Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
Jan 08, 2025 |
referred to codes |
Senate Bill S464
2025-2026 Legislative Session
Sponsored By
(D, WF) 47th Senate District
Current Bill Status - In Senate Committee Codes Committee
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Delivered to Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
co-Sponsors
(D) 36th Senate District
(D) 20th Senate District
(D, WF) 18th Senate District
(D) 32nd Senate District
2025-S464 (ACTIVE) - Details
2025-S464 (ACTIVE) - Summary
Establishes an assumption of the inadmissibility of evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic expression against such defendant in a criminal proceeding; requires the proffering party to affirmatively prove that the evidence is admissible by clear and convincing evidence.
2025-S464 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 464 2025-2026 Regular Sessions I N S E N A T E (PREFILED) January 8, 2025 ___________ Introduced by Sen. HOYLMAN-SIGAL -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to rules of evidence concerning the admissibility of evidence of a defendant's creative expression THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new section 60.77 to read as follows: § 60.77 RULES OF EVIDENCE; ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE OF DEFENDANT'S CREATIVE EXPRESSION. 1. EVIDENCE OF A DEFENDANT'S CREATIVE OR ARTISTIC EXPRESSION, WHETHER ORIGINAL OR DERIVATIVE, MAY NOT BE RECEIVED INTO EVIDENCE AGAINST SUCH DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING UNLESS SUCH EVIDENCE IS DETERMINED BY THE COURT TO BE RELEVANT AND ADMISSIBLE, AFTER AN OFFER OF PROOF BY THE PROPONENT OF SUCH EVIDENCE OUTSIDE THE HEARING OF THE JURY, OR SUCH HEARING AS THE COURT MAY REQUIRE, AND AN ON-THE-RECORD STATEMENT BY THE COURT OF THE FINDINGS OF FACT ESSENTIAL TO ITS DETERMINATION. 2. IN ORDER TO OVERCOME THE PRESUMPTION OF INADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE OF DEFENDANT'S CREATIVE EXPRESSION, THE PROFFERING PARTY MUST AFFIRMA- TIVELY PROVE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE: (A) LITERAL, RATHER THAN FIGURATIVE OR FICTIONAL, MEANING AND, WHERE THE WORK IS DERIVATIVE, THAT THE DEFENDANT INTENDED TO ADOPT THE LITERAL MEANING OF THE WORK AS THE DEFENDANT'S OWN THOUGHT OR STATEMENT; (B) A STRONG FACTUAL NEXUS INDICATING THAT THE CREATIVE EXPRESSION REFERS TO THE SPECIFIC FACTS OF THE CRIME ALLEGED; (C) RELEVANCE TO AN ISSUE OF FACT THAT IS DISPUTED; AND (D) DISTINCT PROBATIVE VALUE NOT PROVIDED BY OTHER ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD00146-01-5
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.