NY State Senate Bill 2011-S3187

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Judiciary Committee

Introduced
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
Delivered to Governor
Signed By Governor

Please enter your contact information

First Name

Last Name

Email Address

A valid email address is required.

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Actions

View Actions

	Assembly Actions - Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Jan 04, 2012	referred to judiciary
Mar 08, 2011	committee discharged and committed to judiciary
Feb 11, 2011	referred to codes

co-Sponsors

2011-S3187 (ACTIVE) - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A4381
Current Committee:: Senate Judiciary
Law Section:: Civil Practice Law and Rules
Laws Affected:: Amd §§3012-a, 1600, 1601 & 3101, add Art 50-C §§5051 & 5052, rpld §3101 sub (d) ¶1 sub¶ (ii), CPLR
Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:: 2009-2010: A6184
2013-2014: A3335
2015-2016: A5648
2017-2018: A4913
2019-2020: A4897

2011-S3187 (ACTIVE) - Summary

Enacts the "medical liability reform act"; requires attorney for plaintiff in a medical, dental or podiatric malpractice case to include with the certificate of merit, an affidavit of an appropriate medical professional licensed in this state stating that there is a reasonable basis for such malpractice action; failure to file will result in dismissal; modifies limited liability of persons jointly liable

2011-S3187 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

                                BILL NUMBER:S3187               REVISED 02/15/11

TITLE OF BILL:
An act
to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to enacting the
"medical liability reform act";
and to repeal subparagraph (ii) of paragraph 1 of subdivision (d) of
section 3101 of such law and rules relating to disclosure of expert
witnesses in medical, dental and podiatric medical malpractice actions

PURPOSE:
The purpose of this legislation is to reform the Civil
Practice Law and Rules in regards to medical liability.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:
§ 1 -Title. "Medical Liability Reform Act."

§ 2 - Adds the requirement of an affidavit from a physician concluding
that there is a reasonable basis for the commencement of an action,
with such affidavit to accompany the certificate required by this
section, with caveats.

§ 3 - Repeals the definition of "non-economic loss" and replaces it
with definitions for "noneconomic damages" and "actual economic
damages."

§ 4 - Amends § 1601 of the CPLR to make equitable share regardless of
whether a defendant was less that fifty percent liable, as determined
in accordance with the relative culpability of each defendant.

§ 5 - Adds Article 50-C, limitation on non-economic damages to the
CPLR.

§ 6 - Amends § 3101 of the CPLR removes the exception that allows the
omission of the names of medical, dental or podiatric experts from
production materials concerning experts testifying at trial.

§ 7 - Replaces clause (ii) of paragraph I of subdivision (d) of § 3101
of the CPLR to require that, in an action for medical, dental or
podiatric malpractice, the report shall contain a complete statement
of all opinions to be expressed, the basis and reasons therefor; the
data or other information considered by such person in forming the
opinions; any exhibits to be used as a summary of or support for the
opinions; the qualifications of the person, including a list of all
publications authored by the person during the preceding ten years;
the compensation to be paid for the person's consideration of data or
other information and for his or her testimony; and a listing of any
other cases in which the person has testified as an expert at trial
or by oral deposition within the preceding four years. Additionally,
this bill requires a party to produce such expert for an EBT, in
accordance with rule 3107 of the CPLR. unless manifest injustice
would result, the court shall
require that the party noticing an oral deposition of such an expert
witness pay such witness a reasonable fee for time spent in attending
such oral deposition. Violation of these provisions shall preclude a
party from offering such expert's testimony at the trial of the action.


§ 8 - Effective date.

EXISTING LAW:
Amends § 3012-a, § 1600, § 1601 of and adds article 50-C
to the CPLR.

JUSTIFICATION:
The cost of medical malpractice liability insurance
coverage in the state of New York have increased steadily for several
years, increasing between 55-80% between 2003 and 2008 and an
additional 5% in July 2010. Such unsustainable cost increases not
only threatens access to care for patients, it also has driven up the
cost of health care for the public. Notably, former Lieutenant
Governor Richard Ravitch highlighted in a September 2010 report the
need for medical liability reform as one necessary component to
reduce New York's extraordinary Medicaid cost burden. Several recent
studies have detailed the billions of dollars in health care costs
that are unnecessarily spent each year due to the practice of
"defensive medicine", such as unnecessary MRIs, CT scans and
specialty referrals.

These enormous costs are driven by an unpredictable medical liability
adjudication system that numerous studies have concluded results in
cases where awards are made despite the absence of any negligence
whatsoever. While an overwhelming majority of medical liability cases
brought result in no payment, even the costs of defending these cases
are extensive and significantly add to the astronomical cost of
medical liability insurance.

This bill makes medical malpractice liability reform in several
important ways.

The bill provides a true mechanism for removing frivolous claims from
the dockets of New York's court rooms. Fewer non-meritorious claims
will be advanced in the state, by adding the requirement of an
affidavit of merit, signed by a physician, and providing a judge the
tools to remove a malpractice claim for failure to comply with the
provisions of this amended section.

To bring down the amount of judgments in medical malpractice claims,
the bill necessarily establishes statutory language for "noneconomic,
damages" and "actual economic damages" in order to facilitate the
$250,000 cap on noneconomic damages for which this bill provides.
There are 30 states that have enacted some form of a cap on
non-economic awards in medical liability actions, including
California and Texas. The effect in premium has been significant.
California physicians pay far less than what New York physicians pay
for liability premiums, in Texas, physicians have seen significant
reductions in their liability insurance costs since the enactment of
a cap in their state in 2003, as well as a significant increase in
physician license applications.

Additionally, the bill links a defendant's monetary liability to their
equitable share in accordance with the relative culpability.

This bill expands the Scope of production in regards to expert
witnesses and their testimony, including identity, which a party must


disclose upon request by its opposition. This bill is necessary to
facilitate meaningful reform of medical malpractice liability.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
2009-2010: A.6184/S.6799
2007-2008: A.3139/S.2144
2005-2006: A.5674/S.3035
2003-2004: A.9599/S.469-A.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.

EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect immediately, except that
sections 2, 3, 6 and 7 of this act shall take effect 90 days after
this act shall have become a law and shall be applicable to actions
commenced and claims filed on and after such date. Sections 4 and 5
of this act shall be applicable to causes of action and claims on and
after this effective date.

2011-S3187 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

                            
                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                  3187

                       2011-2012 Regular Sessions

                            I N  S E N A T E

                            February 11, 2011
                               ___________

Introduced  by  Sen.  HANNON -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
  printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes

AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to  enact-
  ing  the  "medical  liability  reform act"; and to repeal subparagraph
  (ii) of paragraph 1 of subdivision (d) of section 3101 of such law and
  rules relating to disclosure of expert witnesses  in  medical,  dental
  and podiatric medical malpractice actions

  THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may  be  cited  as
the "medical liability reform act".
  S 2. Section 3012-a of the civil practice law and rules, as amended by
chapter 507 of the laws of 1987, is amended to read as follows:
  S  3012-a. Certificate of merit in medical, dental and podiatric malp-
ractice actions. (a) In any action  for  medical,  dental  or  podiatric
malpractice,  the  complaint  shall  be  accompanied  by  a certificate,
executed by the attorney for the plaintiff, declaring that:
  (1) the attorney has reviewed the facts of the case and has  consulted
with at least one physician in medical malpractice actions, at least one
dentist  in  dental  malpractice  actions  or at least one podiatrist in
podiatric malpractice actions who is licensed to practice in this  state
[or  any  other state] and who the attorney reasonably believes is know-
ledgeable in the relevant issues involved in the particular action,  AND
WHO  HAS SIGNED AN AFFIDAVIT CONCLUDING THAT THERE IS A REASONABLE BASIS
FOR THE COMMENCEMENT OF AN ACTION, WITH SUCH AFFIDAVIT TO ACCOMPANY  THE
CERTIFICATE  REQUIRED  BY  THIS  SECTION,  and  that  the  attorney  has
concluded on the basis of such review [and], consultation AND  AFFIDAVIT
that there is a reasonable basis for the commencement of such action; or
  (2)  the  attorney was unable to obtain the consultation AND AFFIDAVIT
required by paragraph one of this subdivision because  a  limitation  of
time,  established  by article two of this chapter, would bar the action

 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD08781-01-1

S. 3187                             2

and that the certificate required by paragraph one of  this  subdivision
could  not reasonably be obtained before such time expired. If a certif-
icate is executed pursuant to this subdivision, the certificate required
by  this  section shall be filed within ninety days after service of the
complaint; or
  (3) the attorney was unable to obtain the consultation  AND  AFFIDAVIT
required  by  paragraph one of this subdivision because the attorney had
made three separate good faith attempts with three separate  physicians,
dentists  or podiatrists, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph
one of this subdivision to obtain such consultation and  none  of  those
contacted would agree to such a consultation.
  (b) Where a certificate is required pursuant to this section, a single
certificate  shall  be  filed  for  each  action,  even if more than one
defendant has been named in the complaint or is subsequently named.
  (c) Where the attorney intends to rely solely on the doctrine of  "res
ipsa  loquitur", this section shall be inapplicable.  In such cases, the
complaint shall be accompanied by a certificate, executed by the  attor-
ney, declaring that the attorney is solely relying on such doctrine and,
for that reason, is not filing a certificate required by this section.
  (d)  If  a request by the plaintiff for the records of the plaintiff's
medical or dental treatment by the defendants has  been  made  and  such
records  have  not been produced, the plaintiff shall not be required to
serve the certificate required by this section until ninety  days  after
such records have been produced.
  (e)  [For  purposes  of this section, and subject to the provisions of
section thirty-one hundred one of this chapter, an attorney who  submits
a  certificate as required by paragraph one or two of subdivision (a) of
this section and the physician, dentist  or  podiatrist  with  whom  the
attorney consulted shall not be required to disclose the identity of the
physician,  dentist  or  podiatrist  consulted  and the contents of such
consultation; provided, however, that when the] WHEN AN attorney makes a
claim under paragraph three of subdivision (a) of this section  that  he
OR SHE was unable to obtain the required consultation AND AFFIDAVIT with
the physician, dentist or podiatrist, the court may, upon the request of
a  defendant  made  prior  to  compliance  by  the  plaintiff  with  the
provisions of [section thirty-one hundred] ARTICLE  THIRTY-ONE  of  this
chapter,  require  the  attorney  to  divulge  to the court the names of
physicians, dentists or podiatrists refusing such consultation.
  (f) The provisions of this section shall not be applicable to a plain-
tiff who is not represented by an attorney.
  (g) The plaintiff may, in lieu of serving the certificate AND  AFFIDA-
VIT  required  by this section, provide the defendant or defendants with
the information required by paragraph one of subdivision (d) of  section
thirty-one  hundred  one  of  this  chapter  within  the  period of time
prescribed by this section.
  (H) WHERE A CERTIFICATE AND AFFIDAVIT IS  REQUIRED  PURSUANT  TO  THIS
SECTION, THE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE SUCH CERTIFICATE AND AFFIDAVIT SHALL
REQUIRE  THAT  THE  ACTION  BE  DEEMED  A DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT FOR
NEGLECT TO FILE THE ACTION FOR THE PURPOSES OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED  FIVE
OF THIS CHAPTER.
  S  3.  Section  1600  of the civil practice law and rules, as added by
chapter 682 of the laws of 1986, is amended to read as follows:
  S 1600. Definitions. As used in this article [the  term  "non-economic
loss" includes but is not limited to pain and suffering, mental anguish,
loss of consortium or other damages for non-economic loss]:

S. 3187                             3

  1. "NONECONOMIC DAMAGES" MEANS NONPECUNIARY DAMAGES ARISING FROM PAIN,
SUFFERING,  INCONVENIENCE,  PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT OR DISFIGUREMENT, MENTAL
ANGUISH, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, LOSS OF SOCIETY AND COMPANIONSHIP, LOSS  OF
CONSORTIUM, INJURY TO REPUTATION, HUMILIATION AND ALL OTHER NONPECUNIARY
DAMAGES.
  2.  "ACTUAL  ECONOMIC  DAMAGES" MEANS OBJECTIVELY VERIFIABLE PECUNIARY
DAMAGES ARISING FROM MEDICAL EXPENSES AND MEDICAL CARE, LOSS OF EARNINGS
AND EARNING CAPACITY, BURIAL COSTS, LOSS OF USE  OF  PROPERTY,  LOSS  OF
GUIDANCE, COSTS OF REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF PROPERTY, COSTS OF OBTAINING
SUBSTITUTE  DOMESTIC  SERVICES,  LOSS OF EMPLOYMENT, LOSS OF BUSINESS OR
EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES, REHABILITATION SERVICES,  CUSTODIAL  CARE  AND
ALL OTHER PECUNIARY DAMAGES.
  S  4.  Section  1601  of the civil practice law and rules, as added by
chapter 682 of the laws of 1986 and subdivision 1 as amended by  chapter
635 of the laws of 1996, is amended to read as follows:
  S  1601.  Limited  liability  of persons jointly liable.  1.  Notwith-
standing any other provision of law, when a verdict or  decision  in  an
action or claim for personal injury is determined in favor of a claimant
in  an  action  involving two or more tortfeasors jointly liable or in a
claim against the state [and the liability of a defendant is found to be
fifty percent or less of the total liability  assigned  to  all  persons
liable], the liability of [such] A defendant to the claimant for [non-e-
conomic  loss]  THE  CLAIMANT'S  ACTUAL ECONOMIC DAMAGES AND NONECONOMIC
DAMAGES shall not exceed that defendant's equitable share determined  in
accordance  with  the  relative  culpability  of  each person causing or
contributing to the total liability for [non-economic loss]  THE  CLAIM-
ANT'S ACTUAL ECONOMIC DAMAGES AND NONECONOMIC DAMAGES; provided, however
that  the culpable conduct of any person not a party to the action shall
not be considered in determining  any  equitable  share  herein  if  the
claimant  proves  that with due diligence he or she was unable to obtain
jurisdiction over such person in said action (or in a claim against  the
state, in a court of this state); and further provided that the culpable
conduct of any person shall not be considered in determining any equita-
ble share herein to the extent that action against such person is barred
because  the  claimant  has not sustained a "grave injury" as defined in
section eleven of the workers' compensation law.
  2. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect or impair  any
right  of  a  tortfeasor under section 15-108 of the general obligations
law.
  S 5. The civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a new arti-
cle 50-C to read as follows:
                               ARTICLE 50-C
                        LIMITATION ON NONECONOMIC
                                 DAMAGES
SECTION 5051. DEFINITIONS.
        5052. DAMAGE AWARDS.
  S 5051. DEFINITIONS. AS USED IN THIS ARTICLE:
  1. "NONECONOMIC DAMAGES" MEANS NONPECUNIARY DAMAGES ARISING FROM PAIN,
SUFFERING, INCONVENIENCE, PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT OR  DISFIGUREMENT,  MENTAL
ANGUISH,  EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, LOSS OF SOCIETY AND COMPANIONSHIP, LOSS OF
CONSORTIUM, INJURY TO REPUTATION, HUMILIATION AND ALL OTHER NONPECUNIARY
DAMAGES.
  2. "ACTUAL ECONOMIC DAMAGES" MEANS  OBJECTIVELY  VERIFIABLE  PECUNIARY
DAMAGES ARISING FROM MEDICAL EXPENSES AND MEDICAL CARE, LOSS OF EARNINGS
AND  EARNING  CAPACITY,  BURIAL  COSTS, LOSS OF USE OF PROPERTY, LOSS OF
GUIDANCE, COSTS OF REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF PROPERTY, COSTS OF OBTAINING

S. 3187                             4

SUBSTITUTE DOMESTIC SERVICES, LOSS OF EMPLOYMENT, LOSS  OF  BUSINESS  OR
EMPLOYMENT  OPPORTUNITIES,  REHABILITATION  SERVICES, CUSTODIAL CARE AND
ALL OTHER PECUNIARY DAMAGES.
  3.  "PERSONAL  INJURY  ACTION"  MEANS  ANY ACTION, INCLUDING BUT IN NO
MANNER LIMITED TO MEDICAL, DENTAL  AND  PODIATRIC  MALPRACTICE  ACTIONS,
WHETHER  IN  TORT,  CONTRACT  OR OTHERWISE, IN WHICH THE PLAINTIFF SEEKS
DAMAGES FOR INJURY TO THE PERSON OR WRONGFUL DEATH.
  4. "COMPENSATION" MEANS MONETARY AWARDS.
  S 5052. DAMAGE AWARDS. 1. IN ANY PERSONAL INJURY ACTION, THE  PREVAIL-
ING  PLAINTIFF  OR  PERSON  WHO CLAIMS INJURY BY OR THROUGH SUCH INJURED
PLAINTIFF MAY BE AWARDED:
  (A) COMPENSATION FOR ACTUAL ECONOMIC DAMAGES SUFFERED BY  THE  INJURED
PLAINTIFF  OR  OTHER PERSON WHO CLAIMS INJURY BY OR THROUGH SUCH INJURED
PLAINTIFF; AND
  (B) COMPENSATION FOR  NONECONOMIC  DAMAGES  SUFFERED  BY  THE  INJURED
PLAINTIFF  OR OTHER PERSON WHO CLAIMS INJURY THROUGH SUCH INJURED PLAIN-
TIFF, OR AS A CONSEQUENCE OF INJURY TO SUCH INJURED  PLAINTIFF,  NOT  TO
EXCEED TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS.
  2. THE DAMAGE AWARD RECOVERABLE FOR A PERSONAL INJURY ACTION SHALL NOT
EXCEED THE AMOUNT PERMITTED TO BE AWARDED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION ONE OF
THIS SECTION REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF DEFENDANTS TO SUCH ACTION. IF A
JURY  AWARDS  AN AMOUNT FOR NONECONOMIC DAMAGES THAT EXCEEDS THE LIMITA-
TION UNDER SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION, THE COURT SHALL  REDUCE  THE
AMOUNT TO CONFORM TO THE LIMITATION.
  3.  NO  OTHER  PERSONAL INJURY ACTION MAY BE BROUGHT BY THE PREVAILING
PLAINTIFF OR OTHER PERSON WHO CLAIMS INJURY THROUGH SUCH INJURED  PLAIN-
TIFF,  OR  AS  A  CONSEQUENCE  OF  INJURY  TO SUCH INJURED PLAINTIFF, TO
RECOVER AMOUNTS FOR THE INJURY OR OCCURRENCE THAT  GIVES  RISE  TO  SUCH
PERSONAL INJURY ACTION.
  4.  WHERE A DEFENDANT HAS SUCCESSFULLY PLEADED AND PROVED CONTRIBUTORY
NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF THE PREVAILING PLAINTIFF PURSUANT  TO  ARTICLE
FOURTEEN-A OF THIS CHAPTER, THE DAMAGE AWARD TO THE PREVAILING PLAINTIFF
SHALL BE DIMINISHED FROM THE AMOUNTS AWARDED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION ONE
OF  THIS  SECTION BY THE PROPORTION WHICH THE CULPABLE CONDUCT ATTRIBUT-
ABLE TO THE PREVAILING PLAINTIFF BEARS TO  THE  CULPABLE  CONDUCT  WHICH
CAUSED THE DAMAGES.
  5.  NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO PREVENT THE APPLICA-
TION OF SECTION FORTY-FIVE HUNDRED  FORTY-FIVE  OF  THIS  CHAPTER  TO  A
DAMAGE  AWARD  FOR A PERSONAL INJURY ACTION MADE PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION
ONE OF THIS SECTION.
  6. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, THE JURY SHALL  NOT  BE
INSTRUCTED OF THE LIMITATION ON NONECONOMIC DAMAGES AS SET FORTH IN THIS
ARTICLE.
  S  6.  Subparagraph  (i)  of paragraph 1 of subdivision (d) of section
3101 of the civil practice law and rules, as amended by chapter  184  of
the laws of 1988, is amended to read as follows:
  (i) Upon request, each party shall identify each person whom the party
expects  to  call  as  an  expert witness at trial and shall disclose in
reasonable detail the subject matter on which each expert is expected to
testify, the substance of the facts and opinions on which each expert is
expected to testify, the qualifications of each  expert  witness  and  a
summary of the grounds for each expert's opinion. However, where a party
for  good  cause  shown retains an expert an insufficient period of time
before the commencement of trial to give appropriate notice thereof, the
party shall not thereupon be precluded  from  introducing  the  expert's
testimony  at  the  trial  solely  on grounds of noncompliance with this

S. 3187                             5

paragraph. In that instance, upon motion of any party, made before or at
trial, or on its own initiative, the court may make whatever  order  may
be  just.  [In an action for medical, dental or podiatric malpractice, a
party, in responding to a request, may omit the names of medical, dental
or  podiatric experts but shall be required to disclose all other infor-
mation concerning such experts otherwise required by this paragraph.]
  S 7. Subparagraph (ii) of paragraph 1 of subdivision  (d)  of  section
3101  of the civil practice law and rules is REPEALED and a new subpara-
graph (ii) is added to read as follows:
  (II) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS ARTICLE OR OF ARTICLE
THIRTY-TWO OF THIS CHAPTER, IN AN ACTION FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL  OR  PODIA-
TRIC  MALPRACTICE,  AT  THE  TIMES  AND  IN THE SEQUENCE DIRECTED BY THE
COURT, SUCH TIMES TO BE PRIOR TO THE SERVICE AND FILING  OF  A  NOTE  OF
ISSUE  UNLESS  THE  COURT  DIRECTS  OTHERWISE AND PRESERVES THE RIGHT OF
EVERY PARTY TO DEPOSE A PERSON WHOSE DISCLOSURE OCCURS SUBSEQUENT TO THE
FILING OF A NOTE OF ISSUE,  EACH  PARTY  SHALL  DISCLOSE  TO  THE  OTHER
PARTIES  THE  IDENTITY OF ANY PERSON WHO MAY BE USED AT TRIAL TO PROVIDE
EXPERT TESTIMONY IN THE CASE AND EACH SUCH DISCLOSURE SHALL BE  ACCOMPA-
NIED  BY A WRITTEN REPORT PREPARED AND SIGNED BY SUCH PERSON. THE REPORT
SHALL CONTAIN A COMPLETE STATEMENT OF ALL OPINIONS TO BE  EXPRESSED  AND
THE BASIS AND REASONS THEREFOR; THE DATA OR OTHER INFORMATION CONSIDERED
BY  SUCH  PERSON  IN  FORMING THE OPINIONS; ANY EXHIBITS TO BE USED AS A
SUMMARY OF OR SUPPORT  FOR  THE  OPINIONS;  THE  QUALIFICATIONS  OF  THE
PERSON,  INCLUDING  A  LIST  OF  ALL PUBLICATIONS AUTHORED BY THE PERSON
DURING THE PRECEDING TEN YEARS; THE COMPENSATION  TO  BE  PAID  FOR  THE
PERSON'S  CONSIDERATION  OF DATA OR OTHER INFORMATION AND FOR HIS OR HER
TESTIMONY; AND A LISTING OF ANY OTHER CASES  IN  WHICH  THE  PERSON  HAS
TESTIFIED AS AN EXPERT AT TRIAL OR BY ORAL DEPOSITION WITHIN THE PRECED-
ING  FOUR  YEARS. EACH PARTY SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PRODUCE EACH PERSON SO
IDENTIFIED BY SUCH PARTY AS AN EXPERT WITNESS, FOR EXAMINATION UPON ORAL
DEPOSITION UPON RECEIPT OF A NOTICE TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION  IN  ACCORD-
ANCE WITH RULE THIRTY-ONE HUNDRED SEVEN OF THIS ARTICLE. UNLESS MANIFEST
INJUSTICE  WOULD RESULT, THE COURT SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE PARTY NOTICING
AN ORAL DEPOSITION OF SUCH AN EXPERT WITNESS PAY SUCH WITNESS A  REASON-
ABLE FEE FOR TIME SPENT IN ATTENDING SUCH ORAL DEPOSITION.  IF ANY PARTY
FAILS  TO  IDENTIFY A PERSON AS AN EXPERT WITNESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS CLAUSE, OR IF ANY PARTY  FAILS  TO  MAKE  ANY  PERSON
IDENTIFIED  BY THE PARTY AS AN EXPERT WITNESS AVAILABLE FOR ORAL DEPOSI-
TION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CLAUSE, THAT PARTY  SHALL
BE  PRECLUDED  FROM OFFERING SUCH EXPERT'S TESTIMONY AT THE TRIAL OF THE
ACTION.
  S 8. This act shall take effect immediately; except that sections two,
three, six and seven of this act shall take effect on the ninetieth  day
after  this  act  shall  have  become  a  law and shall apply to actions
commenced and claims filed on  or  after  the  effective  date  of  such
sections.  The  provisions  of  sections four and five of this act shall
apply to causes of action and claims accruing on or after the  effective
date of this act.

Comments

Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.

Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Senate Bill S3187

Sponsored By

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Judiciary Committee

co-Sponsors

2011-S3187 (ACTIVE) - Details

2011-S3187 (ACTIVE) - Summary

2011-S3187 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

2011-S3187 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments

Senate Bill S3187

Share this bill

Sponsored By

Kemp Hannon

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Judiciary Committee

co-Sponsors

Owen H. Johnson

2011-S3187 (ACTIVE) - Details

2011-S3187 (ACTIVE) - Summary

2011-S3187 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

2011-S3187 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments