IS A DIRECT CONSEQUENCE OF A LAWFUL PERSONNEL DECI-
SION INVOLVING A DISCIPLINARY ACTION, WORK EVALUATION, JOB TRANSFER,
DEMOTION, DISCHARGE, OR TERMINATION TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH BY THE EMPLOYER,
AND WHICH DOES NOT VIOLATE ANY OTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE.
8. "DISABILITY" SHALL MEAN DISABILITY AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION TWEN-
TY-ONE OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED NINETY-TWO OF THE EXECUTIVE LAW.
§ 762. ABUSIVE WORK ENVIRONMENT. 1. NO EMPLOYEE SHALL BE SUBJECTED TO
AN ABUSIVE WORK ENVIRONMENT.
2. NO EMPLOYER OR EMPLOYEE SHALL RETALIATE IN ANY MANNER AGAINST AN
EMPLOYEE WHO HAS OPPOSED ANY UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE UNDER THIS
ARTICLE, OR WHO HAS MADE A CHARGE, TESTIFIED, ASSISTED, OR PARTICIPATED
IN ANY MANNER IN AN INVESTIGATION OR PROCEEDING UNDER THIS ARTICLE,
INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, INTERNAL COMPLAINTS AND PROCEEDINGS,
ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION PROCEEDINGS AND LEGAL ACTIONS.
§ 763. EMPLOYER LIABILITY. 1. AN EMPLOYER SHALL BE VICARIOUSLY LIABLE
FOR A VIOLATION OF SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE
COMMITTED BY ITS EMPLOYEE.
2. WHERE THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SUCH SECTION DOES NOT INCLUDE AN
ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION, IT SHALL BE AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE FOR AN
EMPLOYER ONLY THAT:
(A) THE EMPLOYER EXERCISED REASONABLE CARE TO PREVENT AND CORRECT
PROMPTLY ANY ACTIONABLE BEHAVIOR; AND
(B) THE COMPLAINANT EMPLOYEE UNREASONABLY FAILED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF
APPROPRIATE PREVENTIVE OR CORRECTIVE OPPORTUNITIES PROVIDED BY THE
EMPLOYER.
§ 764. EMPLOYEE LIABILITY. 1. AN EMPLOYEE MAY BE INDIVIDUALLY LIABLE
FOR A VIOLATION OF SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE.
2. IT SHALL BE AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE FOR AN EMPLOYEE ONLY THAT THE
EMPLOYEE COMMITTED A VIOLATION OF SUCH SECTION AT THE DIRECTION OF THE
EMPLOYER, UNDER ACTUAL OR IMPLIED THREAT OF AN ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT
ACTION.
§ 765. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES. IT SHALL BE AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE THAT:
1. THE COMPLAINT IS BASED ON AN ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION REASONABLY
MADE FOR POOR PERFORMANCE, MISCONDUCT OR ECONOMIC NECESSITY;
2. THE COMPLAINT IS BASED ON A REASONABLE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; OR
3. THE COMPLAINT IS BASED ON AN EMPLOYER'S REASONABLE INVESTIGATION
ABOUT POTENTIALLY ILLEGAL OR UNETHICAL ACTIVITY.
§ 766. BURDEN OF PROOF. TO ESTABLISH A PRIMA FACIE CASE, THE COMPLAIN-
ANT EMPLOYEE MUST DEMONSTRATE THAT:
1. SUCH EMPLOYEE WAS SUBJECTED TO ABUSIVE CONDUCT;
2. SUCH EMPLOYEE SUFFERED PHYSICAL OR MENTAL INJURY AS DEFINED IN THIS
ARTICLE; AND
3. THE EVIDENCE AND CIRCUMSTANCES INDICATE THAT THERE WAS A CAUSAL
CONNECTION BETWEEN THE ABUSIVE CONDUCT AND THE INJURIES, ADVERSE EMPLOY-
MENT ACTION, DISCHARGE, OR OTHER DAMAGES SUFFERED BY THE EMPLOYEE.
§ 767. REMEDIES. 1. WHERE A DEFENDANT HAS BEEN FOUND LIABLE FOR A
VIOLATION OF SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE, THE COURT
MAY ENJOIN SUCH DEFENDANT FROM ENGAGING IN THE UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRAC-
S. 1893 4
TICE AND MAY ORDER ANY OTHER RELIEF THAT IS DEEMED APPROPRIATE INCLUD-
ING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, REINSTATEMENT, REMOVAL OF THE OFFENDING PARTY
FROM THE PLAINTIFF'S WORK ENVIRONMENT, REIMBURSEMENT FOR LOST WAGES,
FRONT PAY, MEDICAL EXPENSES, COMPENSATION FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING,
COMPENSATION FOR EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, PUNITIVE DAMAGES AND ATTORNEY FEES.
2. WHERE AN EMPLOYER IS LIABLE FOR A VIOLATION OF SECTION SEVEN
HUNDRED SIXTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE THAT DID NOT INCLUDE AN ADVERSE
EMPLOYMENT ACTION, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS DAMAGES AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES MAY
BE AWARDED ONLY WHEN THE ACTIONABLE CONDUCT WAS EXTREME AND OUTRAGEOUS.
THIS LIMITATION DOES NOT APPLY TO INDIVIDUALLY NAMED EMPLOYEE DEFEND-
ANTS.
§ 768. ENFORCEMENT. 1. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE ARE ENFORCEABLE
SOLELY BY MEANS OF A CIVIL CAUSE OF ACTION COMMENCED BY AN INJURED
EMPLOYEE.
2. AN ACTION TO ENFORCE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE
COMMENCED WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE LAST ACT THAT CONSTITUTES THE ALLEGED
VIOLATION OF SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE.
§ 769. EFFECT ON COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS. THIS ARTICLE SHALL
NOT PREVENT, INTERFERE, EXEMPT OR SUPERSEDE ANY CURRENT PROVISIONS OF AN
EMPLOYEE'S EXISTING COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT WHICH PROVIDES
GREATER RIGHTS AND PROTECTIONS THAN PRESCRIBED IN THIS ARTICLE NOR SHALL
THIS ARTICLE PREVENT ANY NEW PROVISIONS OF THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
AGREEMENT WHICH PROVIDE GREATER RIGHTS AND PROTECTIONS FROM BEING IMPLE-
MENTED AND APPLICABLE TO SUCH EMPLOYEE WITHIN SUCH COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
AGREEMENT. WHERE THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT PROVIDES GREATER
RIGHTS AND PROTECTIONS THAN PRESCRIBED IN THIS ARTICLE, THE RECOGNIZED
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGENT MAY OPT TO ACCEPT OR REJECT TO BE COVERED BY
THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE.
§ 769-A. EFFECT OF OTHER LAWS. 1. NO PROVISION OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL
BE DEEMED TO EXEMPT ANY PERSON OR ENTITY FROM ANY LIABILITY, DUTY OR
PENALTY PROVIDED BY ANY OTHER STATE LAW, RULE OR REGULATION.
2. THE REMEDIES PROVIDED IN THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE IN ADDITION TO ANY
REMEDIES PROVIDED UNDER ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, AND NOTHING IN THIS
ARTICLE SHALL RELIEVE ANY PERSON FROM ANY LIABILITY, DUTY, PENALTY OR
PUNISHMENT PROVIDED BY ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, EXCEPT THAT IF AN
EMPLOYEE RECEIVES WORKERS' COMPENSATION FOR MEDICAL COSTS FOR THE SAME
INJURY OR ILLNESS PURSUANT TO BOTH THIS ARTICLE AND THE WORKERS' COMPEN-
SATION LAW, OR COMPENSATION UNDER BOTH THIS ARTICLE AND SUCH LAW IN CASH
PAYMENTS FOR THE SAME PERIOD OF TIME NOT WORKING AS A RESULT OF THE
COMPENSABLE INJURY OR ILLNESS OR THE UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE, THE
PAYMENTS OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION SHALL BE REIMBURSED FROM DAMAGES PAID
UNDER THIS ARTICLE.
§ 3. This act shall take effect immediately, and shall apply to
abusive conduct occurring on or after such date.