NY State Senate Bill 2023-S8543

Current Bill Status - In Senate Committee Agriculture Committee

Introduced
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
Delivered to Governor
Signed By Governor

Please enter your contact information

First Name

Last Name

Email Address

A valid email address is required.

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Actions

View Actions

	Assembly Actions - Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Feb 12, 2024	referred to agriculture

co-Sponsors

2023-S8543 (ACTIVE) - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A9215
Current Committee:: Senate Agriculture
Law Section:: Agriculture and Markets Law
Laws Affected:: Add Art 26-D §§440 - 447, Ag & Mkts L

2023-S8543 (ACTIVE) - Summary

Establishes a civil remedy for the protection of animals denied proper care by creating a special proceeding in the supreme court that will hold owners and caretakers liable if such animals under their care are mistreated.

2023-S8543 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

                                 
BILL NUMBER: S8543

SPONSOR: GIANARIS
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the agriculture and markets law, in relation to estab-
lishing a civil remedy for the protection of companion animals denied
proper care

 
PURPOSE:

This bill would provide a civil process by which humane law enforcement
agencies can implement a non-criminal process to address acts or omis-
sions that result in a companion animal suffering unnecessary psycholog-
ical or physical injury or pain, or failing to receive food, water,
shelter or veterinary or behavioral care necessary to preserve the phys-
ical health and mental well-being of an animal.

 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section 1 of the bill amends the agriculture and markets law to estab-
lish a new Article 26-D entitled, "Civil Remedy for the Protection of

Companion Animals." This article is comprised of seven sections to
effectuate its purpose, as follows:

Section 440 provides the declaration of purpose for the establishment of
this article, which is to provide a civil means by which a companion
animal found to be mistreated or not properly cared for may be made the
subject of a court order to provide care issued to its owner or caretak-
er or removed from its present custody by court order to ensure proper
care.

Section 441 provides definitions for specific terms in the statute.

Section 442 provides that state supreme courts shall have jurisdiction
over these civil proceedings.

Section 443 describes the process by which written notice is given to
the owner or caretaker of a mistreated companion animal.

Section 444 describes the process by which an authorized agent may peti-
tion the court for an ex-parte emergency care and inspection order
should the owner or caretaker fail to provide care after written notice
was given. This section then describes when the court shall issue the
order and what the order shall require. Upon the issuance of such order,
this section requires the court to schedule an Animal Care Hearing with-
in a specified time period. The court must also provide timely notice to
the owner or caretaker of both the order and the hearing.

Section 445 provides for the Animal Care Hearing process, whereby the
court determines whether the owner or caretaker of a companion animal
being denied proper care is fit to continue owning such animal. If the
court determines that such owner or caretaker is unable or unwilling to
provide adequate care, then the court shall order the animal's immediate
forfeiture and enjoin the owner or caretaker from further possession,
custody, or ownership for a time determined by the court to be reason-
able. The order of forfeiture shall identify a supersedeas bond amount
that the owner or caretaker must pay based on the reasonable cost to
care for the companion animal.
Section 446 establishes the owners right to appeal and the process that
must be followed in that regard.

Section 447 relates to the new Article 26-D interacts with other laws.

Section 2 of the bill provides the effective date of the new Article
26-D, which is 120 days after it becomes law.

 
EXISTING LAW:

New York law only provides a criminal process for adjudicating animal
cruelty cases. There is currently no civil remedy to effectively protect
companion animals from mistreatment.

 
JUSTIFICATION:

This bill would create a civil remedy to ensure that unfit owners are
properly caring for their companion animals or, if necessary, remove
such animals from their custody to prevent further mistreatment. A civil
process for addressing animal mistreatment is critical given the signif-
icant challenges that come with enforcing criminal animal cruelty stat-
utes.

For one thing, the animal itself often serves as evidence of the alleged
crime, but unlike all other forms of evidence, pets are also personal
property and are living, breathing, sentient creatures. They cannot be
placed in secure storage unattended, or in an evidence locker until a
criminal case is adjudicated. Even when removed from severely neglectful
or abusive situations, the quality of life for a seized pet can diminish
significantly in a relatively short period of time without a permanent
living situation. At the same time, shelters have no way of knowing when
a criminal case will be resolved; depending upon numerous factors beyond
their control, a conviction or dismissal can take months, if not
years.During this same period, costs borne by impounding organizations
increase proportionally and quickly become prohibitive. Animals
entrusted to their care require food, water, veterinary care, and behav-
ioral, enrichment and volunteer services that must be continuously
available to the shelter's entire population.

Because towns and cities often contract with not-for-profit entities for
sheltering services, these costs directly impact them as well. In one
recent case, the City of Watervliet incurred $30,000 in sheltering costs
in a case that may have been able to be dispensed with more quickly if a
civil remedy was already in place.

As a result of such circumstances, some shelters may decline to harbor
pets seized during criminal cruelty investigations, especially if their
shelter is already stretched thin due to high intake rates and
veterinary/staff shortages. This in turn impacts the ability for law
enforcement agencies to effectively investigate animal cruelty
complaints; when an officer responds to a complaint, suspects cruelty
but has nowhere to bring an animal at risk, it can drastically compli-
cate the manner in which an investigation can proceed, if at all.

In addition, law enforcement and humane agencies have long expressed
frustration with using criminal law to address specific types of neglect
& cruelty situations like animal hoarding. Yet, it is their only option.
To cite one recent example from the ASPCA in NYC, a routine welfare
check at a small home in Queens alerted police to horrific conditions
inside, where a search warrant was obtained to remove over 70 animals
from an aging mother and her daughter, who was subsequently arrested and
charged with animal cruelty. A petition was filed with the court for the
owners to post a security bond for the care of their animals at ASPCA's
animal hospital, in an attempt get the court to order forfeiture of the
animals. This case took more than a year to litigate, resulted in over
$420,000 in medical care and sheltering costs, and because the organiza-
tion was unable to adopt the pets into loving homes, many languished
despite high-quality professional care. Mental health issues for the
mother and daughter also contributed to court delays which resulted in
even longer legal hold times for the animals. This family needed help -
not the cost of defending themselves in criminal court or the stigma of
a criminal conviction; unfortunately, under current law a search warrant
and criminal charges (twice) was the only option.

In a 2021 example, Hudson Valley Humane Society in Rockland County was
called to a home where they found two dogs chained to an outbuilding.
The shelter eventually gained access to the home and seized 24 adult
dogs. The owner, a man in his early 60's, was a classic animal hoarder,
using multiple veterinarians to hide how many animals he actually owned.
The case went on for 18 months until finally the court recognized the
overwhelming cost HVHS had absorbed by awarding the shelter custody of
the animals. Nonetheless, the shelter housed these dogs for 18 months,
meaning other homeless companion animals couldn't be sheltered due to
space constraints. The total cost of care in the case was $75,000 in
veterinary bills and close to $260,000 in daily care at a rate of
$20/day (which is actually below average).

In 2023, Finger Lakes SPCA took in 13 dogs, mostly Cane Corsos (seven
adults and six puppies) from an animal cruelty case. The seizure was
done by the County Sheriff with the shelter's assistance. The owner
refused to relinquish ownership of the animals and the court process was
"a nightmare," according to the shelter's Executive Director. The owner
managed to keep delaying the case, and the dogs were housed at the shel-
ter for 11 months. The cost of care and damage because of overcrowding
is estimated at between $75,000 and $100,000. The county was able to
assist with only about 20% of this financial burden.

While nothing in this measure would prevent the pursuit of criminal
charges for any situation regarding suspected animal cruelty when
warranted, the establishment of a civil process option - whereby a court
can render a decision, based on the evidence, regarding an animal
owner's ability to care for a companion animal - is good for law
enforcement, good for shelters, good for social justice and of course
good for companion animals. This procedure is not a new concept; it is
used successfully in other states where, when appropriate, it provides a
sound and fair means to wrest animals from harm's way without having to
charge the owner with misdemeanor or felony-level crimes.

 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

New bill.

 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

To be determined.

 
LOCAL FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

To be determined.

 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect 120 days after it shall have become law.

2023-S8543 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

                             
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                   8543
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                             February 12, 2024
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by Sen. GIANARIS -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
   printed to be committed to the Committee on Agriculture
 
 AN ACT to amend the agriculture and markets law, in relation  to  estab-
   lishing  a civil remedy for the protection of companion animals denied
   proper care
 
   THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section  1. The agriculture and markets law is amended by adding a new
 article 26-D to read as follows:
 
                               ARTICLE 26-D
           CIVIL REMEDY FOR THE PROTECTION OF COMPANION ANIMALS
 SECTION 440. LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE.
          441. DEFINITIONS.
          442. JURISDICTION; COURTS; VENUE.
          443. NOTICE OF MISTREATED COMPANION ANIMAL.
          444. EMERGENCY POWERS.
          445. ANIMAL CARE HEARING.
          446. APPEAL.
          447. CONSTRUCTION WITH OTHER LAWS.
   § 440. LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO  PROVIDE
 A CIVIL MEANS BY WHICH A COMPANION ANIMAL THAT IS FOUND TO BE MISTREATED
 OR NOT PROPERLY CARED FOR MAY BE:
   1.  MADE  THE  SUBJECT  OF A COURT ORDER TO PROVIDE CARE ISSUED TO ITS
 OWNER OR CARETAKER, AND
   2. REMOVED FROM ITS PRESENT CUSTODY  IF  NECESSARY  TO  ENSURE  PROPER
 CARE.
   § 441. DEFINITIONS. AS USED IN THIS ARTICLE, THE FOLLOWING TERMS SHALL
 HAVE THE FOLLOWING MEANINGS:
   1.  "MISTREATED OR NOT PROPERLY CARED FOR" MEANS EVERY ACT OR OMISSION
 THAT RESULTS IN A COMPANION ANIMAL SUFFERING  UNNECESSARY  PSYCHOLOGICAL
 OR  PHYSICAL INJURY OR PAIN, OR FAILING TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE FOOD, WATER,
 SHELTER OR VETERINARY CARE NECESSARY TO PRESERVE THE PHYSICAL AND MENTAL
 WELL-BEING OF A COMPANION ANIMAL.

  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.

                                                            LBD14303-03-4
 S. 8543                             2
 
   2. "COMPANION ANIMAL" SHALL  HAVE  THE  SAME  MEANING  AS  DEFINED  BY
 SECTION THREE HUNDRED FIFTY OF THIS CHAPTER.
   3. "AUTHORIZED AGENT" MEANS ANY POLICE OFFICER, OR AGENT OR OFFICER OF
 ANY  DULY  INCORPORATED SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
 PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY-THREE OF THIS CHAPTER.
   4. "IMPOUNDING ORGANIZATION" SHALL MEAN ANY MUNICIPAL POUND  OR  SHEL-
 TER,  DULY INCORPORATED SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
 OR DULY INCORPORATED HUMANE SOCIETY.
   § 442. JURISDICTION; COURTS; VENUE. 1. A SPECIAL PROCEEDING TO  ENSURE
 PROPER  CARE OR SEIZURE OF A COMPANION ANIMAL SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN THE
 SUPREME COURT.
   2. THE PLACE OF THE SPECIAL PROCEEDING SHALL BE WITHIN  THE  JURISDIC-
 TIONAL  AREA  OF  THE COURT WHERE SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL THEREOF IS SITU-
 ATED.
   § 443. NOTICE OF MISTREATED COMPANION ANIMAL. IF AN  AUTHORIZED  AGENT
 HAS  REASON  TO  BELIEVE  THAT  A  COMPANION ANIMAL HAS BEEN OR IS BEING
 MISTREATED OR NOT PROPERLY CARED FOR, SUCH AUTHORIZED AGENT  MAY  NOTIFY
 THE OWNER OR CARETAKER, IN WRITING, OF SUCH OWNER OR CARETAKER'S DUTY TO
 PROVIDE  CERTAIN  CARE,  INCLUDING  BUT  NOT LIMITED TO, PROPER SHELTER,
 FOOD, WATER OR VETERINARY CARE TO SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL AT  THE  OWNER'S
 OR  CARETAKER'S  EXPENSE  AND  WITHIN  A  TIME PERIOD DETERMINED BY SUCH
 AUTHORIZED AGENT'S DISCRETION.
   § 444. EMERGENCY POWERS. 1.  IF  SUCH  OWNER  OR  CARETAKER  FAILS  TO
 PROVIDE  CARE TO SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL AND SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL REMAINS
 MISTREATED OR NOT CARED FOR AFTER RECEIVING NOTICE AND WITHIN  THE  TIME
 PERIOD  DETERMINED  BY  SUCH  AUTHORIZED  AGENT, AN AUTHORIZED AGENT MAY
 IMMEDIATELY PETITION THE  COURT  FOR  AN  EX-PARTE  EMERGENCY  CARE  AND
 INSPECTION ORDER.
   2.  AN EMERGENCY CARE AND INSPECTION ORDER SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ISSUED
 UPON A SHOWING OF PROBABLE CAUSE THAT SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL HAS BEEN  OR
 IS BEING MISTREATED OR NOT PROPERLY CARED FOR.
   3.  SUCH ORDER SHALL REQUIRE THE OWNER OR CARETAKER TO PROVIDE CARE TO
 SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL AND ALLOW AN AUTHORIZED AGENT TO  ENTER  ONTO  THE
 PREMISES  WHERE  SUCH  COMPANION  ANIMAL  IS  BEING  KEPT TO ENSURE SUCH
 COMPANION ANIMAL IS RECEIVING NECESSARY FOOD, WATER, SHELTER AND CARE.
   4. AN EX-PARTE EMERGENCY CARE AND INSPECTION ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT  TO
 THIS SECTION SHALL BE EFFECTIVE UPON SERVICE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
 THREE HUNDRED EIGHT OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES, AND SHALL:
   (A)  PROVIDE  SPECIFIC  DETAILS  OF  SUCH  MISTREATMENT  OR FAILURE TO
 PROVIDE PROPER CARE TO SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL AND DIRECT  SUCH  OWNER  OR
 CARETAKER TO TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION;
   (B)  ALLOW AN AUTHORIZED AGENT AND LICENSED VETERINARIAN AT THE DIREC-
 TION OF SUCH AUTHORIZED AGENT TO INSPECT SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL TO ENSURE
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDER TO PROVIDE CARE;
   (C) PROHIBIT SUCH  OWNER  OR  CARETAKER  FROM  INTERFERING  WITH  SUCH
 INSPECTION BY THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OR VETERINARIAN;
   (D) PROHIBIT AN OWNER OR CARETAKER FROM TRANSFERRING OWNERSHIP OF SUCH
 COMPANION ANIMAL;
   (E)  PROHIBIT  AN  OWNER  OR CARETAKER FROM EUTHANIZING SUCH COMPANION
 ANIMAL WITHOUT FIRST SEEKING AND OBTAINING PERMISSION OF THE COURT ON  A
 SHOWING  THAT  SUCH  PROCEDURE IS TO PREVENT UNDUE SUFFERING OR PHYSICAL
 PAIN TO SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL; AND
   (F) ALLOW A VETERINARIAN TO EXAMINE SUCH  COMPANION  ANIMAL  AT  LEAST
 TWENTY-FOUR HOURS PRIOR TO SUCH ANIMAL CARE HEARING.
   5.  UPON ISSUANCE OF AN EMERGENCY CARE AND INSPECTION ORDER, THE COURT
 SHALL SET A TIME WITHIN TEN CALENDAR DAYS OF THE DATE OF ISSUANCE FOR AN
 S. 8543                             3
 
 ANIMAL CARE HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION FOUR HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE OF  THIS
 ARTICLE,  TO DETERMINE WHETHER SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL HAS BEEN MISTREATED
 OR NOT PROPERLY CARED FOR. THE DATE AND TIME FOR THE  SCHEDULED  HEARING
 SHALL BE NOTED WITHIN SUCH ORDER, OR AS AN ATTACHMENT TO SUCH ORDER.
   6.  SUCH EMERGENCY CARE AND INSPECTION ORDER AND NOTICE OF ANIMAL CARE
 HEARING SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN AT LEAST FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO THE  SCHED-
 ULED  ANIMAL  CARE  HEARING  AND SERVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION THREE
 HUNDRED EIGHT OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND  RULES.  IF  SUCH  OWNER  OR
 CARETAKER  IS  NOT  KNOWN,  THE  EMERGENCY CARE AND INSPECTION ORDER AND
 NOTICE OF ANIMAL CARE HEARING MAY BE AFFIXED TO SUCH PREMISES WHERE SUCH
 COMPANION ANIMAL WAS LOCATED.
   § 445. ANIMAL CARE HEARING. 1. IN A PROCEEDING  TO  DETERMINE  WHETHER
 SUCH  COMPANION  ANIMAL  HAS BEEN OR IS BEING MISTREATED OR NOT PROPERLY
 CARED FOR, AND THAT SUCH OWNER IS UNABLE  TO  OR  UNWILLING  TO  PROVIDE
 IMMEDIATE AND CONTINUED PROPER CARE FOR SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL, THE COURT
 MAY CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING:
   (A)  TESTIMONY FROM THE AUTHORIZED AGENT AND OTHER WITNESSES AS TO THE
 CONDITION OF SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL;
   (B) TESTIMONY FROM THE AUTHORIZED AGENT AND OTHER WITNESSES AS TO  THE
 CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL WAS KEPT;
   (C) EVIDENCE AS TO ANY VETERINARY AND BEHAVIORAL CARE PROVIDED TO SUCH
 COMPANION ANIMAL;
   (D) TESTIMONY FROM WITNESSES AS TO THE PRIOR TREATMENT OR CONDITION OF
 SUCH  COMPANION  ANIMAL OR OTHER COMPANION ANIMALS IN THE OWNER OR CARE-
 TAKER'S CUSTODY;
   (E) PRIOR CONVICTIONS OF STATUTES PROHIBITING CRUELTY TO ANIMALS; AND
   (F) ANY EVIDENCE THE COURT DEEMS MATERIAL OR RELEVANT.
   2. THE AUTHORIZED AGENT SHALL HAVE THE BURDEN TO PROVE, BY  A  PREPON-
 DERANCE  OF  THE  EVIDENCE, THAT SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL WAS MISTREATED OR
 NOT PROPERLY CARED FOR, AND THAT SUCH OWNER OR CARETAKER  IS  UNABLE  OR
 UNWILLING  TO  PROVIDE  IMMEDIATE  AND  CONTINUED  PROPER  CARE FOR SUCH
 COMPANION ANIMAL.  THE OWNER OR CARETAKER SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO A FULL
 DEFENSE INCLUDING, BUT  NOT  LIMITED  TO,  THE  RIGHT  TO  CROSS-EXAMINE
 WITNESSES AND TO PRESENT WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE.
   3. IF THE COURT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OWNER OR CARETAKER OF THE COMPAN-
 ION  ANIMAL  IS  UNABLE  OR  UNWILLING  TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE CARE FOR THE
 COMPANION ANIMAL AND THAT THE COMPANION ANIMAL  WAS  MISTREATED  OR  NOT
 PROPERLY  CARED FOR, THE COURT SHALL ORDER THE IMMEDIATE FORFEITURE SUCH
 COMPANION ANIMAL THAT HAS BEEN THE SUBJECT OF THE HEARING TO THE AUTHOR-
 IZED AGENT. THE COURT SHALL ALSO ENJOIN THE OWNER OR CARETAKER'S FURTHER
 POSSESSION, CUSTODY, OR OWNERSHIP OF SUCH OTHER COMPANION ANIMALS FOR  A
 TIME DETERMINED BY THE COURT TO BE REASONABLE.
   (A)  UPON  AN  ORDER  OF  FORFEITURE PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION, THE
 AUTHORIZED AGENT MAY DELIVER SUCH  COMPANION  ANIMAL  TO  AN  IMPOUNDING
 ORGANIZATION FOR ADOPTION OR OTHER DISPOSITION PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE
 HUNDRED SEVENTY-FOUR OF THIS CHAPTER.
   (B)  ANY ORDER OF FORFEITURE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION SHALL IDENTIFY A
 SUPERSEDEAS BOND AMOUNT BASED ON THE REASONABLE COST  TO  CARE  FOR  THE
 COMPANION  ANIMAL  SUBJECT TO THE ORDER OF FORFEITURE, TO BE PAID BY THE
 OWNER OR CARETAKER. REASONABLE COSTS OF CARE SHALL BE  DETERMINED  BASED
 ON TESTIMONY PROVIDED AT THE ANIMAL CARE HEARING AND SHALL BE CALCULATED
 BASED  ON THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ANIMAL OR ANIMALS AND THE REASONABLE DAILY
 COST OF CARE FOR SUCH ANIMAL OR ANIMALS FOR, AT MINIMUM, A PERIOD OF ONE
 HUNDRED EIGHTY DAYS.
   4. IF THE COURT DETERMINES THAT SUCH OWNER OR CARETAKER OF THE COMPAN-
 ION ANIMAL HAS PROVIDED AND WILL CONTINUE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE  CARE  FOR
 S. 8543                             4
 
 THE  COMPANION  ANIMAL THAT HAS BEEN THE SUBJECT OF THE ORDER TO PROVIDE
 CARE, OR THAT THE COMPANION ANIMAL WAS NOT MISTREATED  OR  NOT  PROPERLY
 CARED  FOR  AS  SET FORTH IN THE EMERGENCY ORDER, THE COURT SHALL VACATE
 THE  ORDER  TO  PROVIDE CARE. VACATUR PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL
 NOT PRECLUDE THE COURT FROM ENTERING AN ORDER TO  PROVIDE  CARE  IN  THE
 FUTURE.
   5.  A  FINDING  IN A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION THAT THE OWNER OR
 CARETAKER OF THE ANIMAL IS GUILTY OF AN OFFENSE BROUGHT PURSUANT TO THIS
 ARTICLE RELATING TO THE COMPANION ANIMAL THAT  IS  THE  SUBJECT  OF  THE
 ANIMAL  CARE  HEARING IS PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE THAT SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL
 HAS BEEN MISTREATED OR NOT PROPERLY CARED FOR.
   § 446. APPEAL. 1. AN APPEAL MAY BE TAKEN TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION  AS
 OF  RIGHT,  ORIGINATING  IN  THE  SUPREME  COURT FROM WHERE THE ORDER OF
 FORFEITURE WAS ISSUED. AS A CONDITION OF  PERFECTING  SUCH  APPEAL,  THE
 OWNER  OR  CARETAKER SHALL FILE A NOTICE OF APPEAL AND PAY SUCH SUPERSE-
 DEAS BOND SET BY THE COURT, NOT LATER THAN TEN CALENDAR DAYS  AFTER  THE
 DATE THE ORDER OF FORFEITURE WAS ISSUED.
   2.  ANY  APPEAL FILED WITH THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
 SHALL BE PERFECTED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FOLLOWING THE DATE OF THE ORDER OF
 FORFEITURE.
   3. A HEARING ON SUCH APPEAL SHALL BE HEARD WITHIN THIRTY CALENDAR DAYS
 AFTER SUCH APPEAL IS PERFECTED UNLESS A CONTINUANCE IS  MUTUALLY  AGREED
 UPON THE PARTIES. IF A CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED, THE OWNER OR CARETAKER OF
 SUCH  FORFEITED  COMPANION ANIMAL SHALL PAY A SECOND SUPERSEDEAS BOND IN
 THE AMOUNT ORDERED BY THE APPELLATE DIVISION.
   4. THE FILING OF SUCH APPEAL  SHALL  NOT  PREVENT  THE  REMOVAL  OF  A
 FORFEITED  COMPANION ANIMAL FROM SUCH OWNER OR CARETAKER'S POSSESSION BY
 THE AUTHORIZED AGENT. HOWEVER, IF SUCH SUPERSEDEAS BOND  HAS  BEEN  PAID
 UNDER  SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION, SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL OR ANIMALS
 MAY NOT BE ADOPTED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF, EXCEPT UNDER  CIRCUMSTANCES
 WHICH  WOULD  REQUIRE  THE HUMANE EUTHANASIA OF SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL TO
 PREVENT UNDUE SUFFERING OR PHYSICAL PAIN, OR WHERE SUCH COMPANION ANIMAL
 POSES A SEVERE AND IMMEDIATE DANGER TO ITSELF, PEOPLE OR OTHER ANIMALS.
   § 447. CONSTRUCTION WITH OTHER LAWS. NOTHING IN THIS ARTICLE SHALL  BE
 CONSTRUED  TO  (A) LIMIT OR RESTRICT AGENTS OR OFFICERS OF SOCIETIES FOR
 THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OR ANY POLICE OFFICER FROM  ENFORC-
 ING  OTHER PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE TWENTY-SIX OF THIS CHAPTER OR ANY OTHER
 LAW RELATING TO THE HUMANE TREATMENT OF, OR CRUELTY TO, ANIMALS, OR  (B)
 PREVENT  A  DOG CONTROL OFFICER OR PEACE OFFICER, ACTING PURSUANT TO THE
 OFFICER'S SPECIAL DUTIES, OR POLICE OFFICER IN THE EMPLOY  OF  OR  UNDER
 CONTRACT  TO  A  MUNICIPALITY  FROM  SEIZING ANY DOG PURSUANT TO ARTICLE
 SEVEN OF THIS CHAPTER. RELIEF PURSUANT TO  THIS  SECTION  SHALL  NOT  BE
 STAYED  OR  CONTINUED DUE TO THE FILING OF CRIMINAL CHARGES INVOLVING OR
 OTHERWISE RELATING TO SUCH COMPANION ANIMALS THAT  ARE  SUBJECT  OF  THE
 EMERGENCY CARE AND INSPECTION ORDER AND ANIMAL CARE HEARING.
   § 2. This act shall take effect on the one hundred twentieth day after
 it shall have become a law.

Comments

Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.

Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Senate Bill S8543

Sponsored By

Current Bill Status - In Senate Committee Agriculture Committee

co-Sponsors

2023-S8543 (ACTIVE) - Details

2023-S8543 (ACTIVE) - Summary

2023-S8543 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

2023-S8543 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments

Senate Bill S8543

Share this bill

Sponsored By

Michael Gianaris

Current Bill Status - In Senate Committee Agriculture Committee

co-Sponsors

George M. Borrello

Pete Harckham

Rachel May

Anthony H. Palumbo

2023-S8543 (ACTIVE) - Details

2023-S8543 (ACTIVE) - Summary

2023-S8543 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

2023-S8543 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments