NY State Senate Bill 2025-S7194

Senate Bill S7194

2025-2026 Legislative Session

Relates to owner liability for failure of an operator to comply with stop signs in the village of Round Lake, county of Saratoga

download bill text pdf

Current Bill Status - In Senate Committee Transportation Committee

Introduced
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
Delivered to Governor
Signed By Governor

Please enter your contact information

First Name

Last Name

Email Address

A valid email address is required.

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Actions

View Actions

	Assembly Actions - Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Apr 03, 2025	referred to transportation

2025-S7194 (ACTIVE) - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A7608
Current Committee:: Senate Transportation
Law Section:: Vehicle and Traffic Law
Laws Affected:: Add §1172-a, V & T L; amd §87, Pub Off L

2025-S7194 (ACTIVE) - Summary

Authorizes the village of Round Lake, county of Saratoga to establish a demonstration program imposing monetary liability on the owner of a vehicle for failure of an operator thereof to stop for a stop sign in such village.

2025-S7194 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

                                 
BILL NUMBER: S7194

SPONSOR: TEDISCO
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the vehicle and traffic law and the public officers law,
in relation to owner liability for failure of an operator to comply with
stop signs in the village of Round Lake, county of Saratoga; and provid-
ing for the repeal of such provisions upon expiration thereof

 
PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL:

To authorize the village of Round Lake to adopt a local law establishing
a stop sign photo violation monitoring demonstration program to impose
monetary liability on the owner of a vehicle for failure of the operator
thereof to stop for a stop sign in the village.

 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section one adds section 1172-a to the vehicle and traffic law to estab-
lish a stop sign photo violation monitoring demonstration program to
impose monetary liability on the owner of a vehicle for failure of the

operator thereof to stop for a stop sign in the village. Section two
amends section 87. of the public officers law to add subdivision (2)(v)
to prohibit the release of any photographs, microphotographs, videotape
or other recorded prepared under authority of VTL § 1172-a, such as
images identifying the driver, passengers or contents of a vehicle.
Section three establishes the effective date and repeal date of the act.

 
JUSTIFICATION:

There are a number Of intersections in the Village of Round Lake where
drivers often seek to "cut through" the Village to avoid other, busier
roadways. Unfortunately, it is also common for such drivers to fail to
come to a full stop at the stop signs in those intersections.  The
Village has sought to slow drivers down by installing speed bumps and a
flashing stop light and has also periodically introduced a steady police
presence, to limited effect. Each of the relevant intersections is also
a school bus stop, and kids in the village need to cross George Avenue
to reach the very popular Malta/Round Lake Little League ballfield. Per
NYSDOT, the average daily volume on George Avenue is 1600 vehicles and
villagers routinely witness drivers ignoring the stop signs. Initiating
this demonstration program will enable the Village to begin consistently
imposing penalties on drivers that fail to observe the stop signs and
put pedestrians at risk.

 
PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

New bill.

 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:

To be determined.

 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall have
become a law and shall expire and be deemed repealed five years after
such date.

2025-S7194 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

                             
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                   7194
 
                        2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                               April 3, 2025
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by  Sen. TEDISCO -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
   printed to be committed to the Committee on Transportation
 
 AN ACT to amend the vehicle and traffic law and the public officers law,
   in relation to owner liability for failure of an  operator  to  comply
   with  stop signs in the village of Round Lake, county of Saratoga; and
   providing for the repeal of such provisions upon expiration thereof
 
   THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section  1.  The  vehicle  and  traffic law is amended by adding a new
 section 1172-a to read as follows:
   § 1172-A. OWNER LIABILITY FOR FAILURE OF OPERATOR TO STOP FOR  A  STOP
 SIGN.  (A) 1. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, THE VILLAGE OF
 ROUND LAKE, COUNTY OF SARATOGA, IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED  AND  EMPOWERED  TO
 ADOPT  AND  AMEND  A LOCAL LAW OR ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A DEMONSTRATION
 PROGRAM IMPOSING MONETARY LIABILITY ON THE OWNER OF A VEHICLE FOR  FAIL-
 URE  OF  AN  OPERATOR THEREOF TO STOP FOR A STOP SIGN IN SUCH VILLAGE IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE  PROVISIONS  OF  THIS  SECTION.  SUCH  DEMONSTRATION
 PROGRAM  SHALL  EMPOWER  SUCH  VILLAGE  TO INSTALL AND OPERATE STOP SIGN
 PHOTO VIOLATION MONITORING DEVICES AT NO MORE  THAN  FIVE  INTERSECTIONS
 WITHIN  AND  UNDER  THE  JURISDICTION  OF  SUCH VILLAGE AT ANY ONE TIME;
 PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT WHERE ONE OF THE TWO HIGHWAYS JOINING ONE ANOTH-
 ER AT SUCH INTERSECTION IS A STATE HIGHWAY MAINTAINED BY THE STATE, SUCH
 VILLAGE MAY INSTALL AND OPERATE SUCH STOP SIGN PHOTO VIOLATION  MONITOR-
 ING  DEVICE  IN  A  MANNER AFFECTING TRAFFIC PROCEEDING ALONG SUCH STATE
 HIGHWAY AT SUCH INTERSECTION IF IT HAS OBTAINED APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM
 THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, AND THE DEPARTMENT  OF  TRANSPORTATION
 MAY AT ANY TIME RESCIND OR MODIFY SUCH APPROVAL.
   2.  SUCH DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM SHALL UTILIZE NECESSARY TECHNOLOGIES TO
 ENSURE, TO THE EXTENT PRACTICABLE, THAT  PHOTOGRAPHS  PRODUCED  BY  SUCH
 STOP  SIGN  PHOTO  VIOLATION MONITORING DEVICES SHALL NOT INCLUDE IMAGES
 THAT IDENTIFY THE DRIVER, THE PASSENGERS, OR THE CONTENTS OF  THE  VEHI-
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                            LBD11162-02-5

 S. 7194                             2
 
 CLE.   PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT NO NOTICE OF LIABILITY ISSUED PURSUANT TO
 THIS SECTION SHALL BE DISMISSED SOLELY BECAUSE A  PHOTOGRAPH  OR  PHOTO-
 GRAPHS  ALLOW  FOR  THE  IDENTIFICATION  OF  THE  CONTENTS OF A VEHICLE,
 PROVIDED  THAT  SUCH VILLAGE HAS MADE A REASONABLE EFFORT TO COMPLY WITH
 THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PARAGRAPH.
   (B) IN ANY SUCH VILLAGE WHICH HAS ADOPTED A  LOCAL  LAW  OR  ORDINANCE
 PURSUANT  TO  SUBDIVISION  (A)  OF  THIS SECTION, THE OWNER OF A VEHICLE
 SHALL BE LIABLE FOR A PENALTY IMPOSED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION  IF  SUCH
 VEHICLE  WAS  USED OR OPERATED WITH THE PERMISSION OF THE OWNER, EXPRESS
 OR IMPLIED, IN VIOLATION OF SUBDIVISION (A) OF  SECTION  ELEVEN  HUNDRED
 SEVENTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE, AND SUCH VIOLATION IS EVIDENCED BY INFORMA-
 TION  OBTAINED  FROM  A  STOP  SIGN  PHOTO  VIOLATION MONITORING DEVICE;
 PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT NO OWNER OF A VEHICLE SHALL BE LIABLE FOR A PENAL-
 TY IMPOSED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION WHERE THE OPERATOR OF  SUCH  VEHICLE
 HAS  BEEN  CONVICTED  OF  THE UNDERLYING VIOLATION OF SUBDIVISION (A) OF
 SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED SEVENTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE.
   (C) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS  SECTION,  "OWNER"  SHALL  HAVE  THE  MEANING
 PROVIDED IN ARTICLE TWO-B OF THIS CHAPTER. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION,
 "STOP  SIGN  PHOTO  VIOLATION  MONITORING  DEVICE"  SHALL MEAN A VEHICLE
 SENSOR INSTALLED TO WORK IN CONJUNCTION WITH A STOP SIGN WHICH  AUTOMAT-
 ICALLY PRODUCES TWO OR MORE PHOTOGRAPHS, TWO OR MORE MICROPHOTOGRAPHS, A
 VIDEOTAPE  OR  OTHER  RECORDED  IMAGES OF EACH VEHICLE AT THE TIME IT IS
 USED OR OPERATED IN VIOLATION  OF  SUBDIVISION  (A)  OF  SECTION  ELEVEN
 HUNDRED SEVENTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE.
   (D)  A  CERTIFICATE,  SWORN TO OR AFFIRMED BY A TECHNICIAN EMPLOYED BY
 THE VILLAGE OF ROUND LAKE IN WHICH THE CHARGED VIOLATION OCCURRED, OR  A
 FACSIMILE  THEREOF,  BASED  UPON  INSPECTION OF PHOTOGRAPHS, MICROPHOTO-
 GRAPHS, VIDEOTAPE OR OTHER RECORDED IMAGES PRODUCED BY A STOP SIGN PHOTO
 VIOLATION MONITORING DEVICE, SHALL BE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE  FACTS
 CONTAINED THEREIN. ANY PHOTOGRAPHS, MICROPHOTOGRAPHS, VIDEOTAPE OR OTHER
 RECORDED  IMAGES  EVIDENCING  SUCH  A  VIOLATION  SHALL BE AVAILABLE FOR
 INSPECTION IN ANY  PROCEEDING  TO  ADJUDICATE  THE  LIABILITY  FOR  SUCH
 VIOLATION  PURSUANT TO A LOCAL LAW OR ORDINANCE ADOPTED PURSUANT TO THIS
 SECTION.
   (E) AN OWNER LIABLE FOR A VIOLATION  OF  SUBDIVISION  (A)  OF  SECTION
 ELEVEN  HUNDRED  SEVENTY-TWO  OF THIS ARTICLE PURSUANT TO A LOCAL LAW OR
 ORDINANCE ADOPTED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION SHALL BE LIABLE FOR  MONETARY
 PENALTIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SCHEDULE OF FINES AND PENALTIES TO BE SET
 FORTH  IN SUCH LOCAL LAW OR ORDINANCE. THE LIABILITY OF THE OWNER PURSU-
 ANT TO THIS SECTION SHALL NOT EXCEED FIFTY DOLLARS FOR  EACH  VIOLATION;
 PROVIDED,  HOWEVER,  THAT SUCH LOCAL LAW OR ORDINANCE MAY PROVIDE FOR AN
 ADDITIONAL PENALTY  NOT  IN  EXCESS  OF  TWENTY-FIVE  DOLLARS  FOR  EACH
 VIOLATION FOR THE FAILURE TO RESPOND TO A NOTICE OF LIABILITY WITHIN THE
 PRESCRIBED TIME PERIOD.
   (F)  AN IMPOSITION OF LIABILITY UNDER A LOCAL LAW OR ORDINANCE ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION SHALL NOT BE DEEMED A CONVICTION AS AN OPERATOR
 AND SHALL NOT BE MADE PART OF THE OPERATING RECORD OF  THE  PERSON  UPON
 WHOM  SUCH  LIABILITY  IS  IMPOSED  NOR  SHALL  IT BE USED FOR INSURANCE
 PURPOSES IN THE PROVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE COVERAGE.
   (G) 1. A NOTICE OF LIABILITY SHALL BE SENT BY FIRST CLASS MAIL TO EACH
 PERSON ALLEGED TO BE LIABLE AS AN OWNER FOR A VIOLATION  OF  SUBDIVISION
 (A)  OF  SECTION  ELEVEN HUNDRED SEVENTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE PURSUANT TO
 THIS SECTION. PERSONAL DELIVERY ON THE OWNER SHALL NOT  BE  REQUIRED.  A
 MANUAL OR AUTOMATIC RECORD OF MAILING PREPARED IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF
 BUSINESS SHALL BE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE FACTS CONTAINED THEREIN.
 S. 7194                             3
 
   2.  A  NOTICE  OF  LIABILITY SHALL CONTAIN THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE
 PERSON ALLEGED TO BE LIABLE AS AN OWNER FOR A VIOLATION  OF  SUBDIVISION
 (A)  OF  SECTION  ELEVEN HUNDRED SEVENTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE PURSUANT TO
 THIS SECTION, THE REGISTRATION NUMBER OF THE VEHICLE  INVOLVED  IN  SUCH
 VIOLATION,  THE  LOCATION  WHERE SUCH VIOLATION TOOK PLACE, THE DATE AND
 TIME OF SUCH VIOLATION AND THE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER OF THE CAMERA WHICH
 RECORDED THE VIOLATION OR OTHER DOCUMENT LOCATOR NUMBER.
   3. THE NOTICE OF LIABILITY  SHALL  CONTAIN  INFORMATION  ADVISING  THE
 PERSON  CHARGED OF THE MANNER AND THE TIME IN WHICH THEY MAY CONTEST THE
 LIABILITY ALLEGED IN THE NOTICE. SUCH NOTICE  OF  LIABILITY  SHALL  ALSO
 CONTAIN  A WARNING TO ADVISE THE PERSONS CHARGED THAT FAILURE TO CONTEST
 IN THE MANNER AND TIME PROVIDED SHALL BE DEEMED AN ADMISSION OF  LIABIL-
 ITY AND THAT A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE ENTERED THEREON.
   4. THE NOTICE OF LIABILITY SHALL BE PREPARED AND MAILED BY THE VILLAGE
 OF  ROUND  LAKE  OR  BY  ANY  OTHER ENTITY AUTHORIZED BY SUCH VILLAGE TO
 PREPARE AND MAIL SUCH NOTIFICATION OF VIOLATION.
   (H) ADJUDICATION OF THE LIABILITY IMPOSED UPON OWNERS BY THIS  SECTION
 SHALL  BE BY A TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS BUREAU ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION
 THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW OR, IF THERE BE NONE,
 BY THE COURT HAVING JURISDICTION OVER TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS.
   (I) IF AN OWNER RECEIVES  A  NOTICE  OF  LIABILITY  PURSUANT  TO  THIS
 SECTION FOR ANY TIME PERIOD DURING WHICH THE VEHICLE WAS REPORTED TO THE
 POLICE  DEPARTMENT AS HAVING BEEN STOLEN, IT SHALL BE A VALID DEFENSE TO
 AN ALLEGATION OF LIABILITY FOR A VIOLATION OF SUBDIVISION (A) OF SECTION
 ELEVEN HUNDRED SEVENTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION THAT
 THE VEHICLE HAD BEEN REPORTED TO THE POLICE AS STOLEN PRIOR TO THE  TIME
 THE  VIOLATION  OCCURRED  AND  HAD  NOT BEEN RECOVERED BY SUCH TIME. FOR
 PURPOSES OF ASSERTING THE DEFENSE PROVIDED BY THIS SUBDIVISION IT  SHALL
 BE  SUFFICIENT  THAT A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE POLICE REPORT ON THE STOLEN
 VEHICLE BE SENT BY FIRST CLASS MAIL TO THE TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS BUREAU  OR
 COURT HAVING JURISDICTION.
   (J) AN OWNER WHO IS A LESSOR OF A VEHICLE TO WHICH A NOTICE OF LIABIL-
 ITY  WAS ISSUED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (G) OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT BE
 LIABLE FOR THE VIOLATION OF SUBDIVISION (A) OF  SECTION  ELEVEN  HUNDRED
 SEVENTY-TWO  OF  THIS  ARTICLE,  PROVIDED  THAT THEY SEND TO THE TRAFFIC
 VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR COURT HAVING JURISDICTION A  COPY  OF  THE  RENTAL,
 LEASE  OR OTHER SUCH CONTRACT DOCUMENT COVERING SUCH VEHICLE ON THE DATE
 OF THE VIOLATION, WITH THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE LESSEE CLEARLY  LEGI-
 BLE,  WITHIN THIRTY-SEVEN DAYS AFTER RECEIVING NOTICE FROM THE BUREAU OR
 COURT OF THE DATE AND TIME OF SUCH VIOLATION, TOGETHER  WITH  THE  OTHER
 INFORMATION  CONTAINED  IN  THE ORIGINAL NOTICE OF LIABILITY. FAILURE TO
 SEND SUCH INFORMATION WITHIN SUCH  THIRTY-SEVEN-DAY  TIME  PERIOD  SHALL
 RENDER  THE  OWNER  LIABLE  FOR  THE PENALTY PRESCRIBED BY THIS SECTION.
 WHERE THE LESSOR COMPLIES WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS  SUBDIVISION,  THE
 LESSEE  OF SUCH VEHICLE ON THE DATE OF SUCH VIOLATION SHALL BE DEEMED TO
 BE THE OWNER OF SUCH VEHICLE FOR PURPOSES  OF  THIS  SECTION,  SHALL  BE
 SUBJECT  TO  LIABILITY  FOR  THE VIOLATION OF SUBDIVISION (A) OF SECTION
 ELEVEN HUNDRED SEVENTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION  AND
 SHALL  BE SENT A NOTICE OF LIABILITY PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (G) OF THIS
 SECTION.
   (K) 1. IF THE OWNER LIABLE FOR  A  VIOLATION  OF  SUBDIVISION  (A)  OF
 SECTION  ELEVEN  HUNDRED  SEVENTY-TWO  OF  THIS ARTICLE PURSUANT TO THIS
 SECTION WAS NOT  THE  OPERATOR  OF  THE  VEHICLE  AT  THE  TIME  OF  THE
 VIOLATION,  THE OWNER MAY MAINTAIN AN ACTION FOR INDEMNIFICATION AGAINST
 THE OPERATOR.
 S. 7194                             4
 
   2. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS SECTION, NO OWNER OF  A
 VEHICLE  SHALL  BE  SUBJECT  TO A MONETARY FINE IMPOSED PURSUANT TO THIS
 SECTION IF THE OPERATOR OF SUCH VEHICLE WAS OPERATING SUCH VEHICLE WITH-
 OUT THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER AT THE TIME SUCH OPERATOR  FAILED  TO  STOP
 FOR  A  STOP  SIGN.  FOR  PURPOSES  OF THIS SUBDIVISION THERE SHALL BE A
 PRESUMPTION THAT THE OPERATOR OF SUCH VEHICLE WAS OPERATING SUCH VEHICLE
 WITH THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER AT THE TIME SUCH OPERATOR FAILED  TO  STOP
 FOR A STOP SIGN.
   (L)  NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO LIMIT THE LIABILITY
 OF AN OPERATOR OF A VEHICLE FOR ANY  VIOLATION  OF  SUBDIVISION  (A)  OF
 SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED SEVENTY-TWO OF THIS ARTICLE.
   (M) ANY VILLAGE THAT ADOPTS A DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM PURSUANT TO SUBDI-
 VISION  (A)  OF THIS SECTION SHALL SUBMIT AN ANNUAL REPORT DETAILING THE
 RESULTS OF THE USE OF SUCH STOP SIGN PHOTO VIOLATION MONITORING  DEVICES
 TO  THE  GOVERNOR, THE TEMPORARY PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE AND THE SPEAKER
 OF THE ASSEMBLY ON OR BEFORE THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE NEXT  SUCCEEDING  THE
 EFFECTIVE  DATE  OF THIS SECTION AND ON THE SAME DATE IN EACH SUCCEEDING
 YEAR IN WHICH THE DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM IS OPERABLE.  SUCH REPORT  SHALL
 INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO:
   1.  A  DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  LOCATIONS WHERE STOP SIGN PHOTO VIOLATION
 MONITORING DEVICES WERE USED;
   2. THE AGGREGATE NUMBER, TYPE AND SEVERITY OF  ACCIDENTS  REPORTED  AT
 INTERSECTIONS  WHERE  A  STOP  SIGN PHOTO VIOLATION MONITORING DEVICE IS
 USED FOR THE THREE YEARS PRECEDING THE INSTALLATION OF SUCH DEVICES,  TO
 THE  EXTENT  THE  INFORMATION  IS  MAINTAINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR
 VEHICLES OF THIS STATE;
   3. THE AGGREGATE NUMBER, TYPE AND SEVERITY OF  ACCIDENTS  REPORTED  AT
 INTERSECTIONS  WHERE  A  STOP  SIGN PHOTO VIOLATION MONITORING DEVICE IS
 USED FOR THE REPORTING YEAR, AS WELL AS FOR EACH YEAR THAT THE STOP SIGN
 PHOTO VIOLATION MONITORING DEVICE HAS BEEN OPERATIONAL,  TO  THE  EXTENT
 THE  INFORMATION  IS  MAINTAINED  BY THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF
 THIS STATE;
   4. THE NUMBER OF EVENTS AND NUMBER  OF  VIOLATIONS  RECORDED  AT  EACH
 INTERSECTION WHERE A STOP SIGN PHOTO VIOLATION MONITORING DEVICE IS USED
 AND IN THE AGGREGATE ON A DAILY, WEEKLY AND MONTHLY BASIS;
   5.  THE  NUMBER OF NOTICES OF LIABILITY ISSUED FOR VIOLATIONS RECORDED
 BY SUCH SYSTEM AT EACH INTERSECTION WHERE A STOP  SIGN  PHOTO  VIOLATION
 MONITORING DEVICE IS USED;
   6.  THE  NUMBER  OF FINES IMPOSED AND TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINES PAID AFTER
 FIRST NOTICE OF LIABILITY;
   7. THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF VIOLATIONS ADJUDICATED AND RESULTS  OF
 SUCH   ADJUDICATIONS  INCLUDING  BREAKDOWNS  OF  DISPOSITIONS  MADE  FOR
 VIOLATIONS RECORDED BY SUCH DEVICES WHICH SHALL  BE  PROVIDED  AT  LEAST
 ANNUALLY TO SUCH VILLAGE BY THE RESPECTIVE COURTS AND BUREAUS CONDUCTING
 SUCH ADJUDICATIONS;
   8.  THE  TOTAL  AMOUNT  OF  REVENUE REALIZED BY SUCH VILLAGE FROM SUCH
 ADJUDICATIONS INCLUDING A BREAKDOWN OF REVENUE REALIZED BY SUCH  VILLAGE
 FOR EACH YEAR SINCE DEPLOYMENT OF ITS STOP SIGN PHOTO VIOLATION MONITOR-
 ING DEVICES;
   9.  EXPENSES  INCURRED BY SUCH VILLAGE IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROGRAM;
 AND
   10. QUALITY OF THE ADJUDICATION PROCESS AND ITS RESULTS WHICH SHALL BE
 PROVIDED AT LEAST ANNUALLY TO SUCH VILLAGE BY THE RESPECTIVE COURTS  AND
 BUREAUS CONDUCTING SUCH ADJUDICATIONS.
   § 2. Subdivision 2 of section 87 of the public officers law is amended
 by adding a new paragraph (v) to read as follows:
 S. 7194                             5
 
   (V)  ARE  PHOTOGRAPHS,  MICROPHOTOGRAPHS,  VIDEOTAPE OR OTHER RECORDED
 IMAGES PREPARED UNDER AUTHORITY OF SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED  SEVENTY-TWO-A
 OF THE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW.
   §  3.  This  act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall
 have become a law and shall expire and be  deemed  repealed  five  years
 after such date.

Comments

Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.

Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.