BILL NUMBER: S2238

SPONSOR: GOUNARDES
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the tax law, in relation to the school tax reduction
credit for residents of a city with a population over one million, and
implementing a child tax credit for residents of such cities

 
PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL:

To phase out the highly regressive New York City school tax credit above
certain income thresholds in favor of a new, progressive New York City
child tax credit

 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section one of this bill amends subsection (ggg) of Section 606 of the
Tax Law to phase out the New York City school tax credit at a rate of
five percent for incomes exceeding $75,000, or $150,000 if married
filing jointly.

              

Section two of this bill creates a new subsection (qqq) in Section 606
of the Tax Law to create a new New York City child tax credit (CTC) of
$300 per child, which would phase out a rate of five percent for incomes
exceeding $75,000, or $150,000 if married filing jointly. The new NYC
child tax credit would be available for all filers with a Social Securi-
ty Number or an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number and would be
fully refundable.

Section three directs the Commissioner of Taxation and Finance to publi-
cize the new NYC CTC.

Section four sets the effective date.

 
JUSTIFICATION:

In 1997, then-Governor George Pataki and the New York State legislature
established the School Tax Relief (STAR) program, which provides either
a property tax credit or exemption to certain income-eligible homeown-
ers. The STAR program, which is administered by the NYS Department of
Taxation and Finance, was created to shift a portion of local educa-
tional tax burdens from individual school districts to the state, as
schools are funded in most areas of the state from property taxes levied
directly by a local board of education (BOE) or municipal government.
When property owners receive relief from the STAR program, thus remit-
ting fewer taxes to a local government or a school district than they
otherwise would, the state will make the locality or district whole by
reimbursing them out of a school tax relief fund funded directly from
state personal income tax revenues (Melamed, Lisa Sturman, et al.
"School Tax Relief (STAR) in New York City." New York City Independent
Budget Office, 9 Sept.  2024,
www.ibo.nyc.ny.us/iboreports/StarConferencePaper.html. Accessed 18 Dec.
2024.)

While laudable in its aims, then-Governor Pataki and the legislature
found the STAR program to be an insufficient means of shifting the
educational burden from New York City taxpayers for a number of reasons.
Firstly, New York City property taxes flow to the City's general fund,
alongside other major revenue sources such as sales tax, the city income
tax, and fines and fees (in fact, property taxes account for only 31% of
the total NYC budget, in contrast to many localities upstate where they
routinely make up more than 50% of the budget (Understanding New York
City's Budget: A Guide. New York City Independent Budget Office, July
2021). New York City then in turn funds its public schools from the
general fund (education spending currently accounts for around 29% of
total spending) - resulting in a very different funding model than
exists in much of the rest of the state, where a local BOE levies school
taxes directly on local property owners.

Secondly, while STAR is an effective means of providing targeted relief
to certain property taxpayers in NYC, that are relatively few homeowners
in the city compared to the rest of the state: the State Comptroller
reports homeownership rates across the five boroughs ranging from 20% in
the Bronx to 45% in Queens, falling far below the state average of 53.6%
("Homeownership Rates in New York I Office of the New York State Comp-
troller." Www.osc.ny.gov, New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli,
Oct. 2022, wwvv.osc.nv.gov/reports/homeownership-rates-new-vork.). Home-
owner rates in 35 other counties, in contrast, exceed 70%. This means
that the 80% of filers in the Bronx, for example, who do not own a home
receive no relief despite contributing to local educational spending
through their remittance of the city personal income tax (PIT) which
flows to the city's general fund.

As the NYC Independent Budget Office (IBO) notes, the implication of all
of the above is that "while a far greater share of households elsewhere
in the state see their school tax burdens meaningfully reduced by STAR,
property tax relief in the city allows a minority of city households to
enjoy only modest relief from their school tax burden." (Melamed, Lisa
Sturman, et al. "School Tax Relief (STAR) in New York City." New York
City Independent Budget Office, 9 Sept.  2024,
www.ibo.nyc.ny.us/iboreports/StarConferencePaper.html. Accessed 18 Dec.
2024.) Real property tax exemptions and credits alone, such as those
delivered through the STAR program, are not an effective means of
providing relief to all of the New York City residents who finance
public education across the five boroughs.

Due to the city's unique education funding structure, the legislature
thus decided in 1997 to offer an additional measure of relief to city
taxpayers: a New York City school tax credit (STC), which reduces the
amount of city personal income tax (PIT) that city taxpayers owe to the
city's coffers. Just as with the STAR program, the state then reimburses
the city for this foregone PIT revenue. While a creative supplement to
the STAR program, NYC's STC is deeply regressive, delivering virtually
all of its support to the highest earners. This is because the STC
consists of two main components: a "fixed" school tax credit of $62.50,
or $125 if married filing jointly, along with a "rate reduction" that
provides a higher percentage discount to higher income bands. For
married filing jointly taxpayers, for example, the STC is only 0.171% of
city taxable income for filers making $12,600 or less - but 0.228%, plus
$37, for filers making more than this amount. A similar rate structure
applies to head of household, single, and married filing separately
taxpayers as well.

While there are a variety of taxpayers across the five boroughs in
urgent need of relief from the city's PIT, which almost no other locali-
ty in New York State imposes, the STC is structured in the complete
opposite manner from most other credits in the state and city tax code,
which generally confer a higher benefit to the lowest-income filers.
This bill thus repeals the STC above certain city taxable income thresh-
olds and redirects this state spending to a new, highly progressive New
York City child tax credit instead.  Under this bill, the STC would be
maintained as is for all filers making $75,000, or $150,000 if married
filing jointly, and would then begin to phase out at a rate of five
percent. The state would then use the savings generated from this phase-
out to create a new $300 child tax credit for all city filers with
dependents aged 0 - 17, which would also begin to phase out at a rate of
five percent at $75,000/$150,000. The credit would be fully refundable
and available to be claimed on a per-child basis for all children with
either a Social Security Number (SSN) or an Individual Taxpayer Iden-
tification Number (ITIN). Under this proposal, all parents with one
child making $78,000, or $153,000 if married filing jointly, will be
better off compared to the status quo, as they would be keeping a
version of their existing STC while also being able to claim the new
CTC.  This bill will provide critical relief to low- and middle-income
parents in New York City, helping avoid spells of poverty that are often
induced by the arrival of a newborn. It better targets money that the
state is already spending, reducing our dependence on a poorly designed,
highly regressive school tax credit that rewards only the highest-income
filers. Furthermore, by pairing a partial repeal of the STC with a new
$300 per-child tax credit for all New York City parents making up to
$75,000, or $150,000 if married filing jointly, this bill will ensure we
are providing much-needed support to the families that need it the most
while minimizing any additional fiscal cost to the state.

 
PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

None

 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

TBD

 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect immediately and shall apply to taxable years
beginning after the effective date of this act.